Israel to World: "Suck It."

I have never read either

I think those are probably the two most visible pro-BDS communities at least in the anglosphere and both engage regularly in horrific anti-semitism particularly re conspiracies (look at Mondoweiss recent discussions of how Israel and the Jews are orchestrating the situation in Ukraine to get a real sense of BDS psychosis).

Jews should take advantage of the tumult to claim a second Jewish state in the Crimea. It's not fair that we can only have one Jewish state.

It goes without saying that the Arabic press is stunningly anti-semitic as well, which goes without saying. Cartoons published in the UK pan-Arabic Al Quds al Arabi recently include:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ogAZvPTZMtA/Uxxl5AWhLYI/AAAAAAAAcqw/Rrp_T2_Suh0/s1600/quds1.jpg

and

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YwkDM_3RAUs/Uxxl56I7XGI/AAAAAAAAcrA/PagWiodVuTs/s1600/quds4.jpg

if it really went without saying obvs i wouldn't have to repeat it so much lol

By "plenty" I didn't mean a large percentage, just that there have been prominent anti-zionist Jewish voices. I'm thinking more of secular Jews like Tony Judt, who advocated a one-state solution. xps

http://www.mrdrybones.com/blog/D14223_3.gif

There are enough anti-semities in the BDS movement to make me deeply uncomfortable about it but not enough to tar the whole movement as such. Which I know sounds like watery liberal equivocation but there you go. I think critics of Israeli policy need to be a hell of a lot firmer about distancing themselves from the bigots. The fact that Gilad Atzmon is still cited as one of the good guys makes me think that's not going to happen for a long time.

Yeah, I don't doubt that anti-semitism gives the BDS movement a bit of extra sizzle. It seems to attract a following out of proportion to other human-rights based boycott campaigns.

xp mordy
I don't doubt it. obv anything on Israel will attract these people, the boycott movement being focused & punitive especially, but people I've met who are involved have all also been involved w/ other political/humanitarian/human rights causes. it seems like it's obviously the audience BDS is courting.

http://www.peacheykeene.com/300%20time%20bomb.gif

Rolling MENA 2014

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/10/29/report-senior-administration-officials-call-israels-netanyahu-chickens-t-and-aspergery/?tid=hp_mm&hpid=z4

Oh man, Bibi is SO aspie.

Want to make a Morbius joke, but the best I can get is "how fast could i KO this chickenshit hillbibi?"

YOU'RE A LIIIIIAR

The Obama administration on Wednesday accused the Israeli government of misleading the public over the Iran nuclear negotiations, using unusually blunt and terse language that once again highlighted the rift between the two sides.

In briefings with reporters, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki and White House spokesman Josh Earnest suggested Israeli officials were not being truthful about how the United States is handling the secretive talks.

“I think it is safe to say not everything you are hearing from the Israeli government is an accurate reflection of the details of the talks,” said Psaki, who acknowledged that the State Department is withholding some details from the Israelis out of concern they will share them more broadly.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-officials-in-blunt-language-say-israel-is-distorting-reality-of-iran-talks/2015/02/18/94556d5e-b7a7-11e4-a200-c008a01a6692_story.html

suddenly you believe what the white house says? convenient.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awY1MRlMKMc

oh they're only upset about dishonesty bcz it involves theit realpolitik stratagems; dead kids are still fine though

obv they're upset bc they are afraid of the negotiations failing. it doesn't matter anyway, presumably they're referring to the report from israel that EU participants claimed the current offer was lifting sanctions and no limitations on centrifuges in exchange for iranian participation in "regional stability." we'll know soon enough (by the end of March) whether that's true or not. i assume obama cannot sell any deal (to P5+1 or the american public) that doesn't contain iranian concessions. i'm guessing... some level of sanctions regime? it would have to deal w/ Arak, Parchin, etc.

meh, Iran and US always be shoutin at the table, shakin hands under it

in case you ever wondered, "that netanyahu, is he really a piece of shit?":

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/world/middleeast/netanyahu-israel-elections-arabs.html

not really.. was always pretty sure about it

well, yeah. but the blatant racism of his latest comments peel off whatever was left of the mask.

wtf is wrong with israelis?

i suppose this is how my european friends felt when the US reelected bush.

Well, there are very few European countries, where the leaders haven't won an election through islamophobia recently. So we know the drill from ourselves.

right. but in israel's case it's already quite clear (to me, anyway) the disastrous course that netanyahu, etc. are taking the country and the region -- so it's amazing that so many israelis want to stay that course, even after netanyahu has dropped the veil of civility and good faith.

makes me feel like it would not really be that surprising if america were to elect some barely-concealed fascist (insert dr. morbius line about obama = hitler). but i guess the demographic trends here seem to mitigate against that (for the time being).

insert dr. morbius line about obama = hitler

is this where i'm supposed to 'laugh at myself', or rather your offensive caricature of me? get fuct.

caveat emptor

Bibi's reelection makes it clear that Israeli voters, more clearly aware of Netanyahu's intent than ever, have chosen the apartheid path, and will now have to live with the consequences.

