I know what he means! I voted in that poll
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:17 (eight years ago) link
even as a pharoah sanders fan it wont surprise anybody to learn that it was the funky stuff that drew me in.
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:18 (eight years ago) link
xp
i couldnt remember if you did or not. Phil did you vote? (i know deej didn't)
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:19 (eight years ago) link
Nah, I don't vote in those gigantic-ass polls. I get 1/16 of the way through the book of nominations and my eyes glaze over.
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 5 October 2015 19:21 (eight years ago) link
I love when people who vote in polls complain that the results aren't canonical enough, never gets old
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:25 (eight years ago) link
people who DON'T arggh
A lot of these jazz cannon type lists always seem to feature Ellington at Newport and omit at least 6 or 7 of his masterworks, at least this is an impression I get.
― xelab, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:26 (eight years ago) link
haha both groups complain! its what ilx polls are about! Theyre never dull thats for sure
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:27 (eight years ago) link
man, do you guys talk to each other like this based purely on opinions expressed on this fucking board? or did somebody fuck another guy's wife? sheesh…
on the last song, and the only thing I hear that seems outside of the 'Trane playbook is the persistent use of heavenly chorales, a la the end of the first side of what's going on.
― veronica moser, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:44 (eight years ago) link
i think the axelrod influence is just as big as coltrane
honestly guys, no matter what you think of washington he's a human being and doesn't deserve to be dragged into bickering about an ILM jazz poll, have a little decency
― Ma$e-en-scène (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 5 October 2015 19:49 (eight years ago) link
http://payload187.cargocollective.com/1/12/402674/6056932/WE_GOT_THE_JAZZ.jpg
― tylerw, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:52 (eight years ago) link
do you guys talk to each other like this based purely on opinions expressed on this fucking board?
lol this is nothing you should see Whiney and deej go at it
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:53 (eight years ago) link
Poll of SPIRITUAL HATS
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:54 (eight years ago) link
i listened to this whole thing over the weekend! some great moments in there, and yeah some uneven-ness. i actually liked the vocal tracks! added a nice element i thought. i'm not entirely sure what everyone is arguing about here ...
― tylerw, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:55 (eight years ago) link
does anyone?
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:55 (eight years ago) link
its like the metal thread arguing that deafheaven are spiritual hat metal and not proper metal
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 19:56 (eight years ago) link
hahaha
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 20:03 (eight years ago) link
huh, well i don't know who deej is, I do know who the other gentleman is. I would say that it's peculiar that grown-ass men act like this, but I guess it isn't.
― veronica moser, Monday, 5 October 2015 20:26 (eight years ago) link
D-40
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 20:28 (eight years ago) link
He has a point, I don't know why people have to get all personally offended. It's not unhealthy to interrogate one's own preferences and how they relate to a bigger picture. The people who respond with "it's all just music, man" don't get it.
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:17 (eight years ago) link
is it too much to ask to actually listen to the fuckin album is my point. no shit there's cultural and critical elements to how music is received i'm not 12 yrs old
― Ma$e-en-scène (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 5 October 2015 22:19 (eight years ago) link
D-40 has a point, I mean
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:19 (eight years ago) link
it's a facile point
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:20 (eight years ago) link
Holy cow he already told you he's talking about the "reception" of the music, not the music itself. Maybe that's not valuable to you, I don't know I think it's interesting
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:20 (eight years ago) link
How is it facile? Because it irritates you?
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:21 (eight years ago) link
because it's a position he trotted out several years ago and has done so repeatedly, whether its relevant/accurate or not
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:23 (eight years ago) link
Is it an appropriate avenue for discussion? Jeez.
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:24 (eight years ago) link
I've ignored this so far bc I assumed it was the latest iteration of spiritual hat jazz
I mean c'mon this post is just a) I am ignorant and then b) am dispensing a handy, readymade argument I have against it anyway
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:24 (eight years ago) link
and then c) basing that assumption on my own assumptions about the album's audience
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:25 (eight years ago) link
Oh come on how many people bought/listened to this thing NCAA of the cover????
