Is this anti-semitism?

say what you will about obama - and i have plenty of complaints about him - he has always been a friend to israel. (i was a little worried when he let kerry loose in the middle east but it turns out that was much ado about nothing.)

sure has! that would be one of my major complaints about him if he wasn't the worst civil liberties president in modern times AND an accomplished war criminal.

yeah, from my perspective obama (like the rest of the presidents dating back--to whom? reagan? nixon?) has been an israel-enabler. (he clearly has a personal antipathy to netanyahu, but that's just good sense.)

also mordy i gave you a hint of my reasons for thinking that my relatives' quasi-exclusionary social milieu is partly willed/willful.

note that I'm not talking about "affiliating w/ other jews and identifying w/ others jews" -- that's to be expected, and certainly not to be disparaged. i'm talking, again, about a milieu in which people's social bonds are all but exclusively among other jews. and these are NOT super-religious people; they are seldom particularly reflective about religious belief or practice. once, when a relative, talking his son and myself out for dinner at disneyland, insisted that I keep kosher alongside them, I asked what the purpose of kosher dietary laws was, and he drew a complete blank.

i guess this all might make more sense if I were to discuss the history of my family, but I don't want to get into that here too much. so probably I'm generalizing from insufficient evidence. (though it's not like my experiences w/ my family haven't been echoed in experiences in hebrew school, hillel, etc.)

anyway, I think it's fair to describe me as alienated from alienated from anything resembling a jewish community, though I would never deny being a Jew and, for reasons I don't entirely understand, am occasionally even proud of this identity.

i think the bare fact that I have been subject to anti-semitism (and certainly heard enough of it, esp. in europe) concretizes my jewish identity, even if i still wouldn't walk into a hillel if you gave me a million dollars.

lol u make me want to invite u over for a shabbos meal

though I would never deny being a Jew and, for reasons I don't entirely understand, am occasionally even proud of this identity.

i find this sentiment very beautiful btw is what i mean

((actually doesn't israel-enabling go back to kennedy? certainly eisenhower was an ambivalent ally.))

ha let's take this thread back to baraka or something so it's not about me. sorry for derail. :(

i'd go to your shabbos if you don't make me feel like a turd for having lost most of my hebrew.

maybe i should just explode this thread with

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsA1-pS5UGs

V much enjoyed yr thoughts itt tbh

i suppose technically 'israel-enabling' goes back to truman.

(i was a little worried when he let kerry loose in the middle east but it turns out that was much ado about nothing.)

andrew cockburn's harper's piece about kerry in the middle east from a month or so ago is well worth reading btw.

ugh, my harper's sub just elapsed - worth resubbing for?

Is it anti-Semitic to be happy Ariel Sharon is dead?

the article was up free on their website for a while but looks like it isn't anymore. :(

i've kinda been craving chatting about sharon's legacy (i like him a lot, tho i'm not sad he's dead -- he was in a coma for a long time) but i'm not sure it would so satisfying - probably more upsetting

i think being happy that Ariel Sharon is dead is a lot like being anti-Israel - high correlation to anti-semitism but not 100%

I mean, I'm not talking about the 'is it okay to be happy someone dies?' stuff we got with Thatcher. I'm interested in whether or not Sharon was a good man.

what is a good man? i think he was loyal to his ppl and his country and an israeli patriot. it's kinda beside the point whether he's a good man (sabra and shatila certainly suggest that he was, like most military men, not totally in touch w/ value of all human life). his biggest legacy probably going to end up being withdrawal from gaza.

Oh, I have no idea what a good man is. I tend to take it by example :) But my only knowledge of Sharon comes from Waltz with Bashir and pro-palestinian fellow travelers during my activist days.

i think we'd probably find non-overlapping circles for ppl who mourned for arafat and those mourning for sharon

Is it anti-Semitic to be happy Ariel Sharon is dead?

― badgers moved the goalposts (dowd), Saturday, January 11, 2014 5:53 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think it's kind of pro-semitic in that it's good the poor guy finally has rest

i mean yeah he was horrible in many ways but i wouldn't wish so many years as a virtual vegetable on my worst enemy

apparently it was his sons that kept him that way against the advice of both doctors and other members of his family

(Jerusalem) – Ariel Sharon died without facing justice for his role in the massacres of hundreds and perhaps thousands of civilians by Lebanese militias in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982. The killings constituted war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Q: Has anyone in history ever been charged with war crimes for allowing someone else's army to commit a massacre?

