the US version was like this as well. Is there a UK version that is different? Is the box thinner?
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 16:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:12 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:17 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:20 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
you don't mean the frosty the snowman thing right? heckfire, well i consider myself a cocteaus peak-period trainspotterbut that's foxed me. tell u what the NME COMPELTE DISCOGRAPHY from 1993, which had EVERYTHING listed on it (dates, prices, trax, cat numbers) never mentioned anything called 'SNOW'.
enlighten me please alex, kyle et al.
― piscesboy, Monday, 1 November 2004 17:49 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:20 (8 years ago) Permalink
it was called Snow
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:22 (8 years ago) Permalink
― jeffery (jeffery), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:22 (8 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Monday, 1 November 2004 18:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Hill (Chris Hill), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 20:36 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 20:37 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Seb (Seb), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 04:56 (8 years ago) Permalink
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 05:35 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:09 (8 years ago) Permalink
One of the joys of the BBC album is that Guthrie didn't produce it.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
Oh, definitely. It's still a transition album as such, and consisted only of Guthrie and Fraser, Raymonde hadn't joined yet. But it's got some absolutely crackerjack numbers, and they also do a few things throughout that they didn't try much again (the overt jazz-scat nods on "Multifoiled," for instance). Still had a lot of early hyperdourness but was channeled into different directions -- the glowering guitar and doom beats on "When Mama Was Moth" and then the explosion/cascade of the concluding "Musette and Drums," which is a monster and a half.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:53 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:54 (8 years ago) Permalink
-- Alex in NYC (vassif...), November 1st, 2004 7:11 PM. (vassifer) (later)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:28 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:06 (8 years ago) Permalink
There's a big "BUT" however, which is that the sound on this pre-remaster CD is absolutely atrocious, it sounds like it was recorded using a dictaphone from three rooms down the hall. I suspect this may be a big barrier to my enjoyment, as it certainly clouds a lot of the sonic intricacies at work. My copy of Treasure sounds startingly clear by comparison.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 7 November 2004 00:29 (8 years ago) Permalink
It occurred to me that a good band doing a version of "Musette and Drums" via a huge sound system would be genius.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 November 2004 01:30 (8 years ago) Permalink
i almost agree, but can't completely because of the overwhelming sadness (to my ears anyway) on those eps. they are wonderful though. and quite a solid package together too. i wrote a random phone number on the case to "twinlights" and i curse that damn number everytime i look at the case.
every once in awhile i'll pull out blue bell knoll or four calendar cafe and bliss out. "spanglemaker" is my favorite though. i can't imagine treasure without those big fake drums either.
― tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 7 November 2004 01:35 (8 years ago) Permalink
The whole EP is perhaps a perfect summation of that period of the band, but yeah, the song itself...man. A friend, many years ago, said she envisioned the song almost like a green slip of material, a scarf or something silken, twirling through a dark cavern that suddenly at the end came forward and enveloped you and took you somewhere else. It was a striking and strictly visual metaphor for the song that has never left me.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 November 2004 02:21 (8 years ago) Permalink
And there's no new album to promote so that leaves the set lists wiiiiiiide open.
http://www.nme.com/news/111427.htm
― piscesboy, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:51 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:28 (8 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:46 (8 years ago) Permalink
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:47 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:08 (7 years ago) Permalink
― joseph (joseph), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:23 (7 years ago) Permalink
..and last night.
so the box set then. in february it's coming out in 2 seperate volumes (for like, a tenner each) usefully bisecting their career into 'the amazing 4ad bits 82 - 90' and 'the boring fontana biot onwards'. which is very nice.
― piscesboy, Thursday, 12 January 2006 17:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:24 (6 years ago) Permalink
Their music was such an important part of my old life (which is why I've been reluctant to write much about them) and for years I couldn't listen to them - it was too painful - but now, in my new life, I can.
Now that's magic.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:29 (6 years ago) Permalink
Charlie, I recommend following your Cocteau purchases in one direction or the other -- I mean, I'd push like Treasure or at least Blue Bell Knoll on you, but if you want to head in their hot-milky-bath direction, start the other way!
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:53 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Friendly Tree (688), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:55 (6 years ago) Permalink
having just uncovered this powerful band quite recently, i'm suddenly confronted with the delightful chore of navigating their back catalogue, and i find myself treading a little carefully so as to not overdose on all the riches at once. i think i'll go with 'treasure' next, and then take it step by step from there. :)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:11 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Treblekicker (treblekicker), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:23 (6 years ago) Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:37 (6 years ago) Permalink
― hank (hank s), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:42 (6 years ago) Permalink
i'll suss out that ep. collection tomorrow i think. particularly since the material is strong.
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:48 (6 years ago) Permalink
i know it's been said many times many ways but my god what a band.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 02:32 (4 years ago) Permalink
You betcha.
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:39 (4 years ago) Permalink
damn I haven't listened to the Cocteau Twins in like a year now, time for another obsessed dive
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:42 (4 years ago) Permalink
yeah she might do a few CT tracks it looks like. short gig otherwise i'd wager.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 27 June 2012 23:14 (10 months ago) Permalink
Thanks for posting the Mojo piece.
My Bloody Valentine? They were just another little indie band to begin with. Lush interested me more because they could actually write songs and had ideas.
He sounds like he's too insecure to admit how good My Bloody Valentine are. Which - if the case - is sad, considering how satisfied he should be with his own body of work. It wouldn't diminish his band in any way. Then again, maybe that mix of insecurity and competitiveness helped him reach the heights he did with CT?...
The only Cocteaus records that make me cringe are the Twinlights and Otherness EPs (from 1995). Twinlights is acoustic and has violins and shite like that, and Otherness is pointless remixes.
I kind of agree with him about Twinlights; I think the instrumentation wasn't up to par. An intriguing exercise - I don't think it's a failure, by any means... But I consider the Otherness EP to be an essential final jewel in their crown. Just listen to the direction that that EP took their live set in; it was yet another breathtaking step in their evolution.
Example 1: The way it drops out at around 3:20 and resurfaces in remix form is a thing of beauty.
Example 2: Definitely NOT a pointless remix.
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:40 (10 months ago) Permalink
Oops, video #2 is supposed to be this:
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:41 (10 months ago) Permalink
Argh. Technical ineptitude. Sorry. It's supposed to be a video of Aloysius live from 1996. Definitely worth checking out if you haven't already done so.
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:43 (10 months ago) Permalink
No, it's because RG was one of that group of people who actually remember MBV as this shambolic live band stumbling round the London scene in the mid to late 80s. As opposed to people who just heard these amazing records coming out of nowhere and presumed they were always that brilliant.
(And I say that as someone who was part of that latter group. But I know quite a few people who remember MBV as an early band, and their later success was, shall we say, unexpected.)
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 28 June 2012 08:33 (10 months ago) Permalink