As is, very near the top.
― Zed Szetlian (Finn MacCool), Sunday, 8 May 2005 19:41 (eighteen years ago) link
Those are easily the best songs on "Sunflower".
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 8 May 2005 19:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― RS_LaRue (RSLaRue), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link
SNAP! Fucking Aussies.
― giboyeux (skowly), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:47 (eighteen years ago) link
I thought it was a gunshot when I heard the sound ("Brian Wilson's finally lost it!")
― giboyeux (skowly), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amon (eman), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― edd s hurt (ddduncan), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:33 (eighteen years ago) link
-- Zed Szetlian (Finn.MacCoo...), May 8th, 2005.
I don't think it's a rock-and-roll album at all. I realize you may just be using the term as a catch-all, but I do think (in light of the recently resuscitated Rockism discussion) that there's a tendency for people who primarily like rock and roll to find this one "ok to like" because it gets grouped with rock. But to me it bears more similarity to elaborately arranged pop music, like maybe Roy Orbison.
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 9 May 2005 00:22 (eighteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 9 May 2005 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link
I've been listening to it on repeat for the last few days and one thing that's struck me is that 'I'm Waiting For The Day' is the album's unheralded masterpiece. Does anyone else agree?
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 8 July 2005 11:46 (eighteen years ago) link
and i agree on the strange demand the record makes for singing along...with lots of people...all mangling the various harmonies..especially after a few drinks. such a wonderful place.
i love Brians fluttertone rhythms used throughout and taken even further on smile
― b b, Friday, 8 July 2005 13:09 (eighteen years ago) link
I'm not sure if I will believe that tomorrow though...
― PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie), Friday, 8 July 2005 15:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 July 2005 15:58 (eighteen years ago) link
I was hoping you said Rock Cannon.. as in an AC/DC prop or something.
"FOR THOSE ABOUT TO PET...."
"SOUNDS!" *BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAST*
"BRIIIIIIIAN WIIIIIIIIIIIILSON!"
― donut e- (donut), Friday, 8 July 2005 16:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 July 2005 16:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― donut e- (donut), Friday, 8 July 2005 16:17 (eighteen years ago) link
― lyra (lyra), Friday, 8 July 2005 22:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Joseph Cowart (Joseph Cowart), Saturday, 9 July 2005 08:56 (eighteen years ago) link
Yes, that's basically true. But then, I'll take as much LHRW as you got.
― Zed Szetlian (Finn MacCool), Sunday, 10 July 2005 03:19 (eighteen years ago) link
what do the ppl who heard it think of it?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 10:31 (eighteen years ago) link
― Mark Rich@rdson, Thursday, 17 May 2007 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 17 May 2007 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 17 May 2007 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 17 May 2007 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 17 May 2007 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link
― 2for25, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link
― dan selzer, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link
― dan selzer, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 May 2007 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link
― dan selzer, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link
― Mark Rich@rdson, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link
― Jon Lewis, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link
― Mark Rich@rdson, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link
― J.D., Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link
― Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link
― PappaWheelie V, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link
― 696, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't think Pet Sounds is overrated by the dad rags, if anything it was underrated by the wider public for so long.
I think so too. And also Rolling Stone (especially editor Dave Marsh) were actually pretty hard on it whenever I came across any mention of it published in the '70s or anything Marsh wrote in the '80s and '90s. They didn't hate it, but they constantly argued it was pretentious and beneath their earlier hits. Even Robert Christgau and I believe Greil Marcus maintain that argument.
They're older now, but the first newspaper critics I remember reading in the '90s were part of a later generation and really championed it. Everyone I knew back home who adored it was high school or college age at the turn of the millennium - Wilson's big revival (which began with that first Pet Sounds tour) probably fed off that and vice versa. I haven't heard as much about it now, but I think that's more reflective of changes in pop with the music most consciously influenced by Wilson having less of a mainstream presence now. I personally don't care - I never bought into the idea that musical trends defined "greatness" to the extent that a work is taken down a notch simply because other things have become trendy. Pet Sounds hasn't lost anything for me, it's still brilliant and beautiful for so many reasons - absolutely one of the great landmarks in rock history.
― birdistheword, Sunday, 3 March 2024 06:09 (one month ago) link