I'm no Sharon defender, but I think that's a pretty fair question in response to that lede.

sharon "allowed" it to happen in that he instructed the perpetrators of the massacre to go into the camps and restore order, and they did so by massacring civilians

In 1983, a UN commission chaired by Sean MacBride concluded that Israel bore responsibility for the violence.[13]

you don't seem to actually understand Mordy's question

the phalangists were sent in on the orders of the IDF = mordy's question is a nonsequitur

not that this specific argument matters, he was the genocidal leader of a settler state either way

If Sharon was "genocidal" he wasn't very good at it. Do the meanings of words matter to you?

re. "hungry4ass"

yeah I feel like you do violence to the word if you use the word in this context. not everything that is unforgivable and horrible and deliberate and kills a lot of people is a genocide. there has been no systematic attempt to destroy the entire palestinian population in israel, the occupied territories, and/or those in exile in surrounding countries. there has been systematic violence, systematic oppression, rampant violations of human rights, etc.

also i am troubled by the phrase "settler state" since it is hard for me to think of many states that would _not_ fit that description.

as you can see from my comments above i do not think of myself as a "friend of israel" in any of the common senses, but your comment is so hyperbolic that i'm a hairsbreadth from being unable to take your opinions on this matter the least bit seriously. not that you ought to care.

(scarcely possible to take anyone with that screen name "seriously" but anyway)

Don't think Sharon was some genocidal monster nor do I think he was a saint, obv, but all "patriots" should gtfo

irrespective of what i think of Sharon and being broadly pro-Israel i just wanna say that Hurting and amateurist, you're playing a bit semantically disingenuous if you want to restrict use of the term "genocidal" only to those who succeed in wiping out the entirety of a people

Q: Has anyone in history ever been charged with war crimes for allowing someone else's army to commit a massacre?

A fair number of Nazi collaborators, I'd have thought.

He was in effective command of their activities and would have foreseen war crimes occurring if they were allowed into the camps. That makes him liable whether he had a specific goal to kill 2000 civilians or not.

I'm sure it's possible for some people to look fondly on his legacy while acknowledging that he committed horrendous criminal acts (many fans of Milosovic, Tudjman, Taylor, etc do) but downplaying his responsibility in the face of international and domestic Israeli calls for him to face justice always looked a bit suspicious to me.

Sharon was a "centrist," per NPR! Wow, that term is even more fucked up outside the US.

(scarcely possible to take anyone with that screen name "seriously" but anyway)

― ★feminist parties i have attended (amateurist), Sunday, January 12, 2014 4:24 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hmm good point, feminist parties i have attended

irrespective of what i think of Sharon and being broadly pro-Israel i just wanna say that Hurting and amateurist, you're playing a bit semantically disingenuous if you want to restrict use of the term "genocidal" only to those who succeed in wiping out the entirety of a people

― Jargon Kinsman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, January 12, 2014 3:11 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I didn't say anything about success.

there are zionists who openly advocate the destruction of the palestinian people, but they are not the engineers of israeli policy, which historically has been awful enough w/o confusing things with the g-word.

i expect this won't stay up too long but here's a link to a copy of the cockburn article:

http://www.phibetaiota.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/2013-12-01-Cockburn-on-Kerry-as-Secretary-of-Nothing.pdf

irrespective of what i think of Sharon and being broadly pro-Israel i just wanna say that Hurting and amateurist, you're playing a bit semantically disingenuous if you want to restrict use of the term "genocidal" only to those who succeed in wiping out the entirety of a people

― Jargon Kinsman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, January 12, 2014 3:11 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I didn't say anything about success.

― ★feminist parties i have attended (amateurist), Sunday, January 12, 2014 10:45 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Right, as ruthless as Sharon could be, I really don't think his GOAL was to wipe out Palestinians.

letter from the lubavitcher rebbe to sharon:
http://www.chabad.org/therebbe/letters/default_cdo/aid/327408/jewish/Condolence-Letter-to-Ariel-Sharon.htm

whether or not sharon could legally or practically have been charged with 'war crimes,' it seems indisputable that he bore ultimate responsibility for the refugee camp killings. whatever else he may have been or done, i can't extend any admiration to a guy with that on his resume.

no admiration extended on my part

Sharon killed only those who deserved to be met with the force of carnage.I weep not for any of his victims

kiddies too, huh

whether or not sharon could legally or practically have been charged with 'war crimes,' it seems indisputable that he bore ultimate responsibility for the refugee camp killings. whatever else he may have been or done, i can't extend any admiration to a guy with that on his resume.

― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, January 12, 2014 12:53 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah, I agree he has much culpability there. his later pragmatism permitted him to do some not-bad things before his stroke. i don't admire the man, but i wouldn't want the task of making a summary judgment of his life and actions.

i also don't know if i agree with the application of "ultimate" responsibility--seems to simplify something that was multi-causal.

a friend wrote this - imo, very beautiful - piece about baraka:
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/159747/amiri-baraka

“Who told 4,000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers/ to stay away from home that 

is this really the line? Cuz that doesnt even make sense. Is he saying that their home was the twin towers?