LCD Soundsystem - "Losing My Edge"

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (199 of them)

...also no need to capitalise Daft Punk, i dont think.

― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 04:34 (9 years ago) Permalink

YOu know, it never occurred to me that he didn't actually mean the band Daft Punk!! But it makes sense, (chrono)logically. I assumed it was a meta-reference the disco punk thing, ie playing disco to punk kids

― Sonny A. (Keiko), Sunday, 11 January 2004 04:42 (9 years ago) Permalink

I'm not gonna kiss you, Mr. Snrub, but y'all done good.

"I'm losing myself"

― Barima (Barima), Sunday, 11 January 2004 13:02 (9 years ago) Permalink

I think you're right. Daft Punk sure as hell never got big in America by being played at CBGB's. Do they even play that kind of music at CBGB's?? I wouldn't know, I've never been there.

Same with the M|A|R|R|S/Mars deal. It's definitely the latter, because a lot of the other bands he mentions (Pere Ubu, PIL, Lou Reed) are post-punky, not house.

― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 11 January 2004 17:04 (9 years ago) Permalink

Plus theres an LCD track called (or known as) "Daft Punk Are Playing at My House" and he sure aint talkin about the frenchband.

― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 17:14 (9 years ago) Permalink

sorry
"Daft Punk IS Playing IN My House"

― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 17:16 (9 years ago) Permalink

I don't get it. why would he use the name Daft Punk if he wasn't referring to the band?

― Elliot (Elliot), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:07 (9 years ago) Permalink

it's gotta be the band!

― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:08 (9 years ago) Permalink

I mean "playing daft punk to the rock kids"--why would that be unusual unless it was the band daft punk?

― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:08 (9 years ago) Permalink

I know!

― Elliot (Elliot), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:09 (9 years ago) Permalink

totally!

― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:10 (9 years ago) Permalink

Is it a slow day up north there?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:14 (9 years ago) Permalink

you have no idea, brah

― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:15 (9 years ago) Permalink

Well, take off, eh?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:15 (9 years ago) Permalink

Plus theres an LCD track called (or known as) "Daft Punk Are Playing at My House"

And WHY have I never heard of it before now!?!?!??!

― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 11 January 2004 18:39 (9 years ago) Permalink

it's never been released but you can find it online - if you can't just let me know.

― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 19:23 (9 years ago) Permalink

it might be called Bitchfight.

― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 19:32 (9 years ago) Permalink

He's talking about the band Daft Punk.

― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 11 January 2004 19:38 (9 years ago) Permalink

Of course he's fucking talking about Daft Punk the band! Even if he wasn't he'd have to have never heard of them to include it as a lyric.

Isn't Laurent Garnier in the lyric to Losing My Edge somewhere?

― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 11 January 2004 19:43 (9 years ago) Permalink

Maybe he was talking about the Melody Maker review of the band Darlin' which called them 'daft punk' which led to the ex-members calling their new band that which etc.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 11 January 2004 19:58 (9 years ago) Permalink

hahahhah

― Elliot (Elliot), Sunday, 11 January 2004 20:14 (9 years ago) Permalink

this is a design company. pretty funny: http://www.associatesinscience.com/

― JaXoN (JasonD), Sunday, 11 January 2004 20:19 (9 years ago) Permalink

jesus, that almost blew up my speakers. anyone else get a weird low sub-bass hum when they went to that site?

― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 11 January 2004 20:21 (9 years ago) Permalink

wifey freaked out when it was on. told me to mute the computer or she'd mute my face

― JaXoN (JasonD), Sunday, 11 January 2004 20:25 (9 years ago) Permalink

I'm sitting here with my pro studio monitors and computer running through a pro interface and everything, really clear and loud, and my teeth were shaking. And it stayed on even if you clicked on one of the videos. weird.

― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 11 January 2004 20:30 (9 years ago) Permalink

i think the last line is actually "we all know what you really want."
and he is referring to daft punk the band in the other song - it's a what-if kind of scenario about a kid who saved up enough $ to get them over to play his house party in the suburbs.

― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 11 January 2004 21:17 (9 years ago) Permalink

I was that guy. Or at least I can sympathise.

― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 11 January 2004 21:24 (9 years ago) Permalink

I heard you have a vinyl of every Niagra record on German import.

like this one here, on ebay right now!!

― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 16 January 2004 04:54 (9 years ago) Permalink

1 year passes...

