The official bored-at-work cryptic crossword pass it on thread.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5697 of them)

On 3578 I got one 3-letter word.

Doing slightly better this week, but only slightly.

koogs, Thursday, 14 May 2015 18:37 (eight years ago) link

I finished 3578, although didn't understand the MOTIVES clue above. 3579 is the one I'm on, and I only have 9 down. I think I read they changed setters?

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 14 May 2015 18:41 (eight years ago) link

idk I just loaded it up on my phone to see what a difficult Everyman looks like & I'm getting thru it at the normal rate, not seen anything that's made me go "oh c'mon!". It helps that I got three of the long clues almost instantly. Having said that I'm sure I'll hit a wall now

italosVEVO (wins), Thursday, 14 May 2015 19:59 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, this isn't as hard as I first thought, I just think the cluing and my brain are not quite on the same wavelength sometimes. I'm about halfway in.

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 15 May 2015 16:41 (eight years ago) link

Finally finished, with a bit on online research. These are examples of "harder than past Everyman puzzles" imo:

14 King with work in store around westward citadel
ACROPOLIS

24 Capital account without pound in it is abandoned
TBILISI

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:05 (eight years ago) link

Although this one I liked a lot!

27 Employ glam rock band with energy coming back
EXERT

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:20 (eight years ago) link

Yeah that was nice.

time trafel 2015 💨 2012 (wins), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:30 (eight years ago) link

Not really enjoying cryptics all that much at the mo. Probably because since moving jobs I'm doing them on my own, where before I'd do them with a couple of colleagues every lunchtime. Maybe because I'm doing them at my desk, instead of in the pub. Perhaps because I'm no longer having a pint alongside.

ledge, Saturday, 23 May 2015 11:26 (eight years ago) link

all that stuff takes the shine off, true

gong mad (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 23 May 2015 13:34 (eight years ago) link

Yeah those are the best contexts

Been doing crosswords at work with the deputy lab manager - not my boss, but my immediate superior. He's a novice so still learning the conventions/frustrations. It's been fun, yesterday we had like half an hour longer for break cause he wanted to finish it!

So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Saturday, 23 May 2015 13:52 (eight years ago) link

Been meaning to ask: why are setters always using "rejected" to mean backwards/inverted? It's one of those things you just accept but I'm not convinced it actually makes sense.

So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:40 (eight years ago) link

Is the thinking "rejected"="sent back"?

So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:42 (eight years ago) link

that wd be my guess. it's not the best but so much of cryptics is learning the jargon

gong mad (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:43 (eight years ago) link

Cryptics are a solo experience for me (being American, anyone I've ever showed them to reacts like I'm explaining quantum physics.) No pubs either, puzzles are mainly for my train ride to/from work. Although I've taken long car trips with my parents and had them read the clues out loud, and I solve them in my head as I drive.

Was anyone able to solve this one in the Everyman unaided?

Flower in good composition held by small child (10)

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 14:05 (eight years ago) link

my botanical knowledge would have to be a hell of a lot better to get that unaided.

ledge, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 12:30 (eight years ago) link

in the grauniad today "up the eiffel tower" indicates a french word. "in paris" or similar is common enough and i guess i don't mind setters getting a bit more florid if it leads to a nice surface. that wasn't the case here.

ledge, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 12:46 (eight years ago) link

is there a list of French indicators anywhere?

koogs, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:10 (eight years ago) link

Yeah that was awful even if he did question-mark it. Liked the grid on the whole though - nice and easy!

So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:21 (eight years ago) link

In general I think "in [place in france]" or "for [french person]" is acceptable, there's nothing wrong with "the Eiffel Tower" per se except it's awkward & feels like he's going for some weak euphemism w "poked my darling up the Eiffel Tower"

So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:25 (eight years ago) link

Flower in good composition held by small child = Mignonette, by the way, which I'd never heard of. Add in that "composition" = nonet and "small child" = mite, and I couldn't get this even with all the crossers.

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 14:01 (eight years ago) link

yeah that's v tough for everyman. still at least it was an actual flower, not a river. (flower = thing that flows, if you haven't come across that delightful construction before.)

ledge, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 14:46 (eight years ago) link

I have come across that so many times I usually think of it *before* I think of an actual flower.

emil.y, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 14:52 (eight years ago) link

Me too!

Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:14 (eight years ago) link

Detective wearing singlet on air got rattled (12)

Easy enough clue in today's Everyman, but one element I could see upsetting people (not me tho, I like stuff like that)

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Sunday, 31 May 2015 16:21 (eight years ago) link

grauniad going for the web developer audience: <span>Minister from cabinet </span><i>almost</i><span> right about several bits of information </span> (9)

ledge, Wednesday, 3 June 2015 12:11 (eight years ago) link

^ That confused me a lot because I thought your formatting error was part of the clue!

It's hardly obscure though? I'm far from a web developer and I got it, the computery bit of the clue is a p common word

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:39 (eight years ago) link

the tags were included in the clue as printed

Keith Moom (Neil S), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:41 (eight years ago) link

Oh haha

(They aren't on the app version)

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:43 (eight years ago) link

It almost sounds like John Connor and Kyle Reese avoid Sinatra's regrets (3,3,2,7)

ledge, Thursday, 4 June 2015 08:27 (eight years ago) link

don't get why the setter would want to italicize "almost" anyway

also "press" for cabinet is v obscure

anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Thursday, 4 June 2015 09:23 (eight years ago) link

xp I could give this a more contemporary spin:

It almost sounds like Mad Max and Immortan Joe avoid Sinatra's regrets (3,3,2,7)

ledge, Thursday, 4 June 2015 16:23 (eight years ago) link

c.mon, with the letter count it's a gimme

ledge, Friday, 5 June 2015 11:03 (eight years ago) link

too few to mention

but i don't get why. i recognise the terminator references and the mad max reference but...

i think last week's everyman is languishing in my bag with 0 (zero) clues done. 8(

koogs, Friday, 5 June 2015 11:12 (eight years ago) link

two future men shun?

would not have got there without letter count (also, while reconstructing the pun got stuck on "Menschen" for a while, and now I'm trying to think of a not completely tortuous context where that could work... afraid I didn't like the "future"/"few to" part so much)

undergraduate dance (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 5 June 2015 12:10 (eight years ago) link

two future men shun?

groans, tortuously constructed ♥️♥️♥️

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Friday, 5 June 2015 13:13 (eight years ago) link

afraid I didn't like the "future"/"few to" part so much

i'd certainly have been cursing the compiler if i'd seen in a real crossword. even with the 'almost'.

ledge, Friday, 5 June 2015 13:14 (eight years ago) link

^this post is a clue btw xp

sink marker (wins), Saturday, 6 June 2015 12:01 (eight years ago) link

aw

ledge, Saturday, 6 June 2015 19:19 (eight years ago) link

It was a cult AND a sincere post! thats why it's so clever.

sink marker (wins), Saturday, 6 June 2015 20:03 (eight years ago) link

*clue ffs

sink marker (wins), Saturday, 6 June 2015 20:03 (eight years ago) link

Two points in dog delight (7)

Made me laugh out loud on the train this morning.

Half as cool as Man Sized Action (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 14:04 (eight years ago) link

two weeks pass...

still working on it...

grauniand puzzle after lex's heart today, but i struggled.

ledge, Thursday, 2 July 2015 12:59 (eight years ago) link

yeah it's a toughie. Got the long anagram, scratching my head over the rest

Keith Moom (Neil S), Thursday, 2 July 2015 13:38 (eight years ago) link

Tuesday's Guardian had Eric Clapton as an anagram of Narcoleptic, which was pretty good.

mahb, Thursday, 2 July 2015 15:11 (eight years ago) link

So I finished the prize crossword yesterday, but I can't for the life of me parse this clue:

Guardian Prize crossword No 26,615, 18 Down: President might introduce ads to create trends or reach family men? (4)

I have the answer but don't see how "create trends" fits in? The clue would work without it, so it must mean something, but what?

the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Sunday, 5 July 2015 14:11 (eight years ago) link

I can't solve the clue but I think trends = fads

anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Sunday, 5 July 2015 18:25 (eight years ago) link

ok that makes no sense to me still. The answer is ford (for dads), I think you're right that fads fits in somehow but I can't make it work. Seems an overstuffed clue to me but maybe it all works lovely once you can see it idk

the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Monday, 6 July 2015 08:46 (eight years ago) link

ah then it's "might introduce ads to create trends" = F + OR + "[might introduce ads to] reach family men" = D

anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Monday, 6 July 2015 11:47 (eight years ago) link

Oh yeah lol

the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Monday, 6 July 2015 12:03 (eight years ago) link

Having no preference in bedroom, police enter here, finding killer in bed (9)

maybe cheeky, maybe offensive, who can say


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.