Not all messages are displayed:
show all messages (2135 of them)
differently? like one person's #1 would count for more than someone else's? how would that even work?
― some dude, Monday, 27 August 2012 04:10 (8 months ago) Permalink
no i mean like, when they tallied up the submissions, did the people's #1's count more than their #2's and so on? or did the placements not matter? so like if someone had OK Computer at #1 it would count just as much as someone who had the same record at #99..
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 28 August 2012 17:34 (8 months ago) Permalink
kind of curious what other lists i&others wld have devised if this had been framed differently: 'top 100 albums 96-11 selected after you've gone for a run /when yr watching Transformers 3/when yr v cold and need the toilet'
my week of listening to 100% women (mb 98% in practice) has been pretty banging though! v pleased to discover lena platonos
― ogmor, Tuesday, 28 August 2012 22:41 (8 months ago) Permalink