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:26 (eight years ago) link
lol NCAA equals because
what's wrong with the cover?
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:29 (eight years ago) link
It looks like a space rock album... It looks like a hipster album.. It does not look like most jazz album covers that are released these days
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:30 (eight years ago) link
are you literally arguing for judging an album by its cover
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:30 (eight years ago) link
brave, critical appraisal there tell me more
I'm saying if people were more inclined to listen to this because of the cover, why is it bad for someone to reject it based on the cover?
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:31 (eight years ago) link
two groups of idiots that deserve each other imo
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:32 (eight years ago) link
No no no Never mind, you sound grumpy.
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:32 (eight years ago) link
You must be really special. You've never been inclined to check out an album because of the sleeve artwork? How is is bad? Or "idiotic"?
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:35 (eight years ago) link
still not sure what the argument is -- people *should* check out an album if they think the cover art is cool? people *shouldn't* check out an album if they think the cover art is cool?
― tylerw, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:37 (eight years ago) link
I'm not arguing that "people only like this album because it looks cool", I'm just acknowledging that it happens and that it's a worthwhile thing to discuss. Ppl getting all mad seem to think they're being accused of being racists or squares or something???
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:38 (eight years ago) link
this thread got stupid
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:38 (eight years ago) link
Fuck you
― brimstead, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:39 (eight years ago) link
afaict the people who checked out the album based on the cover are doing so for the wrong reasons and don't actually like jazz, they just like spiritual hats, and should be judged accordingly as apostates before the altar of canonical jazz cats like Duke Ellington who btw is much better
this whole line of argument is stupid, it has nothing to do with the album in question and everything to do with D-40's tendency to engage in audience strawman ad hom criticism, which should be beneath us tbh
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:40 (eight years ago) link
I preferred the posts on why people liked/disliked the music.
I like the cover - it looks great.
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:42 (eight years ago) link
don't get me wrong the whole spiritual hat thing and associated threads are very funny
but indulging the readymade opinions of someone who hasn't bothered to listen to the record isn't really in anyone's interest
― Οὖτις, Monday, 5 October 2015 22:42 (eight years ago) link
A friend wants to know if they have been selling the 3xLP at the gigs?
― Cosmic Slop, Monday, 5 October 2015 23:21 (eight years ago) link
man this place used to be the one place where i wouldn't have to read page after page of people backpatting for agreeing w/ critical consensus now you can't even talk about how it's covered ??
i'm quite interested in this world but I don't see anyone else, including fans of it, really talking about it in ways that get at what makes it unique or now or whatever, i'm looking for the discussion to sell me on it & no one is doing that here, and then its like "LOL YOU HAVENT EVEN LISTENED TO IT" and its like, no, because i don't make it a mission to keep up w/ jazz generally and as someone who did for many years i'm definitely not about to do so again just because a bunch of rock critics decided this is the one time you should
― TheFatSJW (D-40), Monday, 5 October 2015 23:47 (eight years ago) link
esp from people who are like "no i don't want pitchfork reviewing more jazz!!" yes that would be the worst, if jazz started getting coverage from places people actually read sometimes!!
jazz is not a closed circuit of boring shit that once in a long while shits out a genius auteur, it's a genre in which there are peaks & valleys and many artists doing lots of different things and i like to read criticism that acknowledges this fact instead of touching on the one thing that gets lots of attention as if that is a self-fulfilling rationalization for that attention.
― TheFatSJW (D-40), Monday, 5 October 2015 23:50 (eight years ago) link
Ayler had melodies; Charles Gayle doesn't
This has gone unchallenged for over four hours?
Gayle's piano stuff in particular is full of melodies. It's true he rarely played a "head" or anything like that, but his lines are full of quotes, repeated melodic motifs, etc. You talk like he's in Borbetomagus or something.
― Wimmels, Monday, 5 October 2015 23:56 (eight years ago) link