― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 14 February 2005 14:56 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 February 2005 15:08 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 14 February 2005 15:16 (8 years ago) Permalink
― willem (willem), Monday, 14 February 2005 15:21 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kaiser motorik, Monday, 14 February 2005 15:24 (8 years ago) Permalink
― M Carty (mj_c), Monday, 14 February 2005 15:46 (8 years ago) Permalink
-- Alex in Doncaster (alex_fac...) (webmail), February 14th, 2005 2:21 PM. (link)
Like, for instance, "Silver Machine" Hawkwind?
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 14 February 2005 16:45 (8 years ago) Permalink
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 14 February 2005 17:19 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 17:53 (8 years ago) Permalink
― peter smith (plsmith), Monday, 14 February 2005 17:56 (8 years ago) Permalink
― sleep (sleep), Monday, 14 February 2005 20:32 (8 years ago) Permalink
whitey - two face.
spencer otm about jagz kooner.
― stirmonster, Monday, 14 February 2005 20:49 (8 years ago) Permalink
― don, Monday, 14 February 2005 21:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
4/4 time, basic rock bet, with snare on 2 & 4, HOWEVER, bass drum is playing exactly what the hi-hat does (ie, on each eighth note), except on the beats where the snare hits. It looks like this
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &h h h h h h h h. . s . . . s .b b . b b b . b
This is the beat of many Neu songs, including "Hallogallo". I think the bass drum playing on all those eigth notes is what separates motorik from a lot of other regular old 4/4 rock beats (fast, driving or otherwise).
― Dominique (dleone), Monday, 14 February 2005 21:46 (8 years ago) Permalink
basically, the b's are supposed to line up w/the h's, and the s's are on 2 and 4. I hate the internet!
― Dominique (dleone), Monday, 14 February 2005 21:47 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Aaron A., Monday, 14 February 2005 21:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Dominique (dleone), Monday, 14 February 2005 21:57 (8 years ago) Permalink
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 14 February 2005 22:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
― sleep (sleep), Monday, 14 February 2005 22:38 (8 years ago) Permalink
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 14 February 2005 22:41 (8 years ago) Permalink
― losingsoul, Monday, 14 February 2005 22:54 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 00:13 (8 years ago) Permalink
― The Argunaut (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 00:14 (8 years ago) Permalink
― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 09:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 09:17 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Helltime Product Oh, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:07 (7 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:54 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ¡Vamos a matar, Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:00 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ¡Vamos a matar, Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:01 (6 years ago) Permalink
yes this is a great one.
― hella somethin' Gwen Stefani pantwork (haitch), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:03 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:23 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:26 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:27 (6 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:39 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:44 (6 years ago) Permalink
wow, this thread has given me much food for thought!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:19 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ¡Vamos a matar, Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:35 (6 years ago) Permalink
― hella somethin' Gwen Stefani pantwork (haitch), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:42 (6 years ago) Permalink
Yeah, the Lesson #2 sounds like shit.
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 7 July 2006 22:04 (6 years ago) Permalink
― willem -- (willem), Friday, 7 July 2006 22:14 (6 years ago) Permalink
― willem -- (willem), Friday, 7 July 2006 22:22 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Douglas (Douglas), Friday, 7 July 2006 23:21 (6 years ago) Permalink
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Friday, 7 July 2006 23:54 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Maltodextrin (Maltodextrin), Saturday, 8 July 2006 00:15 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Roque Strew (RoqueStrew), Saturday, 8 July 2006 01:20 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 8 July 2006 01:42 (6 years ago) Permalink
― JMMMusic (Jimmy M), Saturday, 8 July 2006 02:14 (6 years ago) Permalink
― naturemorte (naturemorte), Saturday, 8 July 2006 18:12 (6 years ago) Permalink
was listening to B-52's "Aint it a Shame" and that almost makes the cut, surprisingly...
― t. s. idiot (loves laboured breathing), Monday, 9 July 2012 14:02 (10 months ago) Permalink
2. [04:37] Velvet Underground - I’m waiting for the man (1967)
Totally disagree with this one. It doesn't have a backbeat at all, just a steady, even pulse on every beat.
― click here if you want to load them all (Hurting 2), Monday, 9 July 2012 14:15 (10 months ago) Permalink
Yeah it's not Motorik, but I can see a case for it being proto-Motorik. The insistent evenness I think is the key.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 9 July 2012 14:38 (10 months ago) Permalink
^yeah I agree with this post. "Waiting for the Man" is too much of an important first step, even though it probably predicts "It's a Rainy Day, Sunshine Girl" more than anything Neu! did
― t. s. idiot (loves laboured breathing), Monday, 9 July 2012 14:41 (10 months ago) Permalink
contemporary motorik beat: beak, the band of portishead's geoff barrow (btw they have a new album out). somehow i have the impression they bring something new to the table. they are obviously heavily influenced by neu etc, but they have their sound and lots of interesting ideas. the motorik beat is also played by the bass here.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 9 July 2012 21:53 (10 months ago) Permalink
― am0n, Wednesday, 11 July 2012 19:03 (10 months ago) Permalink
Can I nominate this as the post-speeding-down-the-autobahn version of the motorik, very definitely in an unexpected place (the very underrated Francisco's 'Cosmic Beam Experience')?
― Soundslike, Sunday, 15 July 2012 01:29 (10 months ago) Permalink
― dsb, Sunday, 15 July 2012 02:45 (10 months ago) Permalink
Beak! Bought >> and it is pretty awesome. It is just krauty grooves for the sake of it, seemingly, but oh wow.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:52 (8 months ago) Permalink
^^ it is awesome
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 6 September 2012 21:22 (8 months ago) Permalink
Kraftwerk, "Ohm Sweet Ohm"
... could this be deliberate on their part?
― Tom D is secretly an important person (Tom D.), Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:58 (5 months ago) Permalink
!
― willem, Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:37 (5 months ago) Permalink
Portishead - Chase the Tear
― anonanon, Thursday, 13 December 2012 22:10 (5 months ago) Permalink