2008 USP(G)ET pt. II: counting the days to 2012 primary thread 1

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6883 of them)

Gore won Ohio-1, actually

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

RE: Missouri Meth

Or in Farmington.

I had hopes for Missouri, but isn't he throwing in the towel to a certain extent, since he's dramatically scaling up advertising in FL, CO, NV and PA while cutting back in MO?

Z S, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Digby's dreaming, by the way

don't think his scenario is gonna come to pass, Republicans wanna be seen as proactive in this, not obstructionist.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Iowa wasn't hard-red - Kerry lost by 10,000 votes, less than the third-party vote. Obama is doing well there because he comes from the state next door, which ships a lot of people in, and because he's spent so much time on the ground.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

2004 was the first time Iowa had gone red since Reagan in 1984, so 2004 was the anomaly. That's not a complete answer, but it's a start.

the missing boy (Euler), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

It's sad to see McCain tangled up in it.

It's delightful to see McCain tangled up in it. I don't buy this fallen angel hypothesis. Where's the evidence that McCain has ever been, as a politician, anything but a calculating power-broker?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

isn't he throwing in the towel to a certain extent, since he's dramatically scaling up advertising in FL, CO, NV and PA while cutting back in MO?

MO has always been winnable on the ground only, so ad time isn't going to do much. but he is probably more likely to win all of those states than MO, at which point MO is moot, so it's not throwing in the tool as much as wisely allocating resources.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

what Tracer said. I've never been convinced by anything McCain's done or said that he has any actual values/standards/moral compass whatsoever.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Not that this will matter, but I'm going to be in STL after the election (to be in the Glenn Branca Symphony 13 thing there on 11/13) I'll let you know what the MO ground says there, if someone here doesn't say it first.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:59 (fifteen years ago) link

(Granted, from what I understand, STL != KC != rest of Missouri.)

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

And thank you guys for the Iowa clarification. duh, I shoulda known.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

You can say that again. I grew up an hour south of St. Louis and there were confederate flags all over the place.

Z S, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost

Z S, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Shakey and Tracer, that post is more my 'public persona' speaking. As my few Republican acquaintances get more and more shrill, I find the best way to deal with them is basically to offer my commiseration especially as pre-2000, he may have been a 'calculating power-broker' but by the standards of Congress, he wasn't a particularly venal one and he has seriously dropped any pretenses of being bi-partisan, appealing to the center or conducting this campaign with dignity and honor.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I can accept Michael's point; in 2000 I dismissed McCain as as honorable hothead. At the same time, his "shift" to the right was inevitable – he needed it to get those fundies.

But lachrymose columns mourning the death of Avenging Angel McCain are best left to the likes of Joe Klein.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Missouri was a slave state. One of the stars on the Confederate flag denotes Missouri.

Something I had to keep reminding the Show-Meers who teased Arkansas while I went to school up there.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Obama is tied among young people in Oklahoma, notably not a slave state, which is better than he's doing among young people in the Deep South.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

the new swing states he's putting into play - Colorado, Virginia, Indiana, etc. - are also states where his performance among young people outpaces his performance in even more solidly blue states

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

just the word "oklahoma" fills me with grinding despair

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.willrogers.com/new/articles/WRD_2007/Dog_Iron_Days/Wagon-Oologah.jpg

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

surrey with the friiiiiiiinge on toooooop

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

average age of non-incumbent Dems who have won the Presidency in the last 50 years: 47
Obama's age: 47

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm excluding Gore on 'non-incumbent' and maybe also 'won', but if you include him, it's 49

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

At the same time, his "shift" to the right was inevitable

Was it? I think it was a miscalculation on his part, 'getting out the base', etc., but before he appealed to that base he may not have been getting as much traction, publicly, as he wanted but at least it wasn't dirty tricks, lies, errors of judgment and blatant pandering and 'misspeaking' making most of the news.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

thinking he could win the Repub nomination by appealling to the middle/independents/Democrats was totally fucking delusional so yes - drift to the right was inevitable.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

why we didn't want Mittmentum (like i said)

gabbneb, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

The Republican party would be nowhere without evangelicals. McCain was either going to win by pandering to them or get killed without them.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Picking Palin was post-nomination is what I meant, Shakey.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Regardless, I just want every independent/center leaning Repub I know to feel abandoned by his campaign and either demoralized enough to stay home or angry enough to vote elsewhere.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

thinking he could win the presidency by appealling to the middle/independents/Democrats was totally fucking delusional as well.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

I think everyone wants that.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Well everyone other than Dr Morbius, maybe.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Michael, McCain has either lied about or misstated his positions routinely for at least the last decade. See each thrilling installment of "An Affair to Remember":

http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh092208.shtml
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh092308.shtml
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh092408.shtml

The issues he flipped on or lied about, or both:

- abortion
- prescription drugs
- his own tax plan
- health care
- school vouchers
- iraq

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I can sympathize with the softly softly approach necessary with Certain Relatives, though.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Tracer, it's not like I've been drinking the Kool-Aid on McCain, it's just that I remember a time when he used to spout off about how 'independent' he was and how he would work with the other side for 'America's best interest'. He's basically not saying that much any more.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

??!?! Um he said that a bunch of times during his convention speech.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

I think he still thinks of himself as a crazy rebel too. HESGONNASHAKETHINGSUPS!

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

man you guys bored huh

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

"hey california man I dunno about you but maybe you didn't realize john mccain was ALWAYS a dick"

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

"no, I knew that, but he used to pretend not to be"

"ALWAYS. TOTAL DICK."

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

And now we're all caught up.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:59 (fifteen years ago) link

IF WASTING TIME ON THE INTERNET IS A FIRING OFFENSE THEN SACK ME NOW

WAIT I DIDN'T MEAN THAT

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

??!?! Um he said that a bunch of times during his convention speech.

So he did but he didn't follow that up with anything but base-rousing rhetoric and he hasn't since.

Michael White, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

During vinyl sifting over the weekend, I found a record called The Voice Of Barry Goldwater which was his 1964 Republican campaign 33 1/3rd. (hey Obama, where's your 2008 campaign vinyl??!) Side A was all pretty much "we must protect ourselves from Communists and Cuba, etc. etc." which is not surprising at all for any campaign in 1964. But Side B? It was a mission statement by Goldwater on how to be "Free Men". He then goes on to list all the things to do fiscally that the Republicans have done the *complete opposite* since Nixon basically, but especially Reagan, Bush I, and of course GWB, down to the events just days ago.

Most of us know Goldwater as the O.G. Libertarian Republican (or back in 1964, a Republican), but the pain of the GWB administration really hurts when I read the liner notes on the Side B part. I plan to take pictures of this record and transcribe the liner notes in a few days. I hope to digitize Side B soon after.

Please send me mail or email saying "POST THE GOLDWATER SHIT". Seriously. This is something I can't sleep on.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Goldwater was infamous for penning irritated letters to Republican presidents whenever they failed in their devotion to fiscal conservatism and common sense.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link

lol. Amazon has it for sale

I should post a customer review.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Dear Mr. President

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

gold color vinyl?!?

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

"This Administration deserves to be trusted because it has kept us safe from terrorist attack since 9/11, has fought and won two wars, has presided over eight years of economic growth, has appointed two stellar justices to the Supreme Court, and has even learned how to do Louisiana’s job of protecting that state from hurricanes. The day will come, and not before long, when Americans will wish that George Bush was still president," - Steven Calabresi, professor of law at the Northwestern University Law School.

deej, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw that on Sully's blog. "The day will come" - lol

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.