Jimmy Webb's Immortal "Wichita Lineman"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (191 of them)
in fact i thought Campbell's was the original til now.

it is, isn't it? he didn't write it but i'm reasonably sure his was the first recording.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:13 (nineteen years ago) link

On the Glen Campbell version between the end of a chorus and the guitar solo, there's a chord progression with a high pitch melody.

I just realized that Bobby Lyle's "Magic Carpet Ride", a rare-groove r&B song from the 70's, totally cops that part.

pheNAM (pheNAM), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:32 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm trying to decide what i think of the webb/campbell album "reunion" (1974) right now

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I've never understood the appeal of this song, but I have a Lost Highway compilation where it is sung--nay, intoned, by the Man in Black himself.

You must hear it if you are a fan of Johnny Cash or of the song. I'm just sayin.

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:00 (nineteen years ago) link

I think it's a good song, though I don't think I quite understand the reasoning for the hushed, reverent tone in which it is revered on this board.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:04 (nineteen years ago) link

hush now!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:16 (nineteen years ago) link

The imagery. there are only 37 different words in the whole of the song, Bob Dylan never created an image as evocative as this in his whole musical career of 3 and a half billion words

Bullshit. Anyway, since you're so concerned with how many *different* words are in the song, how many *different* words do you think Dylan used? Probably not 3 and a half billion. "It Takes a Lot To Laugh, It Takes a Train to Cry" (despite the long title) is approximately as laconic as this song and is at least as effective, as far as I'm concerned.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:27 (nineteen years ago) link

the hushed, reverent tone
Are we really being hushed and reverent, or are we just enjoying the shared discovery of a heretofore obscured classic?

Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, some of the tributes being paid to this song upthread verge on the hyperbolic. I mean is it really the greatest song of all time? Yes, it does a lot with a little. The image is effective and original. It tells you just enough to give you a flavor for the guy's feeling but leaves a lot of things shrouded in enigma - for instance, who is the "you" that the song is addressed to? Is it a current lover, a past lover, the object of an unrequited love, is she dead? We really have no clue - which makes the meaning of the song a bit diffuse and gnomic. All we get is the sense of the dutiful working guy out on the roads feeling lonely and thinking of a woman. There are countless classic songs with similar themes of loneliness, desire, and separation: "Solitude", "I Cover the Waterfront", "Visions of Johanna" - to me, to say that this one is unquestionably the best without a little more to back it up just seems a bit premature.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Was it heretofore obscured?

Campbell's version was pretty ubiquitous on even top 40 radio circa 1979.

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Its classicity was obscured.

Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link

its genius. the 'I need you' is one of the single greatest lines in western art

To be honest, this line kind of bugs me. If he "needs" her more than "wants" her, then why in the very next line does he say "and I want you for all time" - there's the "want" again - didn't he just say he "needs" her more than "wants" her? - so why doesn't he say he "needs" her for all time? Because it would sound weird, I guess. How could you "need" someone for all time? But still, it's clumsy.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link

if he needs her more than he wants her, and he wants her for all time, then he needs her THAT MUCH MORE. simple as that, not clumsy.

and you're seriously saying that a song needs to be specific to be good? because that would leave a lot of dylan, esp. 'visions of johanna,' right out on the doorstep.

i never said this was THE greatest song of all time. but it must be considered. 'visions' is good but not on the same level methinks.

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:30 (nineteen years ago) link

It's not remotely clumsy - it's the same construction as saying, "It's more tragic than comic, and it's *very* comic." A is greater than B and B is HUGE.

xpost

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:32 (nineteen years ago) link

It's a great song about a guy who repairs telephone lines when it's cold outside. I always heard it as a song about work, you know, having to work outside when it's cold, and he's missing his girl or whatever.

I like "Galveston" almost as much. Campbell's vocal on "WL" is very subtle, actually, listen to the inflection on the word "still." That's great singing, it sounds so simple but it's not.

Many people complain about the Al De Lory strings on this song and others. I think "WL" just about defines good countrypolitan music, myself, it's incredibly listenable, smooth yet it's real. Glen's country--the way he says "want" as "wont." I have no trouble with anyone who says this is one the finest songs of all time, none at all.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:36 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm trying to decide what i think of the webb/campbell album "reunion" (1974) right now

I'm not, Amateur(ist) — it's crap. And believe me: I wanted to like that record more than you can possibly imagine. Or maybe you can.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:46 (nineteen years ago) link

the Meters did a version of "Wichita Lineman." It's not too hot, actually.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link

before I even was "into" music, like, when I was 4 or 5 years old, this song touched me. no doubt from long car rides to grandma's when my mom only listened to country. and many years later, knowing nothing of the songs cult following or that anyone might put it in the canon of great songs, I heard a snippet or saw the title and could just barely make out the tune in my memory, but the FEELING! I wanted to hear the song for years. I'd forget about it completely, only to remember that somehow I had to hear it. then I saw it on a jukebox one day, played it, and someone I was with immediately noted the song choice with seemingly exactly the same "understanding" of the song that I had had. I don't know if it means anything. does this song include a frequency inaudible to the human ear or something?

ilkshake (ilkshake), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link

"reverent tone in which it is revered on this board."

are you supposed to revere something in an irreverent tone?

