♪♫ caek's corner ♪♫

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1247 of them)

ha i assumed that would be a proper hardcore acronym rather than EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPE

dis civilization and its contents (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:13 (eleven years ago) link

people are excited about the higgs! although tomorrow's result is kind of an open secret like anderson cooper.

there used to be OWL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwhelmingly_Large_Telescope

caek, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:16 (eleven years ago) link

nannte man das neue Projekt etwas selbstironisch Overwhelmingly Large Telescope (Überwältigend Großes Teleskop)

dis civilization and its contents (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:17 (eleven years ago) link

yes they are a droll bunch

caek, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:24 (eleven years ago) link

do you have a "take" on it

max, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:33 (eleven years ago) link

it sounds like they are going to announce a "4-5 sigma" result (which is i guess "beyond reasonable doubt" for almost everyone except particle physicists and probably the people who do aircraft safety).

if i'm honest though, this kind of science doesn't really blow my hair back. partly that's the nature of high energy physics: you need a lot of data, and after a year you have a rough idea of where things are heading. the nature of your fuding quite rightly obliges you to release your early data, so you you release a result that is a "2-sigma" hint. and it's pretty much an open secret that a stronger statement is coming the next year (see e.g. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/07/best-physics-gossips-you-should-be-reading/54123/). so you lose the eureka moment of "tabletop physics", which is a shame. but really that's just an issue of presentation. some people will do what you mentioned yesterday:

The moments after the CNN anchor officially came out of the closet this morning were like an "over-it" contest on Twitter — a chance to see who could be the least surprised by the news.

but that is fronting. this is a legitimately big deal: the first really significant discovery in particle physics in maybe 20 years. the last piece of the puzzle in some sense. it would have been lots more exciting if they were like, "we can't find it. we have no clue." but they had to be sure, and being sure cost $10bn and a generation of particle physicists.

caek, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:00 (eleven years ago) link

good article: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/may/10/crisis-big-science/?pagination=false

caek, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:00 (eleven years ago) link

Hey Caek!

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:16 (eleven years ago) link

Have you by any chance seen these Haribo Fruchtgummi Mopse?

http://www.worldofsweets.de/out/pictures/z1/Haribo-Gert-Kaefer-s-Fruchtgummi-Moepse.jpg

They have sour ones too!

http://www.worldofsweets.de/out/pictures/z1/haribo-gerd-kaefer--039--s-fruchtgummi-moepse-scharf-ingwer_z1.jpg

Apparently they are the work of this famous celebrity chef http://www.gerdkaefer.de/. I actaully ate with my parents in one of his restaurants many years ago. I believe it was this one: http://kurhaus-gastronomie.de/bistro.htm

Anyway this guy has a pug who is supposedly the most famous pug in all of Germany. His name is Sir Henry!

So, I need some of these gummis but can't get them online easily. :/ Are they readily available there?

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:20 (eleven years ago) link

ps - "mops" is pug in german

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:22 (eleven years ago) link

thanks for nybooks article link! great!

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:24 (eleven years ago) link

ha i will have a look in the gummi section of my supermarket next time e! (there is a gummi section. it is next to the ritter sport section.)

caek, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:41 (eleven years ago) link

:D

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:42 (eleven years ago) link

where are you going to be working now again?

the late great, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:05 (eleven years ago) link

so many bores complaining about comic sans in the higgs slides

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 08:47 (eleven years ago) link

i am in munich for the next couple of years i think xp

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 08:50 (eleven years ago) link

that's a nice city, i have some cousins there. one is a foxy tv presenter, i'll send you her facebook.

the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:00 (eleven years ago) link

i like foxy people

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:01 (eleven years ago) link

ugh i hate this shit

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/523589_444526022235081_226372658_n.jpg

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:06 (eleven years ago) link

there was an article on cnn headlined "what you need to know about the higgs boson" and i was hoping it would just "what everyone already thought was true is true, move along"

the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:08 (eleven years ago) link

xp

you would hope that people who pride themselves on knowing about science might have some understanding of the way popular journalism works but hey ho

coopflaggypost (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:15 (eleven years ago) link

dear christians

it is called the god particle because it is the final piece of matter required to build the altar upon which we summon mighty cthulhu

aka "the where-is-your-god-now particle"

the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:17 (eleven years ago) link

i feel like it's kid of a a mixture of solipsism and total fucking ignorance about everything

