Is this anti-semitism?

paradox of always taking the underdog, I guess -- once they start winning they're not the underdog

― socka flocka-jones (man alive), Monday, June 13, 2016 4:30 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Lately I get exposed a lot to ppl from previously marginalized groups who want to both keep their sense of grievance & oppression AND ALSO justify their right to discriminate against others who are currently marginalized, in TONS of ways. I think with people just being human this is on some level unavoidable unless there's really specific teachings and practices/praxes against it. If your liberation from oppression isn't intersectional, it can't help but become exclusionary & wicked itself.

yeah but I meant that quote to cut the other way too -- once your group is seen as having made it, you're fair game for the progressive masses, but you're still a minority.

I mean idk what "progressive masses" is supposed to mean apart from discussions of anti-semitism wrt BDS/anti-BDS views.

It means that I have definitely seen plenty of looking the other way/giving a pass/justifying of blatant anti-Semitism on the left in order to make sure to side with the perceived underdog.

maybe this is obvious and needn't be said but i should point out that one reason anti-semitism is kind of the "model" form of bigotry to which people make reference to clarify other forms is that it led to the largest genocide in world history, one that is still (barely) in living memory.

Hmmmm, expect Mordy will have something to say about that.

Would very much dispute "often individuals who themselves haven't experienced any severe anti-Semitism" and "relatively small" - though I'll leave that to Mordy, I guess.

Not entirely sure what I'm being asked to weigh in on here -- I guess do I think that world antisemitism today is, like places like Mosaic or Commentary or Tablet might argue, on the rise and dangerous? It's clearly more dangerous to be a Jew in Mumbai or Toulouse or Brussels than in NY. Though even in the US there's a history of anti-Jewish violence. But generally speaking outside the artifacts of an extremely vigilant community (v tight security in day schools & shuls, armed guards) almost all my personal exposure to antisemitism over the years has been things like hate speech (generally shouted from moving cars, or one time having pennies thrown at me from a moving car), or what seems like careless / non-malicious use of language (someone I'm conducting business with saying 'I'm not trying to Jew you'), or online where antisemitism has penetrated social media, comment threads and seems ubiquitous. It definitely better to be a Jew today anywhere in the world (well maybe not like Yemen) than most of the world less than a century ago. There's an older man in my synagogue who is very close w/ my family who spent his childhood in Bergen-Belson - first in the concentration and then in the DP camp they turned it into after the war. He's one of the most gung ho right-wing vigilant about antisemitism people I know - and obv I think he is justified based on his life experiences to feel that way.

So I guess tl;dr version: I think it's better to be a Jew in the US today than pretty much anywhere else in any other time in history. It's not always 100% of the time pleasant or 100% of the time totally safe but life isn't either of those things for anyone really so I try not to let it impact me too much. In terms of how I rank the insecurities and anxieties of my life, fear of antisemitism falls below money problems, climate change, and whether I'm doing a good job raising my children. But I am too educated about history and the world to think that this life I have is anything but ahistorical: a lull in history, or a pause between diasporas. So stay woke vigilant, mitigate the risk you can, keep your passports up-to-date, and try to ignore the assholes on twitter posting death camp memes. I'm not sure what else there is to do except feel gratitude that things are as good as they are knowing how bad they can always still become.

the Jewish perspective on life in a nutshell

yeah the anti-Semitism in my life has primarily come in the form of "microaggressions" -- people asking me a lot of suspicious questions in school, mockery of "funny hats" or holiday traditions, being cornered to answer questions about Bernie Madoff or the Netanyahu administration or something, etc. And that was mostly in my pre-NYC-area life, whereas here there are so many Jews that I think that behavior is less prevalent.

FWIW I only experienced very minor anti-semitism in the USA; when i went to france there were a few jaw-dropping incidents where people confided to me what I felt were obviously anti-semitic views which they (I guess) thought i would accept or excuse because I was "on the left" or "one of the good ones" or something.

to be fair the vast majority of French folks I met would hold such views abhorrent. but i hadn't really heard them out in the open until i went there.

