Lance Armstrong is a God

Not a single fuck given about his doping.

can wiggins somehow be implicated? mainly cos he's such a "mod" twat.

― Know how Roo feel (LocalGarda), Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:25 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Implicated, no. There's a heap of suspicion around the whole Sky set-up, including Wiggo, but the only direct links to the doping scandals are Rogers, Yates and Dr. Leinders, anyway if you fancy playing piley-ons just check out the Clinic threads on the Cycling Weekly forum.

http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/347276/the-big-interview-paul-sherwen.html

You live in Uganda where you have interests in a gold mine, and you balance that with your commentating work, how does the year pan out for you?
PS: I start off by going to Australia in January to commentate on the Tour Down Under with Phil, and in February we do the Tour of California. Then every weekend from March until June I travel from Uganda to New York to work on a programme called Cyclisme Sunday for the Versus network. We review the week and commentate on whatever race is on that Sunday.

I start out on Friday and go from Entebbe to Amsterdam, then Amsterdam to New York. I do the return trip every Monday and I’m at my desk on Tuesday morning. As well as the mining business I have another business that supplies logistics to the oil industry here. Oil has been discovered in Uganda and they expect to be pumping it out in 2009. After that it’s the Tour de France.

See also:

http://velorooms.com/files/ArmstrongBusinessConnectionsV2.pdf

dont tell me these things, i love those dudes low key banter

Wiggins is more guilty of lol boring race strategy rather than doping (except the sideburns, they've been boosted in some way).

don't care about paul sherwen, but it bums me out to learn bad things about phil liggett. was I so naive?

cant believe buffoony mcclownshow is a rudderless idiot. paul sherwen looks like a motherfucker with some dark secrets, etc.

If anyone likes the warm fuzzy feel of wool over their eyes, I for one 'd be more than happy to take the dope talk to another thread?

When I said Cycling Weekly upthread I meant Cycling NEWS, argh.

hahaha cranky frankie

http://redkiteprayer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Frankie-537x400.jpg

pelkey:

http://redkiteprayer.com/2012/10/the-explainer-im-shocked-shocked-i-say/

lol, the photo

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13076/Taylor-Phinney-Interview-Getting-the-pill-culture-out-of-the-sport.aspx

taylor seems like one of the good guys - hope he's not all talk.

He's stepping down as chairman of livestrong, AP says

Nike dropped him too.

Trek's stony silence becoming even more embarrassing as are the actions of their local congressman.

another god with feet of clay

Lance Armstrong has done more for cancer survivors than any other person/organiziation, not only the 'sexy' cancers, but all cancers. I will continue to wear my Livestrong gear, covering any Nike swoosh, yea for yellow! Nike I am disappointed with your decision.

I, for one, never met a spreading, deadly cancerous tumor that I didn't find sexy.

http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/athletes/lance-armstrong/Its-Not-About-the-Lab-Rats.html?page=all

Armstrong's connection to the cause of fighting cancer was a symbiotic one. He gained a lot from it, just as they gained from it, too.

His celebrity assisted in fundraising and publicity for charitable organizations, but his association with those organizations and the cause of fighting cancer in turn increased his celebrity and bolstered his public image, allowing him to earn greater endorsements and attract sponsors. His public image also helped to protect his ass while all the doping rumors swirled around him.

not so sure his rep with the wider public will suffer all that much tbh

He has certainly achieved the status of being known far, far beyond his sport, and so this scandal, because it is in a purely sports context, may not touch his reputation very much.

Are you guys kidding? LiveStrong and Nike dropped him. What positive press is he going to get from this point on?

"This is Phil Liggett...LEAVE LANCE ALONE!"

He's been turned away from running a couple big city marathons, though I guess he's still doing triathlons here and there.

yeah i think the floor of support is broken until he somehow earns redemption. in usa, that means some time out of the headlines, or a kardashian.

