Good Charlotte: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (267 of them)
dud!

Andrzej B. (Andrzej B.), Friday, 9 May 2003 02:07 (twenty years ago) link

Maybe it's Alex in NYC's pre-teen son who started this THREAD!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 9 May 2003 02:21 (twenty years ago) link

http://movieweb.com/movie/starwars/rotj2.jpg

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 9 May 2003 02:23 (twenty years ago) link

but which is the dark side?

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 May 2003 02:26 (twenty years ago) link

Ally wins.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Friday, 9 May 2003 02:28 (twenty years ago) link

Who's more worthy of the title "Grand Punk Railroad": Good Charlotte, New Found Glory, or Sum 41?

Nick Mirov (nick), Friday, 9 May 2003 05:18 (twenty years ago) link

i have never heard this band, but the whole 'music for kids' thing is interesting. i like about 50% of what i listened to when i was a teenager, and the other half blows. why should i listen to Good Charlotte if the adult me thinks they suck? what's wrong with the idea that you actually grow up, and that even pop music can produce good things that don't appeal to 14 year olds?

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 9 May 2003 05:46 (twenty years ago) link

Alright, alright....I slightly recant my earlier comment about kids ("They don't know any better and have lower standards."),...although I still think it's a defensible point. They DON'T any better. But, some might argue, they don't CARE! And that's fine...my only problem in the case of Good Charlotte is that they are borrowing wholesale from the iconography of an earlier era of Punk Rock, yet playing music that is as watered down and devoid of the definite article's spark, edge and sensibility as can be. They're hijacking the image of Punk Rock, but using it to sell a shallow, anaemic knock-off of it.


Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 9 May 2003 05:55 (twenty years ago) link

whoops, that irate assertion should read: They DON'T know any better.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 9 May 2003 06:09 (twenty years ago) link

I like their latest single.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 9 May 2003 07:04 (twenty years ago) link

my sisters boyfriend is in love with this band. i threw him out of my house for bashing Durutti Column. Trying to tell me that Good Charlotte is better than anything Durutti Column has ever put out. I asked him if he ever listened to Durutti Column and he said no. I followed it up with a "get out".

Chris V. (Chris V), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:21 (twenty years ago) link

anthony miccio to thread

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:22 (twenty years ago) link

What bothers me the most about them(apart from them being worse than sugar ray) is, they take a subject(re "life styles..") wich seems they have nothing in common with, and than turn it into novelty, sorta like its really important for them to deliver the "message".
kinda like Milli Vanilli lip syncing, kid rock rapping about being brought up in a tuff neighborhood. the point where novelty becomes fakery.

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 11:31 (twenty years ago) link

I thought Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous was terrible; but I love Girls and Boys. I don't have an opinion on 'Good Charlotte' per se: is that terribly wrong of me? Just another pop band. I can see why people might want to turn them into the new 'Avril' as something against which to assert your own 'credibility' but I really can't see the fucking point.

alext (alext), Friday, 9 May 2003 11:43 (twenty years ago) link

"I don't really have a Good Charlotte opinion myself anymore, but I do gotta say it's annoying how EASY a target they're becoming. All the people whining about how they're not a "real" punk band make me WANT to like them. "

Chuck, you (and Xgau) basically summed up my feelings on Avril Lavigne. Stay tuned to SOTC in the coming weeks...

As for GC, they're neither classic nor dud IMO.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:21 (twenty years ago) link

Dude, jess, clearly Alex is Vader; I mean would Luke Skywalker use all that BOLD TEXT??

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:22 (twenty years ago) link

luke skywalker, sweaty dude

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

bite my ass you closeminded posers. ANYBODY can tell these guys dress like Rancid but sound like more like Third Eye Blind (possessed with the brain of a less strident, naive-in-a-different-way Minor Threat-era Ian MacKaye). Why do you think that's perceptive?

I have already talked about these guys enough.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 17:30 (twenty years ago) link

one thing I'd add to my original rant is that the title track ain't redundant at all. In fact, the anti-critic screams sound more justified with each listen (especially since they question the value of their lives right afterwards, something fellow-critic-targets 311 really should have done).

