Ying Yang Twins - Whisper In Your Ear

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (633 of them)
I think there's no question that calling it out is positive. I wish I had done it moreso in the past, certainly, and I plan on being more aware of it in the future. I dont know how I feel about "docking points" to a review (i mean, i think points are fucking stupid in the first place, so I guess its not really that relevent). I think there's a way to be effective, though, without sounding whiny. I mean fuck, its the job of a good writer to realize who her/his audience is and fucking write for it. And you know what, writing in the Source the way Tom does in pfork - and this is no diss to Tom whatsoever - is not going to be effective. I think its important to raise issues in an effective way, rather than coming off as self-righteous. I am NOT suggesting anyone here (or Tom) was being self-righteous, since everyone seems to have been addressing fellow critics anyway - but I think its important to remember that there are different ways of addressing these kinds of issues, and it all depends on where you're writing. I read a review - i forget which magazine it was - where mike jones was given 1 or 2 stars for "talking about hoes." And that was as far as it went. I'm sympathetic to the idea, but I thought the writing was fucking pathetic. I mean, fucking half of hip-hop is talking about hoes. How does this relate to his overall message? How can you work his misogyny into the writing in a way that doesnt make me think "this person doesn't listen to hip-hop"? And I'm not talking about giving a free pass, either - I want to see someone make a stand that makes readers think, no matter who those readers are - not just critics, not just trying to be "right" but trying to effectively challenge people to think about the way women are treated in hip-hop.

I've had a few drinks tonight, but looking this over I think I'll agree with it all when sober. I would like to see some other people acknowledge that sometimes, like jessica and julianne were saying, its not always important to be right. I'd like to be more effective.

(xp if that was the case, massive apologies to Alex!!!!)

deej., Thursday, 2 June 2005 04:32 (eighteen years ago) link

(although to be fair we havent always gotten along, so i think its reasonable I'd read his post sarcastically)

deej., Thursday, 2 June 2005 04:51 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, candicissima asked above 'wheres the anger for xxl?', and part of the reason i kinda went 'eh' when jess, um, posited the above was that part of me thought 'what's the point?'; pfork's reviewed this song three times now - what're the odds the ying yang twins are aware of any of the reviews? how many minds do you think they changed with any of the reviews? (to be fair they may have changed minds in the sense of 'ok, i don't need to hear this song' though i bet they changed some minds in the sense of 'i have GOT to hear this song' too - i'm not sure if either is a desirable impact in this case, even if they're the standard hope for impact in yr usual consumer reports rockcrit). and yeah 'anti-misogyny as a lazy excuse to beat up on hip-hop' is pretty common in non-hip-hop media, i tend to ignore those morons most of the time (i'm sure dero's railed about this for example but damned if i'm gonna find out) so i'd kinda forgotten that crutch. if a hack can merely point out yr 'bitches' and 'fags' then a better/braver critic might even be able to fess up to/examine being thrilled by the same elements you find repulsive. i'm annoyed that maceo's 'go sit down' is 'ho sit down' in the non-radio edit but i luv luv luve 'there's some hoes in this house' and am nearly as fond of singing along to 2 live crew's 'heeey we want some pusssaaay' as i was damn near twenty years ago on the school bus. a good rock critic could tell me WHY.

also, and this is why WHERE miccio's piece matters at least as much as what it said, but even if the debate, the 'no free passes' only has it's impact within the circlejerk rockcritics that's still some impact, impact that if rockcritworld has any influence on popculture (for the sake of argument let's say it does)(humour me) could eventually translate into an actual impact on the music ("and thru that the world!" - c. martin) or at the very least the promotion of it, enough so say a glossy entertainment feature/interview with ______ where he was taken to task for his misogyny might be as routine as a glossy feature/interview with _______ where the subject isn't even broached (or if it is the subject is let off with ye olde 'i'm not referring to all women when i say 'bitches', i just mean some women, the bad ones' - do i even need to say what the racial analogue of this is?) is now.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:05 (eighteen years ago) link

blount OTM - and assuming that rockcrit DOES have an influence (which I dont think is as much of a strech PER SE as some might think) - then it needs to be effective rather than make people shrug. Which lots of anti-misogyny hip-hop writing DOES, unfortunately. Because quite frankly it isn't willing to acknowledge that the music is appealing (i think i might just be repeating what blount said.) This is why I really have enjoyed most of J-Shep's recent contributions to Pfork - in fact, I think her review of the Mike Jones album was one of the better ones I read.