American Jewish groups, key players in the coalition against South African apartheid, will resort to verbal gymnastics to argue that it's not the same. Or they will simply use the convenient ploy of pointing out all the bad decisions made by Palestinian leaders over the years. When the inevitable violence erupts and when the Palestinians, left with no other options, renew their push to condemn Israel in international bodies, they will circle the wagons to defend a Jewish state they claim is unfairly treated by a hostile world. They will ratchet up efforts to stifle even moderate dissent in the Jewish world. They'll blame the deepening divisions in the Jewish community on J Street.

Or they will say the no-statehood pledge was just politics as usual in Israel's fractious democracy, as meaningless as most other campaign promises.

And nobody outside an increasingly narrow pro-Israel tent will buy it. Because apartheid is apartheid, and that's exactly what Israeli voters chose this week as a course for their nation.

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.648006

Bibi's sorry! http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/world/middleeast/netanyahu-apologizes-for-comments-about-israeli-arabs.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 (ie, sorry that anybody was offended, but not for being an inveterate racist)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/israeli-veterans-say-permissive-rules-of-engagement-fueled-gaza-carnage/2015/05/04/ab698d16-f020-11e4-8050-839e9234b303_story.html?hpid=z3

IDF intentionally targeting civilians, firing indiscriminately, razing neighborhoods. you know, the usual.

makes u freud

http://www.timesofisrael.com/oren-obama-reaches-out-to-islam-because-2-muslim-father-figures-abandoned-him

https://scontent-gru1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/11960133_10153536849886341_2147333564638356014_n.jpg?oh=c509946d1348b1c879cf8a0e245b19f0&oe=563A5474

Palestinians scuffle with an Israeli soldier as they try to prevent him from detaining a boy during a protest in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh, near Ramallah August 28, 2015.Reuters

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.673469

This thread should only be used sparingly, but this speech kinda belongs here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/benjamin-netanyahu-blames-holocaust-on-palestinian-leader-haj-amin-al-husseini-a6702091.html

Bibi is insane?

Hitler not such a bad guy after all, claims the Prime Minister of Israel o_0

I had a dream last night that a gutter punk friend had drawn swastikas and "I love Adolph Hitler" all over my head while I was sleeping. It caused me a lot of trouble trying to buy a pair of Levi's 501s.

Al Husseini was a Nazi sympathizer and had meetings with Hitler, but that claim is of course beyond a stretch.

yes, very dumb for bibi to claim that the mufti convinced hitler to switch from expulsion to genocide - at least w/out any supporting documents. it is true that the mufti + hitler met Nov 1941 to talk, but i don't see in schmidt's minutes any indication that the mufti had to convince hitler to resist jewish settlement in palestine. i do remember reading somewhat recently (maybe in the new snyder book?) that the nazis had originally considered palestine as a solution to the 'jewish question,' but ultimately resisted it for the reasons spelled out in those minutes, that it would become a hub of jewish power: "That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine, which was nothing other than a center, in the form of a state, for the exercise of destructive influence by Jewish interests." nb that the wannsee conference was not until Jan 1942 which could make hay to the conspiracy minded - happening only two months after his meeting w/ the mufti. that said - fuck the mufti. the real problem w/ bibi's comments is that it seems to exculpate hitler but he's otm that palestinian nationalism in the early 40s was explicitly aligned w/ the nazis and was pro-genocide.

i do wonder if maybe he heard something from his father (a holocaust scholar) that led him to say what he did. maybe he has some information i haven't seen. it's not impossible that hitler at some pt asked the mufti if sending all the jews to palestine might not solve germany's problem and the mufti answered fuck no, kill them instead. hitler certainly did consider expulsion at some point - i just personally doubt it was the mufti that changed his mind.

The Mufti was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and advisor of Eichmann and Himmler in execution of this plan...He was one of Eichmann's best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say, accompanied by Eichmann, he had visited incognito the gas chamber of Auschwitz.
In a conversation with Endre Steiner in Bratislava (June 1944). Quoted in "The Myth of Hitler's Pope: How Pope Pius XII Rescued Jews from the Nazis" - Page 136 - by David G. Dalin - Political Science - 2005

Probably Bibi just likes lying about muslims? He won his election on it, after all. He's just a straight up demagogue at this point, and it's really really sad and worrying.

Worst democratically elected leader in the world? Him or Orban, I think. Who am I forgetting?

Oh plz - this is not "lying about muslims." So we know that the Mufti pushed for the final solution and cheerleaded for it, but we don't know that he "gave" Hitler the idea. Does that really exonerate him in yr eyes?

I don't think even the claim that he "pushed for the final solution" is adequately substantiated, only that he pushed for Germany to do something other than allow Jews to come to Palestine. The evidence that he actively advocated it is thin, largely hearsay.

more than one source says he did push for it, including eichmann's deputy under interrogation in nuremberg

Worst democratically elected leader in the world? Him or Orban, I think. Who am I forgetting?

Little guy called Putin, way over there in Russia?

what a fucking shitbag