yesssssssss
― difficult listening hour, lundi 26 janvier 2015 21:42 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 26 January 2015 21:43 (nine years ago) link
Re: lumping series, I'm happy to go with whatever seems liek the popular option. Personally I'd say case-by-case and determined during the nominations.
Honestly don't see how lumping ~5-10 completely discrete games released over 30 years makes as much sense to you as ~20 games released annually with incremental changes, but if you wanna vote-split CM97 vs CM03 vs FM08 vs etc etc etc into oblivion I guess it's yr life.
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Monday, 26 January 2015 21:47 (nine years ago) link
Like, a non-franchise poll would be cool. Nothing that has more than maybe one sequel or spin-off.
― Ronald Raisins (Old Lunch), Monday, 26 January 2015 21:50 (nine years ago) link
I mean, we all know that everybody likes Mario and stealing cars in various cities.
― Ronald Raisins (Old Lunch), Monday, 26 January 2015 21:51 (nine years ago) link
I think by decade would be better.
Also, I'd love to see a mobile games poll. Thinking just iOS/Android/etc.
― Jeff, Monday, 26 January 2015 22:05 (nine years ago) link
I'd be willing to drive this one i think
― Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Monday, 26 January 2015 23:04 (nine years ago) link
maybe put it on ILE for maximum exposure
― Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Monday, 26 January 2015 23:05 (nine years ago) link
i think this thread is on ile, and yeah i def agree -- the more the merrier with the big ones!
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Monday, 26 January 2015 23:10 (nine years ago) link
Decades is a pretty interesting idea. Wonder if making several separate ballots would intimidate some people out of playing along, or alternately encourage participation in certain decades by people who otherwise wouldn't bother.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 26 January 2015 23:36 (nine years ago) link
Decades seems like a weird way to split it, at least to me. I kinda prefer generations? (I did a PS2 poll some time ago, I should've included Xbox...)
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Monday, 26 January 2015 23:38 (nine years ago) link
generations is ideal for console games i think
― difficult listening hour, Monday, 26 January 2015 23:51 (nine years ago) link
(but)
This was a really bizarre list. No fighting games either, which is kind of understandable because they usually tend to blur into series rather than stand on their own.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 00:36 (nine years ago) link
Everyone thought someone else was going to burn their one '90s pick on Street Fighter II, but it turned out there were a lot of good games made in the 1990s.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 00:50 (nine years ago) link
Symphony of the Night for one.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 00:56 (nine years ago) link
somebody start a nomination thread for video games of the 80's plz
― Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 01:25 (nine years ago) link
I still like generations -- question is, would we start at 1? 2? (3 is where everyone's a renaissance person i think, probably a lot more response on best NES vs best Atari 2600)
(and all 80s = good luck atari 2600)
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 05:35 (nine years ago) link
How do arcade and personal computer games fit in though?
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 06:34 (nine years ago) link
i reckon i might well be the biggest Football Manager saddo left on this board and no fucken way am i distinguishing one year from another, bundle or die imo
― No Orchids for Ms. Blonde-ish (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 07:08 (nine years ago) link
also if we do this again maybe my ballot won't get disappeared
― No Orchids for Ms. Blonde-ish (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 07:09 (nine years ago) link
is ILX still british enough for lords of midnight to place
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 08:39 (nine years ago) link
important questions 2015
The handhelds hold roughly similar generations as well (DS vs PSP, 3DS vs Vita). The problem of course is that the PC doesn't really care - so where does a game released before the last PS3 title but after the first PS4 count? And that's not counting staggered console release dates.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 11:41 (nine years ago) link
Hmm maybe decades is just the best way to do it then. Until '89, 90-99, 00-09?
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 15:39 (nine years ago) link
or make best-computer-games its own category? 1/2gen, 3,gen, 4gen, ... & computer games
I like mixing everything together but I'll go with whatever
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 15:43 (nine years ago) link
I understand that this would probably be a totally separate thing, but it'd also be cool to see a poll by genre.
― Ronald Raisins (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 15:53 (nine years ago) link
I really see no reason to segregate computer games off in their own space, just reduces turnout in every poll as people may not feel they have enough of a stake to throw in on any given individual poll. Plus, a lot of work for the poll-runner etc.
