ROLLING HIPSTER STUDIES 09

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (609 of them)

are we even talking about whether people talk about hipsters anymore anymore

Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Thursday, 24 April 2014 03:16 (ten years ago) link

this is just a prelude to a ginormous culture war against hipsters

brimstead, Thursday, 24 April 2014 03:23 (ten years ago) link

oh wait did no one post that rightwing book in this thread?

Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Thursday, 24 April 2014 03:25 (ten years ago) link

not cool: with the beatles by some guy

brimstead, Thursday, 24 April 2014 03:30 (ten years ago) link

Motherfucker looks like he's wearing a pince-nez with no lenses.

Prostitute Farm Online (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 24 April 2014 09:24 (ten years ago) link

^ possible new hipster look to supersede buddy holly specs

Prostitute Farm Online (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 24 April 2014 09:24 (ten years ago) link

BIG BROTHER, New York Times bestselling author of THE TWO MINUTES HATE

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 24 April 2014 10:40 (ten years ago) link

NOT COOL story bro

Prostitute Farm Online (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 24 April 2014 10:52 (ten years ago) link

I have been a fan of the Gutfeld Institute of Rational Brain Activity for several years now. Writing this review will probably be one of the hardest reviews I've written in Amazon. Taken on its surface, Greg takes on just about every form of lunacy, pop culture, crazy Hollywood "stars," crazy dictators, crazy Hollywood talking heads, all of the news networks, several crazy representatives of different cultures which make up our society, fracking, Obamacare, the American society as it stands today, and if I named everything, that would be my review!

I cannot tell you how much I laughed at various phrases he uses to describe totally ridiculous things people who should know better say or do throughout his stories. The Chapter on Hugo Chavez nearly made me pass out.

I know intelligence when I see it. And from the first day I saw Greg on Red Eye, I knew he was a whole lot smarter than he let on. Greg is that very rare person who has the ability to see through all the BS going on around him, ferret it out, and somehow not only make it make sense, but make sense in a way that make liberals blow flames out of their ears and leave conservatives wondering if he's on their side or not.

Nevertheless, his grasp of today's youth, today's average social network surfer, today's COOLness and how upside down society is becoming because of it, is so spot on, it's like he took a million post it notes, somehow put them in order, and actually makes sense how this invasion of the quantity vs. quality social scale came to be. Then, somehow, he uses his snarky wit and crazy/sane verbiage to bring it all together and MAKE SENSE! A dry fact-filled book would sit on a shelf and collect dust.

Greg reaches out to today's youngest generation whose parents are so busy working, taking part in social media, keeping the kids busy in after school activities, because THEY are as confused as their parents. Somehow they manage to find down time, Yoga, the Gym, book clubs and possibly the more necessary wine clubs, to get in their free time trying to rest up to do it all over again tomorrow.

His comments and additional stories about SO MUCH STUFF COMING IN TODAY are critically relevant. The fact that EVERYTHING has become politicized, making the field much more muddy, makes his effort to let us know COOL is not (or should not be) our ultimate goal in life. As some of us watch things sag, more and more, not seeming to have an engine to run it or a rudder to guide it, it seems like everything depressingly has no direction. Sort of like algebrabraic equations no longer equal anything. He pushes back, pointing out how dumb it is that we are caught in this sad maze of who to blame, what to do, where to go, how to get it, turns it on its head and points his finger at the who, what, where, and why and in very plain and colorful language, accurately puts the blame where it belongs (on us!!! :-0 ). WE make decisions every day that affect our families, our friends, our parents, our children and buy INTO this crazy society that COOL is, indeed, COOL, and we must attain it at any price. Of course, when he says it, over and over again, it is funnier and full of biting wisdom.

Greg is asking us to wake up out of our stupor, and perhaps on any Hollywood award night, maybe we should NOT be glued to the empty-headed nonsense going on in the media, and turn it BACK to where it belongs: TOWARD THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN! GET INVOLVED IN POLITICS - HELP BRING BACK ALL THAT WE'VE LOST! DO SOME RESEARCH AND SUPPORT A GOOD CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATION THAT WOULD PASS THE TEST OF THE GREG GUTFELT INSTITUTE of RATIONAL BRAIN ACTIVITY!! We can do this!!! And Greg is at the head of the line!!

