Future Islands - On The Water

i got a rod stewart vibe, right off the bat.

Okay, so I just watched their Coachella performance on Youtube and pissed myself laughing throughout. You'd think that this kind of thing would be exactly up my street, but sadly not.

A friend of mine just summed it up as "a Gerry Anderson puppet on cowies growling incomprehensibly over piss-weak electro pop". Yup, that about sums up my view also.

^Lol this guy bloke.

major future islands takedown pip pip cheerio

A friend of mine just summed it up as "a Gerry Anderson puppet on cowies growling incomprehensibly over piss-weak electro pop". Yup, that about sums up my view also.

― Toni Braxton-Hicks (Turrican)

This guy is a fan. http://thetalkhouse.com/reviews/view/andrew-mccluskey-future-islands

what the fuck is cowies?

any1 catch these guys on Letterman?

This guy is a fan. http://thetalkhouse.com/reviews/view/andrew-mccluskey-future-islands

― Kitchen Person, Monday, April 14, 2014 10:06 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, I saw that posted above. I'm a huge OMD fan but... nah, this isn't for me.

Carl Wilson:

With Future Islands, it’s like they’ve put the post-coital cigarette at the beginning of the song and ended it with the casual accidental meeting. The storyboards of their relationship to the audience are cut and shuffled and fanned out and scrambled – and yet by the close, like a street magician, they look up and smile, and say, “So was your card the King of Hearts?” And we say, yes, goddamn it, yes, it was. How did you do that?

http://333sound.com/2014/04/21/lets-talk-about-love-week-the-sound-of-post-taste-pop-future-islands-play-seasons-waiting-on-you-on-david-letterman-march-2014/

Also,

It’s schmaltz that via either semiotic brilliance or lucky poetic misfire plays for higher stakes.

I like Carl, but when he writes that the song is a "logical successor to “Yacht Rock” as a genre due for semi-ironic reclamation" I grind my teeth all over again. I'm only a handful of years younger than he so, show or not, what the hell is so unpalatable about, what, the Michael McDonald-led Doobie Bros that needed semi-ironic reclamation?

The closest the Doobie Bros. have come to semi-ironic reclamation has been via people your age and my age who half-fondly remember that one episode of "What's Happening?"

i sort of vehemently disagree that future islands has anything to do with yacht rock

like, i want to believe there was a time where this just would have been a well-constructed song with an expressive vocal and we wouldn't have needed any more analysis than that

I like Carl, but when he writes that the song is a "logical successor to “Yacht Rock” as a genre due for semi-ironic reclamation" I grind my teeth all over again. I'm only a handful of years younger than he so, show or not, what the hell is so unpalatable about, what, the Michael McDonald-led Doobie Bros that needed semi-ironic reclamation?

― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, April 21, 2014 6:58 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah sometimes i wonder if he learned the supposed lesson of his own book

also agree with cad, it's kind of hilarious that all a band has to do is wear slacks and people freak out about what non-punk lineage they might dare have

Yeah, I vote not very yachty at all. Is it the mostly smooth vox that does it? But, like, Tom Jones is not yacht rock, either.

wondering if these semi-ironic reclamations have to do with good listeners and critics still in thrall to what they think are punk orthodoxies.

there's also no real relation of any kind to Tom Jones either, tbf

*throws panties*

I guess I think of these guys asa synth pop band, like OMD, so yeahb the soft rock thing is weird to me. Esp the bass lines are so post punk to me

wait was was the supposed lesson of the book

i don't see how you can regard this record as anything but synth-pop, which has a healthy tradition of appreciation by the alt/indie set already and is in no need of any reclaiming/reappreciation in and of itself

(could be that this is a resurgence of a certain mode of ~feeling~ in that music, though)

xp yup those types of bands are their logical forebears, i guess that's not interesting enough or something

Not so synthpop at the live show I saw. Rather hard to pin down, actually, and surely this is a good thing.

If anything there's an element of James Murphy to it. A huskier, middle-aged guy totally giving his all vocally, albeit eccentrically, over dancy, synthy post-punk. I recall some interview with Murphy where he even had to ask if his take of I want to say "I Can Change" was too ott. Seems apropo.

what the heck future islands is totally of the new romantic era if anything

these guys couldn't be any more synth-pop if they used wang chung as a verb

just clicked through to the carl wilson piece and ffs alfred learn how to read

Breaking it down, the song scoops into mid-1980s U.K. synth-soul brie, a logical successor to “Yacht Rock” as a genre due for semi-ironic reclamation, but also has a hook that’s hard to forget.

He's saying "UK synth-soul brie" is due for reclamation, LIKE yacht rock already had

though lol that apparently none of us bothered to check for ourselves what carl had to say before casting our votes

He's still a monster imo

If anything there's an element of James Murphy to it. A huskier, middle-aged guy totally giving his all vocally, albeit eccentrically, over dancy, synthy post-punk. I recall some interview with Murphy where he even had to ask if his take of I want to say "I Can Change" was too ott. Seems apropo.

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, April 21, 2014 11:42 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

middle-aged? the members of Future Islands are 30ish and started the band in college.

As a guy pushing 40, I will say that, yes, that counts as middle aged in indie rock years.

You'd have to work out some algorithm factoring in things like coolness/attractiveness/genetic history/gender etc for that to be a workable system tho ie. can we just use years years

I use indie dog years.

time is a flat circle

You just say that because he's balding

http://99gifs.com/-img/5318e62f1605fb7efb0000e3.gif?w=400&h=225

The guy dances so old.

Also 30 pfft. Up to 30 is like teen years for ppl now.

I sort of think the cooler you are, the cooler it is to come off older. Like, Bryan Ferry has been 50 since he was 20.

not to suggest that these guys are beyond compare but I always thought the most appealing thing about Future Islands was how far off the synthpop/LCD axis their music could be. even their more straightforward/catchier songs ("Follow You", "The Happiness of Being Twice", and of course "Seasons") dont really fit the mold

http://www.streamingoldies.com/content-images/rays/RolandGift.jpg

once again we're making associations based on the singer's hairline instead of the band's music

you can't mention Bryan Ferry w/out reaching for hairlines

Except y'know Eno wins over ferry at everything baldness included

Bryan Ferry has had the most impressive and well-styled hair in rock for more than 35 years. Eno has had the brainiest scalp. It's like comparing Pinochet and Stalin.

Initially I thought 'Seasons' was a bit top heavy with all the best songs being at the start. After a few weeks of listening I feel the exact opposite and it's actually the 2nd side of the LP (from 'A Song for Our Grandfathers' onwards) that I like the most. Always a sign of a genuinely good album that.

bit late to the thread. why does every song on this sound like something else from the early-mid 90s? Born Slippy, Falling etc? This is a weird thing at the moment, like Haim - making tracks that just remind you a little bit of a bunch of old songs, but not enough to put your finger on them

it's retro, but what kind of retro is it??

more like future hasbeens

sounds to me like you enjoy hot dogs and a good laugh!