pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

a week later but I'm seconding the new Review. I read it in one sitting.

On the front page of p4k.com there are summaries of the dailly record reviews - anyone know how to find summaries for older reviews?

http://i.imgur.com/LPCOwhf.png

Wayback Machine

kind of a weird request. if i were pitchfork i would be like "why are you so obsessed with me?"

I'd be like "hey good point we should probably include those summaries in the actual reviews as introductory paragraphs in boldface or smth like they do in the papers"

can't argue with that

waybackmachine works for finding them, was looking for the Rihanna/Anti blurb:

Anyone hoping that ANTI might be Rihanna’s opus, some grand declaration of intent, is likely to be underwhelmed. ANTI is a fun and conflicted pop record, at its most interesting when it’s at its smallest and most idiosyncratic. If the album has a narrative arc, it’s about disappointment: the ways in which the people you trust can still come up short in the end, and how lonesome that can feel.

they're usually just an amalgamation of sentences from the review?

but maybe the separate fragments of the summary could be highlighted in bold in the review? i dunno could be a fun time and not confusing

they contain clues about the content of the full reviews and should have Spoiler alerts

it's the abstract

that's the word, thanks

You don't need the Wayback Machine. You can simply get them by looking at the page source for the review and look for the line 'meta name="description"'.

I wish I could find the description for this one

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/8887-machine-ep/

Because I remember it saying something like "at least the cover has a tit"

one for the sticker

but what if they put the sticker on top of the boob? dun dun DUUUUUUNNNN

http://pitchfork.com/features/interviews/9804-the-strangest-trip-animal-collective-on-the-legacy-of-animal-collective/

BW: It just felt like life. We were used to always being exhausted and stoned, but apparently it looked weird to other people.

Pitchfork: Are you guys exhausted now?

All: No.

- END OF INTERVIEW -

the phish of dorkcore. wait, no, that's still phish...

"Cadmium" was inspired by a book compiling letters sent between two authors, the first of which was a square of the titular color. As a seemingly sturdy barroom shuffle collapses, Hall yelps about the impossibility of just telling it like it is

there is no shuffle rhythm in this song

pfork writer in not being familiar with correct musical jargon shockah

i went into the wayback machine and found some cool banner ads on pitchfork

https://web.archive.org/web/20040910211750/http://pitchforkmedia.com/ad/suicidegirls-banner3.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20041103141631/http://pitchforkmedia.com/ad/capitol-banner.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20040830222318/http://pitchforkmedia.com/ad/interscope-banner.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20030530151418/http://www.epitaph.com/epicenter/core/_promos/71.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20050408024426/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/chris/ad/frenchkiss-banner.gif

"Support your local poet" vs “The Black Keys are a broke-down blues-punk duo who holler fuzzed-out tunes about pain, suffering and dancing. You WILL get down.”, which was the better tagline?

i'm surprised shitty banner ads haven't yet made an ironic hipster comeback. i give it 2 years.

SEX
DANGER
MESSAGEBOARDS

I think Ex Models were kinda good

lol I totally remember that black keys one

good work overall nomar

omg i had to review that s.t.u.n. album for blender back in the day.

and ex models are great!

https://web.archive.org/web/20021107000846/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/ad/vagrant-banner2.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20021107001022/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/ad/emperornorton-banner.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20010905224240/http://pitchforkmedia.com/ad/epitaph-banner01.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20021111080444/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/ad/insound-banner.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20021111080457/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/ad/epitaph-banner02.gif

https://web.archive.org/web/20021103130515/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/ad/knittingfactory-banner.gif

Definitely due for a resurgency

experience the operazone
specially priced via this portal

pretty sure i subscribed to emusic off a banner ad

you can do anything at operazone. anything at all.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ca_8NJYWAAALO-B.png

i reportedly dont give a shit

excellent

lol

it feels hurried...and somewhat sloppy

maybe the most unforgivably stupid thing Kanye West has ever rapped

it comes off as both his most labored-over and unfinished album

there are moments here where he just sounds like another asshole

9.0

Rating first, review later.

Maybe they'll keep revising the score over the next few days.

Since when was it a critic's job to criticize Kanye for the stupid shit he says in his music?

Rushing out a review this quickly and criticizing the album for being "hurried" is pretty funny, although I doubt intentionally so. Whole album review section is such a mess these days.

i liked the review.

xp i was gonna also make the joke that they should change the score every 2 days.

I also thought this was a very good review and if this is "rushed" then it's a far better rush job than anything I've ever written

yeah i really like that review

Wait ... is it not?

Since when was it a critic's job to criticize Kanye for the stupid shit he says in his music?

― pitchforkian at best (cryptosicko), Monday, February 15, 2016 7:00 AM (4 hours ago)

cryptosarcasmo

oh. ok, sorry.

reading it again that seems obvious :)