I am beginning to become scared that Romney/Ryan will win. Can smart people please post here and say reassuring things to convince me that he won't?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2289 of them)

serious Republicans have no influence or are David Frum.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 November 2012 17:28 (eleven years ago) link

If that was true Rick Santorum would be the presidential candidate.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 2 November 2012 17:30 (eleven years ago) link

serious republicans are feeling downright grave atm

Aimless, Friday, 2 November 2012 17:34 (eleven years ago) link

Primary voters chose Mitt because he didn't dress his children and his children's dolls in the same skirts.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 November 2012 17:34 (eleven years ago) link

they should have david gergen run for president every year

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 November 2012 17:34 (eleven years ago) link


serious Republicans have no influence or are David Frum.

― the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, November 2, 2012 12:28 PM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If that was true Rick Santorum would be the presidential candidate.

― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, November 2, 2012 12:30 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

'no influence' might be an overstatement but they sure don't run the show. 'their guy' won because the 1000 crazy people that the base preferred flamed out + crazies can't handle national media not because the srs republican establishment took over. rick santorum isn't the candidate because of rick santorum. rick perry isn't the candidate because of rick perry.

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

Mitch McConnell has run the show in the Senate since Obama was elected, WTF are you talking about

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:18 (eleven years ago) link

basically if srs republicans were holding the puppet strings we wouldn't have spent half the year talking about donald trump and herman cain. and once romney became mathematically inevitable, santorum woulda found the exit door.

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:19 (eleven years ago) link

yes

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:20 (eleven years ago) link

not saying he runs everything but to say he has no influence is nutso

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:20 (eleven years ago) link

when the only gop senators still around are far right and the filibuster exists you don't have to do anything to make nothing happen. that's not the same as having real control w/r/t how the party operates.

xp

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:21 (eleven years ago) link

making nothing happen for Obama in the Senate is real control

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link

I'm not arguing that 'republicans don't control congress' I'm arguing that srs people don't control republicans

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link

and i am saying for you to argue that he is not a serious Republican, or a serious person who controls other Republicans, is quite foolish

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

he's a serious asshole

seasonal hugs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link

'the republican party' means a lot more than the 47 people in the senate

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:27 (eleven years ago) link

what iatee is saying is that mcconnell 'controls' the far right republicans pretty much by leading them in the direction they want to go, kind of like a five year old walking a great dane. the five year old holds the leash, but the great dane is making the decisions.

Aimless, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

I'm trying to imagine David Gergen saying that sentence.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:30 (eleven years ago) link

'the republican party' means a lot more than the 47 people in the senate

no shit

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:31 (eleven years ago) link

i am not saying the republican party only exists in the vacuum of the senate

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link

I think we need Pleasant Plains to weigh in on this one.

Hans von Jerkoffsky (WilliamC), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link

the fundamental difference between 'serious' republicans and tea partiers is way overstated

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link

yeah I mean the tea party was just a rebranding campaign, it's not like the gop wasn't filled w/ crazies in 2008 either. but the cleansing of moderates that's been going on means that there are fewer and fewer people who you can go to for making any contrast within the party. and even when they exist and 'hold power' ie mcconnell and romney - they're forced to play by other peoples' rules. romney didn't run the campaign he wanted to run - he *couldn't*. nor could mccain.

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:39 (eleven years ago) link

I mean nobody thinks that if romney wins the presidency - 'at his deep dark core' probably the single most moderate republican to run for pres since eisenhower - he'll have any real capability w/r/t molding the gop to his image. even as the single most powerful man in the country!

iatee, Friday, 2 November 2012 18:43 (eleven years ago) link

serious asshole

http://i48.tinypic.com/1f4op.jpg

but the boo boyz are getting to (Z S), Friday, 2 November 2012 18:44 (eleven years ago) link

despite all the cheery poll numbers, i think i'm just go to have this low level anxiety until the election is over....

thinking about signing up for a shift canvassing for obama, at least feel like i've done something i guess

seasonal hugs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 2 November 2012 21:45 (eleven years ago) link

2 possible ways to visualize/make intuitive a 70% chance of winning

-> if there were an election every day for ten days, w/ the result every day independent of that of the previous day obama would win 7 days, and romney 3
[...]

― flopson, Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:06 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

really late to reply to this, but this would only be correct if the election was done by sampling, which it isn't. with actual voting it could be more like a 69% chance of obama either winning all 10 days, a 29% chance of romney winning all 10, and 2% a mix of results.

abanana, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:01 (eleven years ago) link

c'mon guys we've been over this re: Senator Blobfish

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01565/blobfish_1565953c.jpg

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 November 2012 22:18 (eleven years ago) link

it's become kind of hilarious watching everyone on ile take a turn at coming up with a shaky analogy about what polls may or may not actually mean

some dude, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:20 (eleven years ago) link

Shakey's pretty good about making analogies himself.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 November 2012 22:23 (eleven years ago) link

eh, if you follow sports where silver gets most of his methodology from it's not that hard to get`a grasp on

balls, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:23 (eleven years ago) link

that's why all the pained attempts to overexplain it are funny!

some dude, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:24 (eleven years ago) link

it's like if you put 7 obamas and 3 romneys into a bag....oh nevermind.

ryan, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:25 (eleven years ago) link

if daily elections were held in one hundred alternate universes, the reverse vampires would elect romney πx7 times

some dude, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:27 (eleven years ago) link

I was less trying to come up with an illustration of what 70-30 means--I'm quite sure everyone understands that--then why no one ought to be shocked if the 30% end of it were to happen (and, by extension, why the Republican freak-out of Nate Silver is silly). Surprised, sure, but not shocked.

clemenza, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:30 (eleven years ago) link

"of Nate Silver" = "over Nate Silver"

clemenza, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:31 (eleven years ago) link

80-20

lag∞n, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:31 (eleven years ago) link

O'Nate Silverpants.

Jeff, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:31 (eleven years ago) link

Yes, up to 80-20 now--if I remember 2008 correctly, it will keep increasing until Tuesday (absent any evidence that it shouldn't).

clemenza, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:33 (eleven years ago) link

kinda of excited that this election has lead to a nationwide debate over statistics and probability theory

ryan, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:35 (eleven years ago) link

They should skip the whole election and just roll a d10 every day; if it comes up 2, 6 or 7 Romney gets to be President that day, otherwise Obama gets to be President

Gandalf’s Gobble Melt (DJP), Friday, 2 November 2012 22:36 (eleven years ago) link

xp: 2 or 7 now

Gandalf’s Gobble Melt (DJP), Friday, 2 November 2012 22:37 (eleven years ago) link

Saving throw vs. mind flayers

Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:37 (eleven years ago) link

Future presidents to be exclusively drawn from the worlds of baseball sabermetrics and Texas Hold 'Em champions.

clemenza, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:40 (eleven years ago) link

mitt vs. death

seasonal hugs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 2 November 2012 22:42 (eleven years ago) link

daryl morey at head of nasa, depodesta at hud, epstein at treasury, beane at state, bill james attorney general

balls, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:45 (eleven years ago) link

Would have excellent, but I think he died.

http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/kicks105.com/files/2012/01/robert-hegyes.jpg

clemenza, Friday, 2 November 2012 22:48 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.