He resegregated the federal government, which is worse than what Grover Cleveland ever did re civil rights.
yeah, that's what i mean. not only was his racism fairly virulent even among his class, but he had a position from which he could do a lot of damage. and he did.
that said, it does seem to me that there are probably lots of more important and substantive things to protest than the name of a building or college... not just matters of racial justice (mass incarceration, police abuse, unequal employment and housing opportunities) but also some global matters that we as americans are complicit in (like drone strikes, environmental collapse). i guess you could say that all these things go together, somehow, and to protest one thing does not mean you can't protest another. but it does seem to me that a lot of righteous anger is being focused on what in the grand scheme of things seem like trivial matters. obviously a lot of folks don't agree w/ me on that.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:58 (eight years ago) link
fucking hate woodrow wilson. if nixon wasn't literally guilty of treason, i'd rank him worse than nixon. on the other hand, the idea of "making the world safe for democracy" is probably more geopolitically astute than any us president since 1979. :(
― rushomancy, Thursday, 19 November 2015 21:39 (eight years ago) link
Chas Pierce on the 100th anniv of the current American Empire
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a53792/american-empire-bob-lafollette-wilson/
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 11 March 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link