(and FWIW i worked for two jews in paris so it's not like i was surrounded by this stuff. just a few people i met at parties.)

i have to be careful about extrapolating too much from my personal anecdotal experiences tho bc for a number of reasons (my academic + post-academic interest in hate communities, extensive critical reading + thinking about anti-semitism, reading a lot of the jewish press, walking around w/ a kippah on my head) it seems more looming than it may for someone else. my impression is that in the US overt hate or holocaust denial is pretty taboo or at least pretty non-mainstream - online it's almost exclusively anonymous and even in these weird "is it anti-israel or is it anti-jewish" left-wing circuits i think ppl would generally be horrified to be seen as antisemites (whereas the term initially was a pt of pride for its practitioners) judging by how fervently they defend their actions + words on a basis of not hating all jews qua jews. i still think that prof karega ranting about the rothschild family controlling our government is classic enough antisemitism that i don't have a problem citing it as an example of a regressive antisemitic left but even she is trying to square a circle that doesn't close w/ her being a jew-hater -- plus she's pretty fringe. my impression is that in europe it is worse, and that in the middle east it's just over-the-top psychosis. i guess my feeling about antisemitism on the left is that it's more disappointing because i expect more vigilance/care from ppl who cite tolerance/anti-hate as the basis of their politics, but also that they do ascribe to that ideology means that there are more safe guards in place to keep it from ever devolving into what it could on the right.

lol i feel deja vu and i think i must've had this exact same conversation on this exact same thread at some other pt in time.

some interesting thoughts on the antisemitism + marxism nexus:
https://cominsitu.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/reflections-antisemitism-anti-imperialism-and-liberal-communitarianism/

i grew up in a southern town at least an hour's drive from the nearest yeshiva. we were not in any way religious; my folks were raised jewish, sorta and i'm bloodline but that's about it. we were cultural jews and such an anomaly that no one in my small town knew what the hell a jew was. the only time i remember getting into anything with anyone even vaguely anti semitic was when the guy who sold me my first car promised my dad he wouldn't "jew down the price". We sorta winced and paid him.

(xp) Interesting but I do kinda wish he'd spelled Ken Livingstone's name right, if he had to mention him at all, which I wish he hadn't.

Do you think "Jew down" has become kind of like gyp/gypsy where people don't even think about what they're referring to?

maybe similar but the presence of jews in american life far outstrips the role of gypsys so it's hard to believe that they haven't considered where the expression comes from

This doesn't seem to be an expression that's used in the UK, I've never heard it anyway.

I walked up to someone on the phone a few weeks ago and overheard him calling someone a "shylock;" that was weird. After he hung up, I said, "Excuse me, did I hear you correctly? Did you really just call someone a Shylock?" and he said with surprise that it just meant a loan shark. I think he had no idea it was antti-semitic? Otoh that may just speak to how embedded discriminatory thinking is in some circles.

i totally believe dude wasn't saying anything offensive. i grew up playing a less-than-well-thought-out version of pseudo rugby (ball is thrown at a scrum of kids, kid who catches the ball must get to a goalpoint, everyone tries to knock the ball out of kid's hands and run to the opposite goal point) as a grammar school kid in 1981 that the teachers informed us was called "Smear The Queer." Different times.

Yeah we were subjected to smear the queer in grade school gym (1970s). By somewhere in the early 80s it became tackle the bum.

we played smear the queer in the 80s and I did not have the slightest idea what a queer was

was this an everybody thing? thought it was just me.

also had smear the queer

i never played it though, it was sort of taboo, 'unsafe', for older boys, etc. and i also didn't know what queer was even though i was one.

Smear the queer was banned in my school, but there was a brief period where my friends and I played it after school. I was always the queer! I didn't even know it was supposed to be offensive until one day I went home and told my mom what we had been playing. We came from a good progressive neighborhood, so it was obvious we'd have to change it. From there on out, we played Stymie the Hymie.

I didn't learn that name for the game until I moved to Georgia as a teen, by which time I knew that it was a slur. in FLA it was Kill the Carrier.

Does anyone remember how the game worked, i.e. how the "queer" was chosen? My memories of the game are very vague, except feeling like there was something menacing about it and not really wanting to play.

i remember it very clearly and enjoyed it heartily as a rambunctious 7 year old. the teacher had all the kids mob up and they threw the ball in the middle and whoever got it took off running in one direction.

^ that's how i remember the rules, such as they were. a nerf football is thrown or kicked & whoever catches it gets mobbed by everyone else. you could throw the ball away to avoid getting pigpiled, but having it was both goal & curse, so everyone was trying to grab it. fun, brutal game. and, yeah, we always called it smear the queer. this in the DC suburbs, mid-to-late 70s.

v familiar with this game, def played it, also known as Kill the Pill etc.

