oops
― the late great, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
it works here, too
― WHEY AHR MAH DREGUNS? (DJP), Monday, 4 June 2012 16:57 (eleven years ago) link
I thought for sure this had opened in the US already. Hype Machine must be blown up.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 June 2012 16:59 (eleven years ago) link
Alien Resurrection is great, fuiud
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 4 June 2012 17:24 (eleven years ago) link
ok, switch Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection around if you're that way inclined, I don't mind. :-)
― StanM, Monday, 4 June 2012 17:26 (eleven years ago) link
Now I'm curious how this movie can be so terrible. Is it Transformers terrible, or just terrible because of missed potential? Like, is it inept or just too ambitious?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 June 2012 17:50 (eleven years ago) link
What was the deal w guy pearce's makeup in this movie
― just sayin, Monday, 4 June 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link
He was cheaper than an actual old guy I suppose.
― StanM, Monday, 4 June 2012 18:17 (eleven years ago) link
resurrection was better than this, because it was just dumb and played dumb. might help answer your question too josh.
agree with number none on this- this movie doesn't work at all independently of hype or relation to any other movies, it just doesn't make any sense in and of itself
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Monday, 4 June 2012 19:22 (eleven years ago) link
Again, I'm finding myself in the same boat as I was with Dark Shadows. This isn't bad enough to earn the glory of being a great bad movie.
― Björk lied (Eric H.), Monday, 4 June 2012 19:23 (eleven years ago) link
I really liked this, although I've only seen Aliens (years ago and wasn't moved). There are some majorly daft rmde moments but by the end it's just rollicking great fun.
― Scary Move 4 (dog latin), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 01:47 (eleven years ago) link
this was ok i guess. my first 3D film!
+ one particular scene is can't-turn-away-even-though-every-instinct-is-recoiling gripping, and if i was a female it might have actually traumatised me+ one line from the captain is v amusing+ michael fassbender is amazing+ the charlize theron character is interesting+ blah blah blah impressive cgi stops you falling asleep at least though i think i don't really "get" special effects as a replacement for plot and dialogue and characterisation
- almost nothing of consequence actually happens. there are setpieces but even i, who am not that familiar w/the alien series and have not been following the prometheus hype much, was not actually surprised by a single thing about it- it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep- noomi rapace character way less interesting than charlize theron- as per every blockbuster it misses a ton of tricks that could've made it more interesting or tense in more then a basic way. the two final survivors having to talk to each other and work together, for instance- characterisation didn't go anywhere deep enough - the android is the most complex character ffs, for all that it purported to ask "why?" about everything nothing is ACTUALLY EXPLAINED EVER, half the characters' motivation may as well be completely random
just a really average film basically
― kanye kardashian (lex pretend), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 08:25 (eleven years ago) link
you should see alien, the first one, it is lean and wicked
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:16 (eleven years ago) link
^ speaketh the gospel.
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:19 (eleven years ago) link
- it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep- or all that it purported to ask "why?" about everything nothing is ACTUALLY EXPLAINED EVER, half the characters' motivation may as well be completely random
LINDELOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF!
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:43 (eleven years ago) link
I don't regret my time watching it, but it is mostly bobbins. A friend made the interesting point that a lot of the set up is very similar to Aliens vs Predators, which is odd not least because this was put on hold (while still a twinkle in HR Giger's eye) so AvP could be made.
Lex hugely OTM about nothing consequential or surprising happening. Also the dialogue went out of its way to ensure this (drinking at the space-billiard table probably the worst of this), and the last scene (might be after the credits, I don't remember) seems to have been hammered in to underline certain connections for the really dim.
But yeah - I would recommend people to go see it EG cheap at the Prince Charles in 2D.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:45 (eleven years ago) link
it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep
tempted to put this post above my writing/drawing desk in perpetuo
― but he go's to a resturang and then die in a toilet (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:48 (eleven years ago) link
worst/dumbest scene/dialogue was pearce/theron imo, but there were several contenders- preamble to scientist sexy times was especially painful
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:55 (eleven years ago) link
Not deep you say!?
And I know it’s horribly obnoxious to say “You need to see the movie a couple of times in order to truly appreciate it”, but I do feel like it was designed that way and there are little things that seem like a throw-away on first viewing.For example, when they do the carbon gating on the dead engineer and realise he has been dead for 2000 years then you wonder about when, 2000 years ago, the Engineers decided to wipe us out. What happened 2000 years ago? Is there any correlation with what happened on the earth 2000 years ago and this decision that was already in motion? Could a sequel start in that time period and contextualize what we did to piss these beings off?I think it’s a very interesting question to leave dangling. Is it a loose end? Yeah, probably. But it’s probably what sends you to the pub after the movie and has you arguing with your friends as to what you think it might mean.
For example, when they do the carbon gating on the dead engineer and realise he has been dead for 2000 years then you wonder about when, 2000 years ago, the Engineers decided to wipe us out. What happened 2000 years ago? Is there any correlation with what happened on the earth 2000 years ago and this decision that was already in motion? Could a sequel start in that time period and contextualize what we did to piss these beings off?
