Gay Marriage to Alfred: Your Thoughts

Should be noted Jones was appointed by W. and recommended by Santorum. Hope the latter has some REAL bad heartburn.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:51 PM (45 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

We here in PA are really experiencing schadenfreude about that. :D

Anyone wanna come marry me now?

Roffling at Corbett basically going 'uh...hold on.'

https://twitter.com/GovernorCorbett/status/468865949417107458

I'll marry you, Stevie, as long as we can get divorced in time for me to marry Alfred.

wait but I wanna marry alfred too

We can be a thrupple, but I'm letting Alfred take the fall for bigamy if it comes to that.

wca (would cry at)

No appeal from Corbett

http://www.phillymag.com/g-philly/2014/05/21/governor-corbett-pa-marriage-ruling/

Bigamy to Alfred: Your Thoughts

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/05/gay-marriage-states-legal-map

^^^ up-to-date map, clearly showing "legal" versus "ban struck down, appeal pending." Kind of spectacular.

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/08/06/mn-now-has-one-of-its-first-same-sex-divorces/

sounds like trash news but it's an interesting situation

10th Circuit Court upholds same-sex marriage

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58007681-78/marriage-court-sex-utah.html.csp

Plus, Indiana ruling.

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/25/judge-throws-indiana-ban-sex-marriage/11354083/

Marry, Indiana!
(What a wonderful day.)
Hooray for Richard Young, of judiciary fame.

Marry, Indiana, as an Alfred would say,
Trips along softly on the tongue this way:
Marry, Indiana, marry Indiana, marry, Indiana,
Let the state's ban now be dead
Marry, Indiana, Marry Indiana, Marry, Indiana,
That's the state for newlyweds

Does this mean if it goes to the supremes we are potentially done with this whole thing?

well once we thought the whole abortion thing was doing okish

Mm. In this case, though, overt public support for the banning of gay marriage is rapidly collapsing, and the fact that more and more GOP figures have just simply stopped talking about it is as telling a sign as any. (Yeah, idiot platform statements and vague declarations and pandering to 'the base' but please, compared to ten years ago -- hell, five -- that's still a collapse.) This is a done deal, the question is the exact timing. That said a couple of friends still think this could go state by state; still, giving the 10th Circuit ruling today, it's kinda hard NOT to see this as being decided nationwide in the end.

St. Louis challenges Missouri ban on gay marriage

ST. LOUIS (AP) -- St. Louis officials have challenged Missouri's constitutional ban on gay marriage by issuing four same-sex marriage licenses in a City Hall ceremony.

Four gay couples were married Wednesday in the office of Mayor Francis Slay in a ceremony presided over by a municipal judge.

Attorney General Chris Koster went to court Thursday seeking to stop the marriages.

St. Louis Circuit Judge Rex Burlison denied a temporary restraining order but will consider whether to grant an injunction at a later date.

Burlison said St. Louis officials have agreed not to issue more marriage licenses to same-sex couples at this time and would do so in the future only after notifying the court and attorney general's office.

State voters approved the constitutional ban on gay marriage in 2004.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-gay-marriage-ban-overturned-florida-20140717,0,5016096.story

ALFRED IS MINE.

Almost there but am taking requests so I'm ready when the Florida Supreme Court decides.

need to examine yr health plan, send details

I only do peccadilloes now. Time was not on our side.

I make a mean arroz con picadillo.

pack o' dildos

First one to translate that sentence into Spanish gets my picadillo.

Virginia.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/07/28/virginia-gay-marriage-appeals-court-decision/12536403/

Hell, the entire Fourth Circuit area, it seems

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2014/07/breaking-fourth-circuit-court-strikes.html

wow, that's huge and a major step into red state territory

In Mississippi, Campaign for Southern Equality organized a day for couples married in other states to record their marriages at the local level. In Starkville, the Chancery Court clerk sez "sure, cool by me" --

http://www.wtva.com/news/local/story/Same-sex-couple-records-marriage-license-in/KvOHeePyCESU4OqZVHI1zA.cspx

Meanwhile, what happened in Tennessee?

Roane county is firmly red state; when they eventually appeal in Davidson things may run differently.

Also, no stay in the Fourth Circuit; it's up to SCOTUS to put one in or not pending appeal.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/federal-judges-refuse-to-stay-decision-striking-va-same-sex-marriage-ban/2014/08/13/a695193a-2303-11e4-8593-da634b334390_story.html?hpid=z4

http://socalpatent.com/la-patent-attorney/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tumblr_m593e5TMI31qcy1c2o1_1280.jpg

This fall on ABC.

I'm picking out my wedding gown. See you soon, my betrothed.

So glad I waited til my wedding night!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpY_ElM4CYk

Not til after we tie the knot!

I'm having the ring appraised next week.

I'm having you appraised next week

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4CVZnGJIzQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi7gwX7rjOw

Wisconsin and Indiana in:

http://time.com/3270517/court-rules-against-gay-marriage-bans-in-2-states/

Louisiana yesterday a hiccup.

which made its predecessors premature ejaculation

Oh my

Wisconsin AG already talking appeal.

Richard Posner, probably the best writer on any bench or circuit in the United States, tears into the case:

Heterosexuals get drunk and pregnant, producing unwanted children; their reward is to be allowed to marry. Homosexual couples do not produce unwanted children; their reward is to be denied the right to marry. Go figure.

Our pair of cases is rich in detail but ultimately straight- forward to decide. The challenged laws discriminate against a minority defined by an immutable characteristic, and the only rationale that the states put forth with any conviction— that same-sex couples and their children don’t need marriage because same-sex couples can’t produce children, intended or unintended—is so full of holes that it cannot be taken seri- ously. To the extent that children are better off in families in which the parents are married, they are better off whether they are raised by their biological parents or by adoptive parents. The discrimination against same-sex couples is irra- tional, and therefore unconstitutional even if the discrimina- tion is not subjected to heightened scrutiny, which is why we can largely elide the more complex analysis found in more closely balanced equal-protection cases.