Mia Farrow's son -- Ronan Seamus Farrow -- really creeps me out!

"So how'd you beat the rap?"

"Ce n'est pas difficile!"

mia farrow is a polanski supporter, which in context is just O_O

source?

everywhere

farrow defended polanski in an unrelated issue involving a libel charge, not the rape case:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mia-farrow-defends-polanski/

everywhere

― espring (amateurist), Friday, February 7, 2014 2:50 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is one of THE dumbest posts I have ever read

"everyone knows that, lots of blogs are saying it"

its on googlr

she testified on his behalf

"everyone knows that, lots of blogs are saying it"

― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Friday, February 7, 2014 1:57 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

more like, type it into google and you will find a lot of results at respectable news outlets

fwiw someone on twitter posted that she was still friends with roman polanski, to which mia replied "i'm not."

https://twitter.com/swin24/status/427933381553176576

she testified on his behalf in 2005 on an issue unrelated to the rape charge, and people who want to disparage the farrows (as if it even matters one iota to Dylan's credibility) are running with it, is all I can seem to see. Now suddenly they're best friends.

I agree that that's irrelevant to the questions at hand, as is her "never breaking up" with that human shitstain Sinatra.

more like, type it into google and you will find a lot of results at respectable news outlets

― espring (amateurist), Friday, 7 February 2014 21:57 (11 minutes ago) Permalink

then it shouldn't be hard for you to link me to one

also you guys realize there is something called subpoena power right? She didn't necessarily testify because she wanted to.

here's a link http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/04/roman-polanskis-victim-on-accusations-leveled-at-woody-allen-everybody-should-pull-back-and-not-make-this-such-a-public-thing/

In 1977, following the accusations that Geimer leveled at her abuser, it was the elder Farrow who came to Polanski's defense, writing a letter on the director's behalf.

maybe it's bs tho

No, that's true, but that was in 1977 and before the allegations were proven. People are acting like TODAY she is going all buddy buddy with Polanski and saying he's innocent.

ah

i wasn't using Mia's occasionally support for Polanski as evidence of anything, just that it was pretty surprising. hence the O_O

Clears a few things up:

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2014/02/woody-allen-sex-abuse-10-facts

Shorter Woody Allen: Bitches be crazy, amirite? www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/opinion/sunday/woody-allen-speaks-out.html

Note he also brings up the fucking film clip, proving that for all his alleged profundity this asshole is no smarter or more clever than your average People magazine reader.

very Solomonic of you

I almost said "average ILXor" but it's nearly Valentine's Day.

looks like his tactics remain the exact same as the judge called out two decades ago

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfwX9FKCIAAQUmz.png:large

a ton of things in his piece are almost verbatim things I've already read in internet comments.

Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” It was on the same record as the song Dory Previn had written about Mia’s betraying their friendship by insidiously stealing her husband, André, “Beware of Young Girls.” One must ask, did Dylan even write the letter or was it at least guided by her mother? Does the letter really benefit Dylan or does it simply advance her mother’s shabby agenda? That is to hurt me with a smear. There is even a lame attempt to do professional damage by trying to involve movie stars, which smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan.

This part struck me as one of the oddest - first the shoehorning in of Dory Previn, then suggesting that Dylan didn't even write the letter himself, because referencing movie stars sounds like something mia would do rather than the daughter he hasn't interacted with since childhood?

write the letter herself, sorry

yeah, that was really weird. I don't understand why he went there. Was Mia also ventriloquist dummying Dylan when she spoke to People Magazine?

Woody Allen is a filmmaker in New York City.

'Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out. Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” It was on the same record as the song Dory Previn had written about Mia’s betraying their friendship by insidiously stealing her husband, André, “Beware of Young Girls.”'

i'm not surprised allen has brought this up. i saw a reference to this song in dory previn's wiki entry a couple of weeks ago and then read the lyrics and was struck by the coincidences (the father in the song even plays clarinet) and wondered if allen might try to use it to discredit mia farrow. both this song and 'beware of young girls' seemed to have slight extra prominence in the overall discussion of previn's work so i even wondered if someone had edited her entry on his behalf, hoping people would notice and draw the exact conclusions he is now broadcasting. it's not impossible that someone with a penchant for staging scenes and who was familiar with the song might choose the attic venue with the intention of later using the lyrics to create obfuscation to defend himself. it's not farfetched to think that a child abuser might consider in advance ways to foil a seven year old's testimony.

wikipedia: 'Much of the album, which like several subsequent albums was produced by Venet, deals with her experiences in the late 1960s. "Mister Whisper" examines episodes of psychosis from within the confines of a psychiatric hospital, while "Beware of Young Girls" is a scathing attack on Mia Farrow and her motives for befriending the Previns (Farrow belatedly apologized to Dory in her memoir What Falls Away). The track "With My Daddy in the Attic" is a chilling piece dealing with Stockholm Syndrome and fantasies of incest.'

why am i not surprised by the top rated comment

I've been very heartened over the years that none of this has prevented you from continuing to make movies I enjoy and admire. Thank you.

good to know what this is really all about for you

It's just one of those details that to me doesn't weigh much either way because it's so attenuated. Maybe Farrow got the idea from the song, maybe Allen got the idea from the song, maybe Dylan got the idea from the song, maybe it's a coincidence/none of the above.

xp

"Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bf1sdk7CYAE1W6J.png:large

LAW & ORDER: ILX

i have thought about all that and it seems to me it's too dumb and crazy for farrow to come up with but not for someone who wants farrow to seem dumb and crazy. xp to hurting

80-year-old man who doesn't know what twitter is and still writes on a typewriter: definitely very interested in influencing people via wikipedia

nelkin's quote that allen refers to, from piers morgan

"They asked if I would testify and admit that I was 15 when we dated, and I said 'no,' because I was not 15. I was 17, 18 and 19, and to me there's a big distinction between that, and I think they were looking for the fact that, you know, 15 is jail bait. Seventeen is a very different story," said Nelkin, who first met Allen on the set of the film “Manhattan." "I would not go along with that, so I think she was trying to create a pattern of, this is a man who looks for young girls and seduces them unwittingly and that's not true. I was very, very much willing to be dating him, I was thrilled."

Man, the Seventies.

Have we got this all resolved yet

Even if he is not Frank’s, the possibility she raises that he could be, indicates she was secretly intimate with him during our years. Not to mention all the money I paid for child support. Was I supporting Frank’s son? Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that.

lol @ the gall for him to actually say this when he had an affair with her daughter.

80-year-old man who doesn't know what twitter is and still writes on a typewriter: definitely very interested in influencing people via wikipedia

― scott c-word (some dude), Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:05 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

which is why i said 'i even wondered if someone had edited her entry on his behalf', 'even wondered' suggests it's a stretch, 'someone...on his behalf' means not him doing it directly.

i'm not hugely invested in this and don't expect others to be but it's interesting to me since i had thought about it and then he went and devoted a full paragraph to it in his statement.

"undoubtedly."

"One must ask"

I love Dory Previn's songs, but wasn't "Lemon Haired Ladies" about her too?

now that i think about it, every single mia farrow performance was just a series of dory previn songs

none of this is real

we are all just dory's playthings

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-E5mF6HMOmHc/TzyMxyER4pI/AAAAAAAABRg/XHmXjbBWKV4/s320/1980DoryPrevin02PA150212.jpg

just remembered that the dad-flirting charlotte rampling character in stardust memories is called dory