Unemployed Watercooler Fridge Buzz Commiseration, Alienation and Mental Anti-Stagnation Society (DNRIYHM)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (744 of them)

anyway hope s/thing comes up clouds, getting cash in has to take precedence over the fulfilling lifedream stuff most of the time ime, but i hope yr e works out at a balance you can live with in the longer term

banlieue jagger (darraghmac), Thursday, 27 December 2012 23:42 (eleven years ago) link

"by your affirmative keystroke you authorize an investigative report concerning past employment, mode-of-living and general reputation"

fucking hell

nevaeh for evaeh (clouds), Friday, 28 December 2012 20:09 (eleven years ago) link

you have a lovely reputation, screw them: PUSH THE BUTTON AND LOOK THEM DEAD IN THE EYE

'them'

'eye'

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 28 December 2012 21:50 (eleven years ago) link

my last retail gig was selling high-end men's clothing which for anyone who knows me is an endless lol.

― packt like phoebe cates's dad in a chimney (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Thursday, December 27, 2012 6:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

my job of 8 years is with a company that makes cooking tools, which for anyone who knows me is too lol to even be funny.

crossing my fingers for u clouds. want u to be able to buy albums and talk to me about them.

~farben~ (Jon Lewis), Friday, 28 December 2012 22:04 (eleven years ago) link

two months pass...

i don't know if there's a 2013 unemployed thread so i'm just gonna bump this one to propose the following:

so say you have a guy who's pushing 60 and has many years of experience as a computer programmer under his belt. and say his current company is letting him go because they're moving the office to another state and the guy doesn't want to move (and even if he did want to, he'd have to quit and then re-apply for the job he currently has). and say this guy doesn't really have enough to live off of for retirement to support both himself and his wife (who doesn't work), and that he has a whole host of health issues and a mortgage and other debts and bills to pay off on top of that.

in the year of our lord 2013, is this guy pretty much screwed?

steaklife (donna rouge), Monday, 18 March 2013 17:18 (eleven years ago) link

sounds like

j., Monday, 18 March 2013 22:25 (eleven years ago) link

computer programming isn't the most age-friendly career, it's true, but it may also depend on what technologies he's familiar with. does sound like a bad situation though, good luck to him

(suspect someone more US-based would be better placed to provide specific advice, sorry)

susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 18 March 2013 22:30 (eleven years ago) link

my dad was recently in this situation and he wound up getting a contract job with a cemetery. there are jobs out there, it's just a question of looking in perhaps unconventional places.

maura, Monday, 18 March 2013 22:53 (eleven years ago) link

yeah, the guy is my dad, also

steaklife (donna rouge), Monday, 18 March 2013 23:11 (eleven years ago) link

there's at least some time before all this happens (his current job ends next year and he'll have a pretty decent severance package). and today he underwent some significant surgery that i'm optimistic will do wonders for him, so he'll be in better shape by the time he has to seriously start dealing with this

still, hell of a spot to be in :/

steaklife (donna rouge), Monday, 18 March 2013 23:16 (eleven years ago) link

It's rough, but having computer skills is one of the few ways "make money from home, ask me how" can work out for people.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 18 March 2013 23:17 (eleven years ago) link

two months pass...

ugh, i just had one of my worst interviews ever.

pro (novice) tip: if you are doing a phone interview with a group in a conference room on the other end, they will not talk on the other end.

they will just sit there and let you yak until someone says 'we have to go on to the next question' and 'we're almost out of time'.

j., Wednesday, 22 May 2013 16:51 (ten years ago) link

one month passes...

WCC painfully OTM upthread.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 15 July 2013 11:44 (ten years ago) link

six months pass...

Latest WTF experience while trying to apply for work: I am told that the employer is only looking for people who live in certified HUBZone neighborhoods. Excuse me for not being a gentrifying opportunist.

