I am beginning to become scared that Romney/Ryan will win. Can smart people please post here and say reassuring things to convince me that he won't?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2289 of them)

http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/D/O/2/mctongue-pic.jpg

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:47 (eleven years ago) link

That's my point! Whatever he held with McCain it wasn't a debate.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:48 (eleven years ago) link

Obama has a strong tendency to get professorial, which he needs to resist.

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:49 (eleven years ago) link

i remember him seemingly progressively sleepier through each of the last debates - like veering into a more solemn mode, looking downwards, &c. i figure he'll be okay at enumerating his triumphs & all, though, i don't think debates are actually like to be all that snappy or high-risk in this context.

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:49 (eleven years ago) link

it doesn't matter if he's a "good" debater or not, it's all about his opponent, who is a hideous boob.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:50 (eleven years ago) link

Well, yeah, none of these are debates. You could put two staffers behind podiums who have iPads loaded with sound clips and they just play the appropriate one at the appropriate time for how much debating actually goes.

However, I do actually like watching these things, and am curious how much of a public event they'll be around here. For the last two cycles at least, people filled bars & theaters to watch and yell at the screen.

I may or may not have been yelling at the screen whilst typing on here with everybody whilst it happened.

Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:52 (eleven years ago) link

kind of hoping Romney bursts into tears flames america the beautiful the dance of joy as a pas de deux with rafalca heaven, kissing the cotton clouds at the debate.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:57 (eleven years ago) link

I'm curious though, almost everything that Romney's being doing recently seems like it should get Obama angry. Isn't there a portion of Obama's appeal that isn't compatible with him being "My esteemed opponent, who I believe has good in his heart.." about someone who's been blatantly lying and poor-baiting? Even more so if Charles Pierce is right and the Romney campaign is going to go straight evil over the next seven weeks.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 16:58 (eleven years ago) link

My sense atm is that Romney won't go straight evil until after he sees the overnight polling after the first 'debate'. It isn't his preferred style. Rove would have been all Tyson-biting-Spinks'-ear-off by three days after the R convention, when he saw the numbers.

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:09 (eleven years ago) link

he can go straight evil in his ads, but i don't see him pulling off anything beyond petulant in a debate

mookieproof, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:14 (eleven years ago) link

Holyfield

xpost

One Way Ticket on the 1277 Express (Bill Magill), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:16 (eleven years ago) link

correction accepted

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:17 (eleven years ago) link

Tyson bit off Holyfield's ear, fwiw.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:17 (eleven years ago) link

lol too late

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:17 (eleven years ago) link

There are some ads, not approved by Romney of course, poised to Swiftboat Osama vs. Obama (although described as starting with headline OSAMA DEAD, followed by an added question mark, which may be going "a bit far,some commentators agree")(predicted subhed)

dow, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:43 (eleven years ago) link

Net ads, mostly.

dow, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:43 (eleven years ago) link

romney is clearly not unflappable in public and I'm wondering what sort of verbal wilding he's going to engage in when face to face with his opponent.

― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:46 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ya curious to see what a desperate mitt dawg will do in the debates

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 17:47 (eleven years ago) link

i can't really imagine it getting any wilder than him reverting to his faux-laugh/fixed grin/intense stare, tbh, he more often speaks irrelevantly than he does incoherently

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:04 (eleven years ago) link

http://i45.tinypic.com/2pywabn.jpg

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:05 (eleven years ago) link

I don't expect any major gaffes on either side in the debate. Most likely they'll be kind of boring.

o. nate, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:06 (eleven years ago) link

I said way back in primary season that the GOP should pick Perry, that they were shying away from him because he was too much of a wild card, but he was the wild card with a 20% chance of winning whereas Romney has always been the guy with virtually 0% chance of winning.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:06 (eleven years ago) link

feel like mitts gonna go on the offensive

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link

when romneys attack, season premiere 10/12 9pm all the channels

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link

rick perry is not a wild card, hes a goober

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link

not ready 4 prime time, never gonna be

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link

Dubya was a goober too!