We called it Smear the Queer too but we were elementary students in a glorified farm town before the invention of the internet. This guy I overheard was a 50-something lifetime New Yorker.

really thought this was a "just me" thing

http://ask.metafilter.com/284756/Do-kids-still-play-a-game-they-call-smear-the-queer
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40545754?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://ittakesateam.blogspot.com/2010/12/smear-queer-when-tradition-needs-to-be.html

in even more pernicious childhood memories, i also recall a grammar school varietal of freeze tag in our recently segregated school called "run nigger run" where whoever was 'it' had to keep running until they tagged someone else or couldn't run any more and if they stopped they were out. then the teacher (or was it the oldest or strongest boy? i only remember it was someone in a position of primacy) would tag another kid, yell "run nigger run" and then that kid is it and we all kept playing until no one could run anymore, last man standing wins. i liked to run a lot and i was pretty good at it. Came home one day after i won to proudly tell my parents and that's when i found out that was a word we weren't supposed to say. after that i didn't play that game anymore. at some point our school followed suit; i don't remember when it stopped but it was after fourth grade.

i'd check to see if this was a 'just me' thing as well, but damned if i'm gonna google that. i have a sad roster of grammar school bigotry stashed in my memory; i imagine that's common for all gen-xers and peripheral 80's babies.

this is maybe a different thread

it's super obvious in retrospect but "smear the queer" was essentially a tool to teach gut response mob reactions to seven year olds

i've told myself i won't watch holocaust movies any more but this one looks interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYcx43AmAyY

when i first saw the trump jewish star thing my impression was that i could easily see why ppl would be offended but the six-sided star icon itself is generic enough that i assumed it was much ado about nothing. obviously that changed when i learned its provenience (and when david duke praised it), but it does make me wonder about the right-wing and jew baiting in general. like overt hate (pictures of jewish journalists superimposed over gas chambers, or the obnoxious "oy annudah shoah" meme) is easy to recognize. when it comes to israel it's a whole other thing (trying to determine to what extent israel or zionism is acting as a stand-in for jews, and what kinds of criticisms are designed to exploit that ambiguity), but then there's this thing where it's like "is it a dog whistle or isn't it" - even the covering up of the star with a circle that doesn't cover all the points - it seems like duke is reading that as a comment itself "revealing the hidden hand" that i guess is hiding behind the circle. surely they could've just covered the whole thing up? idk this probably sounds weird coming from me but i feel like maybe i haven't been sensitive enough to this kind of thing? maybe bc of the recent star of david apparel thing i felt more conflicted? but that one was clearly a sheriff star bc of the rounded points whereas this one doesn't even have that (and that one actually looked like concentration camp clothing whereas this one was just red -- i joked that maybe red bc "communism" and jews but who the fuck really even knows - i know i don't want to spend my life trying to figure it out tho). anyway, i know this long paragraph doesn't have much of a point - just thinking out loud.

fwiw, as an outsider who occasionally thinks fear of anti-semitism is (understandably) paranoid this seemed like an obvious dog whistle to me

I feel some conflict about situations like these because there's always this feeling for me that, if it really is a dog whistle for the right wing fringe that already believes what it believes, but doesn't convey any particular message to anyone else, does blowing it up into a huge media event actually benefit anyone? I guess to the extent it hurts Trump, it does, but I'm not sure whether it actually hurts Trump.

I think it's complicated with Trump because he's both a) clearly a bigot and b) clearly a hapless moron who just reposts things he agrees with without considering the source or any subtext and then doubles down on the pathetic excuses because he is congenitally incapable of apologizing or admitting that he made a mistake. But because a) is a thing, I feel like it's totally acceptable to assume a) even if it's actually b).

Sometimes the line between heartfelt bigot and opportunistic bigot is very blurry. I think he's more the latter, but that's been true of many dangerous demagogues.

As has been discussed elsewhere, the heartfelt vs opportunistic bigot distinction is one without a difference.

welp
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/jared-kushner-family-trump-holocaust-225210#ixzz4DjbgmrB1

Jacob Schulder, another cousin, went even further in a comment on Marc Kushner’s post, writing: “When an out of touch with reality nominee hires an out of touch with reality campaign manager, who is also a son­-in-­law, you get the BS Jared wrote. I don't think Trump is an anti­Semite; I think he's a lying idiot (among other things) with little to no experiences outside his teetering fiefdom of failed development projects, divorces, bankrupted sports leagues, fraudulent "Universities" and golf courses (and the list keeps going). The very first thing a responsible campaign manager should do, I'd think, and I mean the very first thing, would be to take away his father-­in­-law's Twitter account. Even Joseph Kushner would've had the street smarts to figure that one out while living on boiled potatoes in the forest.”

O_O

this is pretty o_0, from old Vanity Fair article from the 1990

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmxP-vaWAAA3d8D.jpg:large

I would never read them just channel them

"I am his friend, but I'm not Jewish." !!!

well he does work at Paramount, which is staffed entirely by Jews, dontchaknow. Honest mistake!

i wonder if right-wing jews who keep defending trump would also vote for david duke if he were the R nominee.

Certainly the neocons would all be voting HRC I'd have to think

i think so - but the neocons were dems originally anyway so the movement historically isn't dogmatically partisan