deej., Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:12 (eighteen years ago) link

blount -- "calling it out" IS a pretty standard part of the hack-bag-o-trix, but usually in a dull and unengaging way that just doesn't work or is hostile to the music entirely. c.f. pretty much the whole reception of rap in the big mainstream press from 1985 or so onwards! No matter how popular rap is in the charts, we're still talking a fraction of the critigentsia.

re: the source, expecting critical reflexivity from it about *anything* is a joke these days, but yeah it does exemplify this panic-mongering w/r/t race while completely ignoring gender. i bought the issue on 50 recently to see what scoops it had on the recent drama, etc. where it did pull up interesting things in its neverending quest to fuck with em, and was taken aback/amused by the fawning profile of the ying yang twins in the same issue that didn't even seem to engage at ALL with sexism, etc.

but for the most part, in the larger world outside of benzino's reality distortion field, and extending all the way to mtv and vh-1 (if not usually BET) the basic outlines of the feminist critique of hip-hop and sexism are hardly unknown.

it also depends what you mean by "calling out" becuz saying "yeah, this is there, and it bothers me, and here's how i deal with it" is all the calling out that this really merits, i think (not least becuz anything more extreme than that gets rather ineffective fast) and it can be done without dominating a review, and if done right can even provide an organizing context for a review.

but i'd rather have ppl. talk about my very interesting points upthread about context in the use of the word "bitch."

(also it's absurd to drag chuck into this. the voice never tows just one critical line and by publishing tate and coates and emb and etc. he's done as much as anyone to give the smarter critiques of the state of hip-hop a place. i mean disagree w/ miccio all you want, great, but the pages of the voice are precisely where this exchange of views is SUPPOSED to happen. [just like in the blogosphere, the neighborhood barbershop, the school hallway, the break room at work, the morning talk-radio show hosted by the less shock-jocky djs (i.e. not just B96 but also WGCI), etc.] oh yeah, and the nice article the voice ran on dancehall and homophobia too, and its ongoing coverage of protests against hot 97, et fucking cetera.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:18 (eighteen years ago) link

(the first para is sorta an xpost already)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:21 (eighteen years ago) link

(Sterling, yr from chicago?)

deej., Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:21 (eighteen years ago) link

(i was. and the bay area before that. been in boston a few years now tho.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 2 June 2005 05:23 (eighteen years ago) link

The real issue here is: BOOM Boom boom boom... BOOM Boom boom boom.
Also: Tsss. T-t-t-tsss. Tsss. T-t-t-t-ts.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 2 June 2005 06:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Re-reading Miccio's actual initial piece, the one thing that really stands out to me, the thing that would certainly make me get the weapons from the wall if I was a woman who'd voiced objections to the misogyny in the song, is the phrase "self-revealing". What is it that's implied is being "revealed" about oneself by voicing such objections?

Flyboy (Flyboy), Thursday, 2 June 2005 08:01 (eighteen years ago) link

the other thing Sterling is that you are over estimating the impact of music critics if you think that calling out the misogyny in this song is going to change anything among artists or fans. I mean, maybe from our insular circle jerk it might make Eddy think twice about running something that "defends" misogyny, but there's never going to be a series of articles in the NY Times or zillion word cover story in the New York about this issue. It's not the quality of writing or the writer in question--it's the reception by readers they really don't care that much about the topic because 99% of the time the misogyny/homophobia/bigotry is so woven into society and culture that extracting it from art has no meaningful resonance. Telling fans that they are wrong to like a song or that they are bad people for liking a song is, unsurprisingly, a losing battle. See also: 50 year battle against the evils of rock-n-roll, the PMRC, etc.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 2 June 2005 10:27 (eighteen years ago) link

and yeah 'anti-misogyny as a lazy excuse to beat up on hip-hop' is pretty common in non-hip-hop media, i tend to ignore those morons most of the time [...] so i'd kinda forgotten that crutch. if a hack can merely point out yr 'bitches' and 'fags' then a better/braver critic might even be able to fess up to/examine being thrilled by the same elements you find repulsive.

this counter-argument is not new, either; it is lazy; and, obviously, a 'better/braver' (writing reviews is not brave) critic might also be able to 'fess up to/examine' being repulsed by the same elements you find thrilling. and if they could do it without calling their oppos 'morons', even better. no new territory is discovered by finding that critics get off on offensive/whacked-out lyrics. it's common knowledge.

