OPO, so what was the worst film you ever saw?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (879 of them)

For years my automatic answer to this was Natural Born Killers, which I hated while I was watching it and hated even more thinking about it afterward. But it's been a long time so I can't swear I'd still have the same reaction -- I'm just not in any hurry to find out.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 22 August 2014 03:42 (nine years ago) link

The Congress is pretty atrocious. That was the worst film I'd seen in a long time.

Frederik B, Friday, 22 August 2014 04:52 (nine years ago) link

recently watched some of the film adaptation of tropic of cancer w/ rip torn, its so bad nobody shd watch it

johnny crunch, Friday, 22 August 2014 04:57 (nine years ago) link

oh yeah god The Congress was not great, and there were so many things about it I really wanted to like

heck (silby), Friday, 22 August 2014 06:07 (nine years ago) link

In recent times I can't think of anything as terrible as Nymphomaniac, either of them as they are both insufferable garbage.

autumn reckoning faction (xelab), Friday, 22 August 2014 06:38 (nine years ago) link

God Help The Girl

sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Friday, 22 August 2014 08:06 (nine years ago) link

Haha I quite enjoyed the congress, in a southland tales kinda way

a spectrum is taunting ur OP (wins), Friday, 22 August 2014 09:50 (nine years ago) link

re: Natural Born Killers - Does this streak of naive, faux-subversive cinema encapsulated by the likes of Fight Club, NBK, the Matrix, American Beauty etc, still exist or was it just a nineties/early aughts thing? I'm trying to put my finger on it and it's sort of along the lines of 'wake up sheeple, you watch too much TV!'; adored by people in my age group at the time (16-18 year olds who listened to alt-rock and grunge) but whose politics and message, though well meaning, ultimately boiled down to superficiality, pretentiousness, often misogynistic ritual.

Scary Darey (dog latin), Friday, 22 August 2014 10:07 (nine years ago) link

alternatively tho isn't it exactly the superficial gateway material to more developed conceptual frameworks of counterculture etc that one would expect ppl of that age group to 'discover'? ie thus ever it was, these are just the examples of your generation.

either way fu matrix is awesome

nakh is the wintour of our diss content (darraghmac), Friday, 22 August 2014 10:13 (nine years ago) link

yes deems, agreed. it's only because i was reading this bit yesterday: http://www.vice.com/read/15-years-later-fight-club-still-sucks-its-the-reddit-of-movies which is all very well but kind of amounts to 'it was all very at the time but now it's aged badly and i'm older and wiser'. But I'm wondering if this kind of thing is still prevalent today or if it could be seen as a subgenre largely contained to its time.

Scary Darey (dog latin), Friday, 22 August 2014 10:23 (nine years ago) link

I hated those films at the time, too. Though I didn't quite put it in the "wake up, sheeple" corner, I put it in the "superficial film that thinks it's soooo clever" corner, with Usual Suspects, Seven, Memento etc. The wake up sheeple part is more objectionable, though, I agree.

emil.y, Friday, 22 August 2014 10:39 (nine years ago) link

The other thing is that all of the ones I've listed are perfectly watchable films, they're just... really really up themselves.

emil.y, Friday, 22 August 2014 10:40 (nine years ago) link

yeah, they're not not-fun movies, just unbearably pretentious, especially in retrospect. Usual Suspects was the worst for 'aha do you see?' despite it being obvious who the culprit was from the first fifteen minutes of the film. Did M Night Shayalaman put the final nail in the coffin for this kind of movie-making... Oh, oh I just remembered Equilibrium.

Scary Darey (dog latin), Friday, 22 August 2014 10:51 (nine years ago) link

Actually, the congress is bad in much the same way. It's just much much worse than anything from 99. 'Wake up sheeple' is kinda the whole plot.

Frederik B, Friday, 22 August 2014 15:03 (nine years ago) link

has to be boondock saints

marcos, Friday, 22 August 2014 15:16 (nine years ago) link

every christopher nolan movie

this is the correct answer

imago, Friday, 22 August 2014 15:33 (nine years ago) link

eurgh, Fight Club. Actually, more accurately, eurgh, people who are way too into Fight Club

heck (silby), Friday, 22 August 2014 16:21 (nine years ago) link

Thought there might be a mention of Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies: A Film Critic's Year-Long Quest to Find the Worst Movie Ever Made by Michael Adams. Anyone read this?

Sounds like an interesting book because he covers a huge variety and people say he finds quite a lot of good in a lot of them.

