New trailer btw:
― A Full Torgo Apparition (Phil D.), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
I hope they spend 20 minutes with a Nick Fury origin story, so we can find out how he got his eyepatch.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
mail order iirc
― inspector george gentlyfallingblood (c sharp major), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:53 (1 year ago) Permalink
that trailer is pretty awesome
― Number None, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:59 (1 year ago) Permalink
the ruffaloface on hulk is cracking me up
― goole, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 18:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
Ruffalo seems too mellow to hulk out
― Number None, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 18:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
― goole, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 18:07 (1 year ago) Permalink
I want them to do a mo-cap movie where actors play everything, including trees and buildings. It would be so surreal to see inanimate objects imbued with human characteristics.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 19:19 (1 year ago) Permalink
is the title of the movie Avengers Assemble now?
nah, Sony have the rights to Spider-Man, Fantastic 4 and X-Men. They can't use him
― Number None, Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:19 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
sony has spiderman, fox has x-men & FF
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:43 (1 year ago) Permalink
Who has The Punisher now?
― EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
yo is that robin in this next to the guy from cougar town
― max, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:46 (1 year ago) Permalink
you just now know that? you need to read your sister blog, the "all the avengers news fit to paste" one
― valleys of your mind (mh), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:47 (1 year ago) Permalink
It's only called Avengers Assemble in the UK afaik. Prob cos of
― Number None, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:48 (1 year ago) Permalink
It still has Avengers in the title though! I don't get how that title is less confusing.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:57 (1 year ago) Permalink
― goole, Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:07 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark
lol at this btw
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
who knows how studio execs/marketing people's minds work really?
― Number None, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
Maybe they could make it AV3NG5RS
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
eh?
I'll just wait for AVENGERS 2: THE AVENGERING
― A Full Torgo Apparition (Phil D.), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:26 (1 year ago) Permalink
AV2 AVENGE THIS
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:38 (1 year ago) Permalink
"Avenged!" (with Liam Neeson)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
Alternatively: "Avenge Harder."
I'll Always Know What You Avenged Last Summer
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:42 (1 year ago) Permalink
looks great! i like that they're including some of the less well-known avengers, like hawkeye and scarlett johannson.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:43 (1 year ago) Permalink
It's lame that they went for the "kewl" Matrix style Ultimate Marvel redesign of Hawkeye's costume, though. The original costume has a classic design, all they would've needed to do was tweak the horns of the mask and the tunic, as they probably don't look that good in live action:
What's even lamer is that in the main Marvel continuity Hawkeye now has the same stupid Matrix costume, most likely for cross-marketing purposes.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 1 March 2012 08:33 (1 year ago) Permalink
i agree about ultimate hawkeye being lame - thats a design thats really aged poorly - but i've always thought all his iterations were pretty lame looking. at least hes not wearing wraparound shades in this
they did go with one of the most overtly comic booky costumes ive ever seen for captain america though
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 1 March 2012 09:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
Yeah, Captain America is the one example where they could've modernized the costume a bit more. His helmet is especially goofy, as it makes his head look bloated in a weird way. Maybe they should've given him a hood instead of a helmet, like in the comics?
― Tuomas, Thursday, 1 March 2012 09:10 (1 year ago) Permalink
he sorta looks like an overgrown toddler now.
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 1 March 2012 09:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
Captain America's costume looked great in his solo movie but the modern design is kind of terrrible
― Number None, Thursday, 1 March 2012 10:29 (1 year ago) Permalink
I dunno, I thought the helmet looked goofily big in that one too. Either he should have a hood, or a helmet that doesn't cover his whole head.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 1 March 2012 10:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
I guess the reason they didn't want to change Cap's costume too much is because he's the best known and most iconic of these characters?
― Tuomas, Thursday, 1 March 2012 10:33 (1 year ago) Permalink
Not really! I would say the hulk by far.
― drop these whiners on a island (Surviver style) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 1 March 2012 13:38 (1 year ago) Permalink
the hulk doesn't really have a costume to change though
― Number None, Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
That depends on how good Ruffalo looks in purple cutoffs.
― A Full Torgo Apparition (Phil D.), Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
Cap. America is a strict costume constructionist. He's all about tradition.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:48 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:50 (1 year ago) Permalink
if they kept hawkeye's loincloth it would have bene ridiculous.
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 1 March 2012 15:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
But couldn't they find some way to obscure Renner's pudgy face?
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 1 March 2012 18:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Respectfully, Tyrese Gibson (Nicole), Thursday, 8 March 2012 18:16 (1 year ago) Permalink
http://io9.com/5893554/japanese-the-avengers-trailer-has-loads-of-new-footage-including-new-shots-of-the-helicarrier
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 March 2012 15:51 (1 year ago) Permalink
Gwyneth Paltrow cameo at 0:16
― butvi wouls (Phil D.), Thursday, 15 March 2012 15:59 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh mama
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
man that's a whole lotta 90s leftovers
― You big bully, why are you hitting that little bully? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
ooh, exclusive Kasabian track
― Number None, Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:05 (1 year ago) Permalink
what the
― THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
glad to see some dude landed a job putting together 'the avengers' soundtrack
― Lamp, Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:07 (1 year ago) Permalink
lol
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:08 (1 year ago) Permalink
i'm psyched about the new soundgarden song, i won't lie. i think....three? of the other bands have made at least one single i've enjoyed in the last few years.
― some dude, Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:08 (1 year ago) Permalink
I really don't think I should be looking at the soundtrack for a 2012 movie and thinking "the most appealing-looking song on here is the Photek remix of Evanescence"
― THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:10 (1 year ago) Permalink
yeah i didnt even know new soundgarden was a thing that was happening, so thats cool
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:10 (1 year ago) Permalink