I've been reading William Empson, and the idea of 'daft punk' *not* meaning Daft Punk on 'Losing My Edge' is genius.

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:55 (8 years ago) Permalink

uh?

― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 17 February 2005 10:29 (8 years ago) Permalink

it's a case of empson's second variety of ambiguity, where the ambiguity is resolved eventually. playing 'daft punk' to rock kids at cbgbs in the context of the song could just mean playing the ramones in 1975. but it could also mean playing daft punk at some point in the late 90s. both things being epochal. the eventual resolution is, i guess, that we know that murphy intended the 'ambiguity', it's a case of 'clever wording, cheers'.

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 10:34 (8 years ago) Permalink

so not really 'genius' then? (sorry i just get so irked by the over-use of that term)

― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 17 February 2005 10:37 (8 years ago) Permalink

no, it's not really genius. it's not even scenius.

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 10:41 (8 years ago) Permalink

What ambiguity

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:51 (8 years ago) Permalink

How would the Ramones be a "daft" variation on orthodox punk in '75

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:55 (8 years ago) Permalink

they were daft. and punk. not unorthodox. no-one said they were an unorthodox variation on punk. but they were dafter than television. and punk is a bit daft.

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:00 (8 years ago) Permalink

Yeah it WOULD be pretty crazy to play a Ramones rec at CBGBs in 75

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:16 (8 years ago) Permalink

um, no-one said it was 'crazy' either. the lyrics are about being in on the ground floor of canonic musical scenes. not about being crazy, unorthodox, or daft. (you could say '1974' instead of 1975 i suppose, being pedantic.)

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:22 (8 years ago) Permalink

This song has one of my fav recent lyrics (actually fuck "one of", it's about the only one that's really got me at all, they're mostly not my thing), and it revolves around EXACTNESS. All the right references, an exact history of the narrator's experiences and credentials as a hipster. Ambiguity doesn't come into it. In fact, ambiguity contradicts its nature and fucks any worth it has. xpost Henry have you HEARD or READ the lyric?

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:22 (8 years ago) Permalink

"I was the first guy playing Daft Punk to the rock kids.
I played it at CBGBs.
Everybody thought I was crazy."

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:23 (8 years ago) Permalink

shit, this is true. i was finding the idea of thinking he didn't mean Daft Punk funny, as per comments upthread. anything can be ambiguous, of course, but i guess for me the ambiguity was pitched up by my image of cbgbs in the era of Daft Punk as a ridiculous punk-tourist trap as related by people who've visited (may be a false conception). this would make playing DP 'crazy' because the people who go are indeed dyed-in-the-wool rock fans (why would playing daft punk to regular rock fans seem crazy? it certainly wasn't considered crazy in england). but playing cbgbs (again according to my idea of what it is these days) would be very far from the edge in 1997-2002. the only time (again, in my mind) that cbgbs was hipster was in the 70s.

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:33 (8 years ago) Permalink

Well see yr image of the lyric seems like exactly what I took it to mean. Playing CBGBs in the late 90s isn't edgy, but going there and playing the new sounds of the electronica (yeah yuck) "takeover" to a bunch of punk fetishists would be, I think. As you more or less said. Also going by the rest of the song I think we can take it for granted the narrator was around for the venue in the 70s, right?

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:40 (8 years ago) Permalink

it's the w'burg 'sympathy for the devil' ((C) everybode, 2002)

― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:42 (8 years ago) Permalink

"I was the first guy playing Daft Punk to the rock kids.
I played it at CBGBs.
Everybody thought I was crazy."

Bloody hell! When you write it down like that, it's almost like Wesley Willis lyrics.

― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:28 (8 years ago) Permalink

The song is obviously about TIME TRAVEL, duh.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:10 (8 years ago) Permalink

The melody is lifted from Killing Joke's "Change," by the way. FACT!

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 18 February 2005 03:18 (8 years ago) Permalink

What melody?

― Speedhump Bungle (noodle vague), Friday, 18 February 2005 03:21 (8 years ago) Permalink

FACT!

― W i l l (common_person), Friday, 18 February 2005 03:48 (8 years ago) Permalink

THE HOOK! FACT!

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 18 February 2005 03:54 (8 years ago) Permalink

I'm as minimalist as anybody, but it's essentially just talking over an 808 pattern isn't it? NB This is a good thing.

― Speedhump Bungle (noodle vague), Friday, 18 February 2005 03:56 (8 years ago) Permalink

Skipping 99 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.