I just don't know how anyone has the patience to be a bad movie fan (which many of the reviewers of this book called themselves), in my experience the "so bad it's good" phenomenon is extremely rare. I can't think of any films I've enjoyed because they were bad.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:11 (nine years ago) link

I've seen this thread's question asked other times and like on this thread, the question usually gets interpreted as which film do you dislike the most or which film do you want to offend people by calling it the worst. Or the most ideologically toxic films.
I think finding the genuinely worst films is far more interesting.

Every time I hear someone say Titanic or Only God Forgives I'd like to strap them into a chair, clamp their eyes open and force them to watch the hundreds of b-movies, straight to video and tv films that make Chopper Chicks In Zombietown look like a divine work of art.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:37 (nine years ago) link

you're ignoring the crucial inputs of expectation and resources. like, Prometheus.

nakh is the wintour of our diss content (darraghmac), Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:47 (nine years ago) link

purposely looking for shit in b-movies is the boringest endeavor in the full range of human endeavors

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:51 (nine years ago) link

there have been a few late period Woody Allen films mentioned already, but I'd like to put a word in for Cassandra's Dream as the apotheosis of his autumn years cack-handedness

soref, Saturday, 23 August 2014 22:01 (nine years ago) link

I mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_jJJge2nPk

soref, Saturday, 23 August 2014 22:01 (nine years ago) link

Somehow some people delight in finding the most incompetent low budget trash; I would advise people against doing it because life is too short, but some will do it nonetheless and I'd like to see where it taken them.
But when this question is asked I'm genuinely interested in how bad it can get; not the films that were popular but disliked by many, particularly when it's disliked because one group loves it and the other gets angry from the overratedness. Feels like a boring cop-out.

I guess there is also the feeling that people who make obvious choices have never truly suffered enough. To be honest the worst films I've seen are probably the cream of the crappy crop, not even miles close to the worst.
Obviously there can never be an objective worst and some of the most incompetent films are appealingly strange, surreal and hypnotic to some people. Mystics Of Bali (never seen the whole of that either) has among the worst special effects I've seen but it's got imagination, gusto and freshness that makes it a preferable experience to most films, for me.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 23 August 2014 22:34 (nine years ago) link

The secret of so bad they're good is that bad and good are the same point on the circular arc of quality.

It's Autumn Sunrise (Eric H.), Saturday, 23 August 2014 23:06 (nine years ago) link

What films would you say were bad in a great way? Anything you would go as far to urge someone to see?

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 23 August 2014 23:19 (nine years ago) link

Man alive, that Cassandra's Dream clip.

Alba, Sunday, 24 August 2014 00:04 (nine years ago) link

I looked to see if there was an Cassandra's Dream ilx thread, and there seems to be a UK/US divide between people who thought it was the worst film ever made and people who thought it was OK to pretty good

Come Anticipate Woody Allen's "Cassandra's Dream"

soref, Sunday, 24 August 2014 00:14 (nine years ago) link

dreamcatcher
2012
american beauty

clouds, Sunday, 24 August 2014 00:17 (nine years ago) link

What films would you say were bad in a great way?

I dunno. Roughly half of my all-time favorite films are straight terrible.

It's Autumn Sunrise (Eric H.), Sunday, 24 August 2014 04:05 (nine years ago) link

straight terrible you say

imago, Sunday, 24 August 2014 08:02 (nine years ago) link

But when this question is asked I'm genuinely interested in how bad it can get; not the films that were popular but disliked by many, particularly when it's disliked because one group loves it and the other gets angry from the overratedness. Feels like a boring cop-out.

― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, August 23, 2014 3:34 PM (Yesterday)

the movies that truly earn worst-of-the-worst consideration aren't worth considering. especially when we exclude "appealingly strange, surreal and hypnotic" cult favorites like showgirls, glen or glenda and the visitor.

one of the worst films i've ever seen was a shot-on-video, redneck-themed horror flick called gutpile. wooden non-performances, impenatrable photographic murk, witless writing, cheap & unimaginative special effects: it's a complete failure on every imaginable level. there are hundreds of such films out there, especially in the horror genre. i've seen a bunch, fanmade zombie movies starring the director's family and school chums, backyard slashers lit with flashlights, boasting ketchup blood and cellphone image quality. the cult is so ravenous that just about anything feature-length can get distribution & attention. but there's nothing worth saying about most such films. they're lifeless.

where gutpile lies there stinking, hearbeeps is garbage on a mission. it's hard to imagine that something so mortifyingly wrong could have ever been imagined, much less financed (and made (and shown in theaters)). it's much more sophisticated and technically accomplished than gutpile, thus "better" on some quasi-objective level, and, crucially, its badness is never inert, the mere absence of worth. heartbeeps is staggeringly bad - but it's not as bad as gutpile. this gives it a reason to exist and gives us a reason to care about its badness, push it off on unsuspecting friends.

when it comes to film, "the worst" is rarely the actual worst-of-the-worst WORST. we usually mean the worst that's somehow notable, remarkable - the worst with some component of worth. heartbeeps and fight club both fill the bill, if in different ways. gutpile doesn't.

