Rolling 'this is sexist' thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2019 of them)

ugh at the screencaptured comments
ugh at humanity
ugh

susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 4 June 2013 22:31 (ten years ago) link

i thought that lindy west's previous piece on this stuff was v. well put together plus extremely funny: http://jezebel.com/5925186/how-to-make-a-rape-joke

it also articulates where she's coming from better than the later piece, which is not on what she said/thinks about these sorts of jokes so much as the horrifying response she's gotten for saying/thinking such stuff. (which response, in turn, would be justified by those making it as 'jokes, bro'.)

stefon taylor swiftboat (s.clover), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 13:59 (ten years ago) link

I was just going to post this similar piece. Like K@73 H@rd1ng says, I think it's not that all jokes involving rape are verboten, it's that you should consider who is the butt of the joke.

I especially like this

10. Dane Cook, you guys. Dane Motherfucking Cook can construct a funny rape joke. This means no one else, anywhere, ever, has an excuse to screw this up.

Je55e, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:17 (ten years ago) link

I don't believe there is any connection between UK newspapers publishing anti-Semitic cartoons and its occurrence in the population.

Which newspaper was this?

Bees Against Racism (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:19 (ten years ago) link

wow, fuck daniel tosh

in fact

I

Hope

He

Gets

R

A

P

I

D

L

Y

B

O

O

O

E

D

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:22 (ten years ago) link

xp the Sunday Times. Start here and read down.

hashtag sizzler (Phil D.), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:25 (ten years ago) link

But it's OK because it has no effect on the culture.

hashtag sizzler (Phil D.), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:26 (ten years ago) link

That's the right wing Rupert Murdoch owned press for you

Bees Against Racism (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:28 (ten years ago) link

/I don't believe there is any connection between UK newspapers publishing anti-Semitic cartoons and its occurrence in the population./

Which newspaper was this?

Steve bell had one this year iirc?

caek, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 17:19 (ten years ago) link

To call Steve Bell evil implies a clarity of purpose I do not want to attribute to anyone involved.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 17:21 (ten years ago) link

This story has me absolutely livid with rage. It's everything wrong with Texas, gun culture, misogyny, the dangers of sex work and a dozen other things all in one handy package.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Jury-acquits-escort-shooter-4581027.php

hashtag sizzler (Phil D.), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:10 (ten years ago) link

What the fuck?! That's astonishing.

хуто-хуторянка (ShariVari), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:18 (ten years ago) link

wtf

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:19 (ten years ago) link

ugh, that story makes me feel physically sick.

Treeship, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:20 (ten years ago) link

one hundred and fifty dollars is justification for taking her LIFE?

get the fuck outta here

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:20 (ten years ago) link

even if it's a million dollars, what. the. fuck. money is an abstraction, it's not real the way human lives are real. obviously the jury didn't give a shit about this poor woman because she was a prostitute. fuck america.

Treeship, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:21 (ten years ago) link

There must be scope for appeal, surely? I can't imagine there is any other country in the world with a legal code where you could walk away from doing that.

хуто-хуторянка (ShariVari), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:22 (ten years ago) link

http://completeoutrageredux.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/bugs.gif

Do Texas next, Bugs!

polyphonic, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:22 (ten years ago) link

that still won't help the people who are forced to live there.

Treeship, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:23 (ten years ago) link

I read about this this morning and I remain perplexed that the jury would accept that he was recovering his 'property' when his misunderstanding about the escort's services would nonetheless have been illegal.

Lectures of Pelé (Michael White), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:26 (ten years ago) link

I would love to see the transcript of this trial. Was it ever addressed that this murdering fuck, if he was genuinely trying to buy sex, was engaged in a crime? And that killing someone during the commission of a crime (or causing injuries to which they later succumb) is in fact a felony?

hashtag sizzler (Phil D.), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:26 (ten years ago) link

xp

hashtag sizzler (Phil D.), Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:26 (ten years ago) link

i assume we are going to hear more about this case. no way this doesn't become a national story.

