Feminist Theory & "Women's Issues" Discussion Thread: All Gender Identities Are Encouraged To Participate

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1938 of them)

why are a bunch of dudes discussing the offensiveness of another dude's word choice re disabled people on the feminism and wymen's thread?

sarahell, Friday, 18 July 2014 23:40 (nine years ago) link

also in the us an affectation like 'arseholes' has classist connotations i'm guessing you'd want to avoid. you're kinda giving off a rick santelli vibe. is that yr intention?

balls, Friday, 18 July 2014 23:40 (nine years ago) link

Stay classy, balls

, Friday, 18 July 2014 23:45 (nine years ago) link

why are a bunch of dudes discussing the offensiveness of another dude's word choice re disabled people on the feminism and wymen's thread?

Won't argue with that and unreservedly apologise for that. But fuck the rest of these arseholes.

xelab, Friday, 18 July 2014 23:46 (nine years ago) link

be the change you want to see in the world xelab.

balls, Friday, 18 July 2014 23:48 (nine years ago) link

i think it's only fair that we now fill the weird al thread with 150 posts about feminism

relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Saturday, 19 July 2014 01:03 (nine years ago) link

ugh, i really did not intend to drag the whole weird al discussion here. i had a tangential thought that there is a gendered dynamic to the downward-punching, derisive sense of humor. while i dont think men are the exclusive practitioners of this style of humor, it is male-dominated.

and up here there is a style of "he couldnt be ____ist because he is a decent guy, its just a joke lighten up" reputation defense that...i dont know if its a male thing especially, but i see it used more for men in male-dominated spaces.

it's not a fedora, it's a trill bae (m bison), Saturday, 19 July 2014 02:03 (nine years ago) link

That's like if one country decided to use the word "orange" as a slur for some minority and then insisted that everywhere and anywhere all uses of the word to refer to the fruit or the color were actually derogatory slurs.

hi

blap setter (darraghmac), Saturday, 19 July 2014 08:34 (nine years ago) link

decent discussion IMO I find myself in the unfamiliar but not unwelcome position of agreeing with my mayne dayo to a large extent but maybe only cos spastic is p obviously a word not to use, being derogatorily descriptive of certain physical failings by comparing them to ppl with shit medical conditions.

but I would be interested to hear what, exactly,yanks think it means. if that's been explained elsewhere in all this soz I'm a lil drunk

blap setter (darraghmac), Saturday, 19 July 2014 08:41 (nine years ago) link

It's not just 'spastic', iirc there's a US series called 'the mentalist'

kinder, Saturday, 19 July 2014 09:08 (nine years ago) link

jesus , the monsters

blap setter (darraghmac), Saturday, 19 July 2014 09:10 (nine years ago) link

#accidentalpartridge

kinder, Saturday, 19 July 2014 09:14 (nine years ago) link

I was in local place called YPAT earlier, it is a local authority clubhouse for young people with a wide range of disabilities. For many of them that attend it is the only social interaction they experience other than school and family. I'd imagine even some of the hard-headed zingy types on here would be humbled and revising their attitude towards disablist words if they even spent 10 minutes there.

Sorry about the thread hijacking, last post.

xelab, Saturday, 19 July 2014 12:30 (nine years ago) link

why are a bunch of dudes discussing the offensiveness of another dude's word choice re disabled people on the feminism and wymen's thread?

― sarahell, Friday, July 18, 2014 11:40 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

intersectionALity

when you call my name it's like a prickly pear (Crabbits), Saturday, 19 July 2014 15:08 (nine years ago) link

HAHAHAHAHAH!

sarahell, Saturday, 19 July 2014 15:53 (nine years ago) link

perfect

sleeve, Saturday, 19 July 2014 15:56 (nine years ago) link

all this has convinced me to stop insulting people with words that refer to different physical / mental conditions fwiw

mattresslessness, Saturday, 19 July 2014 16:31 (nine years ago) link

including 'idiot', 'stupid' and 'dumb'. still think it's ok to say someone is dull or thick-headed, thank god.

mattresslessness, Saturday, 19 July 2014 16:35 (nine years ago) link

Is dimbulb still safe, do you think? What about nudnik?

how's life, Saturday, 19 July 2014 16:39 (nine years ago) link

terms of contempt (all-purpose, non-bigotted)

how's life, Saturday, 19 July 2014 16:40 (nine years ago) link

Also "lame" xps

just1n3, Saturday, 19 July 2014 20:52 (nine years ago) link

How's about fucking Über-Schmoozer, how's life? All this "political correctness gone mad" vehemence is complete shit. I am sticking up for people here who often don't have ability to fight back and I don't really care if I sound like a loon. I am the only able bodied person in my household, my partner has some rare form of leukodystrophy/MS and my son is on the non-verbal side of the autism spectrum. I can't really approach this from any than other vantage other than fuck people who are always arguing for their right to use reductive insults against disabled people. Anyone who who thinks words are harmless is talking garbage and has no appreciation of the insidious, attritional effect they have on vulnerable people, often without the ability to fight back.