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:13 (eleven years ago) link

the common line I heard about Rick Perry before he ran in the primary was that ppl in Texas said he made GWB look like Einstein

wtf where's my chapbook (DJP), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

although tbf Perry is kind of a poor man's Dubya, which is, really, man how bad can it get

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

xp lol

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

its true bush was a goober, but he had waay more on the ball than perry

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

Just shows how sad the GOP field was, because Mitt has never truly been "ready for prime time" either, but they went with him because at least he resembles a cardboard cutout of a standard republican presidential candidate

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:16 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah, I think he won't freak, he'll turn on the locked society smile and break the switch off

Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:16 (eleven years ago) link

Rick Perry did not have ivy league credentials and thus was not in the same league with Dubya, who was a full member of Skull n' Bones.

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:19 (eleven years ago) link

W too they really groomed him for a long time and he had the A team behind him everything was well planned and thought out

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:20 (eleven years ago) link

Thing I'm most curious about is vp debate. No idea how this one will play out, much like we didn't know how the last one would, only this seems way different weirdness than last time's

Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:20 (eleven years ago) link

rick just kinda jumped in there like hay whats up *shoots finger guns*

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:21 (eleven years ago) link

VP debate is going to be totally tepid unless Ryan challenges Biden to a pushup contest or something (btw anyone following the recent Ryan 6-8% bodyfat lie hilariousness? He's great!)

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:21 (eleven years ago) link

ha yes at 6% body fat yr body starts to consume itself in a desperate bid to stay alive

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

i woulda thought the vp debate is gonna be the republicans' best bet?, like given that the appeal of ryan is like STRAIGHT TALKIN NO SPENDIN ATTITUDE he just has to appear to chastise biden on account of spending &c. biden can be all "now hold on a second, jackrabbit", though, so who knows how it ends up, i guess w/biden winning vice-presidential reelection as the grandparent we love to hate.

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

http://taxfoundation.org:81/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/UserFiles/Image/Fiscal%20Facts/20100524-229-nonpayers-mapM.jpg

Perry is merely the product of a base that has learned nothing and will double down on demonstrably wrong-headedness every chance they get. This is representative of the rump of the existing Republican Party and it is telling that Romney can slag off non-payers of tax when the bastions of his numbers are basically the top ten States in not paying income tax.

The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link

vp debate

ryan will destroy biden with mountains of facts that later turn out to be total fabrications

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:26 (eleven years ago) link

at the beginning when ryan goes to shake his hand biden should put him in an affectionate headlock and give him a lil noogie just to set the tone

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:27 (eleven years ago) link

Wasn't Bruce Lee rumored to only have like 3% bodyfat at one point? Or am I off by a factor of 5 or so

Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

heres all yr ryan body fat debunking infos http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/09/paul_ryan_claims_he_has_6_to_8_percent_body_fat_.html

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:29 (eleven years ago) link

yeah folks are all over the fact that this "47%" is made up of A LOT of Republicans.

the flip side of that is that the 53% is made up of A LOT of Dems. 52% of ppl making over 200k supported Obama in '08. nearly half of of those earning 50k - 200k did, too. i realize this isn't 2008, but goddam how dumb can these Erik Erickson 53% chumps be??

it's smdh time in America (will), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:29 (eleven years ago) link

Next up:

11th - TN
12th - NC
13th - UT
14th - AZ
15th - KY

I think Obama won NC in '08, but every single other one of those States (except Florida? I don't remember) voted solidly for McCain/GOP.

The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:29 (eleven years ago) link

Considering that nerve tissue requires fat to operate, 3% would probably lead to brain damage.

Aimless, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:30 (eleven years ago) link

yeah folks are all over the fact that this "47%" is made up of A LOT of Republicans.

the flip side of that is that the 53% is made up of A LOT of Dems. 52% of ppl making over 200k supported Obama in '08. nearly half of of those earning 50k - 200k did, too. i realize this isn't 2008, but goddam how dumb can these Erik Erickson 53% chumps be??

― it's smdh time in America (will), Tuesday, September 18, 2012 2:29 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This (the first point) is being kind of overstated though -- Obama handily carries the vote of the non-income-tax-paying poor in a lot of those red states.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:31 (eleven years ago) link

Obama handily carries the vote of the non-income-tax-paying poor in a lot of those red states.

Can you verify this?

The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 September 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.