Word Salad Username (j.lu), Monday, 27 January 2014 16:35 (ten years ago) link

I was once turned down for a 9-to-5 office job on the basis that I didn't own a car and the nearest bus stop was *gasp* a mile away. Like they really thought it impossible that someone could walk that far. I pointed out that as a child I'd walked a mile to school every day, but they were set in their views.

And when you f--- up, you go backwards (snoball), Monday, 27 January 2014 16:40 (ten years ago) link

two months pass...

Well, I guess I'm back here is where I'm at.

I can talk to myself without feeling like my presence is stopping other people from talking to themselves. I can bitch about headhunters and their dumb ways to my heart's content. I can post pictures of dirty dronerock boys without feeling like I'm imposing on other people.

I have a limit on how much headhuntry I can deal with in a day. There comes a point where I don't want to be bright! and chirpy! and personable! and employable! any more. I am sick of explaining how an overinflated salary is not a compensation for treating your employees like they aren't human beings, or for having to deal with cnuts. I am sick of explaining that no, really, *insert random town in Hampshire* is not a reasonable commute from South London. I am really sick of having to take SQL tests administered by people who know zip about SQL.

Here is a hott boy, though he is neither dirty, nor particularly dronerock, either, but he has some pretty christmas tree lights.

https://31.media.tumblr.com/77e9416010e71a4aded50b65d3111b39/tumblr_n3er0xWF8Q1qgze9ho3_1280.png

Branwell Bell, Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:04 (ten years ago) link

Is working from home an option for you (both personally, and is an option in your line of work)? Just curious - and feel free to tell me to STFU.

I've been working from home for 3.5 now and so I am curious about other people's opinions about it. I thought maybe the solitude would do my head in but in fact this hasn't been the case at all. I think going back to sharing an office *would* do my head in tho. Think I'd need my own office if I did.

Grandpont Genie, Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:32 (ten years ago) link

*3.5 years*

Grandpont Genie, Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:34 (ten years ago) link

No, it's not a bad question to ask at all!

i did discuss working from home at my last job (my boss and the other programmer both worked from home, and it worked really well for them) - but, in discussion, one of the things they both agreed was that working from home works really well *when* you have a partner/family life. If you work in your study for 8 hours, and then your partner and/or kids come home, and you have reasonable social interactions with them (and especially if you have a regular social life outside the home) then it's apparently fine! Also, you have to be really comfortable with being on the phone a lot, which I really am not. I have an upper limit for the amount of phone time I can face. (This was a big problem, with having an off-site boss at the last job.)

I live by myself, and I know from (6 months of unemployment or whatever at this point) that being by myself for prolonged periods of time like this, is very, very bad for my mental health. One of the things I most need from going back to work, is a regular social interaction environment, where I'm expected to turn up regularly, and perform basic small talk or whatever. I have an incredible ability to survive prolonged periods of aloneness (I currently can go 4 or 5 days at a stretch without speaking to another human being face to face) but I am also aware that it is very, very *not good for me*.

(Sometimes things like ILX can help with this. But whatever gives also takes away. There are stretches where ILX is super not-good for me.)

But, it seems there are lot of people, especially IT folk, for whom working from home is a great option! I'm just not one of them.

Branwell Bell, Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:56 (ten years ago) link

The thing about recruiters is something to which there is no easy solution - there will be always be those who put their commission before any satisfaction of doing a job properly and enhancing people's lives by matching the right employee to the employer. I was fortunate enough to find the diamond in the rough, but I did so via LinkedIn, which I know a lot of people don't like. It did mean, however, that I was able to observe his posts on there, see that he knew and cared about the industry (as he didn't only post job stuff) and so *probably* was a decent guy before I approached him about the job I was interested in. My instincts were, fortunately, correct and he ended up being one of the very few people I endorsed publicly via the LinkedIn site.

Grandpont Genie, Thursday, 3 April 2014 13:28 (ten years ago) link

Yeah, I recognise it's a major setback, not using LinkedIn, but I do not feel comfortable giving out so much personal and identifying information to a company that have already shown they aren't great with data issues.