Adding ease. Adding wonder. Adding (contenderizer), Sunday, 24 August 2014 09:41 (nine years ago) link

I looked to see if there was an Cassandra's Dream ilx thread, and there seems to be a UK/US divide between people who thought it was the worst film ever made and people who thought it was OK to pretty good

I heard some Americans thought Match Point was pretty good too, but I've never met anyone British who likes it.

Alba, Sunday, 24 August 2014 10:30 (nine years ago) link

I remember being absolutely gobsmackingly appalled at the sheer awfulness and ineptness of Stephen Poliakoff's first film 'Hidden City', in the late 80s. It starred Charles Dance and Bill Patterson.

It's on youtube for those who want to punish themselves.

Comfrey Mugwort (Bob Six), Sunday, 24 August 2014 10:41 (nine years ago) link

I've probably seen about 800 new films in the past decade and the three that stand out in my mind as the worst are Trust The Man, Mr Brooks and Zack and Miri Make a Porno. I think the last one takes it.

Alba, Sunday, 24 August 2014 12:13 (nine years ago) link

Blue Jasmine def the worst prestige film I saw last year.

guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 24 August 2014 13:00 (nine years ago) link

Boxing Helena

BlackIronPrison, Sunday, 24 August 2014 13:06 (nine years ago) link

Obviously there can never be an objective worst and some of the most incompetent films are appealingly strange, surreal and hypnotic to some people. Mystics Of Bali (never seen the whole of that either) has among the worst special effects I've seen but it's got imagination, gusto and freshness that makes it a preferable experience to most films, for me.

― Robert Adam Gilmour

Not sure how you can say these things and yet claim not to understand "so bad its good". I mean, I think that's a misnomer in a lot of cases, so I suppose I understand on one level. "Strange", "surreal", "hypnotic", "imaginative", "fresh", these things, along with "hilarious", "novel", "outlandish" and the like, they're all perfectly valid reasons to like a film, just as valid as technical brilliance or excellent writing or impeccable acting.

As I said upthread a year ago, my worst of the worst is a trash film not a mainstream one. But I genuinely think Titanic is a bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad film. The acting, the music, the tediousness, the hatred I feel for everyone and everything involved in it. Just awful.

emil.y, Sunday, 24 August 2014 13:15 (nine years ago) link

but it's about true love

guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 24 August 2014 13:17 (nine years ago) link

I don't think the ineptness is much of what is good about the clips of Mystics In Bali that I've seen. The energy of the screaming old witch, the grotesque elements and the setting seem to me to come from actual care and effort.

I don't like Titanic but I never really smelt an unbearable stench from it.

Contenderizer- I think there are incompetent films among Gutpile that are notable for awfulness aside from the technical side. I probably should have emphasized this more above but those Bela Lugosi films could never be as bad as Little Man because the latter has a stench of a repulsive mind set of a sort you won't find in a major film of recent decades.
2001 Maniacs and Zombie Women Of Satan are both banal and offensive in a way I've never seen in Oscar type films. It's the arrogance and smugness of the wallowing stupidity, the lowbrow repulsiveness that is more than just incompetence.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:12 (nine years ago) link

It's the repulsion you get from seeing comics about celebrities being brutally raped by disgusting racial caricatures. Where the misogyny, racism, stupidity and aggression is like a suffocating fog.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:17 (nine years ago) link

what dreams may come is terrible, like a kitsch bulimia.

nauru, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:26 (nine years ago) link

too…late?

imago, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:27 (nine years ago) link

I've always wanted to see What Dreams May Come. Just for the pretty stuff.

BEWARE! This is a clip from Little Man, you'll probably regret watching this if you do. This is real stench. Not sentimental mawkish popular crap. REAL STENCH.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaS0v3_bQdg

Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:40 (nine years ago) link

the worst movie I watched expecting to love it & expecting *good art* was probably punch-drunk love

if pta ruins pynchon then he really will be dead to me

imago, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:44 (nine years ago) link

i mean i've given the bastard enough chances

imago, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:44 (nine years ago) link

What did you dislike about Punch-Drunk Love?

Alba, Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:54 (nine years ago) link

slow boring obvious Sandler impossible to watch

nakh is the wintour of our diss content (darraghmac), Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:59 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.