I think it’s a very interesting question to leave dangling. Is it a loose end? Yeah, probably. But it’s probably what sends you to the pub after the movie and has you arguing with your friends as to what you think it might mean.
― Number None, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:57 (eleven years ago) link
rmde
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:00 (eleven years ago) link
Alien 5: SPACE JESUS
questions also left open for the two sequels apparently in the pipeline
― DG, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:02 (eleven years ago) link
unless the appalling word of mouth on this scuppers those plans
― Number None, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:07 (eleven years ago) link
in the past, that has stopped nothing!
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:15 (eleven years ago) link
WAS JESUS A PREDATOR
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:16 (eleven years ago) link
*mind explodes, quits job, changes user name*
― but he go's to a resturang and then die in a toilet (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:17 (eleven years ago) link
tbh i'm resigned to this film being poo but i know i'm going to end up seeing it anyway if only to pull it to pieces
― DG, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:30 (eleven years ago) link
in Alien Russia, film pulls you to pieces!
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:31 (eleven years ago) link
^ already a better plot than this POS
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:46 (eleven years ago) link
we should totally write the jesus-predator-alien sequel, I'm sure we can pitch a better treatment than this Lindeloff guy
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:48 (eleven years ago) link
as someone who frequently leaves cinemas seething with rage at slapdash insulting blockbuster tripe, i agree with p much everyone's criticisms but i had a decent time anyway and don't particularly regret going.
(altho saying that, this was also my first 3d screening and it felt more like a ride than anything tbh, the sensory overload made it weirdly difficult to track narrative and characterization on the fly as you usually would)
― r|t|c, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:49 (eleven years ago) link
almost feel like they couldve just about gotten away with something if they'd had even the slightest bit of interesting dialogue with awoken titan guy at the end, but no, hulk smash, rip fassbender head off zzzz
― r|t|c, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
yeah rtc nailed it wide the ride analogy for 3D, seeing avatar was kind of like being on a pirates of the caribbean type ghost train
― the late great, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
so the alien giant dude is like big angry frankenstein, jeez this keeps sounding worse and worse
― the late great, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:52 (eleven years ago) link
walking home after v disorientating too, like here's a car coming right at me oh wait ok this will actually hit me won't it
― r|t|c, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:54 (eleven years ago) link
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall),
this is bouncing around in my skull as an arnie taunt from terminator
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:01 (eleven years ago) link
man, not to be all yank-centric but could we at least go gentle on the spoilers until this thing is released in the US for like a day?
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:09 (eleven years ago) link
from what i can gather there aren't any spoilers unless you've somehow avoided all the trailers and promo gubbins
― DG, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:26 (eleven years ago) link
well there was the part where the alien ship rolls down the hill like a wagon wheel and noomi runs along the top of it like as the alien is chasing her
― the late great, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:30 (eleven years ago) link
p. sure that the normal line in these situations is 'avoid the movie thread once the movie's released if you don't want spoilers'
but
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:37 (eleven years ago) link
SPOILER
the android did it
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:37 (eleven years ago) link
they fly at u face
this is shit
Another question: is this pretty much bad from the get-go, or does it only dawn upon you when the credits roll how terrible it has been? Thinking of "Lost" here, which for all its ups and downs could have gone either way until the last ep, which some folks (like me) felt invalidated and retro-shittified much of what came before it.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:38 (eleven years ago) link
I'm hardly the Chief of Credibility Police w.r.t movies like this, but (REAL SPOILER ALERT if you care) those crunches Noomi has to do throughout the last quarter of the movie are kind of OTT considering her emergency C-section.
― Björk lied (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:44 (eleven years ago) link
SPOILERZ
ikr, so much mystique about Our Creators and it's just this giant monster. no ANSWERS even on the film's own terms.
also wtf @ saving Vickers and Shaw and then instead of that leading to, idk, some dialogue between two of the film's opposite poles...one of them just gets squashed.
the self-C-section scene was the most intense thing though.
― kanye kardashian (lex pretend), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:49 (eleven years ago) link
the 3D bit i appreciated most was the shirtless-right-in-the-camera scene, quite glad they didn't have a full-on 3D sex scene though
― kanye kardashian (lex pretend), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:52 (eleven years ago) link
Hah, I spent the whole movie wondering if I'd seen him in any other movies and, if not, why. Back curves in 3D were v nice.
― Björk lied (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:56 (eleven years ago) link
Another question: is this pretty much bad from the get-go, or does it only dawn upon you when the credits roll how terrible it has been?
first 40 mins are pretty good, deserve a better what-seemed-like-300-mins
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 18:30 (eleven years ago) link
I would've absolutely hated it if they'd actually managed to get Into Serious Dialog with the titan. As far as it goes I thought he was perfectly reasonable - clearly none of you have ever seen me before my first coffee of the morning.
Also rmde at we have discovered that they have advanced holograms, which they seem to use mainly for exposition.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 18:38 (eleven years ago) link