Mad Men on AMC • Fifth Season Thread

Sketchiest part of the ep for me was how little Roger had to say about the whole affair. Reeked of contrivance.

Yeah, I'd say it was because now he's got two ex-wives and his family to support, but he was also trucking the lobsters.

But really, Roger doesn't care about anything other than himself and the practicalities. He can justify anything if it gets him what he wants. He loves Joan but he's never been able to treat her as an equal. He's a pretty sleazy dude, all told.

Then again he'd blow up the Honda account by going after the Japanese because of WWII, but maybe he cares more about that then he does women.

roger torpedoing the honda account seems like a relic from a less-developed era of the show & characters. hard to believe that the roger we've subsequently come to know would care enough about old grudges to do something like that.

Mad Men doesn't usually get me emotional but when Jaguar creep says to Joan "Now let's see 'em" and they cut to the blank expression on her face...aw jeez louise.
I could hardly watch I felt so sad.
Poor Joan.

I feel like there was some weird theme with Don + losing his "power" with women?
- With Megan & the audition, he says no she says eff off I'm doing it
- With Joan he says you don't have to lie with the creep but it's already a done deal, he thinks he saved her only to find she did it anyway
- Peggy's resignation. He can't talk her out of it.

I dunno, it just felt like a mini arc in light of the Jaguar/ownership of beautiful woman thing. Or i'm reading too much into it.

no, that's a good catch wr2 the idea of ownership and control he was pitching to jaguar

It contrasts w/Pete's war against women, which really became a thing post-Rory.

Don's relationship with women is definitely a running theme in the episode and, with regards to Megan, the season as a whole. The chauvinistic comparison of the Jaguar to a mistress is kind of a joke because it's not just some wayward fling on the side they can't control anymore, it's all the women in their lives. I think Don really likes Megan's free-spirit, independence, but he has a really hard time letting go of the way things "should be", in his mind, which is why he's been such a prick but also has eventually relented. Pete definitely set up as an opposite all season. He's not coping with the realities of women-as-people instead of women-as-objects nearly well at all.

Don also has issues with prostitution because of his mother, which is why I don't think he'll think less of Joan for doing what she did, but rather he feels guilty for being complicit in an environment that virtually necessitates prostitution.

Maybe I'm forgetting other times, but the only time I seem to remember him with a prostitute was the one that he paid to dominate him - even at his lowest the only way he could be with a prostitute was to give her the control his mother didn't have etc etc.

He had a hooker party w/Lane that one time too.

ah right. nevermind then.

started this season seeing don very much as the show's unacknowledged villain. by this point, it's hard not to see him as its only real hero.

*ahem* male hero, make that

I think it's silly to try to look at this show as "heroes" and "villains". Everyone's trying to figure themselves out, but some more than others. Pete is definitely an asshole, but we understand why he's an asshole. Don can be a real asshole, but we always understand why.

I think it's silly to try to look at this show as "heroes" and "villains".

xp - i agree, but old habits die hard

i'm just not post-affectionate wr2 fictional characters. some i like, some i don't.

It's fine to like or not like a character. my point is that it's not really the kind of dichotomy the show has any interest in.

yeah, i agree. cue endless "what the show is intersested in" vs. "what i am interested in" pas de deux.

Not necessarily the end of Joan's career; everyone is, perhaps begrudgingly, indebeted to her for being the ringer on their 1st auto account, which will supposedly make the company. If anything her presence just reminds them how they were all complicit in the act.

They have always flirted with the pimp / prostitute analogy for the ad industry. This episode just drove it home (hit you over the head with it). Megan turning around in the audition, money thrown at Peggy, Don thinking he can keep her there for the right price, and the explicit discussion of pimping out Joan. Everyone is compromised, with Joan as sacrificial lamb. I viewed this episode as "the point of no return".

have to presume the guy from jaguar will start showing up at the office next season demanding more from joan, causing stink and consternation a la lee garner jr

This episode just drove it home (hit you over the head with it). Megan turning around in the audition, money thrown at Peggy, Don thinking he can keep her there for the right price, and the explicit discussion of pimping out Joan. Everyone is compromised, with Joan as sacrificial lamb.

otm, "money thrown at Peggy, Don thinking he can keep her there for the right price" a damn good catch.

"Isn't Peggy now "lead copy" or something high up like that at the new place?"

Copy Chief is what it says on the napkin, so yes.

have to presume the guy from jaguar will start showing up at the office next season demanding more from joan

Even if just personally for Joan, will be p. disappointed if this doesn't have long-term ramifications of some kind.

like I can see why they dropped it as much as possible, but I always felt Peggy's baby was under-represented in terms of its plausible consequences.

You have to figure the Jaguar guy (who was on the search committee, not the actual point person?) might not get very far with Joan ever again - she's got her contract, and I doubt she signed anything that was contingent on *always* keeping the clients happy.

i'd be surprised if he's ever in the show again

True!

Hopefully Joan will get Pete fired.

Best episode since 'Carousel'.

like I can see why they dropped it as much as possible, but I always felt Peggy's baby was under-represented in terms of its plausible consequences.

How so?

Babby would be between 6 and 7 now, so it's not like he/she is going to come looking for Peggy.

btw, I feel like we just got this show back and after two more weeks it's gone again for up to (or more than) a year! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

firing pete would actually be a bad business move, and joan knows that

lane is expendable at this point

someone should really put together a fake opening montage for a late-60s era situation comedy called peggy, complete with bouncy theme song called "i'm on my way" or something.

That's a great idea.

opening credits montage, i mean.

she could take freddy rumsen, abe drexler the jewish radical journalist, her kvetching mother, the lesbian photojournalist, etc. with her! hilarity ensues!

she should also hire away stan rizzo from SCDP.

i'm kinda psyched for this imaginary show. if weiner did that IRL it would be kind of next-level.

btw i'm willing to bet that by next (!) season it'll be sterling cooper draper campbell.

I suppose Pete is the only person doing anything about new business. Bummer.

Sal ducking his head in for a few saucy Alan Suesian quips every few minutes.

i know this was a bit up thread, but can someone tell me what the hell " trucking the lobsters" means?!

it's a sexual reference.

how so

hard to put a finger on. just feels as though her having a young child out there only rarely factors into her psyche, which doesn't ring true with how I've heard the adoption experience described, even in the 1960s world of never-speak-of-it-again etc. Doesn't quite chime right.

maybe ted chaoughghg adopted it

which doesn't ring true with how I've heard the adoption experience described

I don't think there's a universal definition of how women react to having their children adopted.

man just remembered Don having to fire Sal, and suggesting that he should've accepted LGJr's proposition. ~resonances~

I don't think there's a universal definition of how women react to having their children adopted.

I definitely don't mean to say that. Like I say, it's hard to express. The handling of it just feels to me more like "that bit of the plot is over now, thanks vm" than any sort of intended expression of an integrated character.

it almost seemed like the shot of the necklace being put on Joan (and her dress) a Vertigo reference. but i cant remember if the necklace in Vertigo was green (seems right though).