That's what I figured.
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Thursday, 9 January 2014 03:29 (ten years ago) link
critics usu don't come out, cuz no one cares
AW's politics are far too addled to earn "right-wing" I'd say
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 January 2014 03:39 (ten years ago) link
free armond
― Hungry4Ass, Thursday, 9 January 2014 03:40 (ten years ago) link
Zack Snyder’s powerful visionary re-imagining of the spiritual potential in comix trounces Alfonso Cuaron’s second-rate Kubrick-DePalma rip-off.
right is wrong, up is down, dogs are cats
― the "Weird Al" Yankovic of country music (stevie), Thursday, 9 January 2014 07:30 (ten years ago) link
lol what does that insult even mean― Hungry4Ass, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 1:44 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think it means that white is accusing mcqueen of being an uncle tom. or low-class. or both, somehow. pretty hateful either/both ways.
what happens when you veer into unintentional self-parody and just stay on that road for years and years? when do people start ignoring you? or are we doomed to play this out forever?
― ★feminist parties i have attended (amateurist), Thursday, 9 January 2014 08:18 (ten years ago) link
btw if you type "armond white" into Google, it autofills "troll" afterward
― ★feminist parties i have attended (amateurist), Thursday, 9 January 2014 08:23 (ten years ago) link
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/01/13/armond-white-kicked-out-of-ny-critics/
― Number None, Monday, 13 January 2014 19:01 (ten years ago) link
Gee, that's certainly not going to fuel his schtick any.
― Alfre, Lord Woodard (Eric H.), Monday, 13 January 2014 19:09 (ten years ago) link
(Armond tosses out provocations like grenades and eats acclaimed films for breakfast)
an editor let this sentence in?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 19:20 (ten years ago) link
It's a parenthetical
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Monday, 13 January 2014 19:27 (ten years ago) link
you don't say
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 19:37 (ten years ago) link
I guess this would all be considered a win-win, really.
― Alfre, Lord Woodard (Eric H.), Monday, 13 January 2014 19:37 (ten years ago) link
I saw 12 Years yesterday and consider Armond's accusations of slavery porn to be among the most clueless he's ever uttered. He's not a critic, he's a shameless, attention-craving charlatan who's found the best way to get what he wants with the least effort.
― the "Weird Al" Yankovic of country music (stevie), Monday, 13 January 2014 22:56 (ten years ago) link
what does he want, tell me
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Monday, 13 January 2014 22:59 (ten years ago) link
oh attention. well that's bad then
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:00 (ten years ago) link
for its own sake, its not very worthwhile.
― the "Weird Al" Yankovic of country music (stevie), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:04 (ten years ago) link
you'd think he'd like porn
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 13 January 2014 23:05 (ten years ago) link
because...
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:12 (ten years ago) link
he's Christian
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:16 (ten years ago) link
Note his dropping of the names Michael Lucas and Wakefield Poole into his reviews.
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:18 (ten years ago) link
link?
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:19 (ten years ago) link
he likes a fair amount of brainless pop music, cuz he's gay
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:23 (ten years ago) link
how nice
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:26 (ten years ago) link
nice day all day on the nice board
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 13 January 2014 23:36 (ten years ago) link
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, January 13, 2014 11:12 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
because he enjoys the films of Paul WS Anderson
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 13 January 2014 23:40 (ten years ago) link
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Monday, January 13, 2014 6:19 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
From his ridiculous rant against the Palm D'Or re: Blue is the Warmest Color:
The Festival circuit is notoriously gullible and 2013 moviegoers may never have seen stuff like this, not even Radley Metzger’s Therese and Isabelle or Jake Deckard’s Men in the Sand) but at best they’ll be shocked, not enlightened, bored not edified.
(ok, so my memory failed me a bit--he's not referencing Wakefield Poole directly, but rather a recent remake of Poole's 70s gay porn film Men in the Sand. Still...)
A Google search didn't turn up his reference to Michael Lucas, and I can't remember which review it occurred in (probably something from the NY Press days), but as far as I can recall, it was a similar kind of comparison.
