― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 03:18 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 03:55 (9 years ago) Permalink
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 04:40 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 04:45 (9 years ago) Permalink
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 13 March 2005 00:00 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 March 2005 00:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 13 March 2005 00:26 (8 years ago) Permalink
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Sunday, 13 March 2005 00:33 (8 years ago) Permalink
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Sunday, 13 March 2005 01:18 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Suedey (John Cei Douglas), Sunday, 13 March 2005 01:27 (8 years ago) Permalink
I saw the documentary tonight, and I really liked his whole self deprecating sense of humour.
And why are there so many (well two) attractive gay musicians?
― jellybean at home, Sunday, 13 March 2005 01:47 (8 years ago) Permalink
― edd s hurt (ddduncan), Sunday, 13 March 2005 01:55 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Al (sitcom), Sunday, 13 March 2005 02:00 (8 years ago) Permalink
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Sunday, 13 March 2005 02:06 (8 years ago) Permalink
And his sister. Rwor.
― Masked Gazza, Sunday, 13 March 2005 02:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:46 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Jonathan (Jonathan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
I'm prepared to give him another chance, as that's the only track I've heard (and instinctively recoiled from) thus far.
― Goit MacLachlan, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:16 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:52 (8 years ago) Permalink
"Vibrate" is so many leagues above anything Thom Yorke has put his name to! Even apart from that I don't see that they share any similarities at all, either lyrically or sonically.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:47 (8 years ago) Permalink
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:58 (8 years ago) Permalink
What will happen insteadSomeone will demand my headAnd then I will kneel downAnd give it to them
And I like his voice LOADS more than Thom Yorke, who I honestly have no time for. While I can understand someone saying they have similar timbre and texture, Rufus thankfully never sounds like a lamb bleating out of tune
― rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 21:34 (8 years ago) Permalink
I kind of dread the next album: I think by now it's clear that Rufus thrives on attention, and this gives him more confidence to really indulge himself, so now his PR people are doing such stellar work fuck only knows what ideas he'll carry through next.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 21:40 (8 years ago) Permalink
Melody: start on the 5th and descend predictably/diatonically..E DD CC BB A.
Switch Chord to (predictable) Dm.
Melody : F EE DD AA B
Lyrics (from beat 1 of A minor chord) :
"All the times I tried to hide from,everything I was denied..."
Remember to hold your breath, plug your nosefor the nasal whine and sing out of the cornerof your mouth.
Repulsively pathetic, boring, depressing, monotonous,unoriginal and disgusting is Rufus.
-- Musicfan101 (mz...), March 1st, 2006.
the nasal bleating thing is annoying, someone so gaga over opera should pay attention to vocal technique
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 03:14 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 03:49 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Myke. (Myke Weiskopf), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 03:59 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 06:10 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Thursday, 14 September 2006 04:41 (6 years ago) Permalink
spot on. it's all one long, mumbled note. I have no idea why his vocals are so admired.
he makes me want to forcibly expunge his sinus bees.
― guanoman (mister the guanoman), Thursday, 14 September 2006 06:00 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Rowlando for the kidz (Sam Rowlands), Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:23 (6 years ago) Permalink
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Thursday, 14 September 2006 12:48 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Vichitravirya XI (Vichitravirya XI), Thursday, 14 September 2006 12:55 (6 years ago) Permalink
― pisces (piscesx), Thursday, 14 September 2006 13:34 (6 years ago) Permalink
Hott.
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 14 September 2006 14:26 (6 years ago) Permalink
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 14 September 2006 14:31 (6 years ago) Permalink
― gentoo (gentoo), Thursday, 14 September 2006 16:08 (6 years ago) Permalink
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Thursday, 14 September 2006 19:16 (6 years ago) Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 14 September 2006 20:17 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Jamesy (SuzyCreemcheese), Friday, 15 September 2006 01:05 (6 years ago) Permalink
new record, still annoying
― gershy, Sunday, 20 May 2007 23:40 (5 years ago) Permalink
Classic on songs written by other people (like "What Can I Do" off the Antony and the Johnsons record or "I'll Build a Stairway to Paradise"), but I'm not a huge fan of his own songs (I haven't heard that much, though)...it might just be the production, though.
