Hip Hop taken to new levels.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (755 of them)
Why hasn't this thread been locked yet?

Mofo, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link

Don't ask me.
I asked someone to lock it paaaages ago.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link

Clearly, this thread hasn't been a bunch of mutherfuckers jumping down my neck from the beginning.

well it hasn't! it might have gotten intense, but I think most everybody was trying to discuss things with you! yes even Blount! elliptical discussion doesn't mean it's not discussion, heated discussion doesn't mean it's not discussion, even way-overheated discussion still counts!

not "paranoid": just "defensive," maybe justifiably so, but the puzzling thing about getting defensive is that it usually fails to provide much protection/shelter/however one wants to describe what being defensive does.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:31 (twenty years ago) link

IN THE EVENT YOUR FRIENDLY MODERATOR DOESN'T LOCK A THREAD, JUST STOP POSTING ALREADY, SILLY MAN

(please don't take that as 'jumping on you' or something. i'm trying to help ya out)

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:33 (twenty years ago) link

I remain opposed to the locking of this thread!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:36 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't really see it as people trying to "discuss" things with me. Blount's "elliptical" discussion was him accusing me of thinking that progressive hip hop involved incorporating the work of old dead white people. (the opposite of what I actually argued.)
I enjoy the heated-discussion aspect.
I don't like the constant jabs at me, personal and otherwise, from member of this board - which have been quite constant. I'm all for people disagreeing. And the way I initially phrased my remarks was intended to create a heated discussion.
But things got out of control, and when people stopped actually discussing the issue with me and it became an issue of

"I can't think of any other occasional on ilx where someone has had their ass as out and out schooled as ddrake on this thread. and I still think any further 'engagement' with him from any ilxors is tantamount to running up the score."

Yeah, what a "game" it was. I don't really see how my opinion was "owned" at all. Certainly there were minor flaws in my argument, but no more than in anyone else's. And I admitted it when their were and refined my argument par the course. But there was some SERIOUS ganging-up-on-ddrake going on. Not just the cyberstalking, but what amounted to harrassment of ME rather than a discussion of my ideas. Or even a HEATED discussion of my ideas.
See the difference, Ned? (if you're out there?)
I attacked your LIST
You attacked ME.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:37 (twenty years ago) link

And I am in favor of locking this thread because I think that while aspects of this discussion were interesting and informative, the majority of it was bullshit.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:39 (twenty years ago) link

OK, I'm bored and sad so I'm going to attempt to break down the thread as I saw it:

1) Original poster James picks misleading/provocative thread title and couches what would otherwise be a harmless inquiry about experimental rap in the dangerous area of "rap on the whole is stagnant and I want the newness".
2) The usual suspects mock this. Most of us are all "ok, fine, pfhsgh" because we're familiar with these posters. ddrake initially chimes in with "instruments in rap /= progressive" and gets little if any real hostility.
3) ddrake then mistakes "progressive/experimental" for "white", flings out a "you know that's what you really mean" equivalent ("admit it") and suddenly the tone of Typical ILM Prog-Rap Mockery gets a bit weird
4) Ned sez "because instruments are white! oh wait" and ddrake fires back "U R NOT OF TEH FUNNIE"
5) ddrake: "Seriously though, unless you actually know the hip hop history, which it sounds like you don't, I'd wait to listen to "prog" hip hop. " [emphasis mine]
6) A couple more joke posts, a couple geniune attempts to steer the thread into actual topical coherence ("Dalek?"), J0hn being all "Ned OTM"
7) dd: "Oh give me a break! Dilute, my friends, dilute!" Then he goes onto some snotty "prog is unfun" jibe.
8) Jokes jokes jokes. The nate that is not me says "The twisted part is that some people actually like challenging their brains."
9) dd: "Rush! Yes! Prog stupid! Also read it, motherfuckers!"
10) not me nate: "But Braxton/Cornel/Toni Morrison..."
11) Ned to o. nate: "ddrake will get mad at you now and claim you don't understand hip-hop. You are so burned. *cue ddrake: 'Ha ha, where is your sense of humor, dork, etc.'*"
12) "you're out of your league, donnie."
13) dd shortly later: "Blues People is a more incredible work than anything anyone on ILM has accomplished...a more important work as well. That I can't believe more of you haven't read." [here is where my arrogance alarm goes off.]
14) Ned sums up the crux of the issue: "Remind me again how you've assumed you know what everyone here has read/listened to/thought again? I missed the proof of your omniscience here."
15) Some stupid bullshit ensues
16) Wooster is namedropped
17) Accusations of privacy intrusions fly
18) The thread officially becomes ridiculous
19) Everyone tries to explain to ddrake why they're mad at him
20) ddrake gets mad defensive
21) I forgot to mention, blount has a field day
22) OWNED
23) A failed attempt to return to original discussion in the thread
24) ddrake: "So "whitening" in the case in which I am using it refers to the values inherent in the musicians' musical ideas. White CULTURE rather than white PEOPLE."
25) Oh no
26) nickalicious and scott seward simmer things down somewhat
27) Perry sums everything up neatly
28) Numerous thread-locking requests go out
29) Oh yeah, there's some stuff about Amiri Baraka in here too (c/o J0hn Darn1elle)
30) Someone named "Big Boi" stomps in, says "prog rap is shit!" only in much wordier terms, resorts to name-dropping the Strokes, then eventually disappears
31) "Ned and his ethugs" are mentioned
32) People start backtracking in an attempt to recap this thread
33) This goes on for a while
34) There is a delightful Popeye intermission
35) An ugly goulash of meta-spastic he-said-he-said "no no no I'M RIGHT I WIN" nonsense and arrogant written-in-stone declarations of what various genres TRULY AND REALLY ARE AND AREN'T, DAMN IT
36) This actually goes on for a while
37) http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/cam.gif
38) more pictures, which ddrake calls "unclever"
39) see #35
40) I post this
41) I feel dirty

nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:50 (twenty years ago) link

Its like a Fox News perspective of the thread!

Congratulations.
I especially like how you mock my posts...i.e. U R NOT OF TEH FUNNIE

and just quote their posts as if they came from the most sensible, polite place in the universe.


Thank you, you've really summed up this thread "accurately."
Someone lock this bullshit.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:55 (twenty years ago) link

Do you want someone to lock this thread then?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:58 (twenty years ago) link

Why are you still posting on this thread? You do realize that you are pretty much the only thing keeping it going, don't you?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

To dd, not Dom, obviously.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

drake that was your most defensive post yet! the "u r not of teh funnie" is practically a WELCOME sign, i.e., your stuff is being described in the local jargon, and you take offense!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

Hi! I'm @d@ml!!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:03 (twenty years ago) link

Why are you still posting on this thread? You do realize that you are pretty much the only thing keeping it going, don't you?

This thread was at the top of the list of "new answers" when I came back from doing 3 hours of homework, actually.

19) Everyone tries to explain to ddrake why they're mad at him

Was this before or after everyone mocks me?

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:04 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah,

Definately check out Dalek, David. Especially the split 7" single called Nummer 3 on Bomb Mitte w/ Faust to clock in your number 2 category of sampling.

This came free with the last WIRE Tapper actually.

Mandy M., Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link

Fuck it.

I need to get some sleep.

This thread is ridiculous...I can understand where I hear so much shit about ILM. Some cliquish motherfuckers some of you are.
Even when "big boi" TOLD you he was agreeing with me, you continued to give me shit.
My initial provocations taken too seriously.
My actual arguments met with jeers from the peanut gallery.
What a stupid bullshit thread this has been.

Now, here come a cavalcade of posts...

ddrake was owned, ddrake is so stupid, etc. etc. etc.
Ned Raggett having thugs! That's crazy! No, no one ganged up on him! ddrake just came and started trouble in our normally pure community!

Christ.

have a good fucking life.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:09 (twenty years ago) link

I can understand that you're feeling like you were unfairly put upon in this thread, ddrake, but I would wager that anyone who's been around web boards, newsgroups, etc., for any length of time would probably be able to tell you that the discussion on this thread has been relatively civil by Internet standards. Sometimes people actually make ad hominem comments on web boards!!! It's shocking, I know, but par for the course. If you decide to stick around, you'll develop a thicker skin - we all do.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:11 (twenty years ago) link

34) There is a delightful Popeye intermission

This sentence makes me happy. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 06:45 (twenty years ago) link