Have been speaking to my old boss about references stuff, and aawww, he is so great. I do actually miss my former boss. Don't miss the rest of the company at all, but I do miss my immediate boss.

Branwell Bell, Thursday, 3 April 2014 18:01 (ten years ago) link

Phoner interview went OK. I hate phone interviews (especially on speakerphone, because it's so hard to hear!) but it's nice to be able to do an interview on your bed, in your pyjamas. The guys who interviewed me seemed OK but it's impossible to tell without physically meeting people and seeing what the environment is like. Straight White Dudes will always describe an all-male environment as "totally relaxed, totally friendly" but it takes walking in there with breasts to find out whether it really is. When he was talking about the team, he initially said "guys" then realised I was a woman and corrected to "people" and immediately apologised for it, and we had a bit of a laugh over that, so it seemed like he's not a jerk. I don't really like the industry, but it's an industry I'm familiar with so that counts in favour, I guess. Hmmm. So much would depend on the environment. Also, formal clothes, ugh. I don't think I even have formal work clothes any more; at least not ones that fit. I suppose I can just pretend I'm cosplaying Daniel Kessler if I have to wear a suit every damned day.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 12:26 (ten years ago) link

P.S. Headhunters: do not EVER call me by the diminutive of my name, not in an email, not over the phone, just not EVER. What the living fuck. Very tempted to shoot back an email saying "Thanks, Bobbie" (the headhunter's name is not Robert, but this is the kind of thing) and see how he likes it. Ugh.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 12:27 (ten years ago) link

surely an interviewer should use what ever name you've used in your email, CV and covering letter? Otherwise they would be just *guessing* the diminutive of your name (given that there's at least four possibilities I can think of?).

Formal clothes is a bit :-O nowadays unless the job is client-facing (which mine is, sometimes).

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 4 April 2014 13:06 (ten years ago) link

Yeah, the job is occasionally client facing, and though I suggested the concept of "The Office Tie" which we employed at my old job, that got laughs, but they said sometimes more than one of you had to meet a client at once?

Diminutives are just... it's not even which spelling variant they would use, but the fact that he feels entitled to even use one in the first place? NO. Use the name I have on my CV, my covering letter, my email. It's pretty clear what I consider my name to be.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 13:16 (ten years ago) link

Exactly.

Does someone called James get routinely called Jim?

Mark G, Friday, 4 April 2014 13:36 (ten years ago) link

I am sure that people called James routinely get shortened to Jim or Daniel to Dan, without their consent, and usually if it matters to them, they have a way to say politely but firmly "actually, it's James" or something like that. But you know, if you had "Mark" on your CV your email your cover letter, and someone in a business setting just started calling you "Marky" - you'd give the side-eye a bit to that.

Anyway, I am back for the next round next week. I don't know how I feel about this. I will know better once I get in there and lookit the place.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 14:24 (ten years ago) link

Anyway, it's just the headhunter doing that, and not the actual employer, so it doesn't matter.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 14:25 (ten years ago) link

The very first phone interview I ever had was scheduled for Thursday, August 14th 2003. I got home, waiting by the phone for them to call and they never did. I tried to call them eventually - no response. Turned out that a power outage had blacked out most of the eastern US! When I got a job as an editor of an oil and energy journal the following year, the first issue I edited was about this incident and why it took so long for the power to come back on (there's no National Grid in the US so they couldn't transfer power from elsewhere. There's an Eastern grid, a Western grid and a Texas grid).

Well, the phone interview was re-scheduled....I had two further in person interviews in the UK after that - it was down to me and one another person and were struggling to make up their minds and eventually chose the other person. Maybe I had a lucky escape as it was quite a bizarre job - editing a textbook which I'd used myself at uni (new editions come out every few years) and liaising between the various authors all of whom were quite eminent names in cell biology. They always held their meetings in a big Georgian house round the corner from Abbey Road studios, and when the interviewer showed me the previous edition of the book it had a picture of them all on the back cover dressed up as the Beatles as they appeared on the cover of Sgt Pepper.

