new 77 keeping it positive meta thread to request dudes stop biting their own joeks

dont lie you are deeply offended that we scoff at your dad jokes

the more you scoff at a dad joke, the more you secretly love it. real talk.

This is not a film, but it's one of my favorite things. Check out the old long-running box for Twister:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00000DMBK.01-A3LTAW8FHJ63G2._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

"Why yes, young black child, feel free to play Twister with us in complete racial harmony! No wait, stop touching the white girls. Right. Umm ... why don't you go back over there and work the spinner for us, 'kay?"

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, June 7, 2006 11:44 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://www.uki.net/images/shoppingdb/bullseyepagesukinet96-p-l.gif
Classic Twister: Fun for Everyone (Except Your Black Friend Who Has to Sit in Back Operating the Spinner Because We Don't Want to Show Him Actually Touching and Crawling Around on the Little White Girls)

― nabisco, Monday, July 21, 2008 1:53 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

This reminds me of another one:

ihttp://www.boscovs.com/wcsstore/boscovs/images/store/product/images/4191581474645.jpg

I always hated this old Twister box. I mean, look at the smug white kid with the redhead crawling all over him. And then look at this shit: Hasbro apparently decided they couldn't have a picture of the black kid actually touching the white girls, so they've put him off in the corner to tend to the spinner? It's pretty much explicitly racist, and as a result imposes some weird sexual tension over the whole system here. (Well, that and that look on the other boy's face: is there like a fifth, not-visible person playing that's making him make that face?)

For the record they have updates the Twister box and now black people are allowed to play.

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:10 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

all leading up to a general chin-scratching steeple-fingered "very interesting, Nabisco, you are very interested in that Twister box."

yeah rachel ray rapey mo joeks was really the origin of deliberately misconstruing someone to bask in the b-hurt glow and i would never discourage an attempt to recreate the lolz that provided me all those years ago

― and what, Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:21 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what is the story behind this

http://i41.tinypic.com/2mmycs2.jpg

ahahahahahahhhhahhhaaaa

what is the story behind this

― mad loli vamp bone (cankles), Friday, January 30, 2009 5:21 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Who will listen to another Courtney Love "comeback record"?

yeah rachel ray rapey mo joeks was really the origin of deliberately misconstruing someone to bask in the b-hurt glow and i would never discourage an attempt to recreate the lolz that provided me all those years ago

― and what, Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:21 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what is the story behind this

― mad loli vamp bone (cankles), Friday, January 30, 2009 11:21 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

few years back shakey let his guard down and got comfortable enough to admit him & wifey mo have "s&m fantasies" while watching rachel ray - i think he meant on some wack alex in nyc "beyonce should be boiled in oil" b.s. but me & some other bandwagoners ran with it - started acting like shakey mo seriously wanted to rape and torture rachel ray - was A+ funny for a few months before he wised up the only reason anybody kept mentioning it was because he got madd so dude started shrugging it off and the lolz died out

That's not even the half of it.

There was some thread where he said that he and his wife sit around, thinking up different ways they could rape and dismember Rachel Ray.

After three years, I'm trying to give Shakes a little leeway. But man, like Nate P, it's kinda hard to let something like that go.

xp

lol why are you getting your panties in a twist about a dude who made a joke about messing around with a tv chef when theres a dude who ACTUALLY DROWNED A CELEBRITY on this board right now

rachel ray's booty looks A+ in that pic

makes me wanna dismember it

lol why are you getting your panties in a twist about a dude who made a joke about messing around with a tv chef when theres a dude who ACTUALLY DROWNED A CELEBRITY on this board right now

Ned Raggett?

suffocated in the raggettstacks

http://kuci.org/~nraggett/nedwedding.jpg
drownin u

Heavens! I drown you ;-)

*flounces away*

ned doesn't post on 77 does he?

I feel the thread move under my feet.

im sure he has access to the 77 - and if not whyyyy

it's pretty easy to repeat jokes without realizing you've done it...i've clicked on threads to post a corny-ass joke then realize i made it YEARS ago on the same thread. this has happened like 5 times so far.

― Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:51 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

actually, probably more than that but who's keeping count

― Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:52 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

sounds like you are

all leading up to a general chin-scratching steeple-fingered "very interesting, Nabisco, you are very interested in that Twister box."

― max, Friday, January 30, 2009 11:19 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

5 stars

neither ned or shakey are on 77. nice job.

I'd invite Shakey if I knew his e-mail address.

Plus, it'd make it a lot easier to find that RR quote.

this thread is more meta than a bag of hammers

I got to this thread by googling "hateration"

hay admin why dont u just give ned and shakey access already

so even just mentioning running jokes like the rachel rapey mo thing is enough to get a thread moved to ile? or posting the same pic of ned thats in 8 million ile threads already

i mentioned thirdalternative above, where i called him the worst poster to have ever lived, why didnt this get moved back then

Factual statements are exempt.

so is this the nice 'n' positive 77 ppl been telling me about? would hate to see what the negative looks like

Are the people in the Star Wars movies humans?

lol

well i suppose another option would be for me to step in and do what i did when LJ started talking about a non-77 poster, but i dont think that you and PP and Crutis and jhosh and dom would like it too much if you all got removed from 77. xposts

i have direct from the source that ned lurks on 77 anyway

and the shakey mo thing wasnt like repasting all his posts or google-mapping where dogg lives it was just... discussing a kind of joke.... that was perpetuated on shakey mo once. we can't do that? its shakey mo, dude.

but srsly why not just add someone why they get mentioned - its the non punitive all inclusive keepin positive way to go

i have direct from the source that ned lurks on 77 anyway

Not even that, really. I do have access and once or twice I've looked in there, but that's about it.

whole point of thread was to post stuff that people on 77 could see and help them improve their posting not the fabled 77 stalker meta b.s. that doesnt actually exist.... just bcz we mentioned offhand two of ilx's top 3 most joeked-about posters doesnt warrant ile-moving, its not like that bullshit alex in nyc thread (that wasnt even started by a "real" 77er btw it was like ian or bell labs or chaki or somebody)

I do love these threads that prove the whole "77 is positive!" thing is self-deluded bullshit

ice cr?m why should ppl have to get involuntarily added to 77? some of us aren't there because we dislike the whole idea of it

oh shit i mentioned ian and bell labs and slocki you better print out a copy of that post and fax it to them

^^^ more negative than anyone else on this thread xp

j.d. how the fuck is this funny & all-around life-affirming thread not POSITIVE

but srsly why not just add someone why they get mentioned - its the non punitive all inclusive keepin positive way to go

― ice cr?m, Friday, January 30, 2009 6:25 PM (1 minute ago)

yah but see whenever this happens we get all sorts of "waaahh why r ruinin our boarad" shit, so it seems like there isnt any real happy solution to this. other than maybe just dont fucking post stuff about people who are not on 77.

since john is talking shit about 77 on a non-77 board ths thread should be moved to 77

yah s1ocki this aint 77 so I don't have to play-act at "positivity" while talking about ppl behind their backs

xpost ethan otm, move it back

Let's play musical threads!

yes how dare people promote positivity if they are not 100% positive all the time it is so dishonest

john if ur not on 77 the only 77 threds u see are the ones that have been deemed 'unpositive' - there are literally hundreds of threads on 77 about such positive things as:

• mixtape art
• the word 'actually'
• my brother's high school senior portrait

i hav no idea whos on 77 tho - tho obv ned did hav access - i mean of course ned had access