N_RQ, Thursday, 2 June 2005 10:36 (eighteen years ago) link

ha ha, blount the effect of my "no more free passes" rule (which i am hardly as rigorous about as i should be when i sit down exhausted after work at night to bang out a review of something i really don't give a shit about to pay the phone bill) (just being honest) (but hey, everybody's gotta eat) is essentially that i don't write about rap anymore for the most part. it was partly a personal decision (i find it hard to really get worked up over the genre at this particular moment in time, at least when it comes to albums) and partly an indirect result of uh suggestion that i find more albums to be positive about and the exhaustion from the struggle. if more rap albums were exciting me, i'd hope i would be able to try and talk about that excitement vs. my distaste for the contents. (people don't really want singles reviews in the real world, and i am too album-focused to write about them without being prodded these days.) (just ask nick s.) the flipside, of course, is that it's very hard to talk about anything in 200 words. really. hard. especially the complex, personal relationship between morality, politics, aesthetics, and enjoyment. so unless i am wholly positive or wholly negative about something it almost doesn't make any sense to bother, since i haven't exactly mastered the zen koan thing. (one of the benefits of writing for pitchfork is that if i want to bang out 1k on something, scott will usually only hack it down to 800, which is a damn sight better than 250.)

strng hlkngtn, Thursday, 2 June 2005 10:49 (eighteen years ago) link

(also, i am not a particularly erudite fellow, so writing glorified ad copy may be my eventual future anyway.)

strng hlkngtn, Thursday, 2 June 2005 10:54 (eighteen years ago) link

I responded to flyboy's comment in my message box and I'll repeat what I wrote there here (and something I acknowledged earlier in said box that is key here too, I didn't write the headline and I don't like it - I was arguing in defense of the "listener" of a specific song, not all "porn-rap lovers"):

I will unhesitatingly fess up to how clumsy that phrase was. And I am sorry that my glibness and the wave-the-red-flag headline inspired such fury. What I was going for is that, by declaring all people who enjoy "Wait" to be scum, you're asking people to look at your own tastes in vulgar erotic content and see if you have any ground to stand on when declaring this song indefensible as a source of entertainment (this is the ironic thing - declaring something defensible doesn't mean its beyond critique, it means you feel it deserves critique and discussion as to its qualities. Something indefensible - perhaps like this "date rape song" we've been threatened with or "Black Korea" by Ice Cube - would overtly endorse a criminal act, there would be no room for interpretation).

and obv I'm not actually saying all songs that endorse criminal acts are necessarily indefensible.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 2 June 2005 11:59 (eighteen years ago) link

No idea what I'm being called on here. I posted to Anthony's blog, FWIW.

xhuxk, Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Reviving, as I'm referencing it in a new post over at the Hut about "offensive" music... stop by and find out how they did it back in the thirties!

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 13 June 2005 12:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I finally heard "Wait" on a local radio station and the edit had NO CHORUS. It went straight from mega-censored verse to "bee-yam bee-yam bee-yam" with no waiting or beating to be found. How many different edits of this track ARE there?

miccio (miccio), Monday, 13 June 2005 12:07 (eighteen years ago) link

forks one of these days I'm gonna get it together and send you another mp3 or two, their quality inspiring you to ask why the hell you asked me to do it in the first place.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 13 June 2005 12:08 (eighteen years ago) link

I await your return with fish baited breath.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 13 June 2005 12:11 (eighteen years ago) link

the sequel to this is hot.

mwahyeah, Tuesday, 21 June 2005 09:46 (eighteen years ago) link

six years pass...

i can't believe I'm just now reading this. lol wow.

(interest sparked cuz i just acquired the album this is on for two bucks, tho how could you miss the single when it came out).

so...uh...has anybody's minds changed?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 11 February 2012 02:24 (twelve years ago) link

two years pass...

lol reading this just cuz I've been listening to their music & remembering how popular they were when I was in college, and while honestly I think there's better songs on the album anyway ("Badd" and "Shake" are both better singles) the couple posts (poorly) attempting an analogy of what a "female response track'd" entail are super-headdesk

nova, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 03:53 (nine years ago) link

my basic issue with the beat is idk what it does that "Drop It Like It's Hot" doesn't do better, although I suppose it doesn't "pop" as much and that works in the context of the delivery

anyway party like it's 2005 man

nova, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 03:56 (nine years ago) link

"Shake" is a low key classic, nowadays it's the song i'm most likely to hear a rap DJ play by the Ying Yang Twins OR by Pitbull

some dude, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 04:00 (nine years ago) link

yeah, Pitbull's opening verse is so great too

Funny thing about this song is how much my best friend in college's first gf / pretty much every girl there were mad into it, truly the (slightly more unnerving?) "Blurred Lines" of its day

I did not realize how old Mr. Collipark was btw, kinda cool

nova, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 11:58 (nine years ago) link

wow, wtf I had no idea. for context, dude is older than Grandmaster Flash! o___O

The Reverend, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 20:56 (nine years ago) link

wait, he was over 40 when he decided to briefly go by Beat In Azz?

