Hip Hop taken to new levels.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (755 of them)
Bastard, you're not sharing.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

I told you from the beginning it wasn't personal.
Take it personally if you will.
I'm sorry we started off on the wrong foot.
I'm not interested in portraying myself as a "wounded victim."
I suppose if you consider criticizms of a list of music - music you did not create, but merely appreciate on some level - to be a personal insult, then I'm sorry you took it personally. It was not intended to be so. In fact, IN that initial thread, I said to you that I respected yr writing and the work that you'd done.


haha just because someone says something ISN'T hip hop doesn't make it so!

oooh, someones on the deconstructionist tip.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:56 (twenty years ago) link

as opposed to what, the reconstructionist one?

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:56 (twenty years ago) link

I think this question was answered earlier in the thread, near the very beginning: 12 tone based hip-hop with lyrics by W. Whitman would no longer be hip-hop.

Ah, where this is where "in my humble opinion" becomes the key phrase. Terms, definitions, values, aesthetics change over time.
Musical history has a nah-sty habit of changing over time (a topic worthy of another thread) Yeah, that concepts sounds really funny NOW.... (Muahaahahahaah)


I was arguing that instrumental music does not make hip hop any more groundbreaking, and associating this idea is particularly "white," assuming that the person suggesting it is coming from a rock background

"in your humble opinion". "in his humble opinion"
"just bringin' it back to the days of IMHO'llin'"

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake when you gonna learn?

He DID learn! He used the word "asshats"!!!

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

400 ego-feeding posts! now 403! let's keep it going people! (on the other hand, let's not. I'm out, for real. been fun, everyone.)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

ok: 77
a&m: 0

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:58 (twenty years ago) link

Well christ, I didn't print my words in a dictionary.

Of course its "IMHO."

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:58 (twenty years ago) link

this thread title just gets funnier and funnier as time drags on.

scott seward, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:59 (twenty years ago) link

there are many "rock" perspectives, but they all are considerably different from hip hop perspectives on music

arguable

from the beginning, rock was based on instrumental music

The blues are mainly instrumental?

oooh, someones on the deconstructionist tip.

How so? I fail to see much to do with deconstructionism in the cited comment.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:00 (twenty years ago) link

This picture references other posts AND is relevant to the initial question. Yay me!
http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drd000/d090/d09077808r5.jpg

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:00 (twenty years ago) link

I suppose if you consider criticizms of a list of music - music you did not create, but merely appreciate on some level - to be a personal insult, then I'm sorry you took it personally. It was not intended to be so. In fact, IN that initial thread, I said to you that I respected yr writing and the work that you'd done.

And I appreciate that. It IS personal, however, to assume that you know what someone has or hasn't heard, to assume that you know best what someone honestly likes more or less than something else, and so forth. Those are personal judgments and the net effect is to say, "Well, your opinion is wrong on an objective level, sorry." You couldn't have raised my hackles any more effectively and you couldn't have come across as any more humorless as a result. What I've said before stays just as true now -- don't hang around on a board thinking that you've found something which 'clearly' nobody else knows about or might not have already encountered, and don't draw automatic assumptions from what someone says about themselves or their preferences that somehow 'explains' everything about them. You're only going to get a hell of a lot of grief and most of it will be with damn good reason.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:01 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake, I'm just referring to the fact that "asshat" is somewhat of a popular term on ILX, and your using it could be seen as you conceding to the ILX hivemind.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:01 (twenty years ago) link

NONE ESCAPE, NONE ESCAPE

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:02 (twenty years ago) link

maybe he meant subjectivist

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:02 (twenty years ago) link

LeRoi Jones - Blue People

Read it motherfuckers.
---------------
OR not.
Seriously Ned, read Blues People.
To quote big lebowski.

"You're out of yr element donnie."

see ddrake this is the kind of smug *bam* i'm smart me bullshit that gets me pissed. i actuallyhaven't read Blues People. This tells me nothing. This gives me no reason to read it. This is just a pretentious kid dropping names. At least gimme the salient points which have SOMETHING to do with whats being argued here.

You're all up for arguments, supposedly. So John drops you this:

Fine, but that's a very arguable position - not one you can "Bam!" as though revealing the Truth From On High. I'd argue that context limits the capacity for insight, and a fair number of people who think about reading/interpretation would tend to agree.

and what do you reply? what do you reply? you complain about being compared to Geir, instead of responding by arguing your point.

and
But no, I can't really offer pointers any more than anyone else can tell me in frank terms exactly what makes ROCK.
YOU FEEL IT MAN!!!

this was your attempt at a joke...right?