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link

in any event i can agree with o. nate that there are many other effective songs with a similar theme, and that "wichita lineman" is a great song, there's no need to declare it the "best of all time" or anything like that. anyway, that sort of hyperbole has a mostly rhetorical function right? no one's actually saying that in some fact-based way this is the "best of all time."

i do have a distaste for hyperbole. it's nice to read something like o. nate's post, then. since this board is so full of hyperbole.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago) link

. I always heard it as a song about work, you know, having to work outside when it's cold, and he's missing his girl or whatever.

hmmm...this is interesting, because webb has a problem with writing really abstract love lyrics with overly fussy metaphors. in fact i would even say that some of his lyrics verge on the sort of mushy pop-psychological stuff that really turns me off. (as in the "reunion" record which i can't dismiss so easily.)

i think it's this song's specificity, its occasional rendering of concrete detail, that lifts it above a lot of other webb compositions.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:00 (nineteen years ago) link

i like that line in one song on "reunion" about his girl not liking the way he smokes!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link

that line in one song

Yes.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:20 (nineteen years ago) link

are you supposed to revere something in an irreverent tone?

OK, fine, but something typed in haste on a message board should necessarily be held to the same level of literary standards as a song, especially if it's claimed to be the greatest of all time.

Maybe the line means what people are saying it means: I x more than y, and I y a lot. But if so, this doesn't strike me as a particularly clever or poetic construction - it's almost childish, really. For a more grown-up, complex, and sexy take on the whole "need vs. want" thing, see Smokey Robinson's "You Really Got a Hold On Me".

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

For a more grown-up, complex, and sexy take on the whole "need vs. want" thing, see Smokey Robinson's "You Really Got a Hold On Me".

That was a favorite theme of Motown and vintage R&B. See also Marvin Gaye's "Ain't that Peculiar" ("you do me wrong but still I'm crazy bout you"), Martha and the Vandellas' "Nowhere to Run" ("I know you're no good for me, but you've become a part of me").

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Shelby Lynne does a kick-ass verison of this live.

mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:59 (nineteen years ago) link

The Avalanches prominently sample the intro to Tony Mottola's string-laden instrumental version of "Wichita Lineman" on "Since I Left You" (the track itself).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:05 (nineteen years ago) link

3xpost:
o nate, I disagree with much of what you are saying on this thread, but I am not displeased that you are here saying it- a hater only helps us prove our love even more. To address one of your charges, one that I think some others have already addressed, the question of who is the "you" that the song is addressed to, I would say that a love song that is too specific or concentrates too much on describing the love object can often backfire and repel the listener as it descends into the "sort of mushy pop-psychological stuff" that amateurist mentioned. The mix of specificity with regard to the singer- he is a lineman, in Wichita, for the county!- with the lack of specifics about the "you" on his mind gives the song a nice balance.

As far as "need vs. want" - "You Really Got a Hold On Me" is a great song, especially in the Beatles version, but its razor's edge approach/avoid take on love is actually easier to pull off successfully than the infinite corridor of want that is evoked in "Wichita Lineman."

Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Joan Armatrading made a whole career of the whole need v. want distinction, right? "Love and Affection," "I Need You," these are great songs.

mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't want to get into an argument about which is earlier to pull off. I just think one tells a more interesting story than the other. Everything in Webb's song is idealized: you have the noble, selfless lineman making sure everyone's phones work and you have the woman, the object of desire, who is the source of all that is good, pure, and happy. And nothing happens! The guy stays out there doing his duty and thinking of the woman. To me it would be more interesting if he said, you know, fuck the phones, I'm going to go be with the woman I love, or something like that. I mean for all his talk about how much he needs and wants her, there must be something keeping him from going to her that he needs and wants more, right? The song is really when you think about it the ultimate love song to the self-denying Calvinist work ethic.

xpost

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:19 (nineteen years ago) link

earlier = easier

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe the metaphor is that the work IS the love.

