― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:38 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:41 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:47 (7 years ago) Permalink
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:41 (7 years ago) Permalink
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:42 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:42 (7 years ago) Permalink
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:24 (7 years ago) Permalink
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:26 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:30 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:31 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 9 June 2006 17:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 9 June 2006 18:06 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 9 June 2006 18:48 (7 years ago) Permalink
So then I guess he didn't read the 100-odd pages in which Matos discussed Prince.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:48 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:53 (7 years ago) Permalink
DeRo is a FUCKING MORON.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:55 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Terrible Cold (Terrible Cold), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:55 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 9 June 2006 21:09 (7 years ago) Permalink
Yeah, it's all info, no prose. A lot of the 33 1/3 books seem to forget how much people like that.
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:05 (7 years ago) Permalink
― gear (gear), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:32 (7 years ago) Permalink
― David Bachyrycz (David Bachyrycz), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:37 (7 years ago) Permalink
Someone should do Tom T. Hall's greatest hits.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:56 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:58 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 9 June 2006 22:59 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
seriously though, i realize the books have to sell, hence the more mainstream angle. i'm sure there are a ton of albums the writers would love to write about that aren't commercially viable for the publisher.
― gear (gear), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:11 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:26 (7 years ago) Permalink
actually do you think they would let somebody self-33 1/3? if it was some famous musician?
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:33 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:38 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ (chaki), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:41 (7 years ago) Permalink
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:55 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 23:56 (7 years ago) Permalink
― that's so taylrr (ken taylrr), Saturday, 10 June 2006 02:04 (7 years ago) Permalink
Morrissey is not attracted to Morrissey.
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Saturday, 10 June 2006 02:15 (7 years ago) Permalink
Carl Wilson is writing one about Celine Dion's "Let's Talk About Love".
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 10 June 2006 02:59 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Jeff Reguil0n (Talent Explosion), Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:14 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Steve Schneeberg (Steve Goldberg), Saturday, 10 June 2006 11:52 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 10 June 2006 15:25 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 10 June 2006 15:30 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Terrible Cold (Terrible Cold), Monday, 12 June 2006 15:45 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tripmaker (SDWitzm), Monday, 12 June 2006 15:52 (7 years ago) Permalink
This is more or less happening with LD Beghtol writing about 69 Love Songs. No idea how it's coming along; I haven't talked to him since the EMP Pop Conference.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Monday, 12 June 2006 15:59 (7 years ago) Permalink
― dh (djh), Monday, 12 June 2006 17:26 (7 years ago) Permalink
The Stone Roses one was okay, not much in the way of new info and insights really (though I did learn that what I previously thought was just a guitar string squeak in "Elizabeth My Dear" was really supposed to be a silenced gunshot.)
The Riot one was excellent. I especially liked his first chapters talking from the point of view of someone who was there.
I had high hopes for the Endtroducing one since it's one of the few (only?) hip-hop books but it was really just one long interview with Shadow. Very boring, gross hyperbole at the beginning (the author says something along the lines of Endtroducing not sounding like anything before or since type crap) and Davis himself is not the most interesting of interviewees.
The VU and Nico had some informative info but Joe Harvard's writing style and attitude just rubbed me the wrong way.
― Viz (Viz), Monday, 12 June 2006 17:28 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Monday, 12 June 2006 17:35 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 12 June 2006 17:54 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 12 June 2006 18:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
For this series, I've really enjoyed both the personal takes and insights gained from repeated close listenings that the authors bring to their books and the Endtroducing one was more like "here's an oral history of DJ Shadow" and it didn't focus enough on Endtroducing.
I think the format that was used for the Paul's Boutique book would have served Endtroducing a lot more, ie. context, process, funny stories behind the samples...
― Viz (Viz), Monday, 12 June 2006 19:56 (7 years ago) Permalink
― less-than three's Christiane F. (drowned in milk), Saturday, 15 July 2006 06:52 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Roque Strew (RoqueStrew), Saturday, 15 July 2006 20:55 (6 years ago) Permalink
look tasty all in a row don't they.
― piscesx, Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:08 (2 months ago) Permalink
the next one up; FLOOD by They Might Be Giants, is a bit of a surprise
― piscesx, Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:11 (2 months ago) Permalink
how so?
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:13 (2 months ago) Permalink
TMBG aren't as alt/indie canon as a lot of bands of their generation that have had 33 1/3s, so it's a little surprising, mostly just nice that they're going for a cult classic that's obsessed over by a slightly different crowd.
― the drummer for gay Daddy Yankee (some dude), Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:16 (2 months ago) Permalink
oh the band themselves? yeah guess so. the album is way more beloved than many many others in the range though, so.
I just got excited when it was announced bcz I <3 Flood and I <3 Sandifer - thought it would still be ages away though, iirc was only turned in a month or so ago? hyped now.
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:24 (2 months ago) Permalink
why arent those books in chromatic order
― Poliopolice, Saturday, 6 April 2013 01:42 (2 months ago) Permalink
Actually, Histoire de Melodie Nelson is next, to be released in October, followed by Flood in November and I Get Wet in January.
― MarkoP, Saturday, 6 April 2013 03:40 (2 months ago) Permalink
unhyped again
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Saturday, 6 April 2013 03:56 (2 months ago) Permalink
I have the "Loveless", "In the Aeroplane Over the Sea" and Afghan Whigs' "Gentlemen" books and enjoyed them all. Liked a lot of the contextual stuff in the Whigs book about the general events surrounding the making of the album.
― michaellambert, Saturday, 6 April 2013 19:56 (2 months ago) Permalink