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 4 April 2014 14:50 (ten years ago) link

Although I got fed up by the time I was 5 of people saying "but what is your 1st name?" (I still get that btw) I at least haven't ever had to worry about people shortening my name.

Scooby Doom (۩), Friday, 4 April 2014 15:06 (ten years ago) link

Haha, that's hilarious. (The Abbey Road thing, to GG.) That kind of thing could either mean that it would be a fun place to work or an absolutely awful place to work in a ~hilarious japes~ (oh god kill me now) kinda sense. But yeah, when you don't get a job, sometimes you discover ages later things that, really, you find out you're kinda relieved that they chose the other person. That power outage thing is kinda bizarre, but yeah, at least it wasn't you!

I wish I could be happier and more confident about this place. Part of it is: well, the other job that I was discussing on Monday sounded *so* amazing, and I really wanted to work there. But it would be going back to the medical world (yay!) but the whole thing is, because it's back in that world, if they knew about my previous employer and the whole scandal there (oh I still can't even bring myself to type out anything about what happened there - it was based around something that happened years before I even worked there. I was unaware of it when I was hired, and I worked my fingers to the bone to try to sort out the aftermath of it when it broke, before I resigned in protest over their disgusting and disgraceful handling of it) but all they would have to see is the name of that company, and I'd be tainted by association and I'm terrified that's what has happened. Argh, paranoia.

So I'm kinda torn between "don't really know if I want *this* job" and "had a lead on a really great job that seems to have vanished" and wish I could be feeling less ambivalent about the whole thing.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 15:11 (ten years ago) link

Oh. Headhunter 2 says that ~better job~ won't actually shortlist candidates until Monday. I wish I could go back and erase the panicked post I made above. :-/

Learn to keep your mouth shut, Branwell Bell.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 4 April 2014 15:22 (ten years ago) link

Good luck with that.

Scooby Doom (۩), Friday, 4 April 2014 15:23 (ten years ago) link

So. No word on the job I actually want, which was supposed to select candidates by "Monday". Bah. :(

I hate this uncertainty, I hate not even knowing if it's definitely not going to happen.

Branwell Bell, Monday, 7 April 2014 16:38 (ten years ago) link

4-hour interview (including 3 tests) - I am not sure I have the stamina for this sort of thing.

I just really... I don't know. I normally come out of an interview with a quite clear sense of whether I want the job or not. I don't really have any sense of anything, except a very vague instinct that I don't want the job, and it's so vague a gut instinct that it might just entirely be PMT.

The stickler, really, is the hours. It's 45 hours a week, standard contracted hours (OK, they claim there is "an hour for lunch" but I was there over lunchtime and I saw everyone pretty much eating lunch at their desks.) That, to me, seems excessive. I can do 9 hour days maybe 1 or 2 days a week, if the workload demands it. But the idea of a 9 hour day, every day (and the potential for several days a month that they will require more) is just... no. Was I just spoiled by my last 2 jobs being 9 to 5 and 9 to 5.30? Is 9 to 6 just considered "normal" now, and those last few jobs I had were freaks?

I just can't do that whole macho competitive overwork thing. I do not get any more work done in a 9 hour day than I do in a 7 or 8 hour day. I am just more tired all the time, and tired means 1) I work slower and make more mistakes and 2) it sends my health to hell, which means I start taking loads and loads of sick days, which is really counter productive.

The job itself... I can't think of any overwhelming reason not to take it. I also don't really feel any enthusiasm at all, especially for the industry. Not that I expect to feel "OMG, yay, best job ever!" when I start a new job. (Though I did when I started the last job! - though look how awfully that turned out.) It's just... if my overwhelming response to a job interview is "I don't really want to work here" I should probably not work there. Is this a bratty, childish reaction to have, or is this a perfectly reasonable and adult reaction to have? (Especially over the hours thing.) I can't even tell any more.