Our priorities are hideously twisted, Greg's entire book shouts that out. We MUST read this book carefully to find out HOW, while there is still time left, we break the hold that money, technology, fashion, peeking into other people's lives via reality TV, and ANYTHING Hollywood is trying to sell us in general, has on us, that we check out the Constitution, check out the business pages now and again, and most importantly, get educated on religions, groups of people, those living on assistance, government hand outs, and the most important thing given to us of all: FREEDOM! We live in the best country in the world and we let these false-faced nutballs in the media dictate our lives!

Now he is on FOX NEWS NETWORK ON The Five (at 5:00 p.m.Monday through Friday), a brilliant addition to the team, still has his fun on Red Eye (also on FOX News Network), has written his (I think) 2nd full book (Edit: 3/21/2014 - I stand corrected - Dana said today on the Five that this is his SIXTH BOOK - my most humble apologies to the author), is winning the respect of no less than Bob Beckel (not an easy thing for a guy like Greg to do!!), is turning up on Bill O'Reilly, and is on his way to becoming one of the great thinkers of his generation (seriously!).

This book has much more meat to it than the last book. I think it could have been cut into four books, with more factoids added to educate the masses to the mess this country is currently wallowing in. Greg Gutfeld is one of those writers who can, in one sentence, cut the lies out of the mouths of (fill in the blank) and tie it up in a bow so funny, you might have to go back and ponder what he said for several days.

I don't like my own review, even though I've been at it for two days. I can't catch Greg's amazing ability to cut through all the BS handed to us every day and somehow have it make sense and make it edgy and funny at the same time (funny as in funny rational). So, go out and buy his book. NOW!!!!! His numbers will make him lots o' money, yes. More importantly, it will show the Hollywood COOL and the Washington D.C. COOL and the campus COOL people that we have their number. While Hillary and Obama danced, four of our best men died in Benghazi. Just this week, while they danced again, the Crimea section of the Ukraine was stolen and taken away by Putin. On the international front, things do not look good. On the National front, things don't look good. WAKE UP, AMERICA!! While the cat's been away, the mice have been carting out little pieces of what made this country the exceptional nation it WAS.

NOT COOL is one of the finest relevant books on the state of our world today. Greg has the intelligence to pull it all together, the thick skin not to care who he skewers (they deserve it), a vast range of observations and knowledge to pull from, and a slightly self-deprecating way to end it. One thing I know, you will learn much you did not know when you started Not Cool. I will be keeping this one near me as a reference guide to the Not Cool and don't know it crowd!! Five stars for a book well done, Greg Gutfeld! Very, very cool book! No, having heard Greg say today (Edit - 3/21/2014) on The Five that Greg thinks cool is actually evil (in terms of its collective effect on society) - very, very, GOOD book!

marcos, Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:30 (ten years ago) link

His numbers will make him lots o' money, yes. More importantly, it will show the Hollywood COOL and the Washington D.C. COOL and the campus COOL people that we have their number.

So we're going to stick it to the Washington/Hollywood/Campus COOL by buying a book written by a UC Berkley graduate whose career has been in writing/editing mainstream magazines like Prevention, Men's Health and Maxim, and who currently hosts two shows on the world's highest-rated 24 hour news channel?

▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:52 (ten years ago) link

I want to buy a copy just to see what proper nouns he uses in it

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:05 (ten years ago) link

Washington COOL

purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:56 (ten years ago) link

"it's like he took a million post it notes, somehow put them in order"

kinda makes me die inside that this is regarded as praise in 2014

the tune was space, Thursday, 24 April 2014 16:40 (ten years ago) link

hey, at least it didn't say "a million tweets"

you poll a lot, but you're not saying anything (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 April 2014 16:45 (ten years ago) link

burning brightly in the night

sitting on a claud all day gotta make your butt numb (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 24 April 2014 16:48 (ten years ago) link

waiting for the power point edition

Hunt3r, Thursday, 24 April 2014 16:54 (ten years ago) link

this is an interesting strategy to win the youth demographic

hug niceman (psychgawsple), Thursday, 24 April 2014 18:20 (ten years ago) link

one month passes...

