In Praise of Filler

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (89 of them)

"voices of old people"

Mark G, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, my first post on this thread highlights what I think Dr.C is on about: a 3-minute symphony for harpsichord, opera singers and Tom Baker reading Rolling Stones death poetry. Funny but engaging; what more could you want?

Trayce, you'll like this one: Engineers' BOC rip-off 'Peter Street'

Just got offed, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I think I have that song ackshully!

Trayce, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:13 (sixteen years ago) link

...and to round off my list of LJ Faves, the debut Working For A Nuclear Free City record is almost entirely made up of little filler-esque segments. Electro-prog of the most concise, agreeable kind! "England" especially, a segue between "The Tape" and "Over" (two of the stronger songs proper), is utterly beautiful. And the outro to "Forever", aside from being stunning, is once again pitch-perfect BOC-homily.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:19 (sixteen years ago) link

If a "reprise" counts as filler, then "The Light Dies Down On Broadway" from "The Lamb..." is also excellent. (And, in many ways, better than the original)

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:43 (sixteen years ago) link

but isn't the lamb lies down filler from start to finish?

alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm not happy with any of these definitions of filler. i don't think filler can *ever* be seen to be a good thing. calling a song filler is effectively writing it off, and this thread contains far far too many great pieces of music/silliness for anything to qualify.

when a review slags off an album for containing "too much filler", what it invariably means is "other than the singles, the *overall musical/artistic quality* of this album is lacking".

as noted, some albums are apparently basically *all* filler by nick/dr c's definition! this makes absolutely no bloody sense to me at all. that just makes it a shit record, end of.

CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:14 (sixteen years ago) link

The point is that what many people recognise or refer to as 'filler' is actually the good stuff to other people (myself and Dr C, perhaps...).

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Badly Drawn Boy gave good filler: little instrumental bits & pieces that went nowhere. His first eps & albums are full of it. It reached its apotheothis with the "About A boy" s/t. Then he stopped & got serious & dull.

There was a small vogue for it in the mid/late 90s (Cornershop, Beck, Beastie Boys etc), perhaps started by Money Mark? "Mark's Keyboard Repair" was ALL brilliant filler

bham, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll think of a better way to express it...

But sometimes you just know that a band has had to come up with a couple of tracks to fill up an album, so they either go for something with novelty value (different writer, a cover, an instrumental) or just something that repeats their trademark sound by numbers, maybe even sounds exactly like another of their songs. Often these tracks reveal something about an artist that you wouldn't necessarily get from their 'best' work. I just find that fascinating.

Dr.C, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:21 (sixteen years ago) link

something that repeats their trademark sound by numbers, maybe even sounds exactly like another of their songs

ah, now there's the rub.

CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i think filler can only be a good thing on an album if most songs of the album in question are excellent. the occasional filler track can then be a welcome change or can fulfill the function of a breathing space for the listener.

an example of filler at the end of an album: "after hours" on "the velvet underground". it's an amateurish song i don't like at all but at the end it kind of makes sense. the album is over, it is just a bonus. it's a nice way to say good-bye with a song everybody and his monkey could sing.

alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:31 (sixteen years ago) link

what about hidden filler? how can that possibly be justified? eg that stone roses one, and the cure's 'the weedy burton'.

CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I was going to say that (whether it's filler or not) I am very much in favour of goofy short instrumentals (back when I made tapes side A would always close with Flipside by Breeders, which kind of suffers for being on a one-sided format; the surf closer on Watusi by the Wedding Present is the best damn bit of the whole album), but then I read:

I was just reading about how Boards of Canada kinda like making the little interludes more than the actual songs.

and realised that I couldn't draw the line between the above and roygbiv (short, cheerful interlude, pretty different in sound to the rest of the album, and, y'know, THE track that everyone picks).

But yeah, I like this stuff.
(xposts, heh, only last night I was admiring "after hours" after not really having paid it much attention before. those lyrics...)

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

The filler is never hidden.

The filler on 3 Imaginary Boys is Foxy Lady - classic filler, that : sung by the bass player, only put on the record at the insistence of the producer, cover version, faux-joky 'chat' before it. Lovely!

Dr.C, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:09 (sixteen years ago) link

yes, hidden filler is a contradiction in terms!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:52 (sixteen years ago) link

yes, hidden good filler is a contradiction in terms!

fixed.

CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:54 (sixteen years ago) link

well yes

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:01 (sixteen years ago) link

The Beatles' version of "Twist And Shout" may be the best piece of filler ever, considering all of their cover versions may be seen as filler.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Are non-album b-sides filler?

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

if we think of filler as being part of an album which makes sense i think the answer must be no of course. filler can't exist on its own without reference points. it is part of a flow or destroys a flow.

alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

B-sides are in most cases filler in singles though. Or, at least they were back in the day of the vinyl 7 incher.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Are non-album b-sides filler?

almost inevitably.

CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Semantic interjection: people are seriously privileging connotation over denotation when they say filler is necessarily bad! We have a word for bad songs, and that word is "bad." Filler has more nuance: it is the stuff that fills stuff out! Saying filler is necessarily bad is like saying bread crumbs are necessarily bad, due to their role in filling out, umm, meatloaf.

I prefer Dr. C's notion of filler -- knocked-off, off-topic, "just having fun" stuff used to stretch a record from Six Songs We're Really Insisting On to Ten Songs You Buy.

nabisco, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

(Not necessarily fun -- I forgot an "or" in there. Knocked off, or off-topic, or "just having fun," or genre pastiche, or anything where it feels like the band is spacing out the main display by going "oh hey look we made this thing, too.")

nabisco, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

all the basement jaxx *ludes

s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

xxpost that's why i said filler isn't *necessarily* bad but i don't think it can ever be good. and yeah in my working def. of the word filler as pertains to the album format might as well be a different word than 'meatloaf' filler, which is integral to meatloaf in a way that filler is not considered integral to an album.
I might be totally totally wrong too, it's just how i've used it and how I thought I'd seen it used since forever. At any rate stuffing like 90% of what constitutes the average modern album into the filler category isn't any more workable, surely.
gosh for someone who never even uses the word i sound like i care haha.

tremendoid, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

three years pass...

Non-album b-sides are/were my very favourite filler.

Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 13 November 2010 07:41 (thirteen years ago) link

I love "Treefingers" on Kid A.

corey, Saturday, 13 November 2010 07:43 (thirteen years ago) link

"Flying" by the motherfuckin' Beatles

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 13 November 2010 17:53 (thirteen years ago) link

I liked Madonna filler, especially on earlier albums like True Blue. 'Jimmy Jimmy' and 'Love Makes the World Go Round' etc.

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Saturday, 13 November 2010 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.