If they need to be broken down, decades makes more sense - you'll catch people who were gaming a lot at a certain moment in time, regardless of how they split their time between arcade/console/computers. Plus, then the results feel more like a comparison among peers, which could be more interesting - - - ranking Zelda vs. Mario 3 is meaningful in a way that ranking Asteroids vs. Half-Life 2 might not be.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 16:41 (nine years ago) link
however we do it can we have a lot of votes on our ballots? esp for games i'm gonna be bummed if i only get like 25 spots.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 17:53 (nine years ago) link
just throw everything together, if the kids can't deal with the fact that games were better back in my day then fuck em
― No Orchids for Ms. Blonde-ish (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 07:15 (nine years ago) link
This was a really bizarre list. No fighting games either, which is kind of understandable because they usually tend to blur into series rather than stand on their own.― Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, January 26, 2015 7:36 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkEveryone thought someone else was going to burn their one '90s pick on Street Fighter II, but it turned out there were a lot of good games made in the 1990s.― Doctor Casino, Monday, January 26, 2015 7:50 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, January 26, 2015 7:36 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Monday, January 26, 2015 7:50 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Unforgivable!
― Nhex, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 17:06 (nine years ago) link
No offense to Rygar, but there is no way it would have made it on my ballot had Street Fighter 2, any Sim City, DOOM, or Ms. Pac-Man been available.
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:02 (nine years ago) link
for kicks heres another thing we did
ILX TOP PS2 GAMES POLL RESULTS (116 - 86)ILX TOP PS2 GAMES POLL RESULTS (85-51)ILX TOP PS2 GAMES POLL RESULTS (48-21)ILX TOP PS2 GAMES POLL RESULTS (20-1)
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:31 (nine years ago) link
I love that it went :
100-7. other games6. Team Ico game5. Katamari game4. GTA game3. GTA game2. Katamari game1. Team Ico game
And their combined scores wouldve been3. GTA games, 280 (incl. gta3)2. Katamari games, 2941. Team Ico games, 303
yr hivemind @ work
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:35 (nine years ago) link
old hivemind though tbh, i dunno if overwhelming lasting love for GTA, Katamari or Team Ico still exists universally on this board
― Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:36 (nine years ago) link
hmm maybe, in the context of ps2 i can't imagine they'd move far from the top...
― shit's obviously artisanal (Will M.), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:41 (nine years ago) link
dang it yall, i am seriously considering running an X360+PS3+Wii "seventh generation" ILX poll just so i can think more and talk more about mgs4. i'm reviving this thread because the conversation kinda died, but i like games and rankings and shit.
i'm also into running previous gens polls too...6: ps2/xbox/dreamcast/gamecube, even though we did ps2 already it'd be worth a redo including the xbox and gc and especially the DC5: ps1/n64/saturn/jaguar?/3do?4: snes/genesis/neo geo/tg16 (this one would be v popular... did we ever do this?)3: nes/master system/7800?
the original issue with the generation method is that it became murky when to include PC games. easy fix: no pc games. we could do a separate thing for pc games at some point.
an october rollout for one of these would be pretty fun, what is up ILX can we do it?!
― Bouncy Castlevania (Will M.), Friday, 7 August 2015 20:20 (eight years ago) link
Sure thing, tho some of it will be odd voting patterns: Had a PS2, never touched an XBOX, so my voting will be heavily skewed. Less of a problem with later generations of course.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 August 2015 21:41 (eight years ago) link
I would be down, for sure. I only opted in to the 7th gen when I bought a PS3 early last year and I've been binging ever since.
― Off Pudding (Old Lunch), Friday, 7 August 2015 21:51 (eight years ago) link
i'm game for this shit even tho i've only had a PS3 for a couple of months, i feel the need to get aggro about under-rated Wii games i have loved
― the lion tweets tonight (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 August 2015 22:29 (eight years ago) link
It might get me all nostalgic about playing videogames, which is a thing I don't do anymore, but I'm in. 7th gen probably the peak of my gaming career, which tempts me towards the indefensible thesis that it was the ne plus ultra of videogaming, period.
― ledge, Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:22 (eight years ago) link
yes
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:23 (eight years ago) link
to the poll. real games don't come in "gens" obv
</pcmorbz>
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:24 (eight years ago) link
anyway this will rule i will post about bully and sm64
i can take on the pc thing later actually if no one else wants! eventually, whenever.
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:26 (eight years ago) link
i know sm64 is not seventh gen but i will probably talk about it anyway.
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:28 (eight years ago) link
there are literally no good games after the ps2
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:28 (eight years ago) link
Real music doesn't come on decades, but, y'know, it's a handy device.
― ledge, Saturday, 8 August 2015 07:34 (eight years ago) link
this will rule
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 8 August 2015 08:14 (eight years ago) link
I think I might start w/ third generation, because A) moving fwd chronologically, B) hitting those nostalgia spots early, C) by the time I get to seventh generation it's more fully "complete" (i mean there are still games coming out for these consoles rn, they're just usually inferior ports of 8g games).
cool?
― Bouncy Castlevania (Will M.), Saturday, 8 August 2015 18:35 (eight years ago) link