We really don't care about theatre do we?

A man is not an orange. You can't eat the fruit and throw the peel away!

actually that one sucks tbh

inspirational.

Alright then, I really love the monologues (its almost all monologue) in Alan Clarke's TV film "Road" (its on youtube, great acting in it). It was originally a play by Jim Cartwright.

ah this sounds good, i'll check it out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA3re1Ng54k

speaking of friel, theres some good 'uns in "philadelphia here i come". at least from what i remember when i read it for the leaving cert.

yeah i love that play. also did it for the leaving.

i was thinking of entire plays that consist of monologues when i asked about this - seems to be something irish writers favour.

Saw a great monologue (one-man play) a way back in the 80s called Judgement by George Dillon. Very powerful and haunting, the memory of it has never left me.

that does sound good, hard to find though!

do ppl like Rattigan? My exposure is limited, but The Winslow Boy is getting p damn good reception on B'way

So...if you're a fledgling theatre group doing Sondheim's Assassins, and charging $20 a ticket, perhaps don't use MIDI FILES as your fucking accompaniment tracks? Also perhaps when you have a four part barbershop harmony in "Gun Song", that at least two of you are on the correct notes?

Feel so ripped off, if a friend of mine hadn't have been in it, I'd have left midway through.

What do you all think of Punchdrunk in general? I see Ledge was at The Drowned Man in London, upthread.

I saw this last night and I thought it was amazing, incredible sets, totally immersive, brilliant physical theatre. I saw Sleep No More i New York a few weeks ago and I loved that too.

My friend left early and I suspect she hated it. I just found the entire thing incredibly absorbing, it reminded me of the weirdest elements of acting class, and the same feeling of freedom that you get from that sort of deep dive into theatricality.;

Some of the David Lynch influence went from nod to rip-off, in The Drowned Man, like actually using music written by him felt a bit much, even if it was amazing seeing their incredibly costumed dancers shuffling along to The Pink Room from Fire Walk With Me... always felt this should be some alternative form of techno.

I also feel there's a slight hint of money spinning from what they do, but still love the worlds they create.

Last night I had this really odd one-on-one with one of the actresses where she led me into this room, shone a red light in my eyes and examined my face, then made me sign a form making my image "the property of Temple Studios" (the whole thing is set in a 60s film studio.)

She then put a trenchcoat and scarf on me and walked me into this pitch black corner of the room and left me for a minute or so, then these strobes started flickering and a director's voice came through directing me in this love scene whereby the actress re-entered from the darkness further away and this sort of face-off happened, it was all amazingly scripted, and the "scene" went on for a few minutes, then the lights came back on and she led me out and was like "that was wonderful - the studio will be in touch."

It's just been extended to March, I really recommend going.

I really liked it and I was a bit cynical at the outset and would actually really like to go again and have a different experience (I imagine) but it's expensive got my brother and his girlfriend tickets for his birthday and saw him a few days later and all he said was "your cowboy play was weird". I went in july (cheaper preview) and have occasionally thought since then "that's still going on night after night that's pretty cool" and now they've extended it!

Yeah I am tempted to go again, it was absolutely huge, I was on each floor but I am sure I missed bits. There were some incredibly creepy nooks and crannies around the place.

Their NY show has been going for two years.

I'd love to see this. Is there much of a narrative running through it LG?

^ pofaced way of saying tell us more about this love scene, tbh

It's all based on Woyzeck and Day Of The Locust, there is a narrative but it's quite abstract and the experience will be different wherever you decide to go, or whomever you follow. Personally after seeing the NY show, which was Macbeth meets Hitchcock, I didn't feel the need to follow all the main characters or to see the main scenes. Though it probably would be enjoyable to do that. It can be a collection of lots of little experiences.

It's mostly silent scenes expressed by physical theatrics or dance, though there is some speech. It's all quite muscular and wringy.

The love scene thing was like a one to one, which can happen you at Punchdrunk shows, but not always, is kind of luck of the draw, there are tons of different ones in each show they do, I think. (In NYC I waltzed with a witch.)

I basically walked after a sort of PA character after she'd done one of the main characters make-up and after she put me in the dark the director's voice came on and was talking about darkness and the city, and as the strobes came on it was like "in the shimmering lights a figure approaches you" and the actress kind of walked into this tiny enclosure of red curtains I was in.

There was a sort of confetti effect to the strobes and the director's voice was all this stuff about like "you never thought you'd see her again, yet here you are, you touch her face, you take her hand, you know this moment is fleeting, but it is the greatest moment of your life" and she was about to kiss me and then he's like CUT and it all ended.

It was sort of cheesy and dark in a Lynchian kind of way, but also really intense, the actress was v striking, again it reminded me of some of the more full-on things I've done in acting class, like total immersion in another person.

Obv lots of titillation involved, but that's kind of what Punchdrunk do, the shows are brimming with sex and sexual jealousy.

It's funny, the completist in me gets a bit paralysed by choice at the thought of open-ended participatory stuff in case I end up somehow missing what's 'important'. Obv I know that's not the point at all and is a stupid way to think, but it's a feeling I can never shake. Innocuous things that make you irrationally unconfident etc.

(Sounds great though!)

Speaking of caring about theatre, the four-hour Einstein on the Beach is streaming online this month, somewhere out there.

Meanwhile:
http://observer.com/2014/01/an-a-ffair-to-remember-toni-bentley-brings-her-anal-sex-memoir-to-the-stage/

I'm going to see Frank Langella in King Lear this Saturday. Don't think that one has anal sex in it, iirc.

