― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:12 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:09 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:14 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:16 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:17 (8 years ago) Permalink
Women
f/f = 90m/f = 75m/m= 45
Men =
f/f = 68%m/f = 75%m/m = 67%
Which would be mean men are better at spotting m/f than either m/m or f/f. Hmm.. that would also be weird. Other combinations I've tried result in both sexes being bettter at spotting female virgins than male ones, which seem noteworthy enough for them to put up on the website.
Can you come up with a set of average scores that fits what we know without any interesting implications at all?
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:38 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 24 July 2004 21:21 (8 years ago) Permalink
ihttp://www.okcupid.com/profile?pic=0&tuid=8878330946154156249
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 July 2004 22:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 24 July 2004 23:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
― dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=12703610378878205705
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 02:04 (8 years ago) Permalink
http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=1366843686365106737
haha
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Sunday, 25 July 2004 02:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 08:49 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 09:55 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 09:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
I still don't get this... Could someone please explain it to this poor foreigner?
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:21 (8 years ago) Permalink
― j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:29 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:36 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:44 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 15:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
radcliffy adj. Consisting of the broad range of personality traits normally associated with Harvard girls.
Bob's organized, ambitious, and smart. I wish I were more Radcliffy like he, because I can't get a job at Morgan Stanley. He needs to fuckin' loosen up, though
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 25 July 2004 16:00 (8 years ago) Permalink
I don't like this new layout. The most off-putting part is probably the "Real Friends: None (0)" part. Sheesh.
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:31 (8 years ago) Permalink
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:33 (8 years ago) Permalink
― teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:54 (8 years ago) Permalink
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:24 (8 years ago) Permalink
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:27 (8 years ago) Permalink
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:29 (8 years ago) Permalink
x-post.
― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:30 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:31 (8 years ago) Permalink
OMG teh oxymoron!11
― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:34 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:34 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:37 (8 years ago) Permalink
You should message me if: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------You can appreciate this bizarre social experiment.
Plus he works on the computer field, and has kids. So it's prolly just a joke.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:56 (8 years ago) Permalink
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:57 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Fergal (Ferg), Sunday, 25 July 2004 22:01 (8 years ago) Permalink
OKCupid.com, Pt.2- Afterparty! Hotel lobby! REMIX!
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 25 July 2004 22:03 (8 years ago) Permalink
The punchline, of course, was that her profile said she was looking for someone "who could be honest with (her)".
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 26 July 2004 08:54 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:01 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:03 (8 years ago) Permalink
Loads of you haven't even filled in any information, come on, that's the most interesting bit, not your moody rubbish photos, ch.
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:06 (8 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:08 (8 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:12 (8 years ago) Permalink
true - only about 70% of the profiles I look at involve self harm in the "most embarassing thing you'll admit" section.
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:13 (8 years ago) Permalink
xpost
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:13 (8 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:14 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Bryan (Bryan), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 26 July 2004 09:16 (8 years ago) Permalink
Which way do you face in the shower?On Force-Fields, Or Rather, Fields Of ForceWhere's The Common People's Music?SEEKING ASIAN FEMALE?What do you hate about toilet seats? cant believe i have to pay to search for fatties Vampire PaedophilesMean girls are sexy
― scintilla (seandalai), Monday, 13 May 2013 14:29 (1 week ago) Permalink
u know what, fuck those toilet seats
― Nhex, Monday, 13 May 2013 14:30 (1 week ago) Permalink
i keep starting these promising conversations with attractive people, and then realizing that i don't actually have enough time or interest to be trying to 'date' somebody from scratch right now. and i wind up just not-responding when it gets to the 'so where do you want to meet up?' portion
Yeah, that's kinda me too. I've been busy with other things lately and have spent almost no time on the site, and paradoxically have gotten way more people interested in meeting me than when I was actively messaging people. I've met a few of these people with the idea that if I meet someone amazing, I'll pursue it further, but honestly I'm just being unfair to anyone I meet because I'm not the type that's gonna think someone is amazing from one date. Maybe I need to finally deactivate the ol' profile.
― Vinnie, Monday, 13 May 2013 14:49 (1 week ago) Permalink
I don't know why I said paradoxically. There's no paradox there.
― Vinnie, Monday, 13 May 2013 14:50 (1 week ago) Permalink
Hi Crabbbits, nice to see you around - seems like it's been a while.
I'm wondering if this guy answered the question about whether it's okay to maintain an active OKC profile while in a LTR.
When I see people answer that it's okay to do that, I feel like I'm some kind of jealous monster.
― Je55e, Monday, 13 May 2013 16:03 (1 week ago) Permalink
Yeh, I would say it was a bit odd to maintain a profile on a dating site when you're in a committed relationship. Ultimatums suck, but if someone isn't hearing you when you voice your concerns, then they may be the only way to go. Crabbits deserves only the best.
Also, further to the conversation upthread, even I sometimes get confused by the emil.y/emilys. thing. "I don't remember posting that? Oh, wait, no..." I don't mind though, the emily sistren must be united.
― emil.y, Monday, 13 May 2013 17:06 (1 week ago) Permalink
yall confuse the hell out of me
― Nhex, Monday, 13 May 2013 17:49 (1 week ago) Permalink
Don't give up hope everyone http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2325450/Painting-premonition-Artist-31-creates-oil-painting-perfect-man--marries-spitting-image-years-later.html
― 乒乓, Thursday, 16 May 2013 20:53 (4 days ago) Permalink
I'm gonna meet a lot of cartoon cats in the next ten years.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Thursday, 16 May 2013 21:18 (4 days ago) Permalink
irl lol
― ljubljana, Thursday, 16 May 2013 21:21 (4 days ago) Permalink