― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― fandango, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― SusanD, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Saturday, 7 April 2007 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― fies, Saturday, 7 April 2007 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Saturday, 7 April 2007 18:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― Bee OK, Saturday, 7 April 2007 19:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― Display Name, Sunday, 8 April 2007 01:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Trayce, Sunday, 8 April 2007 02:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Trayce, Sunday, 8 April 2007 02:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― chaki, Sunday, 8 April 2007 05:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― keythkeyth, Sunday, 8 April 2007 16:14 (seventeen years ago) link
I think he's he's awesome! I am really suprised how many people here dislike this kind of thing.
― libcrypt, Sunday, 8 April 2007 19:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― keythkeyth, Sunday, 8 April 2007 22:01 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 8 April 2007 23:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Monday, 9 April 2007 01:49 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 April 2007 01:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Monday, 9 April 2007 02:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Monday, 9 April 2007 02:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― chaki, Monday, 9 April 2007 02:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 9 April 2007 04:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Monday, 9 April 2007 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Trayce, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 02:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 03:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― Trayce, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 03:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 09:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― Trayce, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 09:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― SusanD, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 10:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― flowersdie, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― libcrypt, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― BATTAGS, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― flowersdie, Friday, 20 April 2007 12:31 (sixteen years ago) link
― Cameron Octigan, Friday, 20 April 2007 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link
It's much better than that. I love this guy so much. I think I prefer his sound to that of his influences.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 May 2007 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link
A side-by-side song comparison will reveal that he's much farther away from his influences than the haters make him out to be.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, yeah, I need to get this. Or I'll be excluded from Sonic Cathedral, they'll never let me in the door again if I can't prove my shoegaze credentials.
― Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 10:13 (sixteen years ago) link
The title track of the new one is possibly the most gorgeous thing he's ever done.
― flowersdie, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 11:58 (sixteen years ago) link
^ ^ ^
― rockapads, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link
For all the greatness that his current work is -- Herr Schnauss likely ain't hit his zenith yet -- his early work is its yang of yawn. A Schaussophile pal gave me a ton of early rips and boots and I dunno whatall, but it's just kinda formulaic as far as my ears have a say innit. I guess I'm bound to be castigated for saying that by folks who know a lot more about EM than myself, but eh.
― libcrypt, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link
Sorry to check some of the posters further up this thread, but how can you dislike this stuff (A Strangely Isolated Place)? There's no way this is anything other than utterly brilliant. EVERY SINGLE FUCKING SONG. I can't decide which one to put on a compilation for my friend, although it's been narrowed down to 'On My Own', 'Letter From Home' or 'Clear Day'.
Early days yet, but this might be top 5 for the decade so far.
― Just got offed, Friday, 8 June 2007 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link
I will have to second that the new album is a total fucking mind-blower. It gets a little too MBV sometimes, but seriously it is just owning me. Warm fuzzies all day long.
I put up an MP3 at PTW: http://www.paperthinwalls.com/singlefile/item?id=846
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 8 June 2007 14:50 (sixteen years ago) link
It gets a little too MBV sometimes
You're fired.
That said, I think me now looking for the new MBV would be like me looking for 'the new Tolkien' or whatever.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 June 2007 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link
If it's a literary masterpiece you're after, you could do worse than reading/re-reading Tristram Shandy. Meanwhile, Ulrich Schnauss, whilst not a master of the crossed-wires feedback storm like Shields (a method that has perhaps a more mysterious, subliminal effect upon the listener), is approximating the dream-pop ideal in a more convincing manner than almost anyone I've ever heard. It mines a different, less kinetic/dancy seam to WFANFC, for instance, but Schnauss' music uses its extended length to reach and then sustain ever-higher plateaux of micro-managed sonic bliss.
― Just got offed, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link
Underwhelmed by the new one - just more of the same, and I think two was enough for me. The vocals don't add enough, in fact there's something about the tone and the processing that makes them sound really insipid.
The "Little 15" mix might be my favourite thing of his.
Louis to what extent do you think that the music that most transports you to plateaux of sonic bliss conforms to a certain style - not genre, but at a lower level. Do you think there might be certain styles of melody or chord progression, say, that intrinsically appeal to you? That there might be other bands engaged in micro-management and all the other things that you're after, but who are working with melodic forms that don't push your buttons?
― ledge, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link
Now THAT'S an interesting question.
― Scik Mouthy, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link
ok i'll give it its own thread...
― ledge, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:23 (sixteen years ago) link
First, to answer your question re: Schnauss,
Ledge, I really do think there might be certain ways of progressing chord structure that appeal to me more than others. The confluence of different chords atop one another is even more interesting; this is what Schnauss does brilliantly. Differently melodic and textural synth lines create sonic richness, and this sonic richness is progressed in a very satisfying manner; the progressions and flow often pertain to a major/minor/suspended chord confusion (there's a method to it I'm sure, but one I can't describe), and this emotional fragility is, I find, highly stimulating for the responsive mind. There might well be other bands engaged in micro-management whose concerns are more rhythmical or minimalist, whom I might like less, but I'd need to hear more. You say you're an Autechre fanboy; they're an act I'd really like to check out.
― Just got offed, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link
WHO MAKES THE NAZIS?
― acrobat, Friday, 8 June 2007 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link
^^ I like it a lot too, mostly because the "Little 15" instrumentation is probably the weakest spot on Music for the Masses and Ulrich's mix makes it fantastic. I wouldn't call it my favorite thing he's done, though.
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link
I have a really hard time describing his music in terms of emotion. He doesn't do many songs that I feel like I can describe with emotional adjectives. Words like "pretty" even "beautiful" come to mind, but only a few of his tracks get described as "sad" or "joyful".
― rockapads, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link
nah. but I kinda like it, for that reason. like BOC without the whole "oooooo this is spooky tape music, maybe there's a GHOST in the room!" element
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:36 (seven years ago) link
it's p much direct shoegazing ecstasy, sunny-day melancholy unfiltered
but then i guess there are songs like 'medusa' that could have sparked entire movements of michael bay electronica on their own (but didn't)
― an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:41 (seven years ago) link
I picked up one of his CDs for a buck at a charity shop and it's really gorgeous
― blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:42 (seven years ago) link
ok I got ASIP now and yeah this is very good, definitely better than Far Away Trains
amazed this man hasn't made a mint in soundtrack work
― frogbs, Monday, 12 June 2017 21:47 (six years ago) link
This reminds me. I bought an album he was involved in recently, played it once, then filed it somewhere. Can't remember who or what it was called though. Shit. Far Away Trains is so good. The rest of his stuff is just rehashing the same feeling. You probably don't need more than 5-10 songs of his to experience the entirety of his range.
― brotherlovesdub, Monday, 12 June 2017 22:20 (six years ago) link
and that was easy to find, thanks Discogs. https://www.discogs.com/Ulrich-Schnauss-Jonas-Munk-Passage/release/9725721 - This is the album. It's decent but not great.
― brotherlovesdub, Monday, 12 June 2017 22:22 (six years ago) link
Something new on his Bandcamp page
Free?
― Hilarity Winner (doo dah), Monday, 12 June 2017 22:24 (six years ago) link
name your price isn't ... well, if you want, I guess, sure.
― Uhura Mazda (lukas), Friday, 16 June 2017 18:04 (six years ago) link
this Synthwave thing is pretty okay
― Uhura Mazda (lukas), Thursday, 27 July 2017 13:08 (six years ago) link