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 17:32 (twenty years ago) link

their lives=madden bros. lives, not critics. they're not pulling a Chuck D guess-the-crew-did-it thing.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 17:33 (twenty years ago) link

ANYBODY can tell these guys dress like Rancid but sound like more like Third Eye Blind

A good point, and one I'll swiftly support, though Rancid themselves copped their whole aesthetic from the Exploited et al.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 9 May 2003 19:33 (twenty years ago) link

Alex, you are the Blackwell of ILM.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

>>though Rancid themselves copped their whole aesthetic from the Exploited et al.<<

Oh come on.

They took their HAIRCUTS from the Exploited, if that. (Or do the Exploited have all kindsa sweet pretty melodies I've never heard?) And how original were the Exploited anyway? (Actually, if "et. al." means "the Clash and Specials", tho, you might have a point. Though those bands copped big chunks of their aesthetic from Slade and Desmond Dekker, I guess. Who might not have been originals, either.)

And Third Eye Blind are better than the Exploited were, anyway. (Tho
not better than the 4 Skins or Rudimentary Peni, maybe. I forget.)

chuck, Friday, 9 May 2003 20:02 (twenty years ago) link

especially since they question the value of their lives right afterwards, something fellow-critic-targets 311 really should have done
their lives=madden bros. lives, not critics. they're not pulling a Chuck D guess-the-crew-did-it thing.

Well thats the only explenation about them that makes sense. but one problem remains, the first thing that hit my mind was how awful was that track, how bands like Lit and Sugar Ray did it much better(i ain't no fan of Lit and Sugar Ray).

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 20:51 (twenty years ago) link

Rexjr, what element makes those groups do "it" better for you, since you're no fan of theirs. Sugar Ray, who never even did anything in this style until their more recent work, seem more focused on individuals girls, not being young and disaffected. And Lit always seemed like horrific assholes. What exactly is the "it" you're referring to.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 20:58 (twenty years ago) link

punk-pop anthony? their tracks seem more tolerable and even richer than "lifestyles" wich sounds poor,week,empty to me.

And Lit always seemed like horrific assholes
I'll second that.

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

and the lyrics can be taken in two ways, its not a coin. either they're critisising everybody around them or/and just question the value of their own lives. its frankly not much different than madonna.

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

You can take a piece of shit and say it's the champion of the people and people will react. But it still doesn't change the fact that it's a piece of shit.

Carey (Carey), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:33 (twenty years ago) link

They took their HAIRCUTS from the Exploited, if that.

I should've been clearer -- Rancid appropriated their *VISUAL* style from the Exploited et al. ("et al" meaning GBH, Crass, Discharge, etc.)

(Or do the Exploited have all kindsa sweet pretty melodies I've never heard?)

Uh....no, not really, although "sweet" and "pretty" are conceivably relative terms.

And how original were the Exploited anyway?

Well, they probably owe Sham 69 a debt or two....

(Actually, if "et. al." means "the Clash and Specials", tho, you might have a point.

Rancid completely owe their *SOUND* to those two bands, you are spot-on, Chuck!

Though those bands copped big chunks of their aesthetic from Slade and Desmond Dekker, I guess.

Not quite sure about the Slade part (weren't the Clash bigger fans of Mott than Slade?) but yeah....

And Third Eye Blind are better than the Exploited were, anyway. (Tho not better than the 4 Skins or Rudimentary Peni, maybe. I forget.)

Well, Third Eye Blind and the Exploited are completely apples and oranges -- they make very different musics for very different audiences predisosed to different emotions, sensibilities, etc. But, strictly as "music as universal language," Third Eye Blind are probably a good deal more capable than the Exploited of a broader range of musical options.

Rudimentary Peni are, in their own little community, vastly overrated.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:35 (twenty years ago) link

rexJr, I wasn't talking about "Lifestyles," but the title track of the album. Have you heard the whole thing?