http://jessemichaelsblog.tumblr.com/post/89178134860/white-guy-record-collection-and-cultural-materialism

an ilxor/facebook friend posted this and then i read it and tried to go back and facebook did the thing where it reorganizes the entire order of the feed and also reminds you to purchase something from Dollar Shave Club, so i'm sorry that i can't say exactly who posted about it.

so this is a lil tumblr post focusing in on that particular kind of social interaction where it feels like people are subtly (or not so subtly) competing to name cooler and more obscure bands than you are, and it pisses you off because you're not playing the same mindgames and maybe you just wanted to talk about a specific band in a genuine way.

1) The cultural materialism game ruins and devalues art. It takes what is good and worthwhile in a world that is overwhelmingly empty and vicious, and turns those songs, books, movies, whatevers, into poker chips for the big, nauseating ego struggle that most genuine art serves to oppose.

i sympathize with that argument, on the occasions that the other person(s) in the terrible conversation/game are doing the oneupsmanship thing on purpose. but then there's the following paragraph:

2) The cultural materialism game ruins and devalues social interactions. I simply don’t care about how much internet research somebody did on Detroit garage rarities / chopped and screwed hip hop / unknown Friedkin scripts / obscure British sketch comedy / little known hallucinogens / Fringey French Filosophers / African post punk / carnivorous plants that double as analgesics / Foucault / Derrida / Zizek / Huelbeckqxgfdm ETC ETC ETC. Again, I am NOT saying all those things are not interesting or shouldn’t be discussed. Of course they are all great things, especially Huelbeckqx˙∆˚∫. ˙ I am saying that when people converse by shoving savvy-objects in each others’ faces, it destroys any possibility of real, non-pressurized human interaction.

i get that he's offering a parody of the aforementioned oneupsmanshipping mindgamers by rattling off his own list of semi-obscure genres of note, but he's also (unintentionally, i think) demonstrating that some people casually rattle these things off simply because they KNOW about them and think they're relevant! there certainly exists a subset of total assholes who reference and speak on a very shallow level about certain things just to show that they know about them and are therefore cool, but there are also many
people who actually know about these things and find them relevant and bring them up in conversation because they feel like they're adding something useful into the conversation and possibly offering someone else a new artistic path to explore. hell, maybe that's how they found out about obscuro band x - through a conversation where someone mentioned it.

the infuriating thing about watching norms complain about hipsters is that they often conflate people who are being shallow douches with people who have a deep well of knowledge and aren't afraid to share it with others.

anyway, i actually like the linked post for the most part! i understand and sympathize with what he's saying, and since the people he's complaining about are friends of his, he's probably not making a mistake in attributing their conversational motivations to the desire to seem cool. it just points to a pet peeve of mine, this gut instinct of some people to roll their eyes at any reference that they deem to be "for show". if you talk to some people they seriously think that listening to radiohead makes you a hipster (or arcade fire). and then there are people that roll their eyes at anyone that doesn't wear running shoes on their days off who roll their eyes at the people who are rolling their eyes at the people who listen to radiohead, because they've never even heard of radiohead - "how pompous that this guy is standing here complaining about how someone else mentioned this band i've never heard of! god what a fucking hipster, this guy who doesn't wear running shoes on his days off". it's a terrible fucking spiral that just leads to lowest common denominator conversations where people are afraid to mention anything that others don't know of for fear of appearing to be a hipster. ugh, fuck that.

there was a lil' post on twitter yesterday (again i forgot who, i can't remember anything) where someone was saying that it's so fucking sad when someone starts speaking passionately about a subject in conversation and then stops themselves short and apologizes ("i'm sorry, i just get excited when i talk about X") and changes the subject, because it's a sign that at some point some fucking asshole criticized that person while they were talking about something they were really into, and now they've internalized the feeling that it's not cool to speak about things you really like to people who don't know about it. whoever said that on twitter, OTM

(sorry for rambling posts these days, i go through phases and currently i'm in the one where i can't stfu apparently)

Karl Malone, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:39 (nine years ago) link

I think a lot of music (or other thing) nerds actually enjoy that kind of interaction, and it seems to be the author who is made to feel anxious and pressured by it. I can relate to that, and I don't think he's entirely wrong, but I don't think that's the sole purpose of that kind of interaction either.

