Just when you thought it was safe - OK CUPID PART 3: The Return of the WOO!

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8300 of them)

Oh. I confused myself by making a typo - in the post three above I mean "I can't countenance the possibility that they would be worse at f/m and the same as men at m/m."

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:17 (8 years ago) Permalink

I've played around with some examples of possible averages and see my logic was indeed skewy. For a 70% overall score, it could be:

Women

f/f = 90
m/f = 75
m/m= 45

Men =

f/f = 68%
m/f = 75%
m/m = 67%

Which would be mean men are better at spotting m/f than either m/m or f/f. Hmm.. that would also be weird. Other combinations I've tried result in both sexes being bettter at spotting female virgins than male ones, which seem noteworthy enough for them to put up on the website.

Can you come up with a set of average scores that fits what we know without any interesting implications at all?

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:38 (8 years ago) Permalink

I always spoil everything.

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 21:21 (8 years ago) Permalink

I can't stop looking at her:

ihttp://www.okcupid.com/profile?pic=0&tuid=8878330946154156249

― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 July 2004 22:59 (8 years ago) Permalink

Ew. I can.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 24 July 2004 23:07 (8 years ago) Permalink

is that the Joker?

― dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:15 (8 years ago) Permalink

I can't stop looking at her:

http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=12703610378878205705

― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 02:04 (8 years ago) Permalink

I can't stop looking at her:

http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=1366843686365106737

haha

― AaronHz (AaronHz), Sunday, 25 July 2004 02:11 (8 years ago) Permalink

I can't stop looking.

― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 08:49 (8 years ago) Permalink

My username is lixenixen, and right now I'm scared of logging in to OkCupid, because I haven't checked it for a few days, and now I fear there's yet another bunch of messages waiting for me, and I have to reply them all, because I feel like a bad person if I don't reply. I'm such a wuss!

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 09:55 (8 years ago) Permalink

On the positive side, lately I've been chatting with this Irish girl who plays in a punk band and seems very nice.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 09:59 (8 years ago) Permalink

radcliffy = oxbridge

I still don't get this... Could someone please explain it to this poor foreigner?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:21 (8 years ago) Permalink

okay... I'm FrancesBean with an incredibly obnoxious photo.

― j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:29 (8 years ago) Permalink

Oxbridge = Oxford and Cambridge. The elite of British universities. Traditionally deemed snobby as well as brainy.

― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:36 (8 years ago) Permalink

Yeah, I knew what Oxbridge meant, but I didn't know it could be used as an adjective. So "radcliffy" = "snobby and brainy"?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:44 (8 years ago) Permalink

Well it isn't really a fully functioning adjective, I suppose. You'd have to say something was 'a bit Oxbridge' or 'Oxbridgey' rather than 'it's Oxbridge'. I never knew the word 'radcliffy' before, btw, so I don't know how close the comparison is. Is radcliffy a bit 'preppy', 'WASPy' or 'Ivy League' too?

― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:50 (8 years ago) Permalink

It's in the okcupid glossary, anyway:

radcliffy

adj. Consisting of the broad range of personality traits normally associated with Harvard girls.

Bob's organized, ambitious, and smart. I wish I were more Radcliffy like he, because I can't get a job at Morgan Stanley. He needs to fuckin' loosen up, though

― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 16:00 (8 years ago) Permalink

Aaron, you're supposed to woo a person.

I don't like this new layout. The most off-putting part is probably the "Real Friends: None (0)" part. Sheesh.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:31 (8 years ago) Permalink

OH MY GOD. MY SECOND LOCAL MATCH IS THIS GUY:
http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=12237521857448720993

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:33 (8 years ago) Permalink

holy crap.

― teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:54 (8 years ago) Permalink

that dude is how I imagine nickalicious.

― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:24 (8 years ago) Permalink

I was gonna just copy and paste part of his rhyme, but then I clicked on his whole profile and the landscape of awful just expanded and came into total view and I just put the link there.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:27 (8 years ago) Permalink

sorry dude.

― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:29 (8 years ago) Permalink

Everything about that profile is really fucking funny, except the bits where he raps.

x-post.

― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:30 (8 years ago) Permalink

He's more Republican
He's more capitalistic
He's more socially conservative
He's less thrifty
He's more loving
He's less energetic
He's less ambitious

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:31 (8 years ago) Permalink

He's more Republican
He's more capitalistic
He's more socially conservative
He's more loving

OMG teh oxymoron!11

― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:34 (8 years ago) Permalink

I like how he couldn't be bothered to rhyme the films.

