new 77 keeping it positive meta thread to request dudes stop biting their own joeks

NOT sb'd

just some guidelines us zingers might want to take to heart to preserve the sanctity of some of the best ones

wow this thread is starting to suck. STFU dudes stop handwringing.

i just want to make clear i dont agree with forks but with some duder there

anyway the recurring zing is like the funniest thing ever in my book, i say keep on keeping on

they only stay funny as long as they continue to get a rise out of people though

i mean the drowning thing especially is so nonsensical and so obviously based on just poor wording of a thread title it's only funny so far as whiney takes the bait

i also think its ... something ... that dom is so good at writing zings about drowning

women

write what you know

My girlfriends are all too buoyant to drown.

^lol

77 heres a good recent example how to carry the weight (no passantino) of a recurring zing from our friends across the pond:

No, it's not newsworthy at all, except to HYS types who sit in front of their PC/TV/radio waiting to be offended or self-righteous bores.

Eventually, of course, no one will be allowed to say anything, privately or publicly, that is likely to offend anyone else. If we go down that road we might as well vote in the Nazis now and have done with it.

What people say in private is their own business and nobody else's.

No righteous outrage at the people who sold these things to the tabloids, either, I note.

― Brother Belcher (Marcello Carlin), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:22 AM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

What are the "issues at stake" here again? That the media value non-stories that sell papers over worthy issues that don't? That they're hypocritical? That most things that appear on the front of the Sun are less important than dozens of things going on around the world?

Is there a single person on this thread who doesn't know all that already and needs it all spelt out to them? Christ. This is sub-student level 'debate'.

― Matt DC, Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:23 AM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

might as well vote in the Nazis now and have done with it.

― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:27 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yes, reporting on the Royals' racist epithets is the rocky road to Nazism.

― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:28 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

If we're going to object to racist remarks by publicly funded individuals we might as well vote in the Nazis now and have done with it. Find a flaw in that logic I dare you.

― Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:28 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

That's it, I'm voting Nazi.

― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:29 AM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not a 77 dude^^

TA DAH!

grady did u miss me saying

"77 heres a good recent example how to carry the weight (no passantino) of a recurring zing from our friends across the pond:"

no he is talking about a post that i disappeared that was after yours

o waht did it say

it was actually a very good indictment of a poster who's name rhymes with "Soily Fags" using the same stupid joke 2x

I'll sign the treaty that restricts the drowning theme, but my use of it in the past few days has more been about the joke itself than it has been about Whiney.

I mean, if we're not allowed to tie a meme around some poor soul's neck like an albatross after a one-off careless comment, then why have I been carrying around this .jpg, just waiting for the right moment when one S.M.C. makes his grand entrance onto the WS thread?

http://www.weareneverfull.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/rachelraybutt.jpg

yeah rachel ray rapey mo joeks was really the origin of deliberately misconstruing someone to bask in the b-hurt glow and i would never discourage an attempt to recreate the lolz that provided me all those years ago

to me that's definitely one of the funniest things ever - and instantly defused if the subject just laughs it off

dont lie you are deeply offended that we scoff at your dad jokes

the more you scoff at a dad joke, the more you secretly love it. real talk.

This is not a film, but it's one of my favorite things. Check out the old long-running box for Twister:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00000DMBK.01-A3LTAW8FHJ63G2._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

"Why yes, young black child, feel free to play Twister with us in complete racial harmony! No wait, stop touching the white girls. Right. Umm ... why don't you go back over there and work the spinner for us, 'kay?"

