hahaha what??
it looks for all the world like the design team was given a brief with one phrase on a piece of paper:
"vogue for men"
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 April 2012 09:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
from the pages of slate comments:
MollyI have been a s!ut many many times. I am not proud of it. I think I understand this left-leaning website continuing to write articles about it. They seem to think it will help them get a liberal elected. I do not think it will. Nothing they say here will matter in the election just as what I just said will not matter. Still, it is fun having a place to tell the world stuff. Thank you, slate for letting me say that.55 Minutes Ago from slate.com · Reply
― Mordy, Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
no molly, thank you
― dharunravir (k3vin k.), Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:05 (1 year ago) Permalink
there's actually a whole weird comment community going on on this article:http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/04/27/sluts_across_america_doesn_t_reclaim_the_word_slut_it_makes_it_meaningless.html
― Mordy, Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:07 (1 year ago) Permalink
same bunch of ppl teaching each other how to post and telling corny jokes
― Mordy, Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:08 (1 year ago) Permalink
DaveB_NH"There is no such thing as a slut," Said Sister Ignatius, "but Do not be a skank; They're really quite rank: Kardashians don't make the cut."Molly, outsidethebox and PatriciaSage like this.5 Hours Ago from slate.com
^^too easy
― dharunravir (k3vin k.), Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:08 (1 year ago) Permalink
xp
solitary dadjoekz that sum up ilx
― Mordy, Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:11 (1 year ago) Permalink
was gonna say new board descrip
― dharunravir (k3vin k.), Saturday, 28 April 2012 03:17 (1 year ago) Permalink
i really love Salon running those Imprint columns
― Mordy, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 02:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
excerpt from anthony swofford's new memoir. i really don't know what to make of it. it seems totally insane to me, but i think that's the point right? the author is acknowledging his own sort of psychosis here? http://www.salon.com/2012/06/11/sex_facing_death/singleton/
― Mordy, Monday, 11 June 2012 01:14 (11 months ago) Permalink
that redesign is something
― buzza, Monday, 11 June 2012 01:15 (11 months ago) Permalink
what is up with slate's new recent fascination with adults that choose childlessness?
― Mordy, Monday, 18 June 2012 00:42 (11 months ago) Permalink
read that as "adults who choose childishness" and was gonna be like i don't think it's just slate
― a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Monday, 18 June 2012 00:43 (11 months ago) Permalink
how was there not a "wait, what's the difference?" option
― lamborghini persie (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 June 2012 00:45 (11 months ago) Permalink
recent fascination with adults that choose childlessness
is this really that new? almost feel it's up there with "feminist dissatisfied" as far as "provocative" trend pieces go.
― ryan, Monday, 18 June 2012 00:53 (11 months ago) Permalink
except they've run an article on it every day for the last week!
― Mordy, Monday, 18 June 2012 00:54 (11 months ago) Permalink
it's like one of the editors went crazy for the topic
no-baby crazy
― Word of Wisdom Robots (Abbbottt), Monday, 18 June 2012 00:55 (11 months ago) Permalink
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/06/child_free_women_explain_themselves_.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/06/12/choosing_not_to_have_kids_i_d_rather_die_alone.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/06/13/choosing_to_be_child_free_career_mobility_.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/06/13/choosing_to_be_child_free_tubes_tied_at_26.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/06/14/child_free_do_they_change_their_minds_.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/06/14/choosing_to_be_child_free_there_are_other_kinds_of_babies_.html
there may be more that i missed
― Mordy, Monday, 18 June 2012 00:57 (11 months ago) Permalink
It seems like all the slate editors have four kids each, so it's either some perverse fascination or yearning for a different path
― President Keyes, Monday, 18 June 2012 11:00 (11 months ago) Permalink
It was week long series btw, not a bunch of random individual articles
― President Keyes, Monday, 18 June 2012 11:01 (11 months ago) Permalink
this person is responsible for a lot of shitty salon articles:http://twitter.com/prachigu
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:12 (8 months ago) Permalink
she literally just started there last week
― max, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:26 (8 months ago) Permalink
this is a horrific nightmare
http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/what_if_the_romney_sons_were_a_boy_band/
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:29 (8 months ago) Permalink
well, first i read this piece of breaking news: http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_14/
then went back into the archive and found these unconscionable acts against humanity:http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/child_bride_courtney_stodden_turns_18_today/http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/what_if_the_romney_sons_were_a_boy_band/http://www.salon.com/2012/08/28/more_naked_prince_harry/
it seems like it goes on and on. if she really only started last week then she's already produced a prolific amount of vapid celebrity webpage view content!
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:30 (8 months ago) Permalink
five
― max, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:35 (8 months ago) Permalink
i dunno man if you think this is shitty and unconscionable i hope you dont read my website!
― max, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:36 (8 months ago) Permalink
well obv
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:37 (8 months ago) Permalink
sorry bro
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:38 (8 months ago) Permalink
i did like the romney infodump series tho! great stuff.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:38 (8 months ago) Permalink
Xanax Wednesday, Aug 29, 2012 09:26 PM CDT
The only thing dumber than these tweets is the person who had the idea for this feature.
didn't know 'strong jaws' could be hyphenated
― jack chick-fil-A (dayo), Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:43 (8 months ago) Permalink
i would rather read all of those articles than another interminable 'thinkpiece' from michael lind
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 30 August 2012 20:00 (8 months ago) Permalink
Mordy Hates Prachi
― buzza, Thursday, 30 August 2012 22:05 (8 months ago) Permalink
new atlantic business/tech news property, making a big deal abt how its optimized for mobile for whatever reason, not sure how that relates to anything, all sites should be built to work good on mobile devices, but anyway http://qz.com
― lag∞n, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:10 (7 months ago) Permalink
Quartz is a digitally native news outlet, born in 2012, for business people in the new global economy. We publish bracingly creative and intelligent journalism with a broad worldview, built primarily for the devices closest at hand: tablets and mobile phones.
― lag∞n, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:11 (7 months ago) Permalink
brace yrselves for creative and intelligent journalism
"Qz" because "Hz"=hertz in the International System of Units? oooooooh that is annoying.
― Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 24 September 2012 18:13 (7 months ago) Permalink
http://qz.com/5270/before-we-came-along-quartz-really-was-a-symbol-of-the-global-economy
― lag∞n, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:16 (7 months ago) Permalink
that site actually is pretty crap on an iPad despite being specifically tailored for it
― iatee, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:20 (7 months ago) Permalink
layout is p similar to gakwer
― lag∞n, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:21 (7 months ago) Permalink
gakwer gakwer, can't you see i'm burning burning
― goole, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:23 (7 months ago) Permalink
there's just too much going on on the screen
― iatee, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:24 (7 months ago) Permalink
Quartz is intended to embody the era in which we’re creating it, like Wired in the 1990s, Rolling Stone in the 1960s, Fortune in the 1930s, and The Economist in the 1840s.
lol
― just sayin, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:24 (7 months ago) Permalink
haha burn
― lag∞n, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:25 (7 months ago) Permalink
I would read this if it were 100% economist zings
― iatee, Monday, 24 September 2012 18:26 (7 months ago) Permalink
awesome burn!
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 24 September 2012 19:13 (7 months ago) Permalink
http://qz.com/3416/five-ways-a-new-age-of-cheap-energy-could-shift-the-power-balance-on-the-planet-2/
a great start for this website!
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 24 September 2012 23:25 (7 months ago) Permalink