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:42 (nine years ago) link

("i'm sorry, i just get excited when i talk about X")

...

(sorry for rambling posts these days,

<3

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:55 (nine years ago) link

ugh, well i was going to add even MORE on to that ramble but stopped myself short (there is a line that must be drawn somewhere), but i was going to mention that the twitter thing touched a nerve with me because i have that same tendency (as demonstrated) and i hate it!

Karl Malone, Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:00 (nine years ago) link

carnivorous plants that double as analgesics / Foucault / Derrida / Zizek / Huelbeckqxgfdm ETC ETC ETC.

What, no Adorno?

how's life, Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:01 (nine years ago) link

there was a lil' post on twitter yesterday (again i forgot who, i can't remember anything) where someone was saying that it's so fucking sad when someone starts speaking passionately about a subject in conversation and then stops themselves short and apologizes ("i'm sorry, i just get excited when i talk about X") and changes the subject, because it's a sign that at some point some fucking asshole criticized that person while they were talking about something they were really into, and now they've internalized the feeling that it's not cool to speak about things you really like to people who don't know about it. whoever said that on twitter, OTM

otm
also, i have been accused of "yammering" on multiple occasions, some of them formative i guess :(
i also learned not to offer info unless someone asks. which they rarely do so i walk around being quietly excited about stuff basically all the time

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:03 (nine years ago) link

I think when people go into fits like that talking about records or books or games or restaurants it is an expression of anxiety/desire to prove oneself AND a genuine expression of enthusiasm. We do lots of things socially that have hidden meanings relating to inclusion/exclusion, status, approval/disapproval. I don't think there's any such thing as some kind of "pure human interaction" unadulturated by that kind of thing.

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:15 (nine years ago) link

er, trend.

Last time I was at Brooklyn Flea it occurred to me that all this artisinal Brooklyn stuff is just a rehash of what our bobo parents did. The ceramics thing confirms that.

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:27 (nine years ago) link

some people are just naturally more enthusiastic talkers than others, and people can find that annoying
some people also delight in finding things to dislike about others
like sand through the hourglass, so go the days of our lives

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:28 (nine years ago) link

i genuinely know very few hipster ceramicists; the vast majority at any studio i've been to are grammas and housewives with like a 20% production potter (read: makes stuff for sale, primarily on etsy and generally the same general form over and over and over) and 5% fine artist bent. Hipster pottery studios are out there tho'; pretty sure Choplet fits the mold.

Yeah was also gonna say that that article seems very much in the mold of a NYTimes "no way this is as much of a thing as they say it is" article.

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:36 (nine years ago) link

knowledge/taste can be used as a way of flaunting status or expertise, so i guess it can be a difficult area since peoples' identities are involved. which can be frustrating if you're the sort-of person who likes learning and experiencing as much as possible about lots of different things and likes to keep life fresh. some people get enjoyment from that, some people enjoy status/power more or are easily threatened, prefer a small stable world, take too much pride in what they know now, who knows. i've found that there are people out there who get seriously offended if you mention something they don't know about, and people who use their knowledge or interests as a social weapon.

but then there are people who are adventurous, curious, and put enjoying and exploring life at a higher priority. personally i like sharing all the things i've discovered, because i've appreciated the same from other people ... like when i was just getting into music growing up i learned about new worlds of music from other people. and i'm perfectly happy paying it forward, because it's fun sharing!!!, but i've found it makes some people feel seriously uncomfortable, like you're a messenger bringing the bad news.

i can sympathize with that a little. sometimes i'll feel stupid if i don't know what people are talking about, but i've swallowed my pride in those moments and discovered some of my favorite interests that way. my strategy now is to feel people out to see if they're open to that sort-of dialogue, and if not i'll keep my mouth shut because it's not really productive to focus on incompatible points in personality.