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:18 (eleven years ago) link

xp

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:18 (eleven years ago) link

kid = kind

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:18 (eleven years ago) link

also ungratefulness re: the $10bn particle physics got from european taxpayers (although tbf most of the people posting stuff like that are dawkins-type dilletantes seeking to align themselves with "science")

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 13:19 (eleven years ago) link

yeah that's why i said "knowing about science" rather than being actually in the field or anything.

coopflaggypost (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 13:25 (eleven years ago) link

yep. that kind of person is not a minority in science, but scientists are a minority of that kind of person.

caek, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 13:27 (eleven years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Hi dere caek, refereeing question for u -- when determining stoppage time, what factors would make a referee initially call for 5 minutes and then increase that time to over 8 minutes?

DX Dx DX (dan m), Monday, 30 July 2012 14:55 (eleven years ago) link

stoppages within stoppage time

Shrimpface Killah (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 July 2012 16:16 (eleven years ago) link

Otm. If not that then was this a game with a 4th official?

caek, Monday, 30 July 2012 18:31 (eleven years ago) link

yes

DX Dx DX (dan m), Monday, 30 July 2012 18:46 (eleven years ago) link

does the 4th official set a suggested minimum that the ref can over-rule? i cdn't remember

Shrimpface Killah (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 July 2012 18:47 (eleven years ago) link

basically shakes out like this

5 min stoppage time announced
~3 minutes in, player commits second yellow card foul, is sent off, but does not leave field of play immediately
player's coach protests, is also ejected & leaves slowly
once play resumes, play continues up into 8th minute of stoppage when 10-man team scores goal, game immediately ends

DX Dx DX (dan m), Monday, 30 July 2012 18:49 (eleven years ago) link

(and yes this means the team I support was denied a win but I am trying to understand this from an objective point of view)

DX Dx DX (dan m), Monday, 30 July 2012 18:49 (eleven years ago) link

time can and is added during extra time

e.g. i think there's an explicit directive to add at least 30s for ever substitution during extra time

so sounds like the ref added some time for the nonsense

i'm not actually sure if the ref can overrule the 4th off. he can certainly overrule the linesmen.

caek, Monday, 30 July 2012 19:53 (eleven years ago) link

that's what I figured, thx!

DX Dx DX (dan m), Monday, 30 July 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link

three months pass...

'ello caek. The bbc reckons (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20249753) that 42 light-years away is "not too far away". it bloody is, isn't it?

thomasintrouble, Thursday, 8 November 2012 11:38 (eleven years ago) link

probably wdn't get mobile reception but in galactic terms 42 light years is knack all iirc

movember spawned a nobster (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 8 November 2012 11:39 (eleven years ago) link

we are not galactic we are humantic.

itt: 'splaining men (ledge), Thursday, 8 November 2012 11:40 (eleven years ago) link

speak for yourself i am made of star stuff iirc

movember spawned a nobster (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 8 November 2012 11:42 (eleven years ago) link

we should invade now while they're still in the early 1970's. hippies'll never know what hit'em.

thomasintrouble, Thursday, 8 November 2012 11:47 (eleven years ago) link

the second nearest star to us (i.e. after the sun) is 4 ly away. Our galaxy is about 50,000 ly across. so 42 ly is "the solar neighborhood".

i guess it's like saying, compared to the entire plant earth, woking is not too far away from london. obviously if you can't move then woking is effectively very far away. in this metaphor, we are shut-ins in woking.

caek, Thursday, 8 November 2012 12:35 (eleven years ago) link

so where is Hull then? is there a part of the galaxy that looks forlornly outwards idly waiting to be slowly engulfed?

thomasintrouble, Friday, 9 November 2012 14:18 (eleven years ago) link

two weeks pass...

One observation: A physicist I know posted it on his Facebook not one hour ago.

ILM Communication (seandalai), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:07 (eleven years ago) link

Professor Frampton, described by his 71-year-old ex-wife as a “naive fool”, said he had been lured into travelling to South America by criminals posing as the amply-proportioned fitness trainer...

Aimless, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:11 (eleven years ago) link

ex-wife otm

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:20 (eleven years ago) link

Ha, yeah. It's kind of ridiculous, right. He's a particle physicist so I never met him, but I know ppl who have. Tbh it kind of surprises me that this sort of thing doesn't happen more often. Many male physicists (especially toward the maths/high energy theory end) are a little, ahem, wet behind the ears. I mean even the person who told me this story struck me as the kind if person to whom it could happen.

caek, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 09:13 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.