Carey, who gave you asshole pills today? You like the Doves. Nyeh.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:38 (twenty years ago) link

like I said someone stole my name. It wasn't me.
blah blah blah reno blah blah blah no hands no computer how could i do it.

Carey (Carey), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:39 (twenty years ago) link

I'v mentioned it before that "Lifestyles" was the reason of me not hearing anything else by them.

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 21:40 (twenty years ago) link

sorry, Rexjr, I thought you were commenting on the band based on more than the hearing of one song.

Carey, you're a not-even-heard-the-whole-album-would-like-them-if-they-were-tall-british-guys-with-big-eyes-asshole. :p

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:42 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, I am Anthony. Yes. I. Am.

Carey (Carey), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

(re "life styles..")
I'v mentioned it above that i was commenting on the single and NOT the entire album or their ENTIRE output.

rexJr., Friday, 9 May 2003 21:48 (twenty years ago) link

Rexjr, the stuff of mine you quoted was about a different song, hence I thought you heard it.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:50 (twenty years ago) link

>>Not quite sure about the Slade part (weren't the Clash bigger fans of Mott than Slade?)<<<

Theoretically. But the gang shouts (and the reggae, believe it or not), were presaged by Slade, not Mott (who I love, don't get me wrong.) "All the Young Punks" does have something or other in common with "All the Young Dudes," though, I suppose. I just forget what.

chuck, Friday, 9 May 2003 21:52 (twenty years ago) link

Good point, Chuck.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 9 May 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

Good Charlotte are awful, to put it mildly. Yet another band created by record companies to cash in on the teen angst power pop flavor of the month. Not that there's anything wrong with cashing in. The only problem I have with bands like them is that the music sucks.

The older I get (38) the more I think rock/pop/punk whatever hit it's peak in the late 70's - early 80's. I'll take the Clash and the Ramones and Stiff Little Fingers over any of the popular music today.

Davlo (Davlo), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:16 (twenty years ago) link

Rudimentary Peni are, in their own little community, vastly overrated.

This is my favorite sentence of the whole thread.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:41 (twenty years ago) link

dude weren't R.Peni like 15 when they released their first ep's???
c'mon they totally OWNED the exploited, crass and all other 25 yr old punxorz at the time.

chaki (chaki), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:46 (twenty years ago) link

+ their artwork is timeless.

chaki (chaki), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:47 (twenty years ago) link

they were the eater of peace punk

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:47 (twenty years ago) link

ok i love the zounds and the cravits

chaki (chaki), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:49 (twenty years ago) link

obvious r peni is streets and streets ahead of crass who were just terrible

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

JESS, they were not!

chaki (chaki), Friday, 9 May 2003 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

wait, did crass do "yes sir, i will"? i used to play the shit outta that in college to piss off my roommate. i change my vote to classic!

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 10 May 2003 00:02 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, they did, so hurrah! Peace is established. The goon who reviewed most all of the Crass albums on the AMG can be ignored. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 10 May 2003 01:01 (twenty years ago) link

the names crass not clash you can take your punk credentials and shove em up your ass.

chaki (chaki), Saturday, 10 May 2003 01:09 (twenty years ago) link

Punk is just another word for prison bitch.
And Good Charlotte is punk.

Ex-Tennis Star, Saturday, 10 May 2003 02:25 (twenty years ago) link

Yep, Joel was a judge on The Voice Australia with Seal and Keith Urban (who got a promotion to American Idol and will now be replaced with...Ricky Martin) because...well, I have no fucking clue, all I know is every commercial break on television these days has 'I'm selling fried chicken or mobile phone coverage.

Ceci n'est pas une Le Snak (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 27 January 2013 01:25 (eleven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1WCT9W11Ok

da croupier, Sunday, 27 January 2013 01:29 (eleven years ago) link

Anyway, LAWN BOWLS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIX27v5SmgY

Ceci n'est pas une Le Snak (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 27 January 2013 01:30 (eleven years ago) link

one year passes...

I salute them for surviving these tough times

http://www.theonion.com/articles/good-charlotte-recording-10-new-songs-to-be-played,35797/

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 April 2014 21:19 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.