I think one aspect of this thread that led to such... um, weirdness, was that thing that Matos tried to defuse it with way upthread (for a guy with the reputation for gruffness, this was the earliest demonstration of compassion and even-handedness after the initial salvos had been fired, and fair play to him) -- namely, the fact that old discussions innocently broached by newcomers get met with such yawningly (yawnsomely?) detached and backhanded contempt by older ILMers (by that, I don't mean actual age, of course, just length of ILM residency) who are understandably sick to their eyeballs by the topics (the fact that they come up again and again, of course, suggests that they're of interest regardless of fads, etc). Having been on the receiving end, I can testify to its startling and unpleasant effects. I can imagine it would be fairly easy -- once you've handled it badly, initially -- to descend further into paranoia and a feeling of persecution.

So, what's the answer? My feeling is that snidey, snarky comments from regulars don't help. It can create a sense of cliqueiness and safety-in-numbers pack mentality (justifiably, or not). If you've heard it all before, perhaps it would be a good idea to either a) leave the thread as if a swarm of driver ants* were fast approaching, or b) post helpful links to previous discussions, then bow out (some, like Tracer Hand, seem to take this latter option as a matter of course).

*Very scary prospect, if true.

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 07:14 (twenty years ago) link

artsy hiphop could be good, but generally isn't. as jazz got more open or whatever (read as miles davis started freebasing and aimlessly noodling around on keyboards), etc, etc

the ideas stated at the top of this thread suck. good ideas in the same vein don't exist that much. aside from kid 606. wait, that isn't clever. yeah, wait til i'm 20. i'll produce something cool as fuck.

the more i think about it and the less i type the more i realize you just want hip hop that isn't made by people who are ghetto but by people who have been through graduate school or something. yeah, anticon is sucking at that cuz they fall into the whitekid hipster ghetto trap. maybe you want to listen to prefuse 73. hahahah

asfdzxc (asfdzxc), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 07:58 (twenty years ago) link

this would never have happened if ethan were here

asfdzxc (asfdzxc), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 08:07 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.alphalink.com.au/ ~tsr/swarm.html


ILXOR in todays Guardian

bobby conn, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 09:23 (twenty years ago) link

jesus can there be an ILM thread with 'hip hop' in the title that DOESN'T rack up 600 posts withing 24 hours? what's the matter with us?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:13 (twenty years ago) link

Obsessed with race.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link

the more i think about it and the less i type the more i realize you just want hip hop that isn't made by people who are ghetto but by people who have been through graduate school or something. yeah

Sound like a good idea. The generaly quality of all kinds of music would have increased if all musicians had been through graduate school. Mind you, all those European 18th and 19th century classical composers had. :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link

Dear god.

ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:48 (twenty years ago) link

Geir, you know Paul McCartney isn't a formally educated musician, right?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link

Meanwhile, the singer from the Offspring has a PhD.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:50 (twenty years ago) link

(in microbiology actually, but hey)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:50 (twenty years ago) link

As for the very original post...

There's lots of hip-hop with extended instrumentalism, in fact there's *gasp* a whole shitload of INSTRUMENTAL HIP-HOP ARTISTS!!! *loud gasp*

James, you may like...

*DJ Shadow
*DJ Spooky
*the afforementioned DJ Vadim
*Invisible Skratch Picklz
(in fact, watch Wave Twisters, an animated film whose entire score - dialog and all - is provided by DJ Q-bert)
*some of the collaborations Buckethead has done with various instrumental hip-hop artists (such as the album Bermuda Triangle he did with DJ Extrakd or the Praxis Transmutations Live album which is a performance by Buckethead & Invisible Skratch Picklz)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

also: RJD2!!!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

In every genre ever there's always experimentation going on somewhere, whether people want it or not.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:59 (twenty years ago) link

plus, you can always check out rap FROM asia, africa and india for cool sounds. lots of bhangra with rapped vocals from india has cool-ass indian elements/sounds/instruments that go beyond a simple sitar sample a la timbaland. or check out any of the zillion south american acts mixing and matching rap with trad latin folk songs and electro and ragga and whatever else they can think of. try the last el gran silencio album, it's great! and africa, there is tons of stuff there. even some of that morroccan/french language folk/rap stuff with beats. but i'm not that well-versed. mebbe someone else knows some good titles.there is a world of amazing sounds out there.

scott seward, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 14:28 (twenty years ago) link

Scott has reminded me: Ozomatli!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

Geir, you know Paul McCartney isn't a formally educated musician, right?