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:34 (8 years ago) Permalink

Roxy, he sounds like a treasure. Why resist?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:37 (8 years ago) Permalink

But his final words are these:

You should message me if:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can appreciate this bizarre social experiment.

Plus he works on the computer field, and has kids. So it's prolly just a joke.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:56 (8 years ago) Permalink

Ooh. That ruins it.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:57 (8 years ago) Permalink

I thought he was really a terrible conservative white rapper!!

― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 22:01 (8 years ago) Permalink

Just to link this thread to the other ones:

OKCupid.com, Pt.2- Afterparty! Hotel lobby! REMIX!

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 22:03 (8 years ago) Permalink

A woman I was chatting to (and according to her getting on well) deleted her profile rather than continue.

The punchline, of course, was that her profile said she was looking for someone "who could be honest with (her)".

― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 26 July 2004 08:54 (8 years ago) Permalink

I'm embarassed! I actually mailed one of my matches because he banged on about Richard Feynman and drinking gin... AND HE HASN'T REPLIED, OH MY LIFE, I am that Interweb Nutter, dear lord, help!!

― Sarah (starry), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:01 (8 years ago) Permalink

Welcome to my world, starry.

― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:03 (8 years ago) Permalink

I mean!! I was bored! I wasn't like, hitting on him or anything!

Loads of you haven't even filled in any information, come on, that's the most interesting bit, not your moody rubbish photos, ch.

― Sarah (starry), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:06 (8 years ago) Permalink

there needs to be more cutting involved in the profiles.

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:07 (8 years ago) Permalink

No no, I never hit on anyone, I just like to talk. I've made a couple of nice friends on there but mostly I find people don't bother to reply even to the most politely worded messages. Very strange.

― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:08 (8 years ago) Permalink

did you put "a polite notice" as the subject line?

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:10 (8 years ago) Permalink

I tried something like that once. Now I usually just go for "a story about my brother peeing on me".

― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:12 (8 years ago) Permalink

there needs to be more cutting involved in the profiles.

true - only about 70% of the profiles I look at involve self harm in the "most embarassing thing you'll admit" section.

― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:13 (8 years ago) Permalink

and you wonder why they don't reply.

xpost

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:13 (8 years ago) Permalink

how many of those 70% mentions antidisestablishmentarianism?

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:14 (8 years ago) Permalink

yes

xpost

― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:15 (8 years ago) Permalink

maybe they prefer bukkake stories to golden shower stories.

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:16 (8 years ago) Permalink

Perhaps, though I doubt it.
http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=11308544320115783978 = my favourite person so far, though she's silly enough to think that Transformers could defeat Smurfs (she referred to them as "a bunch of blue red neck yuppies") and she called me an old fool.

― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:22 (8 years ago) Permalink

Yay, Andrew F. has sent me a friend invitation! Maybe I should send some of them to you folks, so I won't feel like a loser in the nu-OKCupid.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 26 July 2004 12:31 (8 years ago) Permalink

Ok, I send one to Starry Sarah, because her profile says she likes Tove Jansson.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 26 July 2004 12:33 (8 years ago) Permalink

I've now befriended Ken C and Roxymuzak too, please be my friends...

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 26 July 2004 15:02 (8 years ago) Permalink

Why do you like us?

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 26 July 2004 15:04 (8 years ago) Permalink

Skipping 8200 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

Hmmm well "stuck up" man found me on Plenty of Fish (NOT recommended) & also revisited my OKC profile again last night. It might be time to block.

― emilys., Friday, 24 May 2013 08:21 (2 days ago) Permalink

he followed you to other sites? yikes!

― Nhex, Friday, 24 May 2013 12:15 (2 days ago) Permalink

His first message on the other site: so, why are you too stuck up to talk to me?

― emilys., Friday, 24 May 2013 20:43 (2 days ago) Permalink

I can't believe that guy has to use the internet to get dates, he's probably so successful he's just trying to slow things down a little.

― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 24 May 2013 20:56 (2 days ago) Permalink

Haha, yeah he's probably freaking out because he's never experienced rejection before.

― emilys., Friday, 24 May 2013 21:21 (2 days ago) Permalink

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.