Sorry again feminist clique I promise I won't post on here again.

xelab, Saturday, 19 July 2014 20:53 (nine years ago) link

arguing for their right to use reductive insults against disabled people - nobody is doing this

Anyone who who thinks words are harmless is talking garbage and has no appreciation of the insidious, attritional effect they have on vulnerable people, often without the ability to fight back. - you are describing nobody on this thread

balls, Saturday, 19 July 2014 20:56 (nine years ago) link

Damn dude let it go

, Saturday, 19 July 2014 21:47 (nine years ago) link

yeah none of this actually matters anyway

balls, Saturday, 19 July 2014 21:56 (nine years ago) link

stop talking, bollocks m8

ogmor, Saturday, 19 July 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link

My daughter has the opposite affliction from spastic disorder (hypertonia). Instead she is seriously hypotonic. I suppose it was a bit of good luck for her that 'hypotonic' has no cachet as a playground insult.

As for her opinion of 'retard' as an insult (nb: her IQ cannot be measured by any existing test and thus is officially set at 60) I think I know her well enough to be sure she would have nothing but contempt for those who bandy it about. Unfortunately she can't speak or sign and therefore cannot share that opinion explicitly.

frog latin (Aimless), Sunday, 20 July 2014 00:40 (nine years ago) link

<3 all dealing with rrealitiesof referenced conditions

but in awe of subset of above realising/allowing for everyday human piggybacking of terms little understood/appreciated nonetheless referenced for everyday effect

blap setter (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 July 2014 01:38 (nine years ago) link

two weeks pass...

Might anyone be able to recommend a gd introduction to 3rd-wave / intersectional stuff for my grandmother (age 88)? It needs to be something reasonably light (she's in pain so finds it hard to read super academic stuff, though she used to a lot) and not get too into technological stuff (no internet etc) but she's keen on knowing more and asked me to find something.

Gravel Puzzleworth, Friday, 8 August 2014 10:20 (nine years ago) link

xp not sure how much it ticks the boxes but Nina Power's One Dimensional Woman is good.

Merdeyeux, Friday, 8 August 2014 16:16 (nine years ago) link

as a v readable take on the state of feminism today

Merdeyeux, Friday, 8 August 2014 16:18 (nine years ago) link

I just recommend bell hooks' Feminism is for Everybody for everything. Very easy read but not light on substance.

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Friday, 8 August 2014 16:20 (nine years ago) link

one dimensional woman is a good call, v short!

ogmor, Friday, 8 August 2014 17:28 (nine years ago) link

Nina Power's book would fit the bill

cardamon, Sunday, 10 August 2014 22:46 (nine years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/04/men-are-harassed-more-than-women-online.html

Quite interesting. Title had me wary but it's good.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 15 September 2014 20:15 (nine years ago) link

"Demos categorised tweets as offensive if they contained 1 or more of the abusive words included in Google's search language filter"

An offensive tweet according to that list of words: "ah balls, pisses me off when that happens too, sorry mate"
Not an offensive tweet according to that list: "(your address here) I know where you live and you don't deserve to. I'm gonna rape you and kill you tonight"

or, for someone smarter than me but with a pretty offputting URL: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamonds/2014/09/07/are-men-really-harassed-more-than-women/

club mate martyr (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 15 September 2014 21:50 (nine years ago) link

yeah I don't need to follow links to know that the only way that could be "true" is through selective manipulation of data

sleeve, Monday, 15 September 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link

Yet we bolster the same stereotypes when we focus on nasty things said to women while trivializing threats against men even though men are much more likely to be victims of violence by strangers.

this is brilliantly obtuse

Daphnis Celesta, Monday, 15 September 2014 22:15 (nine years ago) link

Was just going to post the same complaint about the Demos study. And that's probably the most potentially-substantive piece of evidence in the whole article. It's a bunch of dubious claims, dubiously strung together, in a way guaranteed to give ammunition to misogynists looking to downplay online harassment of women and portray them as deluded and irrational.

JRN, Monday, 15 September 2014 22:17 (nine years ago) link

Yes, that Freethought article is a good takedown

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 15 September 2014 22:57 (nine years ago) link

https://zapp.trakt.us/images/episodes/957-3-2.jpg

Daphnis Celesta, Monday, 15 September 2014 22:58 (nine years ago) link

I know.

The first article was interesting to me mainly because of the various controversies referenced that I was previously unaware of. I realised just as I posted that what I had written sounded like an endorsement of those views and I knew I'd probably regret it.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 15 September 2014 23:06 (nine years ago) link

And also knew that my response to the second article would make me look an embarrasing clown, no way of avoiding it.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 00:06 (nine years ago) link

lol demos still exists

intelligent, expressive males within the greater metropolitan (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:18 (nine years ago) link

i think i finally 'get' shanley on twitter. she's basically a feminist ethan with more work ethic. really starting to enjoy some of her protracted 'performance' tweetstorms.

everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Monday, 22 September 2014 03:42 (nine years ago) link

hahahahahahhahahahahahaha

max, Monday, 22 September 2014 14:34 (nine years ago) link

well put

max, Monday, 22 September 2014 14:34 (nine years ago) link

it's cool, they're armed

the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 18:16 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.