― Tape Store, Monday, 21 May 2007 00:21 (5 years ago) Permalink
He's still a genius.
(Haven't picked up Release the Stars yet, plan on doing so soon)
― The Brainwasher, Monday, 21 May 2007 00:35 (5 years ago) Permalink
I liked his first two records; now he's a certifiable menace. Has Neil Tennant exercised quality control on this one?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 May 2007 00:36 (5 years ago) Permalink
Want One was great though! and Want Two was worth hearing despite the massive overreach. It's the debut I'm not into but I've only given it half a listen. He was great on Letterman last week. I don't know what he was going on about but he belted it out, whatever it was. In lederhosen.
― tremendoid, Monday, 21 May 2007 01:36 (5 years ago) Permalink
I think, when he's on form, he's a fucking amazing melodicist (and a very good singer, obv.) and he's got just enough control alongside his camp to keep his arrangements just the right side of audacious (i.e. impressive rather than pompous).
I also think he hit an unarguable melodic peak circa Want One, and that Want Two was a serious step backwards, totally over-reaching. The new one gains some control back, definitely, and some of the arrangements are amazing, but there's nothing quite as melodically spectacular as the first four tracks on Want One. This is only off a couple of listens, though.
Expect to see choice phrases from this post in a Stylus review near you later this week...
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 21 May 2007 08:29 (5 years ago) Permalink
Perversely (of course) I think Want Two is his best work, certainly the record of his that I play most.
Not quite sure about the new one yet; veering perilously close to writing about His Privileged Life at times and while some of the bitching about previous/failed lovers is quite entertaining he cuts deepest on the America-as-lover-extended-metaphor ballads, e.g. "Leaving For Paris" and especially "Not Ready To Love" which is a quite stunning marriage of Fairport Convention and Art of Noise (both R Thompson and N Tennant making their influence felt). The one with Sian Phillips going mad at the end is also pretty fab.
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 21 May 2007 08:34 (5 years ago) Permalink
enjoyed but wasn't blown away by Judy at Carnegie Hall last year, though I'm certainly thrilled I got to go. haven't found my way into the new one yet; first half-listen sounds good.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 21 May 2007 09:15 (5 years ago) Permalink
Richard Thompson vs the horn section on "Slideshow" = stunning. Things start tailing off for me after that, though. I think he overdoes the trick of starting relatively downbeat/unadorned/vulnerable, piling on the orchestral layers, and ending on a note of triumphal resolution, having turned so many musical corners that the end of each track bears scant relationship to its beginning. Don't get me wrong, it's a *great* trick - but it's also somewhat overplayed. I like the dissatified-nomad-in-exile qualities which "Going To A Town" sets up and "Tiergarten" develops, and I don't miss the more overtly campy playfulness which punctuated previous albums.
― mike t-diva, Monday, 21 May 2007 09:25 (5 years ago) Permalink
It's as if he's trying to convince himself that he's happy.
Musically, though, Richard T is man of the match - I noticed those little Derek Bailey scribbles in "Slideshow"...
― Marcello Carlin, Monday, 21 May 2007 09:32 (5 years ago) Permalink
Making of:
http://www.nowness.com/day/2012/5/5/2130/rufus-wainwright-bitter-tears
― caro's johnson (Eazy), Saturday, 5 May 2012 05:56 (1 year ago) Permalink
I love this thing -- one of the year's best. Never thought I'd say it again about a Wainwright record.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 5 May 2012 16:54 (1 year ago) Permalink
I love this as well, and playing it continuously.
I can't quite pin down what it reminds me of exactly, but it has a nostalgic feel that takes me back to the 70s.
― Bob Six, Sunday, 6 May 2012 09:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
On first listen I was entirely underwhelmed. Much more soft rock than pop. And it's not the sort of soft rock that I find moving ('Art Teacher' was moving).
― we gotta move these refrigerators (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 6 May 2012 14:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
I really like this new one and I haven't even been remotely excited for him since the Want One/Two days. I love the 70s AM rock touches, I think they work pretty well. Kinda wish he'd lay off the gospel backing choirs on some of these though.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:11 (1 year ago) Permalink
huh, had no idea that Nels Cline plays on this album, i wonder what tracks.
― shipl.de.al (some dude), Wednesday, 6 June 2012 13:42 (11 months ago) Permalink