Treeship, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:28 (ten years ago) link

my wife was telling me about this! wtf bexar county sheeeeeit

one if by lamp, two if by deeznuts (m bison), Friday, 7 June 2013 02:28 (ten years ago) link

Someone on jez pointed out that this woman was in fact killed for NOT providing sex for money. So basically for acting according to law.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 7 June 2013 02:38 (ten years ago) link

I have a vague impression that escort services are allowed to exist because they ostensibly only provide social company. I'm pretty sure everyone knows that's not all they offer, but she was within the bounds of her job description in that case.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 7 June 2013 02:41 (ten years ago) link

May as well put this here (being asked to cover up isn't sexist, but the content is re sexism)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22875243

kinder, Wednesday, 12 June 2013 17:35 (ten years ago) link

what the fuuuuuuck

ttyih boi (crüt), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:44 (ten years ago) link

I don't mean to be the dude who always asks "why do people read Vice" but...

they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:47 (ten years ago) link

Be that dude.

If only they'd balanced it up with a "male writer about to drink himself to death" fashion spread.

Bees Against Racism (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:49 (ten years ago) link

i keep thinking vice is 'better' now with mcinnes gone but then

they do run stuff that's worth reading amid the hipster degeneracy. not that i have an example in mind.

goole, Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:50 (ten years ago) link

otoh witness the phenomenon of vice pulling the feature and then tina brown and jezebel running all the pictures that needed to be pulled

goole, Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:51 (ten years ago) link

Did the Jezebel article come before or after the feature was pulled?

they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:53 (ten years ago) link

that was actually more nauseating than I thought it would be

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:53 (ten years ago) link

DJP i dunno but it looks like before

goole, Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:57 (ten years ago) link

I mean jfc one of them has blood running into the sink from the woman's wrist, those are fucking upsetting. I feel like you would have to be a sociopath to think that was a good idea.

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:58 (ten years ago) link

they should've included some male suicides: HST, Hemingway, DFW, Kosinski

Mordy , Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:00 (ten years ago) link

It seems to me that there is a certain level of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" to complaining about these things, where if you don't propagate the offensive material, the context of your complaint isn't as strong and, if the offending material is removed, people coming to it later won't know exactly what it is you are objecting to. However, if you do propagate the offensive material, you are opening yourself up to "who's the REAL racist/sexist?" dismissals as well as potentially traumatizing people who would have avoided the original posting regardless.

they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:02 (ten years ago) link

DFW (someone whose memory is still fresh in many people's minds) would have really thrown into sharp relief what a shockingly horrible idea it was

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:03 (ten years ago) link

I'm often the only dude in a group of people trying to defend Vice a lot of the time, but, really, fuck 'em.

i keep thinking vice is 'better' now with mcinnes gone but then

Yeah, I've done some "at least Jim Goad isn't still writing 'Slavery Wasn't THAT Bad" pieces anymore" stuff, but - they're all just so gross.

Walter Galt, Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:10 (ten years ago) link

fucking vice

i didn't even give much of a fuck that you were mod (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:12 (ten years ago) link

DFW (someone whose memory is still fresh in many people's minds) would have really thrown into sharp relief what a shockingly horrible idea it was

― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:03 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

they included iris chang, whose son christopher is only eleven years old. it really should have been clear at that point, if not before.

data halls and oate (stevie), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:13 (ten years ago) link

In this case, jez posting a few of the pics kept me from going to Vice's site and giving them the page views just in case I wanted to get an impression of the spread for myself.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:17 (ten years ago) link

jesus what the fuck

xp

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:17 (ten years ago) link

Even their apology sucks

The fashion spreads in VICE magazine are always unconventional and approached with an art editorial point-of-view rather than a typical fashion photo-editorial one. Our main goal is to create artful images, with the fashion message following, rather than leading.

‘Last Words’ was created in this tradition and focused on the demise of a set of writers whose lives we very much wish weren’t cut tragically short, especially at their own hands. We will no longer display ‘Last Words’ on our website and apologize to anyone who was hurt or offended.

"We were being edgy and cool. Sorry you squares couldn't handle it, but we humored you and took it down."

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:20 (ten years ago) link

could go in passive aggressive notes thread imo

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:20 (ten years ago) link

yeesh

⚓ (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:25 (ten years ago) link

even as far as VICE's editorial direction w/r/t fashion -- this wasn't even a proper fashion spread, it was just ready-to-wear clothes styled as period costuming

⚓ (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:29 (ten years ago) link

i'm not going to say "if it was executed better it would be less problematic" but the lack of cohesion and near complete absence of fashion really underlines the basic awfulness of the concept

⚓ (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:31 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.