Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

Best Doctor ever.

If you are like me, you've only just seen these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uStWeeEVQAc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkmiefoRcfU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5iwoRA2Cas

for some reason i feel sort of awkward about how... expensive this looks? why did they spend so much money on location shots, what is wrong with a quarry, i ask you

I want my transgender cowboy robot penguin, you bastards.

Good to hear Murray Gold hasn't discovered any new tunes :/

the devil you know

ban Murray Gold

The score of Dr Who should be done on 70s synths.

77 synths

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0N8NefJWCY

I really don't get the point of orchestral incidental music on Dr. Who, it just seems weird whenever I pay attention to it.

This v silly but it gave me a lot of lols and I <3 Peter Serafinowicz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJSQFzw1pEE

David Warner is going to be a guest star! Does that mean next season will be similar to Quest of the Delta Knights? One can only hope.

Posting here bc the RIP thread moved past this way too quickly

Doctor Who star Mary Tamm, who played companion Romana alongside Tom Baker, has died aged 62.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-18995370

A few tributes here:
Doctor Who - Best Companion

So, given the photos of who's in the Christmas special... what does anybody think? I am quite hopeful since I actually quite like the characters.

Also secretly hopeful the biopic of Sydney and Verity that Gatiss has announced could be kind of great.

Had to go hunting to see who you meant--I'm very much looking forward to seeing more of them. Love Strax's butler outfit.

Also, I really hope this means the new companion is from the Victorian era--it's been a long time since there has been a non-contemporary or non-Earthling companion.

Yes, with you on both of those points.

For those who haven't seen it: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8ifg8YGYf1qzaomlo1_1280.jpg

sweeeeeeeeeeet

OH GOD I

HATE

THEM

Also, I really hope this means the new companion is from the Victorian era--it's been a long time since there has been a non-contemporary or non-Earthling companion.

Well, her name is Clara which has made me suspect that she might not be from the 21st century. The last time Clara was in the top 20 for baby names was 1903. Otoh, Martha wasn't a particularly contemporary name either.

wait isn't there one more season with Amy?

Amy & Rory leave midseason, then we get the new companion.

No word yet on what will happen to Rory's misogynist car.

For those who haven't seen it:

DON'T DO THIS PLEASE

sorry, won't happen again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vy1sIXLIyf0

"My other Tardis is a Delorean"

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/26/article-2193768-14B21732000005DC-140_634x898.jpg

xp

A little tribute to Doctor Who, featuring me (as 11) and my teacher (as River Song)

!

http://images.doctorwhonews.net/albums/guide/episodes/bannermen.jpg

The promo photos of the new girl remind me a lot of Bonnie Langford, they both have that cheesy smiley-ness.

Haha Leee, that's great

:-D

*** SPOILER ***

loved this. also brilliant to see the new girl in action (and she's smart).

Ambivalent. THAT character was just too much like one of Moffatt's characters from Coupling - she spoke flunt sitcom. It'll be interesting to see how the end is resolved without it being all River Song again as well.

Amy as a model surely confirms the 'two sets of Ponds' theory required to make last season's timelines work too.

That, and the whole divorce because Amy didn't want kids (um, River? Hello?)

new girl looks like a pal of mine (hands off, she's taken)

Well to be fair, that's not exactly normal 'having kids'. But with no concept of how much later this is - Amy is still a successful model, so not >5 years (?) - it doesn't feel like long enough for the resentment/guilt to have grown to that extent for her to feel like she had to leave. Particularly if it's a no fault divorce (which it must have been - her ego is too big to accept the blame, as shown when it's such a big emotional thing her admitting she threw him out; and he loves her too much, as he says in the same speech, to take the blame for it all so they can split up quickly) where they must have been apart for two years already.

I didn't get why/how it took the daleks a year to find them. That wasn't explained at all.

waht, I thought she *couldn't* have kids

Amy as a model surely confirms the 'two sets of Ponds' theory required to make last season's timelines work too.

idgi

I didn't get why/how it took the daleks a year to find them. That wasn't explained at all.

a few dalek things didn't seem to gel terribly well, but I took the whole dalek conceit to be an excuse to tell a particular story about the leads, and just let it slide

Two Ponds:

At the end of the episode with Craig in it last season, Amy is recognised in the department store by a young gril as a famous perfume model. This is also the day before (as shown in a newspaper The Doctor reads) the events of The Impossible Astronaut, which doesn't leave enough time for that Amy & Rory to get to Utah. So it must therefore be a different A&R that appear in TIA - not least because her career as a model isn't mentioned in either of the series, either in building to her fantastic success or being recognised at any point by anyone other than the little girl despite being on billboards. (See also perfume name coming directly from the dialogue in The Doctor's Wife)

The easiest explanation is that the Amy & Rory dropped in their dream home with a dream car at theend of the one with the space minotaur are 12-18 months further back and live a different life, never to meet each other. The Ponds that receive the invitation in the blue envelope, for example, don't live in the dream house - which the Pond Life interior shots prove.

But I did all this in the thread last year I think.

oh god yes, I forgot about the perfume model thing, cheers

Wait, is that a serious suggestion or just a convenient explanation for shoddy plotting?

Episode was ok, I guess - got better as it went along. Direction/pacing/action a bit lacklustre. A few shots at the end reminded me of that terrifying scene with the robotwoman the end of Superman 3.

I was so fascinated yet repelled by that superman 3 scene as a kid!

This was alright, yet I found it pretty tiresome. Maybe I'm a bit bored of Doctor Who as it's currently done. WOuld love some more small-scale stuff at this point.

CGI dinosaurs in the next one look properly shoddy.

THIS WAS FANTASTIC

I remember when Daleks used to kill people with lasers instead of by boring them to death with shitty melodrama.

Admittedly it's been a while.

I really enjoyed this. Esp my favorite Who thing which = TRAPEZOIDAL HALLWAYS. Found the girl a bit too gabby but overall kinda likeable.

My biggest problem with Pond/Rory is that every time they go for a tearful relationship moment that's v touchign I'm just left kind of cold. Because I don't really like their relationship anyway and I'm not a huge Pond person. The timeywimeyness of their relationship also confuses things too, bc you're not sure which version of them it is and all that other extraneous stuff.

Anyway that was p yay and fun.