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, June 7, 2006 11:44 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://www.uki.net/images/shoppingdb/bullseyepagesukinet96-p-l.gif
Classic Twister: Fun for Everyone (Except Your Black Friend Who Has to Sit in Back Operating the Spinner Because We Don't Want to Show Him Actually Touching and Crawling Around on the Little White Girls)

― nabisco, Monday, July 21, 2008 1:53 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

This reminds me of another one:

ihttp://www.boscovs.com/wcsstore/boscovs/images/store/product/images/4191581474645.jpg

I always hated this old Twister box. I mean, look at the smug white kid with the redhead crawling all over him. And then look at this shit: Hasbro apparently decided they couldn't have a picture of the black kid actually touching the white girls, so they've put him off in the corner to tend to the spinner? It's pretty much explicitly racist, and as a result imposes some weird sexual tension over the whole system here. (Well, that and that look on the other boy's face: is there like a fifth, not-visible person playing that's making him make that face?)

For the record they have updates the Twister box and now black people are allowed to play.

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:10 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

all leading up to a general chin-scratching steeple-fingered "very interesting, Nabisco, you are very interested in that Twister box."

yeah rachel ray rapey mo joeks was really the origin of deliberately misconstruing someone to bask in the b-hurt glow and i would never discourage an attempt to recreate the lolz that provided me all those years ago

― and what, Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:21 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what is the story behind this

http://i41.tinypic.com/2mmycs2.jpg

ahahahahahahhhhahhhaaaa

what is the story behind this

― mad loli vamp bone (cankles), Friday, January 30, 2009 5:21 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Who will listen to another Courtney Love "comeback record"?

yeah rachel ray rapey mo joeks was really the origin of deliberately misconstruing someone to bask in the b-hurt glow and i would never discourage an attempt to recreate the lolz that provided me all those years ago

― and what, Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:21 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what is the story behind this

― mad loli vamp bone (cankles), Friday, January 30, 2009 11:21 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

few years back shakey let his guard down and got comfortable enough to admit him & wifey mo have "s&m fantasies" while watching rachel ray - i think he meant on some wack alex in nyc "beyonce should be boiled in oil" b.s. but me & some other bandwagoners ran with it - started acting like shakey mo seriously wanted to rape and torture rachel ray - was A+ funny for a few months before he wised up the only reason anybody kept mentioning it was because he got madd so dude started shrugging it off and the lolz died out

That's not even the half of it.

There was some thread where he said that he and his wife sit around, thinking up different ways they could rape and dismember Rachel Ray.

After three years, I'm trying to give Shakes a little leeway. But man, like Nate P, it's kinda hard to let something like that go.

xp

lol why are you getting your panties in a twist about a dude who made a joke about messing around with a tv chef when theres a dude who ACTUALLY DROWNED A CELEBRITY on this board right now

rachel ray's booty looks A+ in that pic

makes me wanna dismember it

lol why are you getting your panties in a twist about a dude who made a joke about messing around with a tv chef when theres a dude who ACTUALLY DROWNED A CELEBRITY on this board right now

Ned Raggett?

suffocated in the raggettstacks

http://kuci.org/~nraggett/nedwedding.jpg
drownin u

Heavens! I drown you ;-)

*flounces away*

ned doesn't post on 77 does he?

I feel the thread move under my feet.

im sure he has access to the 77 - and if not whyyyy

it's pretty easy to repeat jokes without realizing you've done it...i've clicked on threads to post a corny-ass joke then realize i made it YEARS ago on the same thread. this has happened like 5 times so far.

― Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:51 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

actually, probably more than that but who's keeping count

― Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:52 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

sounds like you are

all leading up to a general chin-scratching steeple-fingered "very interesting, Nabisco, you are very interested in that Twister box."

― max, Friday, January 30, 2009 11:19 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

5 stars

neither ned or shakey are on 77. nice job.

I'd invite Shakey if I knew his e-mail address.

Plus, it'd make it a lot easier to find that RR quote.

this thread is more meta than a bag of hammers

I got to this thread by googling "hateration"

hay admin why dont u just give ned and shakey access already

so even just mentioning running jokes like the rachel rapey mo thing is enough to get a thread moved to ile? or posting the same pic of ned thats in 8 million ile threads already