Spectrum, Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:58 (nine years ago) link

and like, in my weaker moments i've done what that blog dude criticizes. i think becoming mature is about letting go of ego/pride/insecurity in that way, but it can be tough because knowledge and taste is so ingrained as a marker of social status. so if you go after people for engaging in that activity, you can trace it back to our own culture. whole thing makes me want to read more bourdieu (oh no, did i do it???).

Spectrum, Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:06 (nine years ago) link

sometimes people are just into niche things and want to share them with their friends.
i'm really into fiddle jams from before 1934 and pretty much have NO ONE to talk about that with except a few other ppl who I barely ever see IRL.
the difference i think, is that when i try to talk to my friends abotu this stuff or play them records, they're not feeling insecure and slighted... just bored.

ian, Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:23 (nine years ago) link

Jesse Michaels needs to set that to a rockin' ska-punk beat and sing it really fast.

dan m, Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:36 (nine years ago) link

i genuinely know very few hipster ceramicists; the vast majority at any studio i've been to are grammas and housewives with like a 20% production potter (read: makes stuff for sale, primarily on etsy and generally the same general form over and over and over) and 5% fine artist bent. Hipster pottery studios are out there tho'; pretty sure Choplet fits the mold.

My sister seriously burnt her hands year before last...because she took her pottery out of the kiln before it was cool! *rimshot*

A cursory search suggests the term "one-upmanship" dates to the early 20th century. Although in some cases "upmanship" is in the eye of the beholder: Am I attempting one-upmanship by talking enthusiastically about Poverty Row pre-code film, or is the person who doesn't find that subject so engrossing ascribing one-upmanship to me?

Miss Anne Thrope (j.lu), Thursday, 19 June 2014 19:50 (nine years ago) link

Sometimes it's less about establishing superiority and more about establishing that you're both part of the same nerdy fraternity (spent a minute deciding whether I should use that gendered word or not and decided to leave it alone)

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 19:56 (nine years ago) link

when men do it it's one-upsmanship
when women do it it's yammering

lol

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 19:57 (nine years ago) link

lol/sob

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 19:58 (nine years ago) link

i just talk about things

macklin' rosie (crüt), Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:32 (nine years ago) link

or i don't

macklin' rosie (crüt), Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:32 (nine years ago) link

one-upsPERSONship

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:33 (nine years ago) link

it's not about the intention of the speaker though -- one-upsmanship and yammering (like nagging) are in the eye of the beholder
that's why there is no way out of this sinkhole

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:34 (nine years ago) link

I feel like stopping short and apologizing isn't necessarily an indicator that you're used to criticism -- sometimes it's due to the recognizing that you're dominating the conversation.

The people I've known who have been the best speakers have been able to introduce topics in a way that allows people without any knowledge get up to speed and those in the know aren't bored. It's really, really difficult! Pausing for the other person to indicate that they're interested is important.

I've definitely been part of conversations that were taken over by one-upmanship, chest-puffing through long drops of irrelevant info, or mansplaining. Definitely not limited to hipster interests.

knowledge and taste is so ingrained as a marker of social status

this is really a caricature of the hipster-as-geek, though!

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:38 (nine years ago) link

there is no way an intern we had at work last summer was not yammering

he interrupted a trilingual person who was talking about a book she'd read on language learning to yammer on about what languages are hard to learn

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:39 (nine years ago) link

Why does every conversation have to be aimed at allowing people without any knowledge to get up to speed?

Hier Komme Die Warum Jetzt (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:40 (nine years ago) link

it doesn't! gauging your audience is key.

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:40 (nine years ago) link

mh otm
conversational skills are not a given part of language proficiency and because you are having a conversation with a human being and your goal is ostensibly not to alienate that person?

La Lechera, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:42 (nine years ago) link

There are so many things that I would love to listen to people speak about, especially if they're enthusiastic and knowledgeable. At the very least, that's a good way to connect to people. But many people have absolutely no interest in hearing about arbitrary topics in depth, even if they introduced them.

I just think about the dudes who are occasionally at comic book stores. I like comics, although not necessarily the same ones they do, but I can't do anything with a conversation that is mostly talking about minutiae and one-upping by throwing in jokey references. I like nice stories and art and would like to talk to how I relate to that stuff.

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:48 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.