In what context, kenan? I've never seen Gump and have no desire to.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link
(but I also find Clinton to be the most Reaganesque of RWR's successors)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:20 (sixteen years ago) link
xpost It's psychological horror.
― kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link
Yesterday morning it was a perfectly decent thread. Now look at it.
― Bob Standard, Thursday, 23 August 2007 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link
it all comes down to "liberal" gabbneb's cognitive dissonance about his love for an ostensibly conservative film
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 23 August 2007 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link
<A href=http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/could-a-ferris-bueller-sequel-be-on-the-way/>Bueller SEQUEL?!?</a>
― Oilyrags, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link
that was discussed upthread (highly unlikely, to say the least)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link
i have less than zero invested in ferris bueller
i just like to point out mormonism
― gabbneb, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link
i spose i shouldn't waste my time on the easy stuff tho
hey there's no mormons in Less Than Zero!
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link
this thread was insane, just insane
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 10 September 2012 06:05 (eleven years ago) link