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 01:52 (ten years ago) link
oic he's got a catholic block
― a group of dadfucker types (Matt P), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 02:13 (ten years ago) link
toting up the religious bigots itt
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 02:23 (ten years ago) link
on the Armond story and other hot-take 'controversies'
http://blog.sundancenow.com/weekly-columns/bombast-124
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 January 2014 17:26 (ten years ago) link
http://cityarts.info/2014/02/11/p-c-ping-pong/
The film tours pre-Feminist oppression and indicts Catholic Church restrictions before arriving at its predetermined destination: a harangue on sexual tolerance regarding Philomena’s gay son which includes the mushiest, most calculating AIDS exploitation since Brokeback Mountain.
!!?
― Eric H., Wednesday, 12 February 2014 19:19 (ten years ago) link
Brokeback Mountain exploits AIDS by having a gay guy be a victim of a homophobic murder in the 1970s, duh!
That said, Philomena does sound insufferable. The church and Republicans are homophobic? You're shitting me!
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 22:09 (ten years ago) link
he should have just coined "AIDSploitation" otherwise really what's the point?
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 23:11 (ten years ago) link
Okay, why didn't any of you tell me that Armond has a column in Out magazine now?
Anyway, I may be misreading this review but if I get the gist, it's that the 300 sequel is good because it has hot men and abs: http://www.out.com/entertainment/armond-white/2014/03/16/zack-snyder-re-invents-epic-erotic-300-rise-empire
"Most adventure movies offer fleeting thrills, Snyder’s 300 series combines an emotional surge with a chubby that keeps you ready for more."
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Monday, 17 March 2014 19:20 (ten years ago) link
The spiky and smooth neck hairs are as textured as the different sets of aureole and bulgy nipples that—through 3D imagery—seem touchable.
genuinely feel this could be a rejuvenative direction for him. rex reed should do it too.
― difficult listening hour, Monday, 17 March 2014 19:31 (ten years ago) link
news to me! defensible standard for such a film imho
xp
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 March 2014 19:31 (ten years ago) link
LOL, I actually only just today found out Armond was in OUT myself. I can only hope this strong editorial guidance helps him achieve lucidity. This particular review (and the one for Long Day Closes) make more sense than almost anything he's written in the last decade.
― Eric H., Monday, 17 March 2014 19:40 (ten years ago) link
Not serving as your own editor will do that.
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Monday, 17 March 2014 19:44 (ten years ago) link
Her black eyes and dark heart recall the great Irene Pappas’s Helen of Troy in The Trojan Women, yet she wields a sword with slo-mo vaginal power.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 March 2014 19:45 (ten years ago) link
gorgeous men enflamed by their emotions
emotive men engorged by their flaming
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 March 2014 20:30 (ten years ago) link
Best thing he's written in years.
― Quinoa Phoenix (latebloomer), Monday, 17 March 2014 20:55 (ten years ago) link
it's like armond's dirrrty cousin, raymond white.
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 18 March 2014 10:01 (ten years ago) link
i smell a sitcom
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 18 March 2014 10:02 (ten years ago) link
identical cousins, one a pugnacious, self-deluded critic for a prestigious daily (ok, we can take a little license) who is a lightning rod of controversy, the other a randy, hedonistic gossip columnist for a LGBT magazine.
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 18 March 2014 10:03 (ten years ago) link
wow I had totally forgotten Armond White took Public Enemy to task for "caving" to the white media over the Prof Griff/anti-semitism flap
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 April 2014 20:56 (nine years ago) link
"With this attitude, Chuck D isn't good for anything except recording mindless, pointless confections. This is the first tough fight Public Enemy has had to face and they've crumbled like chalk."
never change bro
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 April 2014 20:59 (nine years ago) link
http://www.indiewire.com/survey/top-films-of-2014-so-far/best-film/armond-white
01. 300: Rise of an Empire02. Blended03. Dormant Beauty04. Jimmy P.05. Journey to the West: Conquering the Demons06. The LEGO Movie07. Maladies08. Palo Alto09. Rob the Mob10. Young and Beautiful (Jeune et jolie)
― Cronk's Not Cronk (Eric H.), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 17:01 (nine years ago) link
Mildly disappointed he didn't go all-in with a vote toward God's Not Dead or Heaven Is For Real.
we agree on #10 at least. Glad to see he and his National Review masters align on The LEGO Movie and capitalism.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 17:55 (nine years ago) link
I'm guessing 05 isn't the Tsai Ming-liang one...
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 17:58 (nine years ago) link