da croupier, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 21:36 (nine years ago) link

haha

The Reverend, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 21:40 (nine years ago) link

Grandpa Collipark onthebeathoe

man I always think it's too late for me to try making beats as a hobby and this gives me hope, thank you DJ Smurf

nova, Wednesday, 17 September 2014 03:34 (nine years ago) link

BTW if y'all put the producer under Composer in iTunes what do you tag the names as? I used to just update to whatever their last alias is but I feel like tagging Collipark as Beat in the Azz/Mr. Collipark/DJ Smurf and sorting as Mr. Collipark is more respectful to his name game lol

nova, Wednesday, 17 September 2014 03:36 (nine years ago) link

I did not realize how old Mr. Collipark was btw, kinda cool

― nova, Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:58 AM (15 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i didn't know this either and it's fantastic.

this album is good, but looking at old tracklists the first 5-6 songs on me and my brother are unstoppable

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 17 September 2014 03:41 (nine years ago) link

This album is pretty hard to f/w outside of "Bedroom Boom," a couple more maudlin numbers and a few "party" tracks that don't pop off like the best stuff, but I should give Me & My Brother a closer listen

how did it take me 9 years to buy it lol, everyone in college loved these guys

nova, Friday, 19 September 2014 02:55 (nine years ago) link

"Fuck the Ying Yang Twins" does nerd-revenge fantasy rap better than any nerd rappers & "Live Again" does "I understand what these strippers go through" better than Drake too lol

nova, Friday, 19 September 2014 02:59 (nine years ago) link

oh man i forgot about Adam Levine singing "oh, the life of a stripper"

some dude, Friday, 19 September 2014 03:04 (nine years ago) link

lol yeah

nova, Friday, 19 September 2014 03:10 (nine years ago) link

man 2005, Adam Levine's year of being Chris Martin before it was all cruelly snatched away

nova, Friday, 19 September 2014 03:11 (nine years ago) link

Is Mr. Collipark the Timbaland to Lil Jon's Neptunes/Pharrell? Not a qualitative comparison either way mind, just a working thesis I thought of where Collipark does club shit while Lil Jon does club shit and/or "hard" shit that Collipark doesn't really

idk doesn't really matter lol they're (were?) both good

nova, Saturday, 20 September 2014 03:12 (nine years ago) link

Timbaland's hard shit is harder than the Neptunes tho

The Reverend, Sunday, 21 September 2014 00:39 (nine years ago) link

Damn, when was the last time Lil Jon really did street rap tho? I miss that shit

The Reverend, Sunday, 21 September 2014 00:40 (nine years ago) link

Mustard is so consciously indebted to Lil Jon that i don't feel like i miss him as much as i did a few years ago. would be interesting to hear him be more engaged w/ rap's current wave than that new "Turn Down For What" knockoff single featuring Tyga, though.

some dude, Sunday, 21 September 2014 01:29 (nine years ago) link

Timbaland's hard shit is harder than the Neptunes tho

― The Reverend, Saturday, September 20, 2014 5:39 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

nah honestly I think most of 'em are pretty bad but idk how many I'm thinking of. "3 A.M." being the one exception I'd agree with you on, shit's like a horror flick lol

nova, Sunday, 21 September 2014 01:51 (nine years ago) link

dude at Ohword back in the mid-'00s had a post dissing the hell out of Timbaland during his JT/Nelly Furtado/Danjahandz resurgence and one of his main criticisms was that his catalogue's devoid of straight-up bangers. I disagreed at the time but he was onto something

Not that his "poppier"/typical old style in diff. eras style hasn't yielded tons of classics but it is a problem that disconnects him a bit from the core of the genre imo. Plus there's the fact that I just can't listen to Missy's albums straight through like that, although that is partially her fault, I don't think she's a very good rapper & the "goofiness" is not enough to make up for it

nova, Sunday, 21 September 2014 02:08 (nine years ago) link

also Mustard may be indebted to Jon but I don't think he's anywhere near as good. though yeah not into "Turn Down for What" and lol don't know the other one you mentioned, fuck Tyga though

OK triple post my bad gonna chill heh

nova, Sunday, 21 September 2014 02:10 (nine years ago) link

seven years pass...

This song grosses me out. I don't like it when vox are recorded in a way that you can hear the saliva noises of the vocalists mouth...there's some Leonard Cohen songs I can't listen to for the same reason...this is my biggest pet peeve in all of music....this is maybe significant cuz it's the first rap song ever to do it. but it's still GROSS! yucky.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 29 April 2005 14:13 (sixteen years ago) link


This is, like, all pop music now

licorice in the front, pizza in the rear (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 5 December 2021 01:39 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.