Branwell Bell, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 16:19 (ten years ago) link

ARGH. Headhunter says they want to make me an offer and all I can think is "can you take your offer, and give me 4/5 of the salary you were planning on offering, in exchange for 4/5 of those crazy working hours?"

Branwell Bell, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 16:27 (ten years ago) link

If they really want you, there is always an opportunity to negotiate. That is, if you really want to work there as opposed to really needing to work.

baked beings on toast (suzy), Tuesday, 8 April 2014 17:34 (ten years ago) link

I do not get any more work done in a 9 hour day than I do in a 7 or 8 hour day. I am just more tired all the time, and tired means 1) I work slower and make more mistakes and 2) it sends my health to hell, which means I start taking loads and loads of sick days, which is really counter productive.

i would put it to them in these terms tbh. good companies recognise that time flexibility helps employees and employers, especially in cases where a documented health condition is an issue. if they're completely intransigent on this they'll assuredly be a horrible company to work for in other ways as well. (unless there's an actual reason for being in the office at certain times that isn't a moronic insistence that more hours = more work done, i can think of some reasons but they wouldn't apply to your industry, i don't think)

lex pretend, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 17:43 (ten years ago) link

I have already raised the issue of flexitime/shorter hours and was met with "you could work at different times, but those are what the hours are". I did explain that there were long-term health issues which meant that regular 45 hour weeks were just not an option for me. I am not quite desperate enough at this point to *have* to take it, so I guess that leaves me in a good position to negotiate for a 4-day workweek, at which point, fine, I'll do 9 hour days. But I'm not feeling very hopeful about the option.

Branwell Bell, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 17:53 (ten years ago) link

if explaining the health issues didn't even persuade them to trial you to see if you're able to do the required work in the hours you need, idk, that's a bit of a warning sign.

lex pretend, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 17:59 (ten years ago) link

Yeah, that's kinda what I'm afraid of, but that's kinda what working in Finance is like: "These are what the hours are, if you can't do them, sucks to be you."

Branwell Bell, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 18:04 (ten years ago) link

I raised my concerns, and the headhunter just came back offering more money. It feels completely churlish to spurn money on that level, but at the same time "thinking that money is the answer, rather than actually addressing the issues raised" is another red flag of "this is not a place I will be happy working."

ARGH. I hate the way the try to make you feel awkward or objectionable for stating in advance what your needs and inabilities are.

And the whole "I want you to reject this more-money offer, before we go back to them with the 4 days a week offer" and it's like... NO. That is backwards. I ask for what is important to me, and if you can't get the ideal thing I want, then we negotiate from that point. I don't feel like I should have to reject an offer outright in order to ask for what I really want.

ugh ugh ugh. I wish I could just bring myself to ... I dunno, give myself permission to say "No. This isn't going to work." And again, that panicked feeling that if I say no to this job offer, there will never be another one. (Rather than "you've impressed one company enough for them to hire you, you can impress another company, that doesn't insist on 45 hour work weeks.)

Branwell Bell, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 10:20 (ten years ago) link

My last 2 jobs were 9-6. It's a pain in the arse and of course most people myself included don't take a whole hour for lunch. Maybe on Fridays if I went to the pub. My new one (which starts next week) is 9-5:30 and the commute is halved so I get to sleep in a bit and get home earlier, which is great. Sorry this is maybe not the thread to mention that.

Good luck BB, I'm pretty sure you do similar stuff to me (my main skill is databases/SQL) so I can relate to your interview stories. There do seem to be more jobs out there these days fwiw.

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 10:28 (ten years ago) link

No, that gives me hope, because it makes me *know* that I'm not being insane or overly demanding to not want to work 9 to 6. Those are stupid hours, and any employer that actually gave a shit about the health of their employees would recognise that. Employers exist who do not insist on squeezing every last drop of effort out of their staff; this is not one of them. My last 2 jobs were 9 to 5 and 10 to 6.30. It is not unreasonable to expect to work those kinds of hours.