He isn't, but he wasn't a typical droupout, unlike Lennon, and has always seemed more interested in the music part than in the rebellion part.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link

...to you, because that suits your theory.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link

James,
It occurs to me that if you're just looking for "spacier" hip hop, Cannibal Ox and Deltron 3030 are decent candidates. They may not be as avant garde as you're looking for, but they're both quite good. Also, for the non-Western sounds, Dan the Automator did an album where he used Bollywood soundtracks, and remixed them to make 'em more hip hop. It's called "Bombay the Hard Way", and I think there might be more than one volume. I only have the first one, but I can vouch for it as being quite good. Really, a lot of Dan the Automator's stuff plays with different types of samples, and sounds very different even from the other underground stuff out there. And again, unlike Anticon, it's good. But you know, that's just like, my opinion man.

Big Boi, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

Anyone brought up the first Divine Styler record yet? ("Spiral Walls Containing Autumns of Light.") That's pretty out in any genre...

M Specktor (M Specktor), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:42 (twenty years ago) link

that's his second album. i kinda brought it up when i recommended his first and third albums.

scott seward, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:58 (twenty years ago) link

"Speakerboxx"/"The Love Below" is at least in part the album James is searching for.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 22:31 (twenty years ago) link

four months pass...
www.evolvemusic.com www.soundclick.com/evolvemusicrecords

zebox.com/evolvemusic, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

okay, so i read the goddamn thing top to bottom and the answer to the guy's question was in the LAST TEN POSTS?

spectacular. Tears of laughter, seriously.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 10:04 (twenty years ago) link

Just a reminder of this old, discarded thread:

1. It's gay.

2. ddrake's point is stupid. (BTW, Genesis ruled, you asshat, and you merely comparing it to 'long instrumental solos' shows your complete fucking ignorance of the band.)

3. James Slone I've known for some time, from the SSMT days, and he could wipe the floor with most all of you intellectually.

charmander, Saturday, 24 April 2004 01:39 (twenty years ago) link

as an outkast fan, I must say speakerboxx/the love below is NOT what he's looking for.

What the hell is progressive about it? Now, yes, I'm bearing in mind that you, Geir, have become famous for only thinking music that stays within the box is good, but let me say The Love Below just sucks.

"Hey Ya" was a fun pop tune, I admit, but the guy attempts to croon when he doesn't have the voice to croon, tries to write funk songs which fall flat, and let's not get into the "shit don't stink" song.

Speakerboxx? I'm sorry, Big Boi doesn't click without Andre 3000 rapping alongside him. The album as a whole is pretty decent, but that's it. Outkast's apex album was Aquemini, followed closely by Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik.

The Love Below was formulaic, and honestly, a huge step back from even Stankonia (which I admittedly like a lot). Speakerboxx was an attempt by Andre to branch out, and I can respect his talent, but he failed.

what???, Saturday, 24 April 2004 01:42 (twenty years ago) link

The new Ghostface...

sexyDancer, Saturday, 24 April 2004 16:14 (twenty years ago) link

It's like a S.W.A.T. team used a large rod of metal to force themsleves in this old door of ILM memories long far hidden inside my mind and is now showing me the horror and the laughs.. and the ass bunnies. I hope ddrake is somewhere peaceful, resting amongst the kingdom of ass bunnies.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 24 April 2004 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

I think ddrake changed his name, joined a witness protection program, and continued posting here under his new name.

I have a "there but for the grace of god go I" feeling about this thread. Though it could have been a few hundred posts shorter is someone had just sincerely apologized for the Wooster jokes.

Sym (shmuel), Saturday, 24 April 2004 22:37 (twenty years ago) link

yeah but sym the Wooster jokes were completely classic

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 24 April 2004 23:00 (twenty years ago) link

nine months pass...
Um yeah so might as well bite the bullet and apologize for this thread since it was brought up the other day.
I was being stupid and immature wrongheaded. I emailed ned awhile back and apologized to him personally but whatever, I suppose I owe it to ILM or something. My apologies.

And remember, you can find hip-hop (writing) taken to new levels here:
Why do people who hate music write about music?

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Monday, 31 January 2005 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.