new 77 keeping it positive meta thread to request dudes stop biting their own joeks

Are the people in the Star Wars movies humans?

lol

well i suppose another option would be for me to step in and do what i did when LJ started talking about a non-77 poster, but i dont think that you and PP and Crutis and jhosh and dom would like it too much if you all got removed from 77. xposts

i have direct from the source that ned lurks on 77 anyway

and the shakey mo thing wasnt like repasting all his posts or google-mapping where dogg lives it was just... discussing a kind of joke.... that was perpetuated on shakey mo once. we can't do that? its shakey mo, dude.

but srsly why not just add someone why they get mentioned - its the non punitive all inclusive keepin positive way to go

i have direct from the source that ned lurks on 77 anyway

Not even that, really. I do have access and once or twice I've looked in there, but that's about it.

whole point of thread was to post stuff that people on 77 could see and help them improve their posting not the fabled 77 stalker meta b.s. that doesnt actually exist.... just bcz we mentioned offhand two of ilx's top 3 most joeked-about posters doesnt warrant ile-moving, its not like that bullshit alex in nyc thread (that wasnt even started by a "real" 77er btw it was like ian or bell labs or chaki or somebody)

I do love these threads that prove the whole "77 is positive!" thing is self-deluded bullshit

ice cr?m why should ppl have to get involuntarily added to 77? some of us aren't there because we dislike the whole idea of it

oh shit i mentioned ian and bell labs and slocki you better print out a copy of that post and fax it to them

^^^ more negative than anyone else on this thread xp

j.d. how the fuck is this funny & all-around life-affirming thread not POSITIVE

but srsly why not just add someone why they get mentioned - its the non punitive all inclusive keepin positive way to go

― ice cr?m, Friday, January 30, 2009 6:25 PM (1 minute ago)

yah but see whenever this happens we get all sorts of "waaahh why r ruinin our boarad" shit, so it seems like there isnt any real happy solution to this. other than maybe just dont fucking post stuff about people who are not on 77.

since john is talking shit about 77 on a non-77 board ths thread should be moved to 77

yah s1ocki this aint 77 so I don't have to play-act at "positivity" while talking about ppl behind their backs

xpost ethan otm, move it back

Let's play musical threads!

yes how dare people promote positivity if they are not 100% positive all the time it is so dishonest

john if ur not on 77 the only 77 threds u see are the ones that have been deemed 'unpositive' - there are literally hundreds of threads on 77 about such positive things as:

• mixtape art
• the word 'actually'
• my brother's high school senior portrait

i hav no idea whos on 77 tho - tho obv ned did hav access - i mean of course ned had access

itt:

http://fc07.deviantart.com/fs29/f/2008/062/b/9/SRS_BUSINESS_GAIS_by_Booter_Freak.jpg

these posts about shakey and ned are lazy zing thread pt 4546 and it's pretty insane that this stuff is now on ile

wonder if non-ITR posters have ever been mentioned on ITR.

but since this has been moved to ile permanently i guess i'd like a mod to go through here and google proof all instances of my real name being used in this thread which is about 10 times i think

didn't we already go through all this type of board-maligning during the early noise board era

the mixtape art thing is the most positive thing in the world.

yeah I'm not gonna get into a huge thing about it, I don't really give a shit, it's just kinda pathetic how ppl are always like "no, 77 is not about being a dick to people who aren't there to defend themselves" and it routinely gets revealed that yes, in fact, that's a pretty common thing there, and the defense of it is "but it's funny!"

to be fair thats a pretty good defense tho

yeah ppl were really trying to propose serious rules about the serious art of zinging deej

― you down with challo.p.p.? (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:49 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i just sug banned you i hope it was 50

― you down with challo.p.p.? (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:50 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

wonder if non-ITR posters have ever been mentioned on ITR.

― Yeh, I said it. Blackface. (special guest stars mark bronson)

everyone on ILX can see ITR, stop pretending that you can not grasp this.

yeah I'm not gonna get into a huge thing about it, I don't really give a shit, it's just kinda pathetic how ppl are always like "no, 77 is not about being a dick to people who aren't there to defend themselves" and it routinely gets revealed that yes, in fact, that's a pretty common thing there, and the defense of it is "but it's funny!"

― J0hn D., Friday, January 30, 2009 6:34 PM (34 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

once in a blue moon someone says something bitchy. stop pretending this gives you some sort of moral high ground over us hypocritical 77ers

keep on the crusade against internet hypocrisy, john d., the world needs more like you etc. etc.

hahaha yes that's it I'm taking the MORAL HIGH GROUND

"no, 77 is not about being a dick to people who aren't there to defend themselves" and it routinely gets revealed that yes, in fact, that's a pretty common thing there

dude big difference between thats what a board is "about" and thats a thing that happens on the board

Insert ILM gag here

everyone on ILX can see ITR, stop pretending that you can not grasp this.

― CLAPSOCK (John Justen), Friday, January 30, 2009 7:36 PM (8 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yea, but only ITR people read it. it's a pretty small difference.

anyway ned raggett is practically a public figure at this point.

Justen, seeing as you read this thread more than the actually moderator board, could you finally approve my dompassant✧✧✧@gm✧✧✧.c✧✧ login? Thanks.

eg i will never know if the kate circle-jerkers/ITR/mongrels talk smack about me because i will never open those threads. makes no odds.

ned raggett belongs to everyone

To the ages.

http://www.myspacespells.com/files/f8d1f7ef8e35.gif

J0HN D if you think lol-shakey-wants-rape-rachel-ray and lol-neds-cheerful-persona-hides-a-serial-killer are game-changingly vicious personal attacks that we were waiting to unveil under the secret cover of 77 - and that its worth you being this much of a dick about it - you need to buy a mfkkkn clue

AND WHAT take some valium plz

as an aside to Dom, i just checked pending registrations and you aren't there anywhere so either someone else already approved it or it isn't showing up.

hey john can you g-proof this thread now? thx

callin a dude out by his ACTUAL name when shit gets heated

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Raggett

if someone has an entry on wikipedia we should be allowed to jk about them on 77 without overanxious mod policing & subsequent goathurtedness

callin a dude out by his ACTUAL name when shit gets heated

Ethan does that every time he gets mad at me, it beats actually having to argue a point without throwing a shitfit

2nd half of post refers to you, yes?

wtg / kiu

Are the people in the Star Wars movies humans?

this is a good example of why we should be allowed to mention ned on 77

I wouldn't argue against it.