Excited to see this Peter Brook doc at some point:

http://www.filmlinc.com/films/on-sale/the-tightrope

Medea at the Riverside (run has just ended) was v good, in parts. Medea itself was played as a vampiric sort which didn't scan with the later, powerful scenes where the logic for her actions is more fully laid out with an emotional core to them. The messenger's speech and re-telling of death was poetically and psychologically convincing and my favourite bit of acting. The score was excellent as well.

I should re-watch the Pasolini film, the play made it seem worse in my faint recollection of it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/theater/in-broadway-seats-few-guys-among-the-dolls.html?hpw&rref=arts&_r=0

why does dudes never want to watch rocky musicallllls

everyone really owes it to themselves to see an episode of john jesurun's "chang in a void moon." these don't happen very often anymore...

http://www.incubatorarts.org/chang.html

Wanted to see this during its brief run last year... I guess it took a Pulitzer to get it reopened.

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/14/pulitzer-winning-play-the-flick-to-reopen-in-new-york

King Lear at the National last night (Dir: Sam Mendes, Lear: Simon Russell Beale). Not very good, really. Heavy handed modern military dictatorship setting; hard to feel anything for this Lear; didn't pull off the long scenes that you need for the narrative (eg reduction of the retinue); some quite poor verse-speaking (Regan basically incomprehensible by act V). So it hit that problem where it really drags during 4 & 5 because it's lost you during 1-3 (Bad sign: during final scene – Lear's death, Cordelia's corpse – I was mostly thinking about how Edgar is going to sort out this political mess). There were good things - Beale hit it sometimes, I liked Kent, the Fool and Goneril – but generally disappointed.

I do want some metaphysical horror at abject, obtuse & cruel existence in my lear, and there wasn't a bit of that.

oh, & I'd seen this in one or two reviews & thought it was facetious or captious criticism… but it's quite hard to get Uncle Albert from Only Fools and Horses out of your head while watching Beale. I don't think it's just the beard – it's the movement & posture.

yes I too detected a merryfieldian influence in his characterisation

well we don't know that here. I think I've only seen him onstage in Spamalot.

SRB is Falstaff in a new TV Henry IV

from two years ago

btw morbs the flick totally slays, make sure you get to it

i'm playin G.W. in a production of S0rdid Lives. kinda fun, but def a weird turn for me

Bush?

I just saw the DC production of Henry IV Part I with Stacy Keach as Falstaff... good, tis a pity the king is like the 5th most interesting character... But the actor who plays Hotspur is very distracting when shirtless bcz he has the most chiseled abs ever seen in the theater. During his "letter" scene I was just thinking "NO ONE is listening to you right now."

I saw Stacy Keach as King Lear a few years ago (Robert Falls directing).

Set in post-Soviet Eastern Europe. Opening scene in a hotel bathroom, then ballroom:
http://livedesignonline.com/site-files/livedesignonline.com/files/archive/livedesignonline.com/theatre/Lear-1.jpg

welp S0rdid opens tonight. even tho I've done this about 50 times now I'm a ball of nerves, fortunately I get to drink beer on stage tho.

break a leg n!

sanks!

@MarkHarrisNYC
When I was a kid, they showed actual scenes from plays on the Tonys. Sometimes they made me want to see plays. Thank God they stopped that.

any theatre homies know anything that's playing the San Diego Fringe? First one I see with a pedigree is an Edinburgh standup alum, Jon Bennett.

http://www.sdfringe.org/2014/shows.php

TAVI thread has me thinking again about the Steppenwolf production of This Is Our Youth. As a script, I thought it was great and confirmed the favorable opinion I have of Lonergan from his film work. Staging by Anna D. Shapiro generally good and interesting, in part because it was performed in a small space with the audience facing each other on two sides of the stage. (Is there a name for that? I thought black box was audience on all four sides, but what I'm talking about is like bleachers at a high-school football game. And the production of RENT that I saw a year or two ago was like this, too.) Performances are where I'm the most uncertain: Like I thought, coming out of the theatre, that Kieran Culkin was by far the best in the bunch, but am I only thinking that because his character is the showiest, all insults and mock-heroic language? I mean, I thought Cera was kind of milquetoast, but again, thinking about it: Is that because his character himself is a willowy, passive dude? Like, was he actually well-cast for the part? (Don't know exactly, because I'd never seen/read the play before.) I dunno, there were particular readings that seemed a little wooden, though. Maybe he's gotten better. Oh, but I read two separate reviews that praised him! Like, the Chicago Reader review singled him out specifically. Tavi, I thought, totally acquitted herself well. Struck me as kind of a Michelle Williams role? Like, Tavi doesn't have M-Will's range, but it's that kind of character. Huh, Kenneth Lonergan and Sarah Polley seem kind of simpatico, in a weird way.

This Is Our Youth is only doing 'modest' Broadway biz. NYC millenials can't figger out how to download theatre.

Staging of Bergman's Scenes from a Marriage downtown getting raves, $75 too rich for my blood tho.

was it toneehuis directed by Ivo Van Hove?

it's expensive but i'd pay to see anything IVH did.

Van Hove, yeah -- he also has an Angels in America production that's about to play here.

http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2014/17/ivo-van-hove-on-directing-scenes-from-a-marriage-and-angels-in-america

Thanks for that link, excellent interview.

although the AIA looks a bit unconvincing. i love the idea of an empty stage too but having people sit on the edge of the proscenium when they need to sit down is a bit bizarre.

not unconvincing just... trying a bit too hard or something.

Any interesting fringe stuff in London? have an urge to see something

will let you know.

i know it's far ahead, expensive and not fringe but i'd be booking to see Van Hove's Antigone with J Binoche if i were you.

http://www.barbican.org.uk/theatre/event-detail.asp?ID=16573