I feel bad now, because I had to get pretty emphatic with the headhunter's boss over the phone, and feel like I've been rude.

But I don't want to commit to a role with hours I know that I will not be able to sustain. The alternatives are: don't take the role. Take the role, end up getting very unhealthy and taking tons of sick days. Take the role, work like a dog for the first few months, then slowly start to slack off in a really underhanded way until I have the hours I desire.

It's awful feeling so bad about turning down a job, but it's clear, this is not the employer for me. "If they negotiated that way for you, then they would have to negotiate that way for everyone." Hey, you know what, if loads of people would actually negotiate for flexitime or 4/5 of their salary in return for 4/5 of their hours, maybe I'm not the weird unreasonable person, just MAYBE YOU ARE WORKING YOUR STAFF TOO HARD.

Branwell Bell, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 10:45 (ten years ago) link

In other news, tomorrow is my birthday. I want to go to the seaside. Should I go to Broadstairs or Brighton?

I think Brighton looks like it's half the price and an easier journey, even though I know there are nicer walks to be had around Broadstairs. There are no sea arches anywhere in walking distance of Brighton, are there.

Branwell Bell, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 10:48 (ten years ago) link

And just when I'm ready to start throwing darts at their pictures, there's this:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/8b0bf0420abdfdb16b226938d974951c/tumblr_n3rwy6Km3E1rd1g7mo1_250.jpg

Smirking bastard. Why are you so cute.

Branwell Bell, Thursday, 10 April 2014 07:33 (ten years ago) link

Bit late, sorry, but HB BB!

the ghosts of dead pom-bears (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 10 April 2014 21:53 (ten years ago) link

Aw, thank you Spacecadet! x

Branwell Bell, Friday, 11 April 2014 07:40 (ten years ago) link

I don't know if I'm just being ~over-emotional~ right now, but...

Although I had an excellent birthday yesterday (chocolate biscuits, TSM, seaside, crazy Victorian architecture, Doom Bar) I kinda ruined it by checking my work-related email last night. I wish I had left that until this morning to get ... I don't even know what the word is for the emotions I'm experiencing.

It isn't disappointment, because my gut feeling through the whole process has been "I do not want that job". I should have just listened to that gut feeling, and said no flat out, and not let myself be coerced or sweet-talked into a negotiation process. But it isn't relief, either, because either the employer or the headhunter decided to just do a passing "kick you in the teeth" neg in the last email, telling me that my negotiation "left a bad impression."

(All along, I think this headhunter has acted particularly unprofessionally. For example, asking me the wrong set of questions in the initial interview (they asked me the developer questions, not the report writer questions!) Then, before the first phone interview with the employer, he said "oh, don't mention that I asked you the wrong questions, also, here are the actual questions you will be asked, look up the answers so you do well in the test - oh, but don't mention I gave you these, either!" Um. Now, obviously, I do not need any help acing a SQL query writing test, but still, that was weird.) ((I am semi-tempted to just forward that email to the guy who interviewed me at the employer and say "by the way, you were complaining about candidates who did well on the phone interview, then couldn't pass the sit-down computer test? Here's why."))

This whole world is just not something that makes any sense to me. I know, from experience, if you say to an initial offer "I think that salary looks a little low, I'd like another £2k or £3k" then headhunters will go back and negotiate. But the idea that I might say "I'm willing to negotiate for less salary in order to get more reasonable hours" is basically viewed like I just did a shit on the board of directors' table.

Oh fuck it. I am just going to consider this whole thing a bullet I have dodged. I will give myself today to feel kinda bummed and weird about it, and then throw myself back into the job search on Monday.

Branwell Bell, Friday, 11 April 2014 08:08 (ten years ago) link

Omg. You did nothing unreasonable! You dodged a bullet imo. I would not have wanted to work those hours either.

kinder, Friday, 11 April 2014 08:24 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.