Bam.

gaz (gaz), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:04 (twenty years ago) link

arguable

Of course its arguable. That's what I'm doing, presenting an argument.

The blues are mainly instrumental?

The beginning of one's conception of the rock aesthetic, i.e. "Rock REALLY began with the beatles!" "Rock began with the Velvet Underground, for me," etc.

How so? I fail to see much to do with deconstructionism in the cited comment.

If he wants to play that way, "hip hop" can mean anything, and this entire thread is pointless. Perhaps "hip hop" refers to all music ever created. In which case my argument is no longer valid. Fuck circles, lets go in a mobius strip.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:04 (twenty years ago) link

like you HAVEN'T BEEN?!

can't! stay! away! (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:05 (twenty years ago) link

for 415 posts?!

must! drag! self! from! computer! (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:06 (twenty years ago) link

Can we just cut to posting our getting-in-the-last-word/dick sizes now? Or better yet just dick pics... which would accelerate the locking of this thread.

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:07 (twenty years ago) link

(and would make C*l*m a happy boy.... mmmm he likes them big)

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:08 (twenty years ago) link

this was your attempt at a joke...right?

Ummm...no. That was me NOT being "pretentious," or claiming that I have any sort of knowledge to drop on anyone, simply because I DON'T know what yr experiences are.
i emphasize that Blues People is a great book though. I'm sorry that isn't convincing enough.

How so? I fail to see much to do with deconstructionism in the cited comment.

"If deconstruction means anything, it means that statements such as "deconstructionism means x" are meaningless."
-Jacques Derrida (roughly)

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:08 (twenty years ago) link

I guess the main question here is: Should a genre be defined by what it is, or by what it isn't?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:08 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, you meant subjectivism.

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:09 (twenty years ago) link

Whatever works.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:10 (twenty years ago) link

is you is, or is you ain't my hip-hop?

nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:12 (twenty years ago) link

so if Jigga put Whitman lines in verses and sampled Schoenberg, that wouldn't be hip hop?

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:12 (twenty years ago) link

But then yr sampling :-p

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:13 (twenty years ago) link

disregard my last post. who cares? hip hop seems to be one of the last genres where people fight over what is and isn't part of it.

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:13 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but yr not a punk cause I have more piercings than you.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:15 (twenty years ago) link

Ignore my post with the "sampling" line, I misunderstood what you were saying.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:15 (twenty years ago) link

''ILM taken to new levels''

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:17 (twenty years ago) link

"of mediocrity"

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:17 (twenty years ago) link

so if Jigga put Whitman lines in verses and sampled Schoenberg, that wouldn't be hip hop?

The correct response to that would be "I'd have to hear it first."

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:18 (twenty years ago) link

Goood night ladies and gentlemen.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:20 (twenty years ago) link

can i lock it now?

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:22 (twenty years ago) link

sure, but where were you like 300 posts ago?

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

it feels weird being at the bottom of this thread. like being in a deep dark hole where no light will ever shine.i think i'll go eat some ice cream.

scott seward, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

Go for it.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

oh right, jess was insisting that the original question-asker was looking for "rock." Sorry to answer my own question there.

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

disregard my last post. who cares? hip hop seems to be one of the last genres where people fight over what is and isn't part of it.

You mean besides "punk"?

Oooh, jess got the keys.. gotta get my dick in here somewhere...

============D

YEEEEEAH baby... lock it now, you sexy mofo

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

i was eating a sandwich and watching the view

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

That referred to locking the thread, but by all means, have some ice cream.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 22:24 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, sorry stence, i said my two or three posts and then, you know, had other stuff to do.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:25 (twenty years ago) link

YOU were the bastard that started this fiddo.

gaz (gaz), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:38 (twenty years ago) link

why do people always threaten to lock threads that become contentious or are dominated by sentiments with which they don't agree? Fuckin' hippies.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

i emphasize that Blues People is a great book though. I'm sorry that isn't convincing enough.

Substitute Blues People with, say, "The Bible" and you see why we're a bit bugged here. Fundamentalism's pretty boring in any guise.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:49 (twenty years ago) link

this thread just makes me feel all...

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:54 (twenty years ago) link

i dunno, just kinda...

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 November 2003 22:54 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.