― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:27 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:34 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:38 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
(I know I'm offended but you can do time for it?)
― Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:41 (7 years ago) Permalink
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:44 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:50 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:58 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:59 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:02 (7 years ago) Permalink
― aylene (Dorca), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:03 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Øystein (Øystein), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:11 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:14 (7 years ago) Permalink
Is it wrong for a couple to have sex while their baby is sleeping in the same room, knowing that the baby might wake up? Or if the baby isn't sleeping at all? Or for a couple to have sex in their bedroom, with their children sleeping in adjoining room, even though they might wake up and hear the noises? How are these things different from the original poster's question?
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:27 (7 years ago) Permalink
You forgot that it could have sperm in his eye.
EW!
I'm trying to think of all the posters who recently became a parent.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:30 (7 years ago) Permalink
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:31 (7 years ago) Permalink
up and down their COCK.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:32 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:32 (7 years ago) Permalink
with their genitals growing bigger and then stuff squirting out of it.
anyway i think the worst part is you knowing the baby being there and still doing it. i mean, that's like sick. it's almost as bad as shagging in a room where there's a huge photo of your parents somewhere in it.
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:33 (7 years ago) Permalink
dude i think it has.
And you think an infant of that age has some conception of what such movement means? I was at least ten before I learned it.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:34 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:35 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:36 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:39 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
do you think it's alright to be whacking one off in an intensive care ward next to someone in a coma?
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:43 (7 years ago) Permalink
(x-post)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:44 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:46 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:46 (7 years ago) Permalink
xpost.
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:49 (7 years ago) Permalink
I said children present, not with children. The incest taboo exists in most cultures and times. The youngsters older Athenian men had sex with had reached puberty, I think, they were probably older than 12. Of course it sounds wrong from today's point of view, but it's kinda hard to judge such an ancient past with todaysä standards. It was part of a young man's life cycle back then, I doubt most of the were traumatized by it, since it was part of everyday life.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:50 (7 years ago) Permalink
No, and there's a difference. Female circumcision does concrete physical harm to women. Wanking before a baby most likely doesn't affect it all, not even mentally.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:52 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:52 (7 years ago) Permalink
xpost
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink
Just don't open up the can of worms of whether fat people are sexy.
(note: They're not)
― Seems2Me, Monday, 5 December 2005 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink
No, but the baby isn't aware of things like a teenager is.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:55 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
Jesus Christ, man, for sure society could stand to loosen up about sexuality a little, but exposing infants to adult sexuality is surely not the place to start.
xpost Tuomas you really, really ought to check out some of the available research about what infants are & aren't aware of
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
heh heh "things"
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:58 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
― JimD (JimD), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:01 (7 years ago) Permalink
only if it is the correct conditioning.
― rage for the machine (banaka), Monday, 30 August 2010 00:32 (2 years ago) Permalink
Also, this thread needs an overbearing Brooklyn father to come up, cuff it on the back of the head and say, "Jeeeesus Christ, what the FUCK is wrong with you?"
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, December 5, 2005 2:19 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― horseshoe, Monday, 30 August 2010 00:36 (2 years ago) Permalink
Is it bad for dick cheney to see you masturbating
― show me your ticks (San Te), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:41 (2 years ago) Permalink
During your baby's first month, she can focus only about 20cm to 30cm away
― the late great, Friday, 11 May 2012 02:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
what if it's a boy?i bet you he could see further. because boys are better. it's science.
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 11 May 2012 04:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
"He was in and out and round about, doing this sort of thing all over the house, "
Impossible not to imagine this sentence as a lyric
― Race Against Rockism (Myonga Vön Bontee), Friday, 11 May 2012 06:26 (1 year ago) Permalink
will make the future repressed memories of a shuffling blur moaning to itself in Finnish all the more mysterious
― like Joe Pasquale and Gandhi (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 May 2012 06:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
It's the rest of the song I worry about...
xpost You know what? The one big ILX fallacy (oo-er) is that Tuomas was the original poster...
― Mark G, Friday, 11 May 2012 06:31 (1 year ago) Permalink
i was trying to get at that if the baby can see you you're doing it too close to the baby
― the late great, Friday, 11 May 2012 06:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
http://efukt.com/20614_Babysitting_Fail.html
― dylannn, Friday, 11 May 2012 07:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
ok, moving beyond vanilla stuff, would pissing/a2m/etc be ok in front of a child, 'because it woudln't understand'?― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, December 5, 2005 9:36 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Boris Kutyurkokhov (Eisbaer), Saturday, 12 May 2012 02:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
― buzza, Friday, 31 August 2012 03:04 (8 months ago) Permalink
this simon guy
― dylannn, Friday, 31 August 2012 03:33 (8 months ago) Permalink
buncha squares
― call all destroyer, Friday, 31 August 2012 03:38 (8 months ago) Permalink