That is, I'm lonely and cold and I'm holding on alone here, doing all the work, but I'm still at it--because I need and want you so much, I have no choice but to keep working at the relationship.

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago) link

And nothing happens!

i like this about the song.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I interpret this song very differently, o. nate. I think their relationship is NOT very happy, that maybe there isn't even a relationship at all, and I think his admission about needing her more than wanting her does not slot in very nicely with the rest of it. For me, the tension lies not just in the suspended chords but in how he's out working all the time, connecting other people when there's obviously some kind of bad connection in his own life. I think it's a very sad song.

That said, I agree with Kenny L that your arguments are good and your perspective is perfectly fine. I enjoy not-agreeing just as much as agreeing, provided that no one is an asshole about it.

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

the guy in the song obviously feels that his job is somewhat poetic, maybe someone asked him "what's your gig" and he said, "aw, I'm just a Wichita Lineman...hey, wait a minute, that sounds good..." To me, he's at the mercy of the elements, driving around, and all he wants to do is go home and relax. It's so American--mildly irritated by your job but yet proud of it, proud of his mastery of the details.

I'm old enough to remember when the song was first out, I was a Glen Campbell fan as a tyke. I never understood what it was about at all for years, but I got it, he was lonely, driving the main road and searching in the sun for another overload, which is such a brilliant line.

Webb's songs are strange--I remember also being puzzled by this Fifth Dimension tune of his, "Carpet Man," I guess the guy was getting walked on or was walking on a woman, so to speak? It's really weird and if I hear it right there's a line "and then the coroner will have a dance on you."

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link

"she walks all over you, she knows she can / you're the carpet man"

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

It's interesting how much discussion is engendered by a song that's got--what, two verses? It's less than 100 words long.

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

and eddie the line actually goes "And she'll say come to my wedding and of course you do / And then the groom and her will have a dance on you"

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, I figured that was the line but I always liked "coroner" so much I wanted it to be so. Webb's poetics kinda failed him there I think but it's still a cool song.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:16 (nineteen years ago) link

anyway i honestly loved this song without thinking about the lyrics much at all--i just got enough of them to paint a general picture of a guy working, missing his girl. or even less than that: whatever i gleaned from the lyrics was enough to confirm and enhance the powerful mood set by the melody and peculiar arrangement.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link

the metaphor about connections doesn't really hit me emotionally, you know. it's not really part of my investment in the song, although i can recognize its poignancy intellectually.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I interpret this song very differently, o. nate. I think their relationship is NOT very happy, that maybe there isn't even a relationship at all, and I think his admission about needing her more than wanting her does not slot in very nicely with the rest of it. For me, the tension lies not just in the suspended chords but in how he's out working all the time, connecting other people when there's obviously some kind of bad connection in his own life. I think it's a very sad song.

It absolutely is. Webb was also going through a hideous and prolonged breakup around that time, which almost certainly contributed to the tone of the song, if not the metaphor itself.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

he went through that breakup for like six years!

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

he talks about the song on the Fresh Air interview from last year:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1668844

turns out, he's quite dissatisfied with that "need you more than want you" chorus for a pretty funny reason (they start discussing it around the 7:00 minute mark if you want to skip ahead)

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I think their relationship is NOT very happy, that maybe there isn't even a relationship at all, and I think his admission about needing her more than wanting her does not slot in very nicely with the rest of it

I guess this goes back to the essential ambiguity of the lyrics that I wrote about upthread. We don't really know what his relationship is to the person he's singing to. So you can read it this way if you want to - but for me to read it that way, I think I'd feel like I was basically rewriting the song in my own mind to conform to what I think the most engaging scenario would be. I like to be given a bit more to go on, I think.

Anyway, a related thought that occurred to me is that maybe this is one of those songs that is going to become a victim of the march of progress. I mean as we all live in an increasingly wireless and omni-connected cyber-verse - the thought of some guy being out there tending to these wires and not being able to connect himself may become an increasingly archaic metaphor. Future generations may not be able to understand why he doesn't just pick up his cell-phone and call her.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Future generations may not be able to understand why he doesn't just pick up his cell-phone and call her.

inasmuch as current generations can understand why paul revere had to ride a horse, i'm pretty sure future generations will be able to figure out what a telephone wire was.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost:
Or just plug his yellow phone-company-issue repairman's receiver right into the line and call her up on Ma Bell's dime. Even prior generations might ask that!

Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

but but but ... isn't it possible that the fact he can her singin' through the wire means she's actually ON THE PHONE ... with someone else ... and maybe he can't call her even if he wants to 'cause the line would be busy?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

maybe he just misses her company!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

(xpost to meself)
he can HEAR her, that is.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.