Clusterfuck Summary Corner

NRO called her a child molester

^^ that, and she treats her sister like a prop in stories

oh like sarah silverman then!

*flees*

lol sarah silverman is many x better than lena dunham obv imo

guess there had to be a fuss tho

aiyi, there are grandmaster Star Wars nerdlingers among us

this is true

come to the dark side we have bacon etc

so tragic, i cannot mock.

otmfm

just fucking tell me then

every time i open that thread it just seems stupid and incomprehensible and shit and everyone is shouting

10 more posts + deej gets a job for kotaku

we're determining the future of american media

way too much time on ilx

deej defended the gawker dudes while we all forgot about our own deaths for awhile. it was nice, though steve jobs would have hated it.

for real though what happened, I can't bother to look into it myself

we said it was kind of shitty for gawker to call a woman a "horny mom" two paragraphs after describing her rape. deej called us idealistic simpletons who know nothing of the hard compromises one makes in the real world of clickbait creation

oh good, we're doing this here as well now

this shit is clusterfuck kindling. Can't just leave it around.

http://i.imgur.com/orCBG6h.jpg

ctrl+f "fucking" shows nothing on SNA, "tell me" shows one post on Thrill Kill K-K-Kult thread. surely LJ could have read the one post?

whoops, two posts. I guess deej crammed a lot into them though

Thread got weird today

Which one?

we said it was kind of shitty for gawker to call a woman a "horny mom" two paragraphs after describing her rape. deej called us idealistic simpletons who know nothing of the hard compromises one makes in the real world of clickbait creation

― Is It Any Wonder I'm Not the (President Keyes), Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:28 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you're a dumb piece of shit too

jjjusten swooped in to suggest that a lazily written piece of clickbait was actually a malicious attempt to make LOLZ out of a story that included rape

i suggested it was just lazily written clickbait copied from another source bc thats how those things tend to work, rather than an intentionally trumped up story

bc jjjusten, croupier, sufjan et al couldn't get people from gawker to respond and i'd made an argument that was close enough to 'defending' gawker and the news story they'd written, they started accusing me of saying a bunch of shit i didn't say, followed by calling me stupid over& over

then it calmed down for a bit and someone posted choire sicha's times editorial suggesting the internet shame book out soon might just be misrepresenting the real problem with social media which is the much more prevalent examples of social media harassing women

i concurred with sicha's article

jjjusten, either because he kneejerk disagrees with everything i say or because he's a probable sexist, called me stupid again restarting an argument

in order to move to a safer subject where he wasn't defending an obviously-stupid book, he quickly backslid to accusing me of defending the 'horny mom story'

and so we're back at the beginning

actual summary-- remember the dog/train thing? this is like a dumber sequel

whats the dog/train thing? link plz

d-40 appears to be trying to communicate and everyone else is doing some joe scarborough bit or something

(summary)

or w/e fill in the blank idiot tv talking head

D-40 appears to be trying not to read this post:

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7066236

huff post article doesn't refer to her as the Horny Mom

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/130626214051-pmt-crossfire-returns-to-discuss-scotus-prop-8-doma-00002816-horizontal-gallery.jpg

But she was a horny mom

Crossfire coming back to TV O_O

lol lady on the right giving newt the look

Looool

we said it was kind of shitty for gawker to call a woman a "horny mom" two paragraphs after describing her rape.

i suggested it was just lazily written clickbait copied from another source

huff post article doesn't refer to her as the Horny Mom

But she was a horny mom

he quickly backslid to accusing me of defending the 'horny mom story'

^my summary, soz for no imgs

It's defending the horny mom story to suggest that "horny mom" is an accurate description? Ok

No it's defending the decision to call a woman a "horny mom" two paragraphs after describing her rape

Which iirc was the original complaint, lemme check upthread

aw man, i was hoping we'd just assume there was no sarcasm in d-40's acceptance and move on

iirc the original discussion was whether or not gawker was actually trying to make a rape story into internet lols and the example used was "horny mom," that didn't strike me as "lols" so much as a pretty accurate description of the mom in the story, if not the most tasteful wording. I'm not defending clickbait trash articles, merely suggesting that this article wasn't a product of malicious lulz-quest as much as the usual clickbait aggregation all these places do

if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording
if not the most tasteful wording

She literally was a horny mom how is this a debate

have you ever been raped?

dude seriously. how are those words not intended to belittle and render facetious?

how can you be ignorant that that turn of phrase reeks of blaming the victim and perpetuating stereotypes?

unless you think that her rape was funny or no big deal

have you ever been raped?

― Mistah FAAB (sarahell), Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:44 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Have you read the story? The rape and the horniness are not being linked here, no one is trying to minimize that she was raped.