Trek have dropped him now, according to Walsh on twitter

his 2nd comeback is going to be even more insufferable, isn't it

3rd you mean.

all lance has to do to stay out of the headlines tho is just not do sports

if he lays low, he'll probably be forgotten by the american public, not vilified. ppl will remember that LA was a doper and maybe got his titles taken away but they're not gonna spit on the ground or anything

esp since livestrong inc probably won't implode---half his name is gonna be out there, vaguely beneficent, and his rep will at the very least be kept from going straight to the basement. plus the whole scandal has made joe q public dimly aware of cycling's doping history, and i'll bet that's enough to make a lot of ppl just shrug, "yeah but i guess that was just what everybody did/does". and up until this point, all the popular coverage has painted the story as Lance The Doper, not Lance The Sociopathic Control-Freak Who Was Not Just A Doper But A Ruthless Motherfucking Doper.

will say tho that i'd kinda love it if he went full Maradona, we don't really have one of those over here yet

a couple of years in the wilderness then a mea culpa with accompanying tell-all bestseller, leaving the way open for your new Governor of Texas *shudders*

"if he lays low, he'll probably be forgotten by the american public, not vilified. ppl will remember that LA was a doper and maybe got his titles taken away but they're not gonna spit on the ground or anything"

Well sure I mean he's not A-Rod, but I still think his overall reputation is not going to be very good. Mostly forgotten and connected to sordid drug scandals is a far cry from all conquering cancer vanquishing sports hero.

He seems to only want to 'do sports' because it's what he's good at so I don't know if he's going to lay low. He'll never hold high office.

his whole reputation, so much more than pretty much any other athlete, rested on him being this admirable superhero who overcame struggles that made him sympathetic etc., i think this is going to hurt the way the general public looks at him way more, than, say, all those baseball players with asterisks on their stats.

hes cooked, theres no grounds for a comeback, he doesnt do the stuff that he was famous for anymore

UCI decision on Monday, let's see how the fuckers spin it.

http://inevitablebacklash.com/media/careerplot_tourwinners.jpg

Nope, nothing suspicious here.

http://www.phys.washington.edu/users/savage/Cycling/LookingAtTheData/AIC.html

oops
http://www.phys.washington.edu/users/savage/Cycling/LookingAtTheData/figures/careerplotALLMEANS.jpg

Anquetil was also a known doper.

True. At least he was honest about it.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/39875782/

Louis Armstrong was God. Lance is just a very annoying athlete who cheated and got caught.

stretch Armstrong is god, stretchy god

Henry Armstrong still the best Armstrong athlete

That average speed plot is misleading, it really represents an increase in the average speed of the entire peleton (most of whom were taking drugs, of course). To single out Lance's contributions we can compare average speeds and times on major climbs (which will bring us to more or less the same conclusions).

It's cynical to think he relied on Livestrong as some kind of cover so he could dope at will. Tour wins or not, he still fought and beat cancer and genuinely wants to help others do the same (and he started his cancer foundation before his comeback). He was nearly invincible because, like Steve Madden wrote in that SOE piece, he was like a mafia figure in cycling for a long time and it still would have taken years to bring him down whether Livestrong was around or not. The only comparable American sports star who dominated his sport/league like that would be Michael Jordan, and nobody ever had any illusions about Jordan being a decent guy just because he was a winner. It would have been just as impossible to bring Jordan down in the 80's and 90's as it was to bring Lance down now, and Jordan didn't have to found a charity to get to that level.

(and yeah, people *could* have gone after Jordan in the 90's for his shady business dealings and gambling problems, but nobody would because he was JORDAN and even today people are reluctant to mention it)

well also Jordan's particular character flaws didn't diminish his athletic accomplishments (unless his gambling had taken a Pete Rose turn or something)

theres an old conspiracy theory that MJ's first 'retirement' (when he quit to play baseball) was a secret suspension for gambling

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/sports/how-armstrongs-wall-fell-one-rider-at-a-time.html?pagewanted=all

I'm taking too much delight in the fall of Lance Armstrong! Living in Austin for 12 years and watching him spearhead the smoking ban on bars which he would never frequent or even care about, I've hated him for years. He